Aleksey M. Urmanov
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Aleksey M. Urmanov.
Archive | 2002
Andrei V. Gribok; J. Wesley Hines; Aleksey M. Urmanov; Robert E. Uhrig
Most data-based predictive modeling techniques have an inherent weakness in that they may give unstable or inconsistent results when the predictor data is highly correlated. Predictive modeling problems of this design are usually under constrained and are termed ill-posed. This paper presents several examples of ill-posed diagnostic problems and regularization methods necessary for getting accurate and consistent prediction results. The examples include plant-wide sensor calibration monitoring and the inferential sensing of nuclear power plant feedwater flow using neural networks, and non-linear partial least squares techniques, and linear regularization techniques implementing ridge regression and informational complexity measures.
Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering | 2003
J. Wesley Hines; Andrei V. Gribok; Aleksey M. Urmanov; Mark A. Buckner
This paper presents a new methodology for regularizing data-based predictive models. Traditional modeling using regression can produce unrepeatable, unstable, or noisy predictions when the inputs are highly correlated. Ridge regression is a regularization technique used to deal with those problems. A drawback of ridge regression is that it optimizes a single regularization parameter while the methodology presented in this paper optimizes several local regularization parameters that operate independently on each component. This method allows components with significant predictive power to be passed while components with low predictive power are damped. The optimal combination of regularization parameters are computed using an Evolutionary Strategy search technique with the objective function being a predictive error estimate. Examples are presented to demonstrate the advantages of this technique.
Proceedings of the 5th International FLINS Conference | 2002
Mark A. Buckner; Aleksey M. Urmanov; Andrei V. Gribok; J. Wesley Hines
Several U.S. Nuclear Power Plants are attempting to move from a periodic sensor calibration schedule to a condition-based schedule using on-line calibration monitoring systems. This move requires a license amendment that must address the requirements set forth in a recently released Nuclear Regulatory Commission Safety Evaluation Report (SER). The major issue addressed in the SER is that of a complete uncertainty analysis of the empirical models. It has been shown that empirical modeling techniques are inherently unstable and inconsistent when the inputs are highly correlated. Regularization methods such as ridge regression or truncated singular value decomposition produce consistent results but may be overly simplified and not produce optimal results. This paper describes a new local regularization method, generalized ridge regression (GRR), and its potential value for sensor calibration monitoring at nuclear power plants. A case study is used to quantitatively compare different modeling methods.
Archive | 2003
Andrei V. Gribok; Aleksey M. Urmanov; J. Wesley Hines; Robert E. Uhrig
Archive | 2008
Andrew J. Lewis; Kenny C. Gross; Aleksey M. Urmanov; Ramakrishna C. Dhanekula
Archive | 2008
Kenny C. Gross; Anton Bougaev; Aleksey M. Urmanov; David K. McElfresh
Archive | 2007
Ronald Melanson; Kenny C. Gross; Aleksey M. Urmanov
Archive | 2011
Anton Bougaev; Aleksey M. Urmanov; Eugene Kolinko; Joshua C. Walter
Archive | 2006
Aleksey M. Urmanov; Kenny C. Gross
Archive | 2006
Aleksey M. Urmanov; Anton Bougaev; Kenny C. Gross