Alessandra Caffagni
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alessandra Caffagni.
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis | 2011
Alessandra Caffagni; Laura Arru; P. Meriggi; Justyna Milc; Pierdomenico Perata; N. Pecchioni
Iodine is an essential microelement for human health, and the recommended daily allowance (RDA) of such element should range from 40 to 200 μg day−1. Because of the low iodine contents in vegetables, cereals, and many other foods, iodine deficiency disorder (IDD) is one of the most widespread nutrient-deficiency diseases in the world. Therefore, investigations of I uptake in plants with the aim of fortifying them can help reach the important health and social objective of IDD elimination. This study was conducted to determine the effects of the absorption of iodine from two different chemical forms—potassium iodide (I−) and potassium iodate (IO− 3)—in a wide range of wild and cultivated plant species. Pot plants were irrigated with different concentrations of I− or IO− 3, namely 0.05% and 0.1% (w/v) I− and 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.5% (w/v) IO− 3. Inhibiting effects on plant growth were observed after adding these amounts of iodine to the irrigation water. Plants were able to tolerate high levels of iodine as IO− 3 better than I− in the root environment. Among cultivated species, barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) showed the lowest biomass reductions due to iodine toxicity and maize (Zea mays L.) together with tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) showed the greatest. After the screening, cultivated tomato and potato were shown to be good targets for a fortification-rate study among the species screened. When fed with 0.05% iodine salts, potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruits absorbed iodine up to 272 and 527 μg/100 g fresh weight (FW) from IO− 3 and 1,875 and 3,900 μg/100 g FW from I−. These uptake levels were well more than the RDA of 150 μg day−1 for adults. Moreover, the agronomic efficiency of iodine accumulation of potato tubers and tomato fruits was calculated. Both plant organs showed greater accumulation efficiency for given units of iodine from iodide than from iodate. This accumulation efficiency decreased in both potato tubers and tomato fruits at iodine concentrations greater than 0.05% for iodide and at respectively 0.2% and 0.1% for iodate. On the basis of the uptake curve, it was finally possible to calculate the doses of supply in the irrigation water of iodine as iodate (0.028% for potato and 0.014% for tomato) as well as of iodide (0.004% for potato and 0.002% for tomato) to reach the 150 μg day−1 RDA for adults in 100 g of such vegetables, to efficiently control IDD, although these results still need to be validated.
Biologia Plantarum | 2014
Alessandra Caffagni; N. Pecchioni; Enrico Francia; Donata Pagani; Justyna Milc
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) is sensitive to chilling stress during all stages of plant development. Genetic variation for chilling tolerance exists between cultivated tomato and its related wild species, but intra-specific variation has not been thoroughly investigated so far. Seedlings of 63 tomato accessions were evaluated under low temperature and two contrasting cultivars were identified for the trait: Albenga and San Marzano, the former being more chillingtolerant. To clarify the molecular mechanisms of chilling tolerance in tomato, changes in candidate gene expressions in the two tomato genotypes were analysed, using quantitative RT-PCR. Candidate genes were chosen among those known to be induced by chilling and/or with putative roles in CBF/DREB and ROS-mediated pathways. Results show that besides a CBF regulon, whose function is conserved, ROS and C2H2-type zinc finger protein-mediated cold signalling pathways were also involved in chilling tolerance. Under the chilling stress, the up-regulation of respective transcripts was consistently higher in the chilling-tolerant genotype than in the chilling-sensitive ones.
Plant Science | 2009
Giorgia Albertazzi; Justyna Milc; Alessandra Caffagni; Enrico Francia; Enrica Roncaglia; Francesco Ferrari; Enrico Tagliafico; Emilio Stefani; N. Pecchioni
Italian Journal of Agronomy | 2012
Alessandra Caffagni; N. Pecchioni; Pierluigi Meriggi; Valerio Bucci; Emidio Sabatini; N. Acciarri; Tommaso Ciriaci; Laura Pulcini; Nazzareno Felicioni; Massimiliano Beretta; Justyna Milc
Euphytica | 2013
Alessandra Caffagni; Giorgia Albertazzi; G. Gavina; S. Ravaglia; Alberto Gianinetti; N. Pecchioni; Justyna Milc
56th Italian Society of Agricultural Genetics Annual Congress | 2012
Abdul Rahman Dannaoui; Antonio Sala; Domenico Beneventano; Justyna Milc; Alessandra Caffagni; Nicola Pecchioni
Scientia Horticulturae | 2016
Justyna Milc; Alessandra Caffagni; Domenico Ronga; Enrico Francia; Marianna Pasquariello; Luca Laviano; Valentina Mazzamurro; N. Pecchioni
XLIII Convegno della Società Italiana di Agronomia - La sostenibilità dell’intensificazione colturale e le politiche agricole: il ruolo della ricerca agronomica | 2014
Domenico Ronga; Alessandra Caffagni; Enrico Francia; Justyna Milc; Valentina Mazzamurro; N. Pecchioni
L'INFORMATORE AGRARIO | 2012
Domenico Ronga; Marianna Pasquariello; R. Provoli; Alessandra Caffagni; Enrico Francia; D. Villecco; N. Pecchioni
56th Italian Society of Agricultural Genetics Annual Congress | 2012
Alessandra Caffagni; Nicola Pecchioni; Justyna Milc; Enrico Francia
Collaboration
Dive into the Alessandra Caffagni's collaboration.
Consiglio per la ricerca e la sperimentazione in agricoltura
View shared research outputs