Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alessandro Marotta.
Science of The Total Environment | 2012
Georgios Fontaras; Giorgio Martini; Urbano Manfredi; Alessandro Marotta; A. Krasenbrink; Francesco Maffioletti; Roberto Terenghi; Mauro Colombo
This paper summarizes the results of an extensive experimental study aiming to evaluate the performance and pollutant emissions of diesel and CNG waste collection trucks under realistic and controlled operating conditions in order to support a fleet renewal initiative in the city of Milan. Four vehicles (1 diesel and 3 CNG) were tested in two phases using a portable emission measurement system. The first phase included real world operation in the city of Milan while the second involved controlled conditions in a closed track. Emissions recorded from the diesel truck were on average 2.4 kg/km for CO(2), 0.21 g/km for HC, 7.4 g/km for CO, 32.3 g/km for NO(x) and 46.4 mg/km for PM. For the CNG the values were 3.6 kg/km for CO(2), 2.19 g/km for HC, 15.8 g/km for CO, 4.38 g/km for NO(x) and 11.4 mg/km for PM. CNG vehicles presented an important advantage with regards to NO(x) and PM emissions but lack the efficiency of their diesel counterparts when it comes to CO, HC and particularly greenhouse gas emissions. This tradeoff needs to be carefully analyzed prior to deciding if a fleet should be shifted towards either technology. In addition it was shown that existing emission factors, used in Europe for environmental assessment studies, reflect well the operation for CNG but were not so accurate when it came to the diesel engine truck particularly for CO(2) and NO(x). With regard to NO(x), it was also shown that the limits imposed by current emission standards are not necessarily reflected in real world operation, under which the diesel vehicle presented almost 4 times higher emissions. Regarding CO(2), appropriate use of PEMS data and vehicle information allows for accurate emission monitoring through computer simulation.
Environmental Science & Technology | 2015
Alessandro Marotta; Jelica Pavlovic; Biagio Ciuffo; Simone Serra; Georgios Fontaras
The Worldwide Harmonized Light Duty Test Procedure (WLTP), recently issued as GTR15 by UNECE-WP29, is designed to check the pollutant emission compliance of Light Duty Vehicles (LDVs) around the world and to establish the reference vehicle fuel consumption and CO2 performance. In the course of the development of WLTP, the Joint Research Center (JRC) of the European Commission has tested gaseous emissions of twenty-one Euro 4-6 gasoline and diesel vehicles, on both the current European type approval test procedure (NEDC) and the progressive versions of the WLTP. The results, which should be regarded just as an initial and qualitative indication of the trends, demonstrated minimal average differences between CO2 emissions over the NEDC and WLTP. On the other hand, CO2 emissions measured at JRC on the NEDC were on average 9% higher than the respective type approval values, therefore suggesting that for the tested vehicles, CO2 emissions over WLTP were almost 10% higher than the respective NEDC type approval values. That difference is likely to increase with application of the full WLTP test procedure. Measured THC emissions from most vehicles stayed below the legal emission limits and in general were lower under the WLTP compared to NEDC. Moving from NEDC to WLTP did not have much impact on NOx from gasoline vehicles and CO from diesel vehicles. On the contrary, NOx from diesel vehicles and CO from low-powered gasoline vehicles were significantly higher over the more dynamic WLTP and in several cases exceeded the emission limits. Results from this study can be considered indicative of emission patterns of modern technology vehicles and useful to both policy makers and vehicle manufacturers in developing future emission policy/technology strategies.
Transportation Research Record | 2015
Biagio Ciuffo; Alessandro Marotta; Monica Tutuianu; Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos; Georgios Fontaras; Jelica Pavlovic; Simone Serra; Stefanos Tsiakmakis; Nikiforos Zacharof
To assess vehicle performance on criteria compounds, carbon dioxide emissions, and fuel energy consumption, laboratory tests are generally carried out. During these tests, a vehicle is driven on a chassis dynamometer (which simulates the resistances the vehicle encounters during its motion) to follow a predefined test cycle. In addition, all conditions for running a test must strictly adhere to a predefined test procedure. The procedure is necessary to ensure that all tests are carried out in a comparable way, following the requirements set by the relevant legislation. Test results are used to assess vehicle compliance with emissions limits or to evaluate the fuel consumption that will be communicated to customers. Every region in the world follows its own approach in carrying out these types of tests. The variations in approaches have resulted in a series of drawbacks for vehicle manufacturers and regulating authorities, leading to a plethora of different conditions and results. As a step toward the harmonization of the test procedures, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe launched a project in 2009 for the development of a worldwide harmonized light-duty test procedure (WLTP), including a new test cycle. The objective of the study reported here was to provide a brief description of WLTP and outline the plausible pathway for its introduction in European legislation.
Transportation Research Record | 2016
Stefanos Tsiakmakis; Biagio Ciuffo; Georgios Fontaras; Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos; Vincenzo Arcidiacono; Renata Praksova; Alessandro Marotta
Initiatives to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from light-duty vehicles have been the cornerstone of European policy for curbing greenhouse gas emissions from road transport in past decades. The political approach has shown its effectiveness in recent years. However, the use of an outdated test procedure to measure the progress in reducing fuel consumption and CO2 emissions jeopardizes these efforts. For this reason, the European Commission is committed to introducing, in the shortest possible time, the new Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure (WLTP), developed through the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, to reduce the gap between type approval and real-world figures on CO2 emissions. The introduction, however, requires the adoption of the CO2 targets set by the relevant European regulations. The approach selected by the European Commission for dealing with this issue required the development of a technology-oriented vehicle simulation model, CO2MPAS, which has been extensively validated against simulated and real data to demonstrate its capacity to capture the differences between the two certification procedures. In the present study, CO2MPAS is used to analyze the possible effects of the introduction of WLTP in the European vehicle market in terms of reported CO2 emissions. An approach based on Monte Carlo sampling has been adopted because of the lack of detailed vehicle information. The differences in estimated CO2 emissions are compared and discussed. Results indicate the accuracy and robustness of CO2MPAS in reproducing CO2 emissions at the fleet level. The results also indicate an increase in global CO2 emissions from existing passenger cars on the order of 10 g/km.
Applied Energy | 2013
Christos Dardiotis; Giorgio Martini; Alessandro Marotta; Urbano Manfredi
Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment | 2015
Monica Tutuianu; Pierre Bonnel; Biagio Ciuffo; Takahiro Haniu; Noriyuki Ichikawa; Alessandro Marotta; Jelica Pavlovic; Heinz Steven
Applied Energy | 2016
Jelica Pavlovic; Alessandro Marotta; Biagio Ciuffo
Journal of Aerosol Science | 2013
Athanasios Mamakos; Giorgio Martini; Alessandro Marotta; Urbano Manfredi
Fuel | 2015
Christos Dardiotis; Georgios Fontaras; Alessandro Marotta; Giorgio Martini; Urbano Manfredi
Transportation research procedia | 2016
Jelica Pavlovic; Alessandro Marotta; Biagio Ciuffo; Simone Serra; Georgios Fontaras; Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos; Stefanos Tsiakmakis; Vincenzo Arcidiacono; Stefan Hausberger; Gérard Silberholz