Alessandro Natalini
Parthenope University of Naples
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alessandro Natalini.
Public Management Review | 2015
Fabrizio Di Mascio; Alessandro Natalini
The vulnerability of the four south European countries (Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain) to the global financial turmoil makes the analysis of their responses to the fiscal crisis particularly interesting for the assessment of the implications of fiscal austerity for public management. Drawing on the historical institutionalist approach, our analysis reveals a picture of variation in the impact of crisis on patterns of public management across south European countries. However, it also shows uniformity in the strategies of retrenchment as in all the four countries under examination governments failed to connect cutback management to ambitious administrative modernization programmes.
International Public Management Journal | 2013
Fabrizio Di Mascio; Alessandro Natalini
ABSTRACT This article aims to present new research on the politics of public management reform in Napoleonic countries. Drawing on the institutional processualist approach, the empirical analysis tracks and explains the trajectory and outcomes of episodes where performance management has been introduced at the local level in Italy. The comparative case analysis shows that plausible causal explanation of the outcomes of public management reform can occur only if researchers are attentive to the interaction between social mechanisms and contextual features together with their interconnections through time.
International Review of Administrative Sciences | 2013
Fabrizio Di Mascio; Alessandro Natalini
The article explores the transformations which have occurred in ministerial cabinets as entrenched advisory structures in the Italian executive since the early 1990s when the party system collapsed and a permanent cycle of public management reforms was introduced. It examines how ministerial advisers have acquired a greater role in executive coordination filling the void of governing capacity left by the failed institutionalization of the new party system. In doing so, the empirical analysis identifies the constellation of actors that reproduced ministerial cabinets as a legacy of the past in the present set-up of the Italian system, eventually hindering the innovation of governance structures according to international standards. Points for practitioners This article seeks to contribute to the literature on the development of ministerial staff as a key manifestation of increasing public service politicization. With its more nuanced type of legacy explanation, focused on the identification of causal mechanisms that link institutional arrangements and actor choices in reform processes, the article can also contribute to general debates on the role of time in public management. It also recommends an integrated focus on the different policies of civil service reform in order to map interrelations of administrative changes.
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice | 2017
Fabrizio Di Mascio; Davide Galli; Alessandro Natalini; Edoardo Ongaro; Francesco Stolfi
Abstract This article analyses the attempts to reform public administration, notably personnel management, in Italy between 1992 and 2014, with a focus on implementation and the period following the multiple crises that have unfolded since 2008. By untangling the policy learning processes between multiple crises, past reform attempts and domestic and European “contexts in motion”, the article finds that efficiency-oriented reforms have floundered regardless of the political color of governments or indeed of the nature – political or technocratic – of the governments. Domestic factors, notably the frequency of government alternation, i.e. government instability, and European pressure have further reinforced the orientation towards single-loop lessons, i.e. the almost exclusive effecting of short-term cost-cutting measures.
American Behavioral Scientist | 2014
Fabrizio Di Mascio; Alessandro Natalini
This article analyzes the Italian government’s response to the sovereign debt crisis. Given the severity of the fiscal crisis affecting Italy, this article provides insights about the crisis’s implication for public administration in such a politically sensitive environment where drastic and far-reaching measures had to be taken by the government. Drawing on the historical institutionalist approach, the impact of the crisis is not considered in isolation but in the context of the historical trajectory that has shaped the government’s capacity to respond. To assess the crisis’s implications for public administration, the empirical analysis focuses on public employment as an area that is especially exposed to fiscal restraint. The findings reveal that the current crisis has been managed with straight cutback management, as public administration has been considered by policy makers just as a source of public expenditure to be squeezed rather than as a provider of public services in need of modernization so as to sustain economic growth.
Rivista trimestrale di scienza della amministrazione. OTT./DIC., 2000 | 2000
Alessandro Natalini
The author describes the first experience of the application of Air. He underlines several problems, starting from the absence of a specific training for the personnel involved, to the lack of information concerning statistics and evaluation of costs and benefits regarding the matters object of the Air methodology.
Public Administration | 2013
Fabrizio Di Mascio; Alessandro Natalini; Francesco Stolfi
European Political Science Review | 2010
Alessandro Natalini
Journal of European Public Policy | 2015
Federica Cacciatore; Alessandro Natalini; Claudius Wagemann
Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives | 2013
Fabrizio Di Mascio; Alessandro Natalini