Alessandro Pappalardo

Stenting of Culprit Lesions in Unstable Angina Leads to a Marked Reduction in Plaque Burden: A Major Role of Plaque Embolization? A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

Background—Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies have shown that a mechanism of plaque compression/embolization contributes toward the poststenting increase in lumen area. The aim of this IVUS study was to compare the mechanisms of lumen enlargement after coronary stenting in 54 consecutive patients with unstable angina (UA) (group 1) and 56 with stable angina (group 2) to verify whether plaque embolization plays a major role in the former. Methods and Results—Both groups underwent the IVUS assessment (speed, 0.5 mm/sec) before the intervention and after stent implantation. The lumen area, the external elastic membrane area, and the plaque+media area (PA) were measured at 0.5-mm intervals. PA reduction in the lesion site was significantly greater in group 1 (−2.50±1.97 versus −0.53±1.43 mm2, P <0.001). After stenting, 47% of the lumen area increase in group 1 was obtained by means of PA reduction, and 53% was attributable to external elastic membrane area increase; the corresponding figures in group 2 were 13% and 87% (P <0.05). Decrease in PA after stenting was the only significant predictor of the MB fraction of creatinine kinase (CK-MB) release in a multiple regression model (P =0.047). Conclusions—Serial volumetric IVUS assessment revealed in UA lesions a marked poststenting reduction in plaque volume, which is significantly greater than in stable angina and is associated with postprocedural CK-MB release. The decrease in PA during the procedure predicts CK-MB release in a multiple regression model. These findings suggest that stent deployment is often associated with plaque embolization in patients with UA.

Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease as culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction due to a culprit lesion in an unprotected left main coronary artery. METHODS In this retrospective, 2-center, international observational study, 5,261 patients were admitted between February 2005 and December 2008 with acute myocardial infarction and treated with PCI; of these, 1,277 were ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 3,984 non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We identified 48 patients among this cohort who underwent emergency PCI to an unprotected left main coronary artery culprit lesion. RESULTS Mean age was 70 ± 12.5 years, and 45% of the patients presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or new left bundle branch block. Cardiogenic shock was present in 45%, and distal left main coronary artery disease was present in 71% of patients. Angiographic procedural success was achieved in 92% of patients. Overall in-hospital mortality was 21%, due in all cases to refractory, multiorgan failure. Twenty-five percent experienced major adverse cardiac events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization. In patients presenting in cardiogenic shock, in-hospital mortality was 32%. At 1-year follow-up, in-hospital survivors had a mortality rate of 10.5%, whereas 18.4% experienced subsequent major adverse cardiac events. Long-term prognosis was excellent in hospital survivors with a 1-year survival rate of 89.5%. CONCLUSIONS Patients with acute myocardial infarction and thrombosis of the unprotected left main coronary artery are a high-risk subgroup with a substantial mortality, particularly if they present in cardiogenic shock. We demonstrate that in these patients, PCI is a feasible treatment option associated with reasonably good outcomes. Long-term prognosis is excellent in hospital survivors with an 89.5% survival rate at 1 year.

Randomized evaluation of intralesion versus intracoronary abciximab and aspiration thrombectomy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The COCTAIL II trial

BACKGROUND Thrombus burden and distal embolization are predictive of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to compare the efficacy of pharmacological and catheter-based strategies for thrombus in patients with STEMI and high atherothrombotic burden. METHODS Between January 2012 and December 2013, 128 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI at 5 centers were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design to intracoronary (IC) abciximab bolus (via the guide catheter) versus intralesion (IL) abciximab bolus, each with versus without aspiration thrombectomy (AT). Study end points were residual intrastent atherothrombotic burden, defined as the number of cross-sections with residual tissue area >10% as assessed by optical coherence tomography, and indices of angiographic and myocardial reperfusion. RESULTS Residual intrastent atherothrombotic burden did not significantly differ with IL versus IC abciximab (median [interquartile range] 6.0 [1-15] vs 6.0 [2-11], P = .806) and with AT versus no aspiration (6.0 [1-13] vs 6.0 [2-12], P = .775). Intralesion abciximab administration was associated with improved angiographic myocardial reperfusion in terms of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow (3 [3-3] vs 3 [2-3], P = .040), corrected TIMI frame count (12 ± 5 vs 17 ± 16, P = .021), and myocardial blush grade (3 [2-3] vs 3 [2-3], P = .035). In particular, IL abciximab was associated with higher occurrence of final TIMI 3 flow (90% vs 73.8%, P = .032) and myocardial blush grade 3 (71.6% vs 52.4%, P = .039). Conversely, AT had no significant effect on indices of angiographic or myocardial reperfusion. CONCLUSIONS In patients with STEMI and high thrombotic burden, neither IL versus IC abciximab nor AT versus no aspiration reduced postprocedure intrastent atherothrombotic burden in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. However, IL abciximab improved indices of angiographic and myocardial reperfusion compared to IC abciximab, benefits not apparent with AT.