Alexander Brinkmann

Vasopressin administration in refractory cardiac arrest

In studies done in pigs, the administration of exogenous vasopressin during closed- and open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation has been shown to be more effective than optimal doses of epinephrine in improving vital organ blood flow and increasing perfusion pressure [1, 2]. Interest in the potential value of vasopressin administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation also stems from human studies showing high levels of circulating vasopressin in patients in cardiac arrest [3, 4]. Higher levels of endogenous vasopressin are associated with greater chances for survival, and higher endogenous levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine are associated with decreased chances for survival [4]. To date, no case reports or controlled studies have addressed the potential value of exogenous vasopressin for the treatment of patients having cardiac arrest. In light of the data from the animal studies, eight patients having refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest were treated with vasopressin after standard therapies, including intravenous administration of epinephrine, had failed. Methods In a final effort to resuscitate patients in whom standard American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support therapies after in-hospital cardiac arrest had failed, arginine vasopressin was administered centrally as an initial 40-U bolus. Each patient had received standard manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation with at least 1 mg of epinephrine and an attempt at direct-current shock before receiving vasopressin through either a femoral or jugular vein. Table 1 lists patient demographic characteristics, and Table 2 provides some details of therapy and outcome after cardiac arrest. One of eight patients (patient 2) had an unwitnessed arrest. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated less than 1 minute after arrest in the remaining patients; cardiopulmonary resuscitation and advanced cardiac life support were done on all patients for at least 12 minutes (mean SD, 21.6 11.8 minutes) before vasopressin was administered. Three patients were discharged from the hospital with good neurologic recovery. Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients Having In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Refractory to Epinephrine*. Table 2. Time Intervals and Outcome in Patients Having In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Refractory to Epinephrine*. Case Highlights Patient 4 Four days after having a hemicolectomy, a 78-year-old woman developed pulmonary emboli and ventricular fibrillation. Defibrillation (200 J) led to asystole. The patient received cardiopulmonary resuscitation and epinephrine (1-mg, 3-mg, and 5-mg doses administered 3 minutes apart). After the 5-mg bolus, ventricular fibrillation evolved but was resistant to repeated direct-current shocks and to lidocaine (100 mg). Central administration of vasopressin (40 U) followed by direct-current shock (360 J) resulted in a supraventricular rhythm with a palpable carotid pulse. A systolic blood pressure of approximately 100 mm Hg was maintained with a norepinephrine infusion of 0.15 g/kg of body weight per minute. After uncomplicated embolectomy, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for 3 days and was discharged without neurologic deficit 4 weeks later. Patient 5 A 71-year-old woman developed ventricular fibrillation while her chest was being scrubbed before implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Closed-chest cardiac massage was initiated within seconds. After three successive direct-current shocks (200 J, 300 J, and 300 J) followed by epinephrine (1 mg) and another direct-current shock (300 J), the patient remained in ventricular fibrillation. Examination of arterial blood gases showed a pH of 7.33 and a Po 2 of 60 mm Hg before endotracheal intubation. Additional epinephrine (1 mg) and defibrillation efforts were unsuccessful. Vasopressin (40 U) was administered 50 minutes after the arrest, and spontaneous circulation returned immediately after a 300-J direct-current shock. Immediately before vasopressin administration, the patients arterial blood had a pH of 7.18 and a Po 2 of 543 mm Hg. The patient was treated with dopamine (10 g/kg per minute) intravenously. Forty-five minutes later, she again developed hypotension followed by ventricular fibrillation. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was reinitiated, but direct-current shock (300 J), epinephrine (1 mg), and another direct-current shock (300 J) failed to revive her. Vasopressin (20 U) followed 30 seconds later by direct-current shock (300 J) was unsuccessful; more vasopressin (20 U) was administered 2 minutes after the first 20-U dose. Thirty seconds later, a direct-current shock (300 J) led to an immediate return of spontaneous circulation. The patients pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at this time was 25 mm Hg, and her pulmonary systolic pressure was 35 mm Hg. Twenty minutes after her second and final resuscitation effort, she became hypotensive and bradycardic and died secondary to pulseless electrical activity. Patient 6 Immediately after induction with a standard cardiac general anesthetic for placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, a 45-year-old man developed pulseless electrical activity. Standard closed-chest manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation was started immediately. The patient received fluids (500 mL of normal saline), atropine (1 mg intravenously), and epinephrine (1 mg intravenously). After 10 minutes and another 1-mg epinephrine dose, he developed ventricular fibrillation. Several efforts to defibrillate failed. Twenty minutes after cardiac arrest, the patient received vasopressin (40 U); after a single 360-J transthoracic direct-current shock, spontaneous circulation promptly returned. The patient remained hemodynamically stable for 30 minutes. Despite intravenous fluids, dopamine (10 g/kg per minute), and placement of an intra-aortic balloon pump, he again developed hypotension, followed by ventricular fibrillation. After an effort to resuscitate the patient with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation, epinephrine (1 mg), and direct-current shock was unsuccessful, the patient was given vasopressin (40 U) and was successfully resuscitated with direct-current shock. An angiogram showed a large thrombus at the site of an angioplasty done 2 weeks earlier; the vessel was again dilated. Within 30 minutes, the patient developed polymorphous ventricular tachycardia and had another cardiac arrest. Standard manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intravenous vasopressin (40 U), and direct-current shock were not effective. The patient received active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and vasopressin (40 U). Systolic arterial pressure increased to more than 100 mm Hg; when active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation was stopped, the patient spontaneously convertedwithout direct-current shockto sinus tachycardia. One hour later, ventricular fibrillation again developed. Resuscitation efforts were terminated. Patient 8 A 31-year-old man had several internal injuries after a car accident. He developed ventricular fibrillation on the way to the operating room for emergent repair of a ruptured aorta. Fibrillation persisted despite many direct-current shocks and the administration of epinephrine (2 1 mg repeated after 3 minutes). After 4 minutes of closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation, examination of the arterial blood showed a pH of 7.16, a Pco 2 of 54 mm Hg, a Po 2 of 49 mm Hg (fraction of inspired oxygen, 1.0), a potassium level of 2.8 mmol/L, and a hemoglobin level of 9.1 g/L. Despite treatment with epinephrine, diastolic arterial pressures remained less than 15 mm Hg. Administration of vasopressin (40 U) increased the diastolic arterial pressure to 30 mm Hg, and a subsequent direct-current shock (360 J) restored a stable heart and blood pressure. After the operation, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. Discussion These cases show that in patients in cardiac arrest who are receiving closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation and have not responded to the standard doses of epinephrine recommended by the American Heart Association, spontaneous circulation can be restored by intravenous administration (through the femoral or jugular vein) of 40 U of vasopressin. These results are consistent with recent data from animals showing that vasopressin has greater efficacy than epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation [1, 2]. Although the prognosis was poor in all cases and all conventional measures had failed, spontaneous circulation was restored in all eight patients after vasopressin administration. Three patients survived to hospital discharge with minimal or no neurologic deficit. In addition, when active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation was combined with the use of vasopressin, one patient had spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm without the use of direct-current shock. Although the optimal dose of vasopressin in humans is not known, 40 U was effective in all of our patients. In one patient, a dose of 20 U was not effective. In the eight patients studied, an initial dose of 1 mg of epinephrine was administered. In four of these eight patients, an escalating dose of epinephrine (from 1 mg to 3 mg to 5 mg) was used but was similarly ineffective. In humans having cardiac arrest, epinephrine therapy is used on the basis of case reports and animal studies [5, 6]. Recent clinical trials comparing low-dose with high-dose epinephrine show that the latter has no significant advantage [7, 8]. A more recent placebo-controlled trial showed that neither high- nor low-dose epinephrine had benefit compared with placebo [9]. In our patients, vasopressin may have been more effective because of several factors. Vasopressin exerts a greater vasoconstrictive effect under conditions of hypoxia and acidosis than does epinephrine, and the effects of vasopressin last longer [1, 2]. Vasopressin causes a greater increase in arterial tone than does epine

Effect of vasopressin on hemodynamic variables, organ blood flow, and acid-base status in a pig model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Based upon the hypothesis that vasopressin (antidiuretic hormone) may increase vascular resistance during ventricular fibrillation, the effects of this potent vasoconstrictor were studied in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation. Vasopressin therapy was compared to epinephrine by randomly allocating 14 pigs to receive either 0.045 mg/kg of epinephrine (n = 7) or 0.8 U/kg of vasopressin (n = 7) after 4 min of ventricular fibrillation and 3 min of open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation. During cardiopulmonary resuscitation, myocardial blood flow before and 90 s and 5 min after drug administration was 57 +/- 11, 84 +/- 11, and 59 +/- 9 mL.min-1 x 100 g-1 (mean +/- SEM) in the epinephrine group, and 61 +/- 5, 148 +/- 26, and 122 +/- 22 mL.min-1 x 100 g-1 in the vasopressin group (P < 0.05 at 90 s and 5 min). At the same times, mean cardiac index was not significantly different between the groups. After drug administration, coronary venous PCO2 was significantly higher and coronary venous pH was significantly lower in the epinephrine as compared to the vasopressin group. All pigs in both groups were resuscitated and survived the 2-h observation period. We conclude that vasopressin improves vital organ perfusion during ventricular fibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Vasopressin seems to be at least as effective as epinephrine in this pig model of ventricular fibrillation.

Analgesic and hemodynamic effects of epidural clonidine, clonidine/morphine, and morphine after pancreatic surgery--a double-blind study.

This study characterizes analgesia and hemodynamics after epidural clonidine 8 micro gram/kg (Group C) or clonidine 4 micro gram/kg + morphine 2 mg (Group CM) in comparison to epidural morphine 50 micro gram/kg (Group M).Forty-five patients scheduled for pancreatectomy in combined general/epidural anesthesia were studied. The study drugs were administered 75 min postoperatively and for 10 h pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cardiac output (CO) were measured; filling pressures were kept >5 mm Hg. Adequate analgesia could be achieved within 1 h in all patients of Groups C and CM, but only in six patients of Group M (P < 0.001). Quality of analgesia was comparable in all groups (VAS reduction 82% +/- 20%, mean +/- SD) but duration of analgesic action was longer in Groups CM (586 +/- 217 min) and M (775 +/- 378 min) compared to Group C (336 +/- 119 min) (P < 0.001). In Group M, no hemodynamic alterations occurred. In Groups C and CM, HR, CO, and MAP were reduced significantly compared to baseline within the first 15-90 min, while stroke volume and systemic vascular resistance remained stable. We conclude, that hemodynamic alteration after epidural clonidine under conditions of stable filling pressures is caused mainly by a decrease in HR. It is not an effect of analgesia but of the intrinsic antihypertensive action of clonidine. (Anesth Analg 1995;80:869-74)

Perioperative endotoxemia and bacterial translocation during major abdominal surgery. Evidence for the protective effect of endogenous prostacyclin

OBJECTIVE To investigate the potential role of endogenous prostacyclin (PGI2) released after mesenteric traction during major abdominal surgery on perioperative endotoxemia and bacterial translocation. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study. SETTING Operating room and surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS Fifty consecutive patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery (pancreas resection, abdominal aortic surgery). INTERVENTIONS Fifteen minutes before skin incision, either 400 mg of ibuprofen or a placebo equivalent were administered intravenously. Immediately after peritoneal incision, eventration and action of the small bowel was intentionally performed in a uniform fashion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Baseline values were obtained before induction of anesthesia. Additional measurements, along with assessments of hemodynamics and gas exchange, were performed before incision of the peritoneum and at 5, 30, and 45 mins and 3, 6, and 24 hrs after mesenteric traction. Arterial plasma concentrations of 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha and thromboxane B2 (stable metabolites of PGI2 and thromboxane A2) were determined by radioimmunoassay. Endotoxin was measured by limulus amebocyte lysate test. Mesenteric lymph nodes were sampled in 31 patients (ibuprofen n = 14, placebo n = 17) and sent for culture under sterile conditions. Transient hypotension and a marked increase of plasma 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha concentrations occurred up to 6 hrs after mesenteric traction in untreated patients with median peak concentrations (2243 vs. 72 ng/L [p < .0001, placebo vs. ibuprofen], observed 5 mins after mesenteric traction). Endotoxemia occurred in both study groups. However, after mesenteric traction, plasma endotoxin concentrations were significantly higher in the ibuprofen group. Median peak concentrations (0.12 vs. 0.27 EU/mL [p < .001, placebo vs. ibuprofen]) were observed 3 hrs after mesenteric traction. Gram-negative bacteria in mesenteric lymph nodes were detected exclusively in the ibuprofen group (n = 5, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS In ibuprofen-pretreated patients, significantly higher endotoxin concentrations as well as bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes occurred, despite the absence of a transient decrease in mean arterial pressure that had been associated with PGI2 release. Therefore, we hypothesized that during major abdominal surgery, endogenous PGI2 released in response to mesenteric traction may play a crucial role in maintaining splanchnic microcirculation and thus preserving gut mucosal barrier function.

Metabolic effects of norepinephrine and dobutamine in healthy volunteers.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of norepinephrine (n = 9) and dobutamine (n = 7) on carbohydrate and protein metabolism in healthy volunteers in comparison with a control group (n = 9). Norepinephrine (0.1 &mgr;g/kg min), dobutamine (5 &mgr;g/kg min), or placebo was infused for 240 min. The plasma concentration of glucose, lactate, epinephrine, norepinephrine, insulin, and glucagon were determined. Glucose and urea production and leucine flux were measured using a tracer technique. Norepinephrine caused a persisting rise in plasma glucose concentration, whereas the increase in glucose production was only transient. A minor increase in plasma lactate concentration was observed, but it did not exceed the physiological range. No change in leucine flux, urea production, or plasma concentration of insulin, glucagon, or epinephrine was found. Dobutamine slightly decreased glucose production, whereas the plasma concentration of glucose and lactate did not change. The reduction in leucine flux was paralleled by a decrease in urea production. No change in the plasma concentration of insulin, glucagon, or the catecholamines was observed. In conclusion, both norepinephrine and dobutamine have only minor metabolic effects. Because glucose production is enhanced by &agr;1- and &bgr;2-adrenoceptor stimulation, we conclude that dobutamine is only a weak agonist at these adrenoceptors. These minor metabolic actions may make both compounds suitable for critically ill patients because no further increase in metabolic rate should be caused.

A cross-validated multifactorial index of perioperative risks in adults undergoing anaesthesia for non-cardiac surgery - Analysis of perioperative events in 26907 anaesthetic procedures

Objective. To develop a severity index of anaesthetic risk that predicts relevant perioperative adverse events in adults. Design. Prospective cross-sectional study. Setting. Department of anaesthesiology at one university hospital. Patients. 26907 consecutive anaesthetic procedures in patients over 15 years of age and a complete preoperative evaluation. Patients undergoing cardiac and obstetric surgery were excluded. Measurements and main results. Demographic data, preoperative health status, type of anaesthesia, operative procedures, and perioperative incidents (standardised on a national basis) were acquired by means of a computerised anaesthetic record system. Occurrence of at least one perioperative event with impact on postanaesthetic care was computed by a multivariate logistic regression model against 17 variables with different characteristics representing possible risk factors. Fourteen variables proved to be independent risk factors. The weighting of the variables was expressed in scores which added up to form a simple index for each patient. Patients without major risk factors (0–10 points) had a 0.3% risk of suffering from a relevant incident. Patients with more than 60 points had a 28.6% risk. The results were well demonstrated by cross-validation. Conclusions. The index seems to reflect the risk of relevant perioperative incidents. It can be used for audit purposes. In daily routine, the index could focus our attention on patients with increased perioperative risk. However, it is limited in detecting particular constellations of factors which interact on each other with regard to perioperative risk.

Vasopressor hormone response following mesenteric traction during major abdominal surgery

Background: We investigated the vasopressor hormone response following mesenteric traction (MT) with hypotension due to prostacyclin (PGI2) release in patients undergoing abdominal surgery with a combined general and epidural anesthesia.

Changes in Gastric Intramucosal pH following Mesenteric Traction in Patients Undergoing Pancreas Surgery

Background/Aim: During major abdominal surgery, mesenteric traction (MT) may result in hemodynamic instability mainly due to endogenous prostacyclin release. Gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) and PiCO2 are indicators of splanchnic tissue perfusion with a predictive value for the postoperative outcome. We investigated the influence of MT on gastric pHi and on postoperative outcome in patients undergoing pancreas surgery. Methods: Forty-six consecutive patients scheduled for pancreas surgery were investigated. We registered hemodynamics and pHi by gastric tonometry and documented postoperative outcome (complications, hospital stay). Baseline data (T0) were recorded after skin incision. Further assessments followed 30, 60 and 120 min after intentional MT (T1–3) and at the end of surgery (T4). Results: Thirty-three patients demonstrated a decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) following MT, whereas 13 patients showed entirely stable hemodynamics. The significant reduction in MAP in patients with an MT response was not associated with changes in pHi as compared to patients with no response (stable MAP) (T0 7.34 ± 0.08 vs. 7.35 ± 0.06; T1 7.34 ± 0.05 vs. 7.32 ± 0.07; T2 7.32 ± 0.05 vs. 7.31 ± 0.08; T3 7.32 ± 0.05 vs. 7.32 ± 0.07; T4 7.26 ± 0.1 vs. 7.27 ± 0.08; mean ± SD, MT response vs. no response). Neither MT response nor gastric intramucosal acidosis as evidenced by a pHi <7.32 at the end of surgery predicted postoperative complications or longer hospital stay. Conclusion: No deterioration of gastric pHi was found, which could reflect acceptable splanchnic perfusion and oxygenation despite systemic blood pressure reactions in patients experiencing an MT response.

The impact of prostanoids on pulmonary gas exchange during abdominal surgery with mesenteric traction.

We investigated the effect of intravenous (iv) ibuprofen on prostanoid release and on pulmonary gas exchange after abdominal mesenteric traction (MT) during either abdominal aortic surgery or pancreas resection.In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 400 mg ibuprofen (pancreas n = 13, aorta n = 13) or a placebo (pancreas n = 13, aorta n = 13) was administered iv before skin incision. MT was applied uniformly. The prostanoid plasma concentrations, venous admixture (Qva/Qt), and PaO (2/FIO)2 ratio were determined at baseline (before MT) and 5, 15, 45, and 90 min after MT. Patients who underwent aortic surgery were older and exhibited a lower preoperative PaO2 than those who underwent pancreas resection. Placebo-treated patients revealed a 30-fold peak increase in 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha (stable metabolite of prostacyclin) levels after intentional MT during aortic as well as pancreatic operations. This response was accompanied by an increase in Qva/Q (t) (ibuprofen: pancreas 7% +/- 1%, aorta 14% +/- 2%; placebo: pancreas 16% +/- 3%, aorta 26% +/- 3%/15 min after MT [mean +/- SEM, p < 0.05, placebo vs ibuprofen]), which resulted in decreased PaO2/FIO2 ratio only in the aortic surgery patients (ibuprofen: 310 +/- 19; placebo: 237 +/- 24 15 min after MT, [mean +/- SEM, P < 0.05]). The authors conclude that ibuprofenpretreated patients demonstrated almost constant prostanoid levels without changes in pulmonary gas exchange after MT. (Anesth Analg 1997;85:274-80)

Ibuprofen does not impair renal function in patients undergoing infrarenal aortic surgery with epidural anaesthesia

AbstractObjective: To investigate the effect of preoperative ibuprofen administration on renal function during and after infrarenal aortic surgery under thoracolumbar epidural anaesthesia (EPA). Design: A prospective randomised, double-blinded clinical study. Setting: Operation room and intensive care unit in a university hospital. Patients: Twenty-six consecutive patients scheduled for elective infrarenal aortic surgery. Interventions: The patients were prospectively randomised to receive 400 mg ibuprofen intravenously (i. v.) or a placebo aliquot before surgery. Measurements and results: We assessed renal function by calculating creatinine clearance, and fractional sodium excretion before surgery (baseline), 1 h after cross-clamping (intraoperative), 6 h after cross-clamping (postoperative) and 24 h after cross-clamping (on the 1 st postoperative day). At each point in time, we additionally registered haemodynamics and determined the plasma concentration of 6-keto-PGF1α (stable metabolite of prostacyclin, PGI2), bicyclic PGE2 (stable metabolite of PGE1 E2), active renin, aldosterone and vasopressin by radioimmunoassays.Throughout the observation period the renal function parameters mostly remained within the normal range without a significant difference between ibuprofen- and placebo-treated patients (creatinine clearance: baseline 41 ± 3 vs 38 ± 6, intraoperative 57 ± 8 vs 64 ± 11, postoperative 64 ± 9 vs 56 ± 9, first postoperative day 43 ± 5 vs 47 ± 6 ml · min · m−2, means ± SEM). The plasma levels of 6-keto-PGF1α (68 ± 8 vs 380 ± 71* ng · 1−1), bicyclic PGE2 (57 ± 5 vs 88 ± 9* ng · 1−1) and vasopressin (14 ± 7 vs 45 ± 10* ng · 1−1,p < 0.0125), however, were significantly higher during the intra-operative period in the placebo-treated patients. Conclusion: The inhibition of endogenous prostaglandin release by ibuprofen does not substantially impair renal function during infrarenal aortic surgery under EPA.