Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alexander Charney is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alexander Charney.


Cell Reports | 2014

A Role for Noncoding Variation in Schizophrenia

Panos Roussos; Amanda C. Mitchell; Georgios Voloudakis; John F. Fullard; Venu Pothula; Jonathan Tsang; Eli A. Stahl; Anastasios Georgakopoulos; Douglas M. Ruderfer; Alexander Charney; Yukinori Okada; Katherine A. Siminovitch; Jane Worthington; Leonid Padyukov; Lars Klareskog; Peter K. Gregersen; Robert M. Plenge; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Menachem Fromer; Shaun Purcell; Kristen J. Brennand; Nikolaos K. Robakis; Eric E. Schadt; Schahram Akbarian; Pamela Sklar

A large portion of common variant loci associated with genetic risk for schizophrenia reside within noncoding sequence of unknown function. Here, we demonstrate promoter and enhancer enrichment in schizophrenia variants associated with expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). The enrichment is greater when functional annotations derived from the human brain are used relative to peripheral tissues. Regulatory trait concordance analysis ranked genes within schizophrenia genome-wide significant loci for a potential functional role, based on colocalization of a risk SNP, eQTL, and regulatory element sequence. We identified potential physical interactions of noncontiguous proximal and distal regulatory elements. This was verified in prefrontal cortex and -induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons for the L-type calcium channel (CACNA1C) risk locus. Our findings point to a functional link between schizophrenia-associated noncoding SNPs and 3D genome architecture associated with chromosomal loopings and transcriptional regulation in the brain.


Translational Psychiatry | 2017

Evidence for genetic heterogeneity between clinical subtypes of bipolar disorder

Alexander Charney; Douglas M. Ruderfer; Eli A. Stahl; Jennifer L. Moran; Richard A. Belliveau; Liz Forty; Katherine Gordon-Smith; A. Di Florio; Phil H. Lee; Evelyn J. Bromet; Peter F. Buckley; Michael A. Escamilla; Ayman H. Fanous; Laura J. Fochtmann; Douglas S. Lehrer; Dolores Malaspina; Stephen R. Marder; Christopher P. Morley; Humberto Nicolini; Diana O. Perkins; Jeffrey J. Rakofsky; Mark Hyman Rapaport; Helena Medeiros; Janet L. Sobell; Elaine K. Green; Lena Backlund; Sarah E. Bergen; Anders Juréus; Martin Schalling; Paul Lichtenstein

We performed a genome-wide association study of 6447 bipolar disorder (BD) cases and 12 639 controls from the International Cohort Collection for Bipolar Disorder (ICCBD). Meta-analysis was performed with prior results from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Bipolar Disorder Working Group for a combined sample of 13 902 cases and 19 279 controls. We identified eight genome-wide significant, associated regions, including a novel associated region on chromosome 10 (rs10884920; P=3.28 × 10−8) that includes the brain-enriched cytoskeleton protein adducin 3 (ADD3), a non-coding RNA, and a neuropeptide-specific aminopeptidase P (XPNPEP1). Our large sample size allowed us to test the heritability and genetic correlation of BD subtypes and investigate their genetic overlap with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. We found a significant difference in heritability of the two most common forms of BD (BD I SNP-h2=0.35; BD II SNP-h2=0.25; P=0.02). The genetic correlation between BD I and BD II was 0.78, whereas the genetic correlation was 0.97 when BD cohorts containing both types were compared. In addition, we demonstrated a significantly greater load of polygenic risk alleles for schizophrenia and BD in patients with BD I compared with patients with BD II, and a greater load of schizophrenia risk alleles in patients with the bipolar type of schizoaffective disorder compared with patients with either BD I or BD II. These results point to a partial difference in the genetic architecture of BD subtypes as currently defined.


The Lancet Psychiatry | 2016

Polygenic overlap between schizophrenia risk and antipsychotic response: a genomic medicine approach

Douglas M. Ruderfer; Alexander Charney; Ben Readhead; Brian A. Kidd; Anna K. Kähler; Paul J Kenny; Michael J. Keiser; Jennifer L. Moran; Christina M. Hultman; Stuart A. Scott; Patrick F. Sullivan; Shaun Purcell; Joel T. Dudley; Pamela Sklar

BACKGROUND Therapeutic treatments for schizophrenia do not alleviate symptoms for all patients and efficacy is limited by common, often severe, side-effects. Genetic studies of disease can identify novel drug targets, and drugs for which the mechanism has direct genetic support have increased likelihood of clinical success. Large-scale genetic studies of schizophrenia have increased the number of genes and gene sets associated with risk. We aimed to examine the overlap between schizophrenia risk loci and gene targets of a comprehensive set of medications to potentially inform and improve treatment of schizophrenia. METHODS We defined schizophrenia risk loci as genomic regions reaching genome-wide significance in the latest Psychiatric Genomics Consortium schizophrenia genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 36 989 cases and 113 075 controls and loss of function variants observed only once among 5079 individuals in an exome-sequencing study of 2536 schizophrenia cases and 2543 controls (Swedish Schizophrenia Study). Using two large and orthogonally created databases, we collated drug targets into 167 gene sets targeted by pharmacologically similar drugs and examined enrichment of schizophrenia risk loci in these sets. We further linked the exome-sequenced data with a national drug registry (the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register) to assess the contribution of rare variants to treatment response, using clozapine prescription as a proxy for treatment resistance. FINDINGS We combined results from testing rare and common variation and, after correction for multiple testing, two gene sets were associated with schizophrenia risk: agents against amoebiasis and other protozoal diseases (106 genes, p=0·00046, pcorrected =0·024) and antipsychotics (347 genes, p=0·00078, pcorrected=0·046). Further analysis pointed to antipsychotics as having independent enrichment after removing genes that overlapped these two target sets. We noted significant enrichment both in known targets of antipsychotics (70 genes, p=0·0078) and novel predicted targets (277 genes, p=0·019). Patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia had an excess of rare disruptive variants in gene targets of antipsychotics (347 genes, p=0·0067) and in genes with evidence for a role in antipsychotic efficacy (91 genes, p=0·0029). INTERPRETATION Our results support genetic overlap between schizophrenia pathogenesis and antipsychotic mechanism of action. This finding is consistent with treatment efficacy being polygenic and suggests that single-target therapeutics might be insufficient. We provide evidence of a role for rare functional variants in antipsychotic treatment response, pointing to a subset of patients where their genetic information could inform treatment. Finally, we present a novel framework for identifying treatments from genetic data and improving our understanding of therapeutic mechanism. FUNDING US National Institutes of Health.


Molecular Psychiatry | 2016

Genome-wide association study identifies SESTD1 as a novel risk gene for lithium-responsive bipolar disorder

Jie Song; Sarah E. Bergen; A. Di Florio; Robert Karlsson; A Charney; Douglas Ruderfer; Erich Stahl; K D Chambert; J L Moran; K. Gordon-Smith; L Forty; E. Green; Ian Richard Jones; Lesley Jones; Edward M. Scolnick; Pamela Sklar; J W Smoller; Paul Lichtenstein; C. M. Hultman; N. Craddock; M Landén; Jordan W. Smoller; Roy H. Perlis; Phil H. Lee; Victor M. Castro; Alison G. Hoffnagle; Eli A. Stahl; Shaun Purcell; Douglas M. Ruderfer; Alexander Charney

Lithium is the mainstay prophylactic treatment for bipolar disorder (BD), but treatment response varies considerably across individuals. Patients who respond well to lithium treatment might represent a relatively homogeneous subtype of this genetically and phenotypically diverse disorder. Here, we performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify (i) specific genetic variations influencing lithium response and (ii) genetic variants associated with risk for lithium-responsive BD. Patients with BD and controls were recruited from Sweden and the United Kingdom. GWAS were performed on 2698 patients with subjectively defined (self-reported) lithium response and 1176 patients with objectively defined (clinically documented) lithium response. We next conducted GWAS comparing lithium responders with healthy controls (1639 subjective responders and 8899 controls; 323 objective responders and 6684 controls). Meta-analyses of Swedish and UK results revealed no significant associations with lithium response within the bipolar subjects. However, when comparing lithium-responsive patients with controls, two imputed markers attained genome-wide significant associations, among which one was validated in confirmatory genotyping (rs116323614, P=2.74 × 10−8). It is an intronic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on chromosome 2q31.2 in the gene SEC14 and spectrin domains 1 (SESTD1), which encodes a protein involved in regulation of phospholipids. Phospholipids have been strongly implicated as lithium treatment targets. Furthermore, we estimated the proportion of variance for lithium-responsive BD explained by common variants (‘SNP heritability’) as 0.25 and 0.29 using two definitions of lithium response. Our results revealed a genetic variant in SESTD1 associated with risk for lithium-responsive BD, suggesting that the understanding of BD etiology could be furthered by focusing on this subtype of BD.


Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine | 2008

Treating pediatric patients with antipsychotic drugs: balancing benefits and safety

Iliyan Ivanov; Alexander Charney

In the last 2 decades, the advances of evidencebased medicine have had a palpable influence on psychiatry. In pediatric psychiatry, this has led to increased acceptance of the idea that neuropsychiatric conditions of childhood are in part biologically determined1,2 and that the use of psychotropic agents can remediate some of the symptoms.3 The use of various psychotropic agents for children suffering from these conditions has become increasingly widespread and accepted by both medical professionals and society at large. Like any other biological treatment, the various types of psychotropic drugs present a number of adverse effects, ranging from mild to severe and potentially life-threatening. Among psychotropic compounds, antipsychotic agents in particular have received considerable attention, which is in part due to their efficacy and in part due to the spectrum of serious side effects that they produce.4 This article reviews the current trends for the therapeutic use of antipsychotic medications in pediatric psychiatry and the available data that support their efficacy, but it also discusses important issues related to their safety during both short-term and long-term administration.


Translational Psychiatry | 2018

Genetic validation of bipolar disorder identified by automated phenotyping using electronic health records

Chia Yen Chen; Phil H. Lee; Victor M. Castro; Jessica Minnier; Alexander Charney; Eli A. Stahl; Douglas Ruderfer; Shawn N. Murphy; Vivian S. Gainer; Tianxi Cai; Ian Richard Jones; Carlos N. Pato; Michele T. Pato; Mikael Landén; Pamela Sklar; Roy H. Perlis; Jordan W. Smoller

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a heritable mood disorder characterized by episodes of mania and depression. Although genomewide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified genetic loci contributing to BD risk, sample size has become a rate-limiting obstacle to genetic discovery. Electronic health records (EHRs) represent a vast but relatively untapped resource for high-throughput phenotyping. As part of the International Cohort Collection for Bipolar Disorder (ICCBD), we previously validated automated EHR-based phenotyping algorithms for BD against in-person diagnostic interviews (Castro et al. Am J Psychiatry 172:363–372, 2015). Here, we establish the genetic validity of these phenotypes by determining their genetic correlation with traditionally ascertained samples. Case and control algorithms were derived from structured and narrative text in the Partners Healthcare system comprising more than 4.6 million patients over 20 years. Genomewide genotype data for 3330 BD cases and 3952 controls of European ancestry were used to estimate SNP-based heritability (h2g) and genetic correlation (rg) between EHR-based phenotype definitions and traditionally ascertained BD cases in GWAS by the ICCBD and Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) using LD score regression. We evaluated BD cases identified using 4 EHR-based algorithms: an NLP-based algorithm (95-NLP) and three rule-based algorithms using codified EHR with decreasing levels of stringency—“coded-strict”, “coded-broad”, and “coded-broad based on a single clinical encounter” (coded-broad-SV). The analytic sample comprised 862 95-NLP, 1968 coded-strict, 2581 coded-broad, 408 coded-broad-SV BD cases, and 3 952 controls. The estimated h2g were 0.24 (p = 0.015), 0.09 (p = 0.064), 0.13 (p = 0.003), 0.00 (p = 0.591) for 95-NLP, coded-strict, coded-broad and coded-broad-SV BD, respectively. The h2g for all EHR-based cases combined except coded-broad-SV (excluded due to 0 h2g) was 0.12 (p = 0.004). These h2g were lower or similar to the h2g observed by the ICCBD + PGCBD (0.23, p = 3.17E−80, total N = 33,181). However, the rg between ICCBD + PGCBD and the EHR-based cases were high for 95-NLP (0.66, p = 3.69 × 10–5), coded-strict (1.00, p = 2.40 × 10−4), and coded-broad (0.74, p = 8.11 × 10–7). The rg between EHR-based BD definitions ranged from 0.90 to 0.98. These results provide the first genetic validation of automated EHR-based phenotyping for BD and suggest that this approach identifies cases that are highly genetically correlated with those ascertained through conventional methods. High throughput phenotyping using the large data resources available in EHRs represents a viable method for accelerating psychiatric genetic research.


bioRxiv | 2018

Contribution of rare copy number variants to bipolar disorder risk is limited to schizoaffective cases

Alexander Charney; Eli A. Stahl; Elaine K. Green; Chia-Yen Chen; Jennifer L. Moran; Richard A. Belliveau; Liz Forty; Katherine Gordon-Smith; Phil Lee; Evelyn J. Bromet; Peter F. Buckley; Michael Escamilla; Ayman H. Fanous; Laura J. Fochtmann; Douglas S. Lehrer; Dolores Malaspina; Stephen R. Marder; Christopher P. Morley; Humberto Nicolini; Diana O. Perkins; Jeffrey J. Rakofsky; Mark Hyman Rapaport; Helena Medeiros; Janet L. Sobell; Lena Backlund; Sarah E. Bergen; Anders Juréus; Martin Schalling; Paul Lichtenstein; James A. Knowles

Background Genetic risk for bipolar disorder (BD) is conferred through many common alleles, while a role for rare copy number variants (CNVs) is less clear. BD subtypes schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (SAB), bipolar I disorder (BD I) and bipolar II disorder (BD II) differ according to the prominence and timing of psychosis, mania and depression. The factors contributing to the combination of symptoms within a given patient are poorly understood. Methods Rare, large CNVs were analyzed in 6353 BD cases (3833 BD I [2676 with psychosis, 850 without psychosis], 1436 BD II, 579 SAB) and 8656 controls. Measures of CNV burden were integrated with polygenic risk scores (PRS) for schizophrenia (SCZ) to evaluate the relative contributions of rare and common variants to psychosis risk. Results CNV burden did not differ in BD relative to controls when treated as a single diagnostic entity. Burden in SAB was increased compared to controls (p-value = 0.001), BD I (p-value = 0.0003) and BD II (p-value = 0.0007). Burden and SCZ PRS were higher in SAB compared to BD I with psychosis (CNV p-value = 0.0007, PRS p-value = 0.004) and BD I without psychosis (CNV p-value = 0.0004, PRS p-value = 3.9 × 10−5). Within BD I, psychosis was associated with higher SCZ PRS (p-value = 0.005) but not with CNV burden. Conclusions CNV burden in BD is limited to SAB. Rare and common genetic variants may contribute differently to risk for psychosis and perhaps other classes of psychiatric symptoms.


American Journal of Human Genetics | 2018

Landscape of Conditional eQTL in Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Co-localization with Schizophrenia GWAS

Amanda Dobbyn; Laura M. Huckins; James Boocock; Laura G. Sloofman; Benjamin S. Glicksberg; Claudia Giambartolomei; Gabriel E. Hoffman; Thanneer M. Perumal; Kiran Girdhar; Yan Jiang; Towfique Raj; Douglas Ruderfer; Robin Kramer; Dalila Pinto; Pamela Sklar; Joseph D. Buxbaum; Bernie Devlin; David A. Lewis; Raquel E. Gur; Chang-Gyu Hahn; Keisuke Hirai; Hiroyoshi Toyoshiba; Enrico Domenici; Laurent Essioux; Lara M. Mangravite; Mette A. Peters; Thomas Lehner; Barbara K. Lipska; A. Ercument Cicek; Cong Lu

Causal genes and variants within genome-wide association study (GWAS) loci can be identified by integrating GWAS statistics with expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) and determining which variants underlie both GWAS and eQTL signals. Most analyses, however, consider only the marginal eQTL signal, rather than dissect this signal into multiple conditionally independent signals for each gene. Here we show that analyzing conditional eQTL signatures, which could be important under specific cellular or temporal contexts, leads to improved fine mapping of GWAS associations. Using genotypes and gene expression levels from post-mortem human brain samples (n = 467) reported by the CommonMind Consortium (CMC), we find that conditional eQTL are widespread; 63% of genes with primary eQTL also have conditional eQTL. In addition, genomic features associated with conditional eQTL are consistent with context-specific (e.g., tissue-, cell type-, or developmental time point-specific) regulation of gene expression. Integrating the 2014 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium schizophrenia (SCZ) GWAS and CMC primary and conditional eQTL data reveals 40 loci with strong evidence for co-localization (posterior probability > 0.8), including six loci with co-localization of conditional eQTL. Our co-localization analyses support previously reported genes, identify novel genes associated with schizophrenia risk, and provide specific hypotheses for their functional follow-up.


Global heart | 2012

Cardiovascular Risk Surveillance to Develop a Nationwide Health Promotion Strategy: The Grenada Heart Project

Sameer Bansilal; Rajesh Vedanthan; Mark Woodward; Rupa L Iyengar; Marilyn Hunn; Marcelle Lewis; Lesley Francis; Alexander Charney; Claire Graves; Michael E. Farkouh; Valentin Fuster


Archive | 2012

gSCIENCE ORIGINAL R ESEARCH Cardiovascular Risk Surveillance to Develop a Nationwide Health Promotion Strategy

Sameer Bansilal; Rajesh Vedanthan; Mark Woodward; Rupa L Iyengar; Marilyn Hunn; Lesley Francis; Alexander Charney; Claire Graves; Michael E. Farkouh

Collaboration


Dive into the Alexander Charney's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eli A. Stahl

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pamela Sklar

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas M. Ruderfer

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claire Graves

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas Ruderfer

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marilyn Hunn

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rajesh Vedanthan

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rupa L Iyengar

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge