Alexandru Saveanu

Efficacy of a dopamine-somatostatin chimeric molecule, BIM-23A760, in the control of cell growth from primary cultures of human non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a multi-center study

Dopamine D2 and somatostatin receptors (sstrs) were reported to affect non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA) proliferation in vitro. However, the reported results differ according to the experimental conditions used. We established an experimental protocol allowing reproducible evaluation of NFPA cell proliferation in vitro, to test and compare the antiproliferative effects of dopamine and somatostatin analogs (alone or in combination) with the activity of the dopamine-somatostatin chimeric molecule BIM-23A760. The protocol was utilized by four independent laboratories, studying 38 fibroblast-deprived NFPA cell cultures. Cells were characterized for GH, POMC, sstr1-sstr5, total dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) (in all cases), and D2 receptor long and short isoforms (in 15 out of 38 cases) mRNA expression and for alpha-subunit, LH, and FSH release. D2R, sstr3, and sstr2 mRNAs were consistently observed, with the dominant expression of D2R (2.9+/-2.6 copy/copy beta-glucuronidase; mean+/-s.e.m.), when compared with sstr3 and sstr2 (0.6+/-1.0 and 0.3+/-0.6 respectively). BIM-23A760, a molecule with high affinity for D2R and sstr2, significantly inhibited [3H]thymidine incorporation in 23 out of 38 (60%) NFPA cultures (EC50=1.2 pM and Emax=-33.6+/-3.7%). BIM-23A760 effects were similar to those induced by the selective D2R agonist cabergoline that showed a statistically significant inhibition in 18 out of 27 tumors (compared with a significant inhibition obtained in 17 out of 27 tumors using BIM-23A760, in the same subgroup of adenomas analyzed), while octreotide was effective in 13 out of 27 cases. In conclusion, superimposable data generated in four independent laboratories using a standardized protocol demonstrate that, in vitro, chimeric dopamine/sstr agonists are effective in inhibiting cell proliferation in two-thirds of NFPAs.

A Potential Inhibitory Role for the New Truncated Variant of Somatostatin Receptor 5, sst5TMD4, in Pituitary Adenomas Poorly Responsive to Somatostatin Analogs

CONTEXT Somatostatin (SST) receptors, specially sst2 and sst5, provide a valuable target to inhibit excessive hormone release and cell growth in pituitary tumors by using SST analogs (SSAs). Unfortunately, an appreciable proportion of tumors fail to respond to SSA despite expressing high levels of one or more ssts. Recently we identified two novel truncated sst5 variants, sst5TMD5, and sst5TMD4, absent in normal pituitary but expressed in pituitary tumors. OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN We aimed at exploring the potential role of sst5TMD5 and sst5TMD4 in the poor response of some tumors to SSA in vivo and in vitro. Specifically, 25 somatotropinomas showing different responses to octreotide in vivo and sst2 (BIM-23197)- and sst5(BIM-23268)-selective compounds in vitro were screened for sst5TMD5/sst5TMD4 expression by real-time PCR. Relationships between ssts expression and in vivo and in vitro secretory response of the corresponding pituitary samples were assessed. RESULTS sst5TMD5 was absent in all samples analyzed. sst5TMD4 was found in 85% of tumors, and its expression was positively correlated to that of sst5 (R(2) = 0.79, P < 0.001). Expression of sst5TMD4 was negatively correlated with the ability of octreotide to reduce GH levels in vivo and partially negatively correlated with inhibition of GH secretion by an sst5 selective agonist (BIM-23268) in vitro. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that sst5TMD4 is related to the reduced ability of octreotide at normalizing hormone secretion in poorly responsive tumors in vivo. Further studies will help to evaluate the potential use of sst5TMD4 expression in surgically removed pituitary adenomas as a predictor of the subsequent response of different pituitary tumors to SSA therapy.

Somatostatin and Dopamine-Somatostatin Multiple Ligands Directed towards Somatostatin and Dopamine Receptors in Pituitary Adenomas

Aim: We report the comparative efficacy of octreotide, cabergoline and multiple ligands directed towards the different somatostatin subtypes (ssts), such as BIM-23A779 and SOM-230, and of chimeric analogs which bind both somatostatin and the dopamine D2 receptors (D2R), such as BIM-23A760 and BIM-23A781, in cell cultures from human growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas. Procedures: RT-PCR analysis of the quantitative expression of the different ssts and D2R mRNAs was performed on tumor fragments of 22 GH-secreting adenomas collected after surgery. Pharmacological studies, using the different ligands, were performed on cell cultures of such tumors. Results: sst2, sst5 and D2R were constantly coexpressed in all tumors, in variable amounts. The levels of expression of sst2 and D2R mRNAs were significantly correlated with the maximal GH suppression by either octreotide or cabergoline (p < 0.001). In each tumor tested, 3 patterns of response, in terms of GH suppression, were observed. GH secretion was preferentially inhibited by the sst2 preferential compound octreotide in 61% of the tumors. In 19% of the tumors, the maximal inhibition of GH release was achieved with the sst5 preferential compound BIM-23268. The dopamine analog cabergoline was the most effective inhibitor of GH secretion in 21% of cases. Among the compounds tested, the most potent inhibitors of GH secretion were the sst2, sst5, D2R chimeric compound BIM-23A760, followed by the sst universal ligand SOM-230. Conclusions: The variable patterns of response to sst2, sst5 and dopamine D2 analogs may explain the greater efficacy of drugs which bind to the 3 receptors in suppressing GH secretion. The biological potency (EC50) and efficacy of the chimeric compound BIM-23A760 on GH secretion can be partly explained by its high affinity for sst2. The effect of multiple receptor activation on the functions of other pituitary tumor types, such as prolactinomas and corticotropinomas, is not presently analyzed, and the efficacy of multireceptor ligands remains to be elucidated.

Somatostatinergic ligands in dopamine-sensitive and -resistant prolactinomas

OBJECTIVE Ten percent of patients with prolactinoma fail to respond with normalization of prolactin (PRL) and tumor shrinkage under dopamine agonist (DA) therapy. The resistance to treatment is linked to a loss of dopamine receptor 2 (D2DR). Prolactinomas express somatostatin (SST) receptor subtypes, SSTR1, 2, and 5. The aim of this study was to determine whether different SST compounds could overcome the resistance to DA in prolactinomas. DESIGN AND METHODS The efficacy of SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR5 ligands; the universal SST ligand, SOM230; and the chimeric SST-DA compound, BIM-23A760, was compared with cabergoline in suppressing PRL secretion from primary cultures of ten prolactinomas (six DA responders and four DA resistant). Receptor mRNAs were assessed by quantitative PCR. RESULTS The mean mRNA levels for D2DR, SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR5 were 92.3+/-47.3, 2.2+/-1.4, 1.1+/-0.7, and 1.6+/-0.6 copy/copy beta-glucuronidase (beta-Gus) respectively. The SSTR1 agonist, BIM-23926, did not suppress PRL in prolactinomas. In a DA-resistant prolactinoma, it did not inhibit [(3)H]thymidine incorporation. The SSTR5 compound, BIM-23206, produced a dose-dependent inhibition of PRL release similar to that of cabergoline in three DA-sensitive prolactinomas. BIM-23A760 produced a maximal PRL inhibition superimposable to that obtained with cabergoline with a lower EC(50) (0.5+/-0.1 vs 2.5+/-1.5 pmol/l). In DA-resistant prolactinomas, BIM-23206 and SOM230 were ineffective. Cabergoline and BIM-23A760 produced a partial inhibition of PRL secretion (19+/-6 and 21+/-3% respectively). CONCLUSION Although the SSTRs are expressed in prolactinomas, the somatostatinergic ligands analyzed do not appear to be highly effective in suppressing PRL. D2DR remains the primary target for effective treatment of prolactinomas.

PROKR2 Variants in Multiple Hypopituitarism with Pituitary Stalk Interruption

CONTEXT Pituitary stalk interruption represents a frequent feature of congenital hypopituitarism, but only rare cases have been assigned to a known genetic cause. OBJECTIVE Using a candidate gene approach, we tested several genes as potential causes of hypopituitarism with pituitary stalk interruption. We hypothesized that ectopic posterior pituitary may be a consequence of defective neuronal axon projections along the pituitary stalk or defective angiogenesis of hypophyseal portal circulation. Considering the role of the prokineticin 2 pathway in angiogenesis and neuronal migration, we screened PROK2 and PROKR2 genes. DESIGN PROK2 and PROKR2 and all genes previously known to be involved in hypopituitarism with pituitary stalk interruption (LHX4, HESX1, OTX2, and SOX3) were screened in 72 index cases with pituitary stalk interruption syndrome from the GENHYPOPIT database. In vitro studies were performed to assess the functional consequences of allelic variants. RESULTS We identified two heterozygous PROKR2 mutations (p.Leu173Arg and p.Arg85His) previously reported in isolated hypogonadotroph hypogonadism and a novel PROKR2 variant (p.Ala51Thr) that, in contrast with both other mutations, did not impair receptor signaling activity. Three allelic variants of HESX1 were identified: the heterozygous p.Phe156Ser and the homozygous p.Arg109X mutations were functionally deleterious, whereas p.Ser67Thr was found as a rare allelic variant in association with p.Arg85His PROKR2 mutation in the same patient. CONCLUSIONS We report PROKR2 variants in congenital hypopituitarism with pituitary stalk interruption, suggesting a potential role of the prokineticin pathway in pituitary development.

Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome in 83 patients: novel HESX1 mutation and severe hormonal prognosis in malformative forms

BACKGROUND Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS) is a particular entity in the population of patients with hypopituitarism. Only rare cases have a known genetic cause. OBJECTIVES i) To compare subgroups with or without extra-pituitary malformations (EPM) in a cohort of PSIS patients to identify predictive factors of evolution, ii) to determine the incidence of mutations of the known pituitary transcription factor genes in PSIS. Study design We analyzed features of 83 PSIS patients from 80 pedigrees and screened HESX1, LHX4, OTX2, and SOX3 genes. RESULTS PSIS had a male predominance and was rarely familial (5%). Pituitary hypoplasia was observed only in the group with EPM. Multiple hormone deficits were observed significantly more often with versus without EPM (87.5 vs 69.5% respectively). Posterior pituitary location along the stalk was a significant protective factor regarding severity of hormonal phenotype. A novel HESX1 causative mutation was found in a consanguineous family, and two LHX4 mutations were present in familial PSIS. CONCLUSION PSIS patients with EPM had a more severe hormonal disorder and pituitary imaging status, suggesting an antenatal origin. HESX1 or LHX4 mutations accounted for <5% of cases and were found in consanguineous or familial cases.

Somatostatin-dopamine ligands in the treatment of pituitary adenomas

Somatostatin receptors (sst1–5) and dopamine receptor 2 (D2DR) are well expressed and co-localized in several human pituitary adenomas, suggesting possible functional interactions in the control of hormonal hypersecretion and tumor cell growth. The present review describes the expression and functionality of these receptors in the different classes of human pituitary adenomas. The sst2 agonists, octreotide and lanreotide, control GH hypersecretion and tumor growth in about 65% of somatotropinomas. The D2DR agonists, bromocriptine and cabergoline, control about 90% of prolactinomas. Such drugs are much less effective in the control of the others pituitary adenomas also expressing ssts and D2DR receptors. The second part summarizes the current knowledge on new chimeric compounds with sst2, sst5, and D2DR affinity. Such ligands bearing distinct ssts and DRD2 pharmacophores may synergistically produce an increased control of secretion and/or of proliferation in the different types of pituitary adenomas. The mechanisms of action of such chimeric molecules through increased binding affinities, prolonged bioavailability, ligand-induced modulation of receptors heterodimerization, are discussed.

Relevance of coexpression of somatostatin and dopamine D2 receptors in pituitary adenomas

Dopamine and somatostatin are both involved in the negative control of normal pituitary cells. Dopamine subtype 2 receptor (D2DR) and somatostatin receptor (sst) agonists, mainly directed to sst2, are used in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. Nevertheless, a majority of corticotroph and gonadotroph adenomas and a third of somatotroph adenomas are still not sufficiently controlled by these treatments. D2DR and sst1, 2, 3 and 5 are present in most pituitary adenomas. These receptors may interact by heterodimerization as shown for sst1-sst5, sst5-D2DR, sst2-sst3 and sst2-D2DR suggesting possible additive effects. D2DR and sst2 agonist cotreatment showed limited additivity on GH secretion in acromegaly. Moreover, new chimeric compounds with sst2, D2DR and sst5 affinity have shown an increased control of secretion and/or proliferation of different types of pituitary adenomas in cell culture. Together with the multi-sst ligand drugs recently developed, these dopamine-somatostatin ligands represent a new opportunity in the combinatory treatment of pituitary adenomas.

Somatostatin Receptor sst2 Decreases Cell Viability and Hormonal Hypersecretion and Reverses Octreotide Resistance of Human Pituitary Adenomas

In human somatotroph adenomas, growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion can be inhibited by somatostatin analogues such as octreotide. Unfortunately, serum GH levels reach normal values in only 60% of treated patients. The decreased sensitivity to octreotide is strongly related to a lower expression of somatostatin receptor sst2. In this present study, the sst2 gene was transferred by an adenoviral vector (Ad-sst2) in human somatotroph (n = 7) and lactotroph (n = 2) adenomas in vitro. Sst2 mRNA levels and sst2 immunostaining dramatically increased after infection. Ten days after infection at 20 multiplicity of infection (MOI), sst2 gene transfer decreased cell viability from 19% to 90% by caspase-dependent apoptosis. At low viral doses (5 MOI), Ad-sst2 decreased GH or prolactin (PRL) basal secretion and mRNA expression. Somatotroph tumors were classified in three groups according to their octreotide sensitivity. Four days after infection by 5 MOI Ad-sst2, the maximal GH suppression by octreotide increased from 31% to 57% in the octreotide partially resistant group and from 0% to 27% in the resistant ones. In the octreotide-sensitive group, EC(50) values significantly decreased from 1.3 x 10(-11) to 6.6 x 10(-13) mol/L without improving maximal GH suppression. Finally, lactotroph tumors, nonresponding to octreotide in basal conditions, became octreotide sensitive with a maximal PRL suppression of 43% at 10(-8) mol/L. Therefore, sst2 reexpression is able to improve octreotide sensitivity. Sst2 gene transfer may open new therapeutic strategies in treatment combined with somatostatin analogues.

Balance between somatostatin and D2 receptor expression drives TSH-secreting adenoma response to somatostatin analogues and dopastatins

Context  First‐line therapy for thyrotropin‐secreting pituitary adenomas (TSHomas) is neurosurgery, while medical treatment rests mainly on somatostatin analogues. Clinically available sst2‐preferring analogues, octreotide and lanreotide, induce normalization of hormone levels in approximately 90% of patients and tumour shrinkage in 45%.