Alice R. Jones
University of Adelaide
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alice R. Jones.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Tim Guilford; Russell B. Wynn; Miguel McMinn; Ana Rodriguez; Annette L. Fayet; Lou Maurice; Alice R. Jones; Rhiannon Meier
Using combined miniature archival light and salt-water immersion loggers, we characterise the year-round individual at-sea movements of Europes only critically endangered seabird, the Balearic shearwater Puffinus mauretanicus, for the first time. Focusing on the non-breeding period, we show that all of the 26 breeding birds tracked from their breeding site on Mallorca in the Mediterranean Sea successfully made a 2–4 month migration into the Atlantic Ocean, where they utilised well-defined core areas off Portuguese and French coasts. As well as identifying high-risk areas in the Atlantic, our results confirm that breeding birds spend most of the year concentrated around productive waters of the Iberian shelf in the western Mediterranean. Migration phenology appeared largely unrelated to the subsequent (distinctly synchronous) breeding attempt, suggesting that any carry-over effects were compensated for during a long pre-laying period spent over winter in the Mediterranean. Using the light and salt-water immersion data alone we were also able to characterise the pattern of pre-laying visits to the colony in considerable detail, demonstrating that breeding pairs appear to coordinate their over-day visits using a high frequency of night-time visits throughout the winter. Our study shows that geolocation technology is a valuable tool for assessing the spatial distribution of risks to this critically endangered species, and also provides a low-impact method for remotely observing the detailed behaviour of seabird species that may be sensitive to disturbance from traditional study methods.
Journal of Animal Ecology | 2016
Alice R. Jones; C. Michael Bull; Barry W. Brook; Konstans Wells; Kenneth H. Pollock; Damien A. Fordham
Assessing the impacts of multiple, often synergistic, stressors on the population dynamics of long-lived species is becoming increasingly important due to recent and future global change. Tiliqua rugosa (sleepy lizard) is a long-lived skink (>30 years) that is adapted to survive in semi-arid environments with varying levels of parasite exposure and highly seasonal food availability. We used an exhaustive database of 30 years of capture-mark-recapture records to quantify the impacts of both parasite exposure and environmental conditions on the lizards survival rates and long-term population dynamics. Lizard abundance was relatively stable throughout the study period; however, there were changing patterns in adult and juvenile apparent survival rates, driven by spatial and temporal variation in levels of tick exposure and temporal variation in environmental conditions. Extreme weather events during the winter and spring seasons were identified as important environmental drivers of survival. Climate models predict a dramatic increase in the frequency of extreme hot and dry winter and spring seasons in our South Australian study region; from a contemporary probability of 0.17 up to 0.47-0.83 in 2080 depending on the emissions scenario. Our stochastic population model projections showed that these future climatic conditions will induce a decline in the abundance of this long-lived reptile of up to 67% within 30 years from 2080, under worst case scenario modelling. The results have broad implications for future work investigating the drivers of population dynamics and persistence. We highlight the importance of long-term data sets and accounting for synergistic impacts between multiple stressors. We show that predicted increases in the frequency of extreme climate events have the potential to considerably and negatively influence a long-lived species, which might previously have been assumed to be resilient to environmental perturbations.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Zoë A. Doubleday; Alice R. Jones; Marty R. Deveney; Tim M. Ward; Bronwyn M. Gillanders
Identifying the relative risk human activities pose to a habitat, and the ecosystem services they provide, can guide management prioritisation and resource allocation. Using a combination of expert elicitation to assess the probable effect of a threat and existing data to assess the level of threat exposure, we conducted a risk assessment for 38 human-mediated threats to eight marine habitats (totalling 304 threat-habitat combinations) in Spencer Gulf, Australia. We developed a score-based survey to collate expert opinion and assess the relative effect of each threat to each habitat, as well as a novel and independent measure of knowledge-based uncertainty. Fifty-five experts representing multiple sectors and institutions participated in the study, with 6 to 15 survey responses per habitat (n = 81 surveys). We identified key threats specific to each habitat; overall, climate change threats received the highest risk rankings, with nutrient discharge identified as a key local-scale stressor. Invasive species and most fishing-related threats, which are commonly identified as major threats to the marine environment, were ranked as low-tier threats to Spencer Gulf, emphasising the importance of regionally-relevant assessments. Further, we identified critical knowledge gaps and quantified uncertainty scores for each risk. Our approach will facilitate prioritisation of resource allocation in a region of increasing social, economic and environmental importance, and can be applied to marine regions where empirical data are lacking.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Alice R. Jones; Zoë A. Doubleday; Thomas A. A. Prowse; Kathryn H. Wiltshire; Marty R. Deveney; Tim M. Ward; Sally L. Scrivens; Phillip Cassey; Laura G. O’Connell; Bronwyn M. Gillanders
Understanding the spatial distribution of human impacts on marine environments is necessary for maintaining healthy ecosystems and supporting ‘blue economies’. Realistic assessments of impact must consider the cumulative impacts of multiple, coincident threats and the differing vulnerabilities of ecosystems to these threats. Expert knowledge is often used to assess impact in marine ecosystems because empirical data are lacking; however, this introduces uncertainty into the results. As part of a spatial cumulative impact assessment for Spencer Gulf, South Australia, we asked experts to estimate score ranges (best-case, most-likely and worst-case), which accounted for their uncertainty about the effect of 32 threats on eight ecosystems. Expert scores were combined with data on the spatial pattern and intensity of threats to generate cumulative impact maps based on each of the three scoring scenarios, as well as simulations and maps of uncertainty. We compared our method, which explicitly accounts for the experts’ knowledge-based uncertainty, with other approaches and found that it provides smaller uncertainty bounds, leading to more constrained assessment results. Collecting these additional data on experts’ knowledge-based uncertainty provides transparency and simplifies interpretation of the outputs from spatial cumulative impact assessments, facilitating their application for sustainable resource management and conservation.
Aob Plants | 2018
Zdravko Baruch; Alice R. Jones; Kathryn E. Hill; Francesca A. McInerney; Colette Blyth; Stefan Caddy-Retalic; Matthew J. Christmas; Nick Gellie; Andrew J. Lowe; Irene Martín-Forés; Kristine E Nielson; Martin F. Breed
We studied a native Australian shrub—Dodonaea viscosa, or sticky hop bush—in the wild and in a gardening experiment and found that the species can readily adapt to different environments. Our findings are interesting because the plants we used came from sites with quite different environmental conditions, although they were only short distances apart. Our findings indicate that the potential risks associated with moving plants between sites with different environmental conditions are not likely to cause negative outcomes for restoration projects using this species, which is commonly used for restoration in southern Australia.
Progress in Oceanography | 2014
Alice R. Jones; Phil Hosegood; Russell B. Wynn; M.N. De Boer; S. Butler-Cowdry; Clare B. Embling
Biological Conservation | 2015
Rhiannon Meier; Russell B. Wynn; Stephen C. Votier; Miguel McMinn Grivé; Ana Rodriguez; L. Maurice; E. Emiel van Loon; Alice R. Jones; Lavinia Suberg; José Manuel Arcos; Greg Morgan; Simon A. Josey; Tim Guilford
Methods in Oceanography | 2014
Lavinia Suberg; Russell B. Wynn; Jeroen van der Kooij; Liam Fernand; Sophie Fielding; Damien Guihen; Douglas Gillespie; Mark Johnson; Kalliopi Gkikopoulou; Ian Allan; Branislav Vrana; Peter I. Miller; David A. Smeed; Alice R. Jones
Endangered Species Research | 2014
Alice R. Jones; Russell B. Wynn; Pierre Yésou; Laurent Thébault; Philip Collins; Lavinia Suberg; Kate M. Lewis; Tom Brereton
Trends in Ecology and Evolution | 2018
K.L. Yates; Phil J. Bouchet; M. Julian Caley; Kerrie Mengersen; Christophe F. Randin; Stephen Parnell; Alan H. Fielding; Andrew J. Bamford; Stephen Ban; A. Márcia Barbosa; Carsten F. Dormann; Jane Elith; Clare B. Embling; Gary N. Ervin; Rebecca Fisher; Susan F. Gould; Roland F. Graf; Edward J. Gregr; Patrick N. Halpin; Risto K. Heikkinen; Stefan Heinänen; Alice R. Jones; Periyadan K. Krishnakumar; Valentina Lauria; Hector M. Lozano-Montes; Laura Mannocci; Camille Mellin; Mohsen B. Mesgaran; Elena Moreno-Amat; Sophie Mormede