Allan R. Glanville

INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR THE SELECTION OF LUNG TRANSPLANT CANDIDATES

12. Paris W, Muchmore J, Pribil A, Zuhdi N, Cooper DK. Study of the relative incidences of psychosocial factors before and after transplantation and the influence of posttransplantation psychosocial factors on heart transplantation outcome. J Heart Lung Transplant 1994; 13: 424. 13. Chacko RC, Harper RG, Kunik M, Young J. Relationship of psychiatric morbidity and psychosocial factors in organ transplant candidates. Psychosomatics 1996; 37: 100. 14. Frazier P, et al. Correlates of non-compliance among renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 1994; 8: 550. 15. Chacko RC, Harper RG, Gotto J, Young J. Psychiatric interview and psychometric predictors of cardiac transplant survival. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153: 1607. 16. Twillmann RK, Manetto C, Wellisch DK, Wolcott DL. The transplant evaluation rating scale: a revision of the psychosocial levels system for evaluating organ transplant candidates. Psychosomatics 1993; 34: 144. 17. Olbrisch ME, Levenson JL, Hamer R. The PACT: a rating scale for the study of clinical decision-making in psychosocial screening of organ transplant candidates. Clin Transplant 1989; 3: 164. 18. Hecker J, Norvell N, Hills H. Psychologic assessment of candidates for heart transplantation: toward a normative data base. J Heart Transplant 1989; 8(2): 171. 19. Levenson JL, Olbrisch ME. Psychosocial evaluation of organ transplant candidates: a comparative survey of process, criteria, and outcomes in heart, liver, and kidney transplantation. Psychosomatics 1993; 34(4): 314.

A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014--an update from the Pulmonary Transplantation Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

The appropriate selection of lung transplant recipients is an important determinant of outcomes. This consensus document is an update of the recipient selection guidelines published in 2006. The Pulmonary Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) organized a Writing Committee of international experts to provide consensus opinion regarding the appropriate timing of referral and listing of candidates for lung transplantation. A comprehensive search of the medical literature was conducted with the assistance of a medical librarian. Writing Committee members were assigned specific topics to research and discuss. The Chairs of the Writing Committee were responsible for evaluating the completeness of the literature search, providing editorial support for the manuscript, and organizing group discussions regarding its content. The consensus document makes specific recommendations regarding the timing of referral and of listing for lung transplantation. These recommendations include discussions not present in previous ISHLT guidelines, including lung allocation scores, bridging to transplant with mechanical circulatory and ventilator support, and expanded indications for lung transplantation. In the absence of high-grade evidence to support decision making, these consensus guidelines remain part of a continuum of expert opinion based on available studies and personal experience. Some positions are immutable. Although transplant is rightly a treatment of last resort for end-stage lung disease, early referral allows proper evaluation and thorough patient education. Subsequent waiting list activation implies a tacit agreement that transplant offers a significant individual survival advantage. It is both the challenge and the responsibility of the transplant community globally to ensure organ allocation maximizes the potential benefits of a scarce resource, thereby achieving that advantage.

A review of lung transplant donor acceptability criteria

Abstract (A consensus report from The Pulmonary Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation)

A new classification system for chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Although survival after lung transplantation has improved significantly during the last decade, chronic rejection is thought to be the major cause of late mortality. The physiologic hallmark of chronic rejection has been a persistent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second associated with an obstructive ventilatory defect, for which the term bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) was defined to allow a uniformity of description and grading of severity throughout the world. Although BOS was generally thought to be irreversible, recent evidence suggests that some patients with BOS may respond to azithromycin with > 10% improvement in their forced expiratory volume in 1 second. In addition, a restrictive form of chronic rejection has recently been described that does not fit the strict definition of BOS as an obstructive defect. Hence, the term chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has been introduced to cover all forms of graft dysfunction, but CLAD has yet to be defined. We propose a definition of CLAD and a flow chart that may facilitate recognition of the different phenotypes of CLAD that can complicate the clinical course of lung transplant recipients.

RNA Interference Therapy in Lung Transplant Patients Infected with Respiratory Syncytial Virus

RATIONALE Lower respiratory tract infections due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are associated with development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in lung transplant (LTX) recipients. ALN-RSV01 is a small interfering RNA targeting RSV replication. OBJECTIVES To determine the safety and explore the efficacy of ALN-RSV01 in RSV infection. METHODS We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in LTX recipients with RSV respiratory tract infection. Patients were permitted to receive standard of care for RSV. Aerosolized ALN-RSV01 (0.6 mg/kg) or placebo was administered daily for 3 days. Viral load was determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction on serial nasal swabs. Patients completed symptom score cards twice daily. Lung function, including the incidence of new-onset or progressive bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, was recorded at Day 90. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS We enrolled 24 patients (ALN-RSV01, n = 16; placebo, n = 8); randomization was stratified by ribavirin use. ALN-RSV01 was well tolerated, with no drug-related serious adverse events or post-inhalation perturbations in lung function. Interpretation of viral measures was confounded by baseline differences between the two groups in viral load and time from symptom onset to first dose. Mean daily symptom scores were lower in subjects receiving ALN-RSV01, and the mean cumulative daily total symptom score was significantly lower with ALN-RSV01 (114.7 ± 63.13 vs. 189.3 ± 99.59, P = 0.035). At Day 90, incidence of new or progressive bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was significantly reduced in ALN-RSV01 recipients compared with placebo (6.3% vs. 50%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS ALN-RSV01 was safe and may have beneficial effects on long-term allograft function in LTX patients infected with RSV. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00658086).

An international ISHLT/ATS/ERS clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a major complication of lung transplantation that is associated with poor survival. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society convened a committee of international experts to describe and/or provide recommendations for 1) the definition of BOS, 2) the risk factors for developing BOS, 3) the diagnosis of BOS, and 4) the management and prevention of BOS. A pragmatic evidence synthesis was performed to identify all unique citations related to BOS published from 1980 through to March, 2013. The expert committee discussed the available research evidence upon which the updated definition of BOS, identified risk factors and recommendations are based. The committee followed the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to develop specific clinical recommendations. The term BOS should be used to describe a delayed allograft dysfunction with persistent decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s that is not caused by other known and potentially reversible causes of post-transplant loss of lung function. The committee formulated specific recommendations about the use of systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azithromycin and about re-transplantation in patients with suspected and confirmed BOS. The diagnosis of BOS requires the careful exclusion of other post-transplant complications that can cause delayed lung allograft dysfunction, and several risk factors have been identified that have a significant association with the onset of BOS. Currently available therapies have not been proven to result in significant benefit in the prevention or treatment of BOS. Adequately designed and executed randomised controlled trials that properly measure and report all patient-important outcomes are needed to identify optimal therapies for established BOS and effective strategies for its prevention. Diagnosis of BOS requires careful exclusion of other complications that can cause delayed lung allograft dysfunction http://ow.ly/AZmbr

Macitentan for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the randomised controlled MUSIC trial

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a progressive, fatal disease. This prospective, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase II trial (NCT00903331) investigated the efficacy and safety of the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eligible subjects were adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis of <3 years duration and a histological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia on surgical lung biopsy. The primary objective was to demonstrate that macitentan (10 mg once daily) positively affected forced vital capacity versus placebo. Using a centralised system, 178 subjects were randomised (2:1) to macitentan (n=119) or placebo (n=59). The median change from baseline up to month 12 in forced vital capacity was -0.20 L in the macitentan arm and -0.20 L in the placebo arm. Overall, no differences between treatments were observed in pulmonary function tests or time to disease worsening or death. Median exposures to macitentan and placebo were 14.5 months and 15.0 months, respectively. Alanine and/or aspartate aminotransferase elevations over three times upper limit of normal arose in 3.4% of macitentan-treated subjects and 5.1% of placebo recipients. In conclusion, the primary objective was not met. Long-term exposure to macitentan was well tolerated with a similar, low incidence of elevated hepatic aminotransferases in each treatment group. Long-term exposure to macitentan was well tolerated in IPF in a trial that did not meet its primary end-point http://ow.ly/p0RDL

Prospective analysis of 1,235 transbronchial lung biopsies in lung transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE Fiber-optic bronchoscopy with multiple transbronchial lung biopsies (TBB) is the gold standard of evaluation of the pulmonary allograft post-lung transplantation (LT). However, controversy exists regarding the need for surveillance procedures and number of biopsy specimens required for satisfactory yield. The potential morbidity in obtaining multiple TBB specimens remains poorly described. We report the largest series of TBB in LT recipients to date, highlighting the occurrence of acute rejection and infection for surveillance and diagnostic procedures. The safety of TBB is analyzed and a biopsy schedule proposed. METHODS Prospective analysis of 1,235 TBB in 230 LT recipients performed at St Vincents Hospital from January 1995 to June 2000. RESULTS Eight hundred thirty-six (67.7%) TBB were performed as surveillance and 399 (32.3%) for a clinical indication. No significant acute rejection (AR) or infection was disclosed in 53.3% of procedures. The Lung Rejection Study Group requirement of at least five pieces of evaluable lung parenchyma was achieved in 98.2% of procedures. The average number of evaluable fragments per procedure was 6.4, whereas only 3 TBB (0.24%) contained no lung parenchyma and 44 (3.6%) no bronchial wall. Histologic features of AR, lymphocytic bronchiolitis or infection were found in 18.9% of surveillance and 86.4% of clinical TBBs. The yield of surveillance procedures between 4 and 12 months was just 1.1% for cytomegalovirus and 6.1% for AR. The overall complication rate was 6.35% with no deaths recorded. CONCLUSION Taking 10 to 12 TBB specimens has a high diagnostic yield and rarely fails to provide adequate tissue. The role of surveillance procedures post-lung transplantation remains controversial.

Severity of Lymphocytic Bronchiolitis Predicts Long-Term Outcome after Lung Transplantation

RATIONALE Severe and recurrent acute vascular rejection of the pulmonary allograft is an accepted major risk factor for obliterative bronchiolitis. OBJECTIVES We assessed the role of lymphocytic bronchiolitis as a risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and death after lung transplantation. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 341 90-day survivors of lung transplant performed in 1995-2005 who underwent 1,770 transbronchial lung biopsy procedures. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Transbronchial biopsies showed grade B0 (normal) (n = 501), B1 (minimal) (n = 762), B2 (mild) (n = 176), B3 (moderate) (n = 70), B4 (severe) (n = 4) lymphocytic bronchiolitis, and Bx (no bronchiolar tissue) (n = 75). A total of 182 transbronchial biopsies were ungraded (8 inadequate, 142 cytomegalovirus, 32 other diagnoses). Lung transplant recipients were grouped by highest B grade before diagnosis of BOS: B0 (n = 12), B1 (n = 166), B2 (n = 89), and B3-B4 (n = 51). Twenty-three were unclassifiable. Cumulative incidence of BOS and death were dependent on highest B grade (Kaplan-Meier, P < 0.001, log-rank). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed significant risks for BOS were highest B grade (relative risk [RR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-2.00) (P < 0.001), longer ischemic time (RR, 1.00; CI, 1.00-1.00) (P < 0.05), and recent year of transplant (RR, 0.93; CI, 0.87-1.00) (P < 0.05), whereas risks for death were BOS as a time-dependent covariable (RR, 19.10; CI, 11.07-32.96) (P < 0.001) and highest B grade (RR, 1.36; CI, 1.07-1.72) (P < 0.05). Acute vascular rejection was not a significant risk factor in either model. CONCLUSIONS Severity of lymphocytic bronchiolitis is associated with increased risk of BOS and death after lung transplantation independent of acute vascular rejection.

Obliterative Bronchiolitis After Heart-Lung Transplantation: Apparent Arrest by Augmented Immunosuppression

Obliterative bronchiolitis has been the major complication in long-term survivors of human heart-lung transplantation at our institution. We have assessed the effect of the introduction of a third immunosuppressive agent, azathioprine, on the rate of decline in airflow variables in eight heart-lung transplant recipients with obliterative bronchiolitis, and have compared this rate with that in five patients who did not receive augmented immunosuppressive therapy. Specifically, the rate of decline in forced expiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of vital capacity improved considerably after institution of this therapy (-5.25 +/- 2.85 compared with -0.27 +/- 0.66 [mean +/- SD]; p less than 0.005), whereas the effect on the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity was more modest (-3.61 +/- 1.52 compared with -0.54 +/- 0.93; p less than 0.005). The rate of decline in airflow variables was similar in both groups before the institution of therapy with azathioprine. These results show that augmented immunosuppressive therapy is capable of slowing the rate of progression of obliterative bronchiolitis in this population; they also suggest that the obliterative bronchiolitis may represent a form of chronic pulmonary allograft rejection.