Christina L. Aboyoun

Prospective analysis of 1,235 transbronchial lung biopsies in lung transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE Fiber-optic bronchoscopy with multiple transbronchial lung biopsies (TBB) is the gold standard of evaluation of the pulmonary allograft post-lung transplantation (LT). However, controversy exists regarding the need for surveillance procedures and number of biopsy specimens required for satisfactory yield. The potential morbidity in obtaining multiple TBB specimens remains poorly described. We report the largest series of TBB in LT recipients to date, highlighting the occurrence of acute rejection and infection for surveillance and diagnostic procedures. The safety of TBB is analyzed and a biopsy schedule proposed. METHODS Prospective analysis of 1,235 TBB in 230 LT recipients performed at St Vincents Hospital from January 1995 to June 2000. RESULTS Eight hundred thirty-six (67.7%) TBB were performed as surveillance and 399 (32.3%) for a clinical indication. No significant acute rejection (AR) or infection was disclosed in 53.3% of procedures. The Lung Rejection Study Group requirement of at least five pieces of evaluable lung parenchyma was achieved in 98.2% of procedures. The average number of evaluable fragments per procedure was 6.4, whereas only 3 TBB (0.24%) contained no lung parenchyma and 44 (3.6%) no bronchial wall. Histologic features of AR, lymphocytic bronchiolitis or infection were found in 18.9% of surveillance and 86.4% of clinical TBBs. The yield of surveillance procedures between 4 and 12 months was just 1.1% for cytomegalovirus and 6.1% for AR. The overall complication rate was 6.35% with no deaths recorded. CONCLUSION Taking 10 to 12 TBB specimens has a high diagnostic yield and rarely fails to provide adequate tissue. The role of surveillance procedures post-lung transplantation remains controversial.

Severity of Lymphocytic Bronchiolitis Predicts Long-Term Outcome after Lung Transplantation

RATIONALE Severe and recurrent acute vascular rejection of the pulmonary allograft is an accepted major risk factor for obliterative bronchiolitis. OBJECTIVES We assessed the role of lymphocytic bronchiolitis as a risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and death after lung transplantation. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 341 90-day survivors of lung transplant performed in 1995-2005 who underwent 1,770 transbronchial lung biopsy procedures. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Transbronchial biopsies showed grade B0 (normal) (n = 501), B1 (minimal) (n = 762), B2 (mild) (n = 176), B3 (moderate) (n = 70), B4 (severe) (n = 4) lymphocytic bronchiolitis, and Bx (no bronchiolar tissue) (n = 75). A total of 182 transbronchial biopsies were ungraded (8 inadequate, 142 cytomegalovirus, 32 other diagnoses). Lung transplant recipients were grouped by highest B grade before diagnosis of BOS: B0 (n = 12), B1 (n = 166), B2 (n = 89), and B3-B4 (n = 51). Twenty-three were unclassifiable. Cumulative incidence of BOS and death were dependent on highest B grade (Kaplan-Meier, P < 0.001, log-rank). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed significant risks for BOS were highest B grade (relative risk [RR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-2.00) (P < 0.001), longer ischemic time (RR, 1.00; CI, 1.00-1.00) (P < 0.05), and recent year of transplant (RR, 0.93; CI, 0.87-1.00) (P < 0.05), whereas risks for death were BOS as a time-dependent covariable (RR, 19.10; CI, 11.07-32.96) (P < 0.001) and highest B grade (RR, 1.36; CI, 1.07-1.72) (P < 0.05). Acute vascular rejection was not a significant risk factor in either model. CONCLUSIONS Severity of lymphocytic bronchiolitis is associated with increased risk of BOS and death after lung transplantation independent of acute vascular rejection.

Tolerability and efficacy of carvedilol in patients with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess the tolerability and efficacy of carvedilol in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV symptoms. BACKGROUND Carvedilol, a nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking drug with alpha-adrenergic blocking and antioxidant properties, has been shown to improve left ventricular function and clinical outcome in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 230 patients with heart failure treated with carvedilol who were stratified according to baseline functional class: 63 patients were NYHA class IV and 167 were NYHA class I, II or III. Carvedilol was commenced at 3.125 mg b.i.d. and titrated to 25 mg b.i.d. as tolerated. Patients with class IV symptoms were older (p = 0.03), had lower left ventricular fractional shortening (p < 0.001), had lower six-min walk distance (p < 0.001) and were receiving more heart failure medications at baseline compared with less symptomatic patients. RESULTS Nonfatal adverse events while taking carvedilol occurred more frequently in class IV patients (43% vs. 24%, p < 0.0001), and more often resulted in permanent withdrawal of the drug (25% vs. 13%, p < 0.01). Thirty-seven (59%) patients who were NYHA class IV at baseline had improved by one or more functional class at 3 months, 8 (13%) were unchanged and 18 (29%) had deteriorated or died. Among the less symptomatic group, 62 (37%) patients had improved their NYHA status at 3 months, 73 (44%) were unchanged and 32 (19%) had deteriorated or died. The differences in symptomatic outcome at three months between the two groups were statistically significant (p = 0.001, chi-square analysis). Both groups demonstrated similar significant improvements in left ventricular dimensions and systolic function. CONCLUSIONS Patients with chronic NYHA class IV heart failure are more likely to develop adverse events during initiation and dose titration when compared with less symptomatic patients but are more likely to show symptomatic improvement in the long term. We conclude that carvedilol is a useful adjunctive therapy for patients with NYHA class IV heart failure; however, they require close observation during initiation and titration of the drug.

Efficacy and safety of pravastatin vs simvastatin after cardiac transplantation

Prior studies of cardiac transplant recipients have shown that pravastatin reduces 12-month rejection and mortality after cardiac transplantation and simvastatin reduces 4-year mortality, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, and intimal thickening. In a 12-month observational study, cardiac transplant recipients received open-label pravastatin 40 mg (n = 42) or simvastatin 20 mg daily (n = 45) on an alternating basis from the time of transplantation. Lipid levels, safety, and post-transplant outcomes were compared. We found no significant differences in total LDL or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, linearized infection or rejection rates, liver function tests, or immunosuppressant dosages between groups at 1, 3, 6, or 12 months. Rhabdomyolysis or myositis occurred only in patients on simvastatin (n = 6, 13.3%) with no episodes for patients on pravastatin (p = 0. 032). Survival at 12 months on an actual treatment basis was 97.6% for patients on pravastatin and 83.7% for those on simvastatin (p = 0.078). Immunosuppression-related deaths occurred in only 2.4% (1 patient) on pravastatin vs 15.6% (n = 7) on simvastatin (p = 0.06). Pravastatin and simvastatin resulted in comparable lipid profiles. Pravastatin use was however free from the high rates of rhabdomyolysis and myositis seen with simvastatin use. Pravastatin was additionally associated with a trend toward superior survival, attributable to fewer immunosuppression-related deaths. For safety and pharmacokinetic reasons, pravastatin should be considered the statin of choice after heart transplantation.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the lung: A consensus report of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a recognized cause of allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. Unlike AMR in other solid-organ transplant recipients, there are no standardized diagnostic criteria or an agreed-upon definition. Hence, a working group was created by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation with the aim of determining criteria for pulmonary AMR and establishing a definition. Diagnostic criteria and a working consensus definition were established. Key diagnostic criteria include the presence of antibodies directed toward donor human leukocyte antigens and characteristic lung histology with or without evidence of complement 4d within the graft. Exclusion of other causes of allograft dysfunction increases confidence in the diagnosis but is not essential. Pulmonary AMR may be clinical (allograft dysfunction which can be asymptomatic) or sub-clinical (normal allograft function). This consensus definition will have clinical, therapeutic and research implications.

Tacrolimus and cyclosporine have differential effects on the risk of development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: Results of a prospective, randomized international trial in lung transplantation

BACKGROUND Chronic lung allograft dysfunction, which manifests as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), is recognized as the primary cause of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. In this study we assessed the efficacy and safety of two de novo immunosuppression protocols to prevent BOS. METHODS Our study approach was a multicenter, prospective, randomized (1:1) open-label superiority investigation of de novo tacrolimus vs cyclosporine, with both study arms given mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone after lung transplantation. Cytolytic induction therapy was not employed. Patients were stratified at entry for cystic fibrosis. Primary outcome was incidence of BOS 3 years after transplant (intention-to-treat analysis). Secondary outcomes were survival and incidence of acute rejection, infection and other adverse events. RESULTS Group demographic data were well matched: 110 of 124 tacrolimus vs 74 of 125 cyclosporine patients were treated per protocol (p < 0.01 by chi-square test). Cumulative incidence of BOS Grade ≥1 at 3 years was 11.6% (tacrolimus) vs 21.3% (cyclosporine) (cumulative incidence curves, p = 0.037 by Grays test, pooled over strata). Univariate proportional sub-distribution hazards regression confirmed cyclosporine as a risk for BOS (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.77, p = 0.039). Three-year cumulative incidence of acute rejection was 67.4% (tacrolimus) vs 74.9% (cyclosporine) (p = 0.118 by Grays test). One- and 3-year survival rates were 84.6% and 78.7% (tacrolimus) vs 88.6% and 82.8% (cyclosporine) (p = 0.382 by log-rank test). Cumulative infection rates were similar (p = 0.91), but there was a trend toward new-onset renal failure with tacrolimus (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS Compared with cyclosporine, de novo tacrolimus use was found to be associated with a significantly reduced risk for BOS Grade ≥1 at 3 years despite a similar rate of acute rejection. However, no survival advantage was detected.

Lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at St Vincent's Hospital

Background: Lung transplantation (LTx) offers selected patients with end‐stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) an improved quality of life and possibly enhanced survival.

Sleep-disordered Breathing Before and After Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in patients with severe chronic respiratory failure, but there are no data describing the prevalence of SDB among patients listed for lung transplantation or the effect of transplantation on SDB. We sought to determine the prevalence and impact of SDB before and after lung transplantation. METHODS We performed polysomnography (PSG) on 117 of 183 (64%) consecutive patients (64 males, 53 females) listed for lung transplantation between 1998 and 2001. SDB was defined as respiratory disturbance index (RDI) >or=10 or an awake oxygen saturation >90% and >or=10% of total sleep time (TST) with oxygen saturation (SaO2) <or=90%. Room-air PSG was repeated post-transplant in 25 subjects. RESULTS Eighty of 117 patients had PSG on room air, 30 of 117 on oxygen and 7 of 117 on non-invasive ventilation. Thirty two of 80 patients (40%) with room-air PSG had SDB: 18 of 32 (56%) had >or=10% of TST with SaO2 <or=90% and RDI <10, and 14 of 32 (44%) had RDI >or=10. Eight of 32 had both >or=10% of TST with SaO2 <or=90% and RDI >or=10. Nine of 30 (30%) patients on oxygen and 1 of 7 on NIV had SDB. Post-transplant, SDB resolved in 6 of 11 patients with the condition, but 4 of 14 without previous SDB developed new SDB. SDB (treated or not) did not influence whether patients survived to transplant (p = 0.8), nor did a diagnosis of SBD prior to transplant influence post-transplant survival (p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS SDB is common before lung transplantation. Lung transplantation improves oxygenation, but new-onset SDB may occur after the procedure.

Three-year results of an investigator-driven multicenter, international, randomized open-label de novo trial to prevent BOS after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), predominantly manifest as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), is the primary cause of morbidity and death after lung transplantation. We assessed the efficacy and safety of 2 de novo immunosuppression protocols to prevent BOS. METHODS This was a multicenter, prospective, international, randomized (1:1) open-label superiority study of de novo enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (MPS) vs delayed-onset everolimus (RAD), both arms in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) monitored by 2-hour post-dose (C2) levels, and corticosteroids. Target C2 levels were lower in the RAD group because RAD is known to potentiate CsA nephrotoxicity. Cytolytic induction therapy was not used. Patients were stratified at entry for cystic fibrosis. Confirmation of anastomotic healing was required for randomization. Primary efficacy was freedom from BOS Grade 1 on intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Secondary efficacy parameters were patient and graft survival and severity of rejection. Treatment failure was defined by graft loss, patient death, drug cessation, or need for other therapy. RESULTS The 3-year freedom from BOS Grade 1 was 70% for MPS (n = 80) vs 71% for RAD (n = 84; p = 0.95 by log-rank) in ITT but was lower in the RAD arm of the per-protocol population (p = 0.03). The 3-year survival was 84% (MPS) vs 76% (RAD; p = 0.19 by log-rank). Thirteen patients switched from MPS vs 31 from RAD (p < 0.01). Days on MPS were greater than days on RAD (p < 0.01). Rejection events proven by biopsy specimen were more common on MPS (p = 0.02), as were leucopenia (p < 0.01), diarrhea (p < 0.01), and cytomegalovirus infection (p = 0.04). Venous thromboembolism was more frequent on RAD (p = 0.02). Creatinine at 3 years was 160 ± 112 μmol/1iter in MPS patients vs 152 ± 98 μmol/1iter in RAD patients (p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS This 3-year ITT analysis found no significant difference between arms but was underpowered to accept the null hypothesis that RAD and MPS have equivalent efficacy in preventing BOS or death after lung transplantation.

Sedative drug requirements during bronchoscopy are higher in cystic fibrosis after lung transplantation.

Background. We noted that patients with cystic fibrosis tended to need higher doses of sedatives during bronchoscopy. We undertook this study to assess the sedative drug doses administered during bronchoscopy in lung transplant recipients and to assess if there is a change in the dosage requirements over time following lung transplantation. Methods. In all, 773 transbronchial biopsy procedures performed via flexible bronchoscopy were analyzed in 140 consecutive lung transplant recipients. Conscious sedation was achieved with intermittent boluses of intravenous midazolam and fentanyl. Intravenous propofol boluses of 10 to 30 mg were administered when optimal sedation was not achieved with midazolam doses of 0.20 to 0.25 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 to 2.5 micrograms/kg. Results. Mean doses of midazolam and fentanyl administered were 0.15±0.07 mg/kg (range 0.02 to 0.44 mg/kg) and 1.8±0.8 micrograms/kg (range 0.1 to 6.67 micrograms/kg) respectively. Midazolam and fentanyl doses administered to patients with cystic fibrosis were the highest compared to those with other disease types (P<0.0001). Examining the sedative doses administered over time following transplantation, there was a significant linear (P<0.001) and quadratic (P=0.0023) effect of time for midazolam and a significant linear (P=0.003) and a trend (P=0.08) for a quadratic effect for fentanyl. Propofol was effectively used in seven lung transplant recipients in whom adequate sedation could not be achieved with high doses of midazolam and fentanyl. Conclusions. There is an increase in sedative drug requirement with time for both midazolam and fentanyl after transplantation, which is significantly higher in patients with cystic fibrosis.