Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alyssa H. Rosemartin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alyssa H. Rosemartin.


International Journal of Biometeorology | 2014

Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plant and animal activity for science and resource management applications

Ellen G. Denny; Katharine L. Gerst; Abraham J. Miller-Rushing; Geraldine L. Tierney; Theresa M. Crimmins; Carolyn A. F. Enquist; Patricia Guertin; Alyssa H. Rosemartin; Mark D. Schwartz; Kathryn A. Thomas; Jake F. Weltzin

Phenology offers critical insights into the responses of species to climate change; shifts in species’ phenologies can result in disruptions to the ecosystem processes and services upon which human livelihood depends. To better detect such shifts, scientists need long-term phenological records covering many taxa and across a broad geographic distribution. To date, phenological observation efforts across the USA have been geographically limited and have used different methods, making comparisons across sites and species difficult. To facilitate coordinated cross-site, cross-species, and geographically extensive phenological monitoring across the nation, the USA National Phenology Network has developed in situ monitoring protocols standardized across taxonomic groups and ecosystem types for terrestrial, freshwater, and marine plant and animal taxa. The protocols include elements that allow enhanced detection and description of phenological responses, including assessment of phenological “status”, or the ability to track presence–absence of a particular phenophase, as well as standards for documenting the degree to which phenological activity is expressed in terms of intensity or abundance. Data collected by this method can be integrated with historical phenology data sets, enabling the development of databases for spatial and temporal assessment of changes in status and trends of disparate organisms. To build a common, spatially, and temporally extensive multi-taxa phenological data set available for a variety of research and science applications, we encourage scientists, resources managers, and others conducting ecological monitoring or research to consider utilization of these standardized protocols for tracking the seasonal activity of plants and animals.


Scientific Data | 2015

Lilac and honeysuckle phenology data 1956-2014

Alyssa H. Rosemartin; Ellen G. Denny; Jake F. Weltzin; R. Lee Marsh; Bruce E. Wilson; Hamed Mehdipoor; R. Zurita-Milla; Mark D. Schwartz

The dataset is comprised of leafing and flowering data collected across the continental United States from 1956 to 2014 for purple common lilac (Syringa vulgaris), a cloned lilac cultivar (S. x chinensis ‘Red Rothomagensis’) and two cloned honeysuckle cultivars (Lonicera tatarica ‘Arnold Red’ and L. korolkowii ‘Zabeli’). Applications of this observational dataset range from detecting regional weather patterns to understanding the impacts of global climate change on the onset of spring at the national scale. While minor changes in methods have occurred over time, and some documentation is lacking, outlier analyses identified fewer than 3% of records as unusually early or late. Lilac and honeysuckle phenology data have proven robust in both model development and climatic research.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Developing a Workflow to Identify Inconsistencies in Volunteered Geographic Information: A Phenological Case Study.

Hamed Mehdipoor; R. Zurita-Milla; Alyssa H. Rosemartin; Katharine L. Gerst; Jake F. Weltzin

Recent improvements in online information communication and mobile location-aware technologies have led to the production of large volumes of volunteered geographic information. Widespread, large-scale efforts by volunteers to collect data can inform and drive scientific advances in diverse fields, including ecology and climatology. Traditional workflows to check the quality of such volunteered information can be costly and time consuming as they heavily rely on human interventions. However, identifying factors that can influence data quality, such as inconsistency, is crucial when these data are used in modeling and decision-making frameworks. Recently developed workflows use simple statistical approaches that assume that the majority of the information is consistent. However, this assumption is not generalizable, and ignores underlying geographic and environmental contextual variability that may explain apparent inconsistencies. Here we describe an automated workflow to check inconsistency based on the availability of contextual environmental information for sampling locations. The workflow consists of three steps: (1) dimensionality reduction to facilitate further analysis and interpretation of results, (2) model-based clustering to group observations according to their contextual conditions, and (3) identification of inconsistent observations within each cluster. The workflow was applied to volunteered observations of flowering in common and cloned lilac plants (Syringa vulgaris and Syringa x chinensis) in the United States for the period 1980 to 2013. About 97% of the observations for both common and cloned lilacs were flagged as consistent, indicating that volunteers provided reliable information for this case study. Relative to the original dataset, the exclusion of inconsistent observations changed the apparent rate of change in lilac bloom dates by two days per decade, indicating the importance of inconsistency checking as a key step in data quality assessment for volunteered geographic information. Initiatives that leverage volunteered geographic information can adapt this workflow to improve the quality of their datasets and the robustness of their scientific analyses.


International Journal of Biometeorology | 2016

Estimating the onset of spring from a complex phenology database: trade-offs across geographic scales

Katharine L. Gerst; Jherime L. Kellermann; Carolyn A. F. Enquist; Alyssa H. Rosemartin; Ellen G. Denny

Phenology is an important indicator of ecological response to climate change. Yet, phenological responses are highly variable among species and biogeographic regions. Recent monitoring initiatives have generated large phenological datasets comprised of observations from both professionals and volunteers. Because the observation frequency is often variable, there is uncertainty associated with estimating the timing of phenological activity. “Status monitoring” is an approach that focuses on recording observations throughout the full development of life cycle stages rather than only first dates in order to quantify uncertainty in generating phenological metrics, such as onset dates or duration. However, methods for using status data and calculating phenological metrics are not standardized. To understand how data selection criteria affect onset estimates of springtime leaf-out, we used status-based monitoring data curated by the USA National Phenology Network for 11 deciduous tree species in the eastern USA between 2009 and 2013. We asked, (1) How are estimates of the date of leaf-out onset, at the site and regional levels, influenced by different data selection criteria and methods for calculating onset, and (2) at the regional level, how does the timing of leaf-out relate to springtime minimum temperatures across latitudes and species? Results indicate that, to answer research questions at site to landscape levels, data users may need to apply more restrictive data selection criteria to increase confidence in calculating phenological metrics. However, when answering questions at the regional level, such as when investigating spatiotemporal patterns across a latitudinal gradient, there is low risk of acquiring erroneous results by maximizing sample size when using status-derived phenological data.


Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union | 2012

Identifying and prioritizing phenological data products and tools

Carolyn A. F. Enquist; Alyssa H. Rosemartin; Mark D. Schwartz

USA National Phenology Network Research Coordination Network Meeting; Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 22–23 May 2012 Phenology is the study of reoccurring life cycle events in plants and animals, such as bird migrations, emergence from hibernation, flowering, and carbon cycling. Changes in the timing of phenological events are widely recognized as indicators of the effects of climate change on ecosystems. Phenological data can be used to inform wildlife management, wildfire and pollen forecasting, and the planning of events such as the National Cherry Blossom Festival. Until recently, collection of phenological data using standardized methods was relatively rare, limiting their use in science, management, and decision making.


PLOS ONE | 2017

USA National Phenology Network’s volunteer-contributed observations yield predictive models of phenological transitions

Theresa M. Crimmins; Michael A. Crimmins; Katharine L. Gerst; Alyssa H. Rosemartin; Jake F. Weltzin

Purpose In support of science and society, the USA National Phenology Network (USA-NPN) maintains a rapidly growing, continental-scale, species-rich dataset of plant and animal phenology observations that with over 10 million records is the largest such database in the United States. The aim of this study was to explore the potential that exists in the broad and rich volunteer-collected dataset maintained by the USA-NPN for constructing models predicting the timing of phenological transition across species’ ranges within the continental United States. Contributed voluntarily by professional and citizen scientists, these opportunistically collected observations are characterized by spatial clustering, inconsistent spatial and temporal sampling, and short temporal depth (2009-present). Whether data exhibiting such limitations can be used to develop predictive models appropriate for use across large geographic regions has not yet been explored. Methods We constructed predictive models for phenophases that are the most abundant in the database and also relevant to management applications for all species with available data, regardless of plant growth habit, location, geographic extent, or temporal depth of the observations. We implemented a very basic model formulation—thermal time models with a fixed start date. Results Sufficient data were available to construct 107 individual species × phenophase models. Remarkably, given the limited temporal depth of this dataset and the simple modeling approach used, fifteen of these models (14%) met our criteria for model fit and error. The majority of these models represented the “breaking leaf buds” and “leaves” phenophases and represented shrub or tree growth forms. Accumulated growing degree day (GDD) thresholds that emerged ranged from 454 GDDs (Amelanchier canadensis-breaking leaf buds) to 1,300 GDDs (Prunus serotina-open flowers). Such candidate thermal time thresholds can be used to produce real-time and short-term forecast maps of the timing of these phenophase transition. In addition, many of the candidate models that emerged were suitable for use across the majority of the species’ geographic ranges. Real-time and forecast maps of phenophase transitions could support a wide range of natural resource management applications, including invasive plant management, issuing asthma and allergy alerts, and anticipating frost damage for crops in vulnerable states. Implications Our finding that several viable thermal time threshold models that work across the majority of the species ranges could be constructed from the USA-NPN database provides clear evidence that great potential exists this dataset to develop more enhanced predictive models for additional species and phenophases. Further, the candidate models that emerged have immediate utility for supporting a wide range of management applications.


Open-File Report | 2018

Development and release of phenological data products—A case study in compliance with federal open data policy

Alyssa H. Rosemartin; Madison L. Langseth; Theresa M. Crimmins; Jake F. Weltzin

........................................................................................................................................................


Biological Conservation | 2017

Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring

Mark Chandler; Linda See; Kyle Copas; Astrid M.Z. Bonde; Bernat C. López; Finn Danielsen; Jan Kristoffer Legind; Siro Masinde; Abraham J. Miller-Rushing; Greg Newman; Alyssa H. Rosemartin; Eren Turak


Ecosphere | 2016

Climate change is advancing spring onset across the U.S. national park system

William B. Monahan; Alyssa H. Rosemartin; Katharine L. Gerst; Nicholas A. Fisichelli; Toby R. Ault; Mark D. Schwartz; John E. Gross; Jake F. Weltzin


Biological Conservation | 2014

Organizing phenological data resources to inform natural resource conservation

Alyssa H. Rosemartin; Theresa M. Crimmins; Carolyn A. F. Enquist; Katharine L. Gerst; Jherime L. Kellermann; Erin E. Posthumus; Ellen G. Denny; Patricia Guertin; Lee Marsh; Jake F. Weltzin

Collaboration


Dive into the Alyssa H. Rosemartin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jake F. Weltzin

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark D. Schwartz

University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce E. Wilson

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lee Marsh

University of Arizona

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge