Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Amanda Arantes Perez is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Amanda Arantes Perez.


Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | 2003

Heart Rate Turbulence in Chagas Disease

Antonio Luiz; Pinho Ribeiro; Georg Schmidt; Marcos Roberto de Sousa; Federico Lombardi; Murilo E.D. Gomes; Amanda Arantes Perez; Márcio Vinícius Lins Barros; Fernando Santana Machado; Manoel Otávio da Costa Rocha

RIBEIRO, A.L.P., et al.: Heart Rate Turbulence in Chagas Disease. Heart rate turbulence (HRT) quantifies the biphasic response of the sinus node to ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) and is a powerful electrocardiogram related risk predictor. VPCs are frequent in Chagas disease, a potentially lethal illness, and can hamper the analysis by conventional methods of autonomic heart control. The aim of the study was to examine HRT in patients with Chagas disease. Chagas disease patients and healthy controls (group 0, n = 11 ) without other diseases were submitted to a standardized protocol, including electrocardiogram, echocardiography, and 24‐hour Holter monitoring. Chagas disease patients were divided according to their left ventricular systolic function: normal (group 1, n = 103 ) and reduced ejection fraction (group 2, n = 23 ). Two HRT indices, turbulence onset (TO) and turbulence slope (TS), were calculated and compared among groups after adjustment for covariates like the prevalence of VPCs and the mean heart rate. Chagas disease patients had significantly altered TO (group 1: −0.0186, group 2: −0.0126) and TS (group 1: 10.844, group 2: 7.870) values in comparison with controls (TO − 0.0256, TS 19.829); P < 0.001 for both comparisons. In conclusion, HRT data may be useful in the electrocardiographic analysis of autonomic heart control in Chagas disease. Its prognostic value remains to be determined. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:406–410)


Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry | 2015

Co-Expression of p16, Ki67 and COX-2 Is Associated with Basal Phenotype in High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.

Amanda Arantes Perez; Débora Balabram; Rafael Malagoli Rocha; Átila da Silva Souza; Helenice Gobbi

We assessed the co-expression of cell cycle-related biomarkers in a series of 121 consecutive cases of high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), pure or associated with invasive carcinoma, and their associations with the different immunoprofiles of DCIS. Cases were identified from the histopathology files of the Breast Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, from 2003 to 2008. The expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2 overexpression, cytokeratin 5, epidermal growth factor receptor 1, cyclooxygenase-2, p16 and Ki67 were assessed. Tumors were placed into five subgroups according to their immunohistochemical profile: luminal A, luminal B, HER2, basal-like and “not classified”. We found that the basal phenotype was associated with a higher frequency of p16-positive cases (83%) and the luminal A phenotype showed a higher frequency of p16-negative cases (93%; p=0.000). The association of biomarkers p16+/Ki67+/COX2+ was expressed in 02/06 cases (33.3%) of the basal phenotype but in only 01/70 cases (1.4%) of the luminal A phenotype (p=0.01). The co-expression of p16+/Ki67+/COX2- was associated with a basal phenotype (p=0.004). P16 expression, p16+/Ki67+/COX2+ and p16+/Ki67+/COX2- co-expression showed significant associations with the basal phenotype and these profiles could be used to guide more aggressive treatment strategies in patients with high-grade DCIS.


Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia | 2008

Importância da segunda opinião em patologia cirúrgica mamária e suas implicações terapêuticas

Marcio de Almeida Salles; Fernanda Squárcio Fernandes Sanches; Amanda Arantes Perez; Helenice Gobbi

PURPOSE: to evaluate the agreement between histopathologic diagnoses of breast lesions made by general pathologists and by a specialist in breast pathology. METHODS: a cohort retrospective study comparing histopathologic diagnoses of 329 cases of breast lesions received in consultation for a second opinion was carried out. The material received for consultation included slides (152 cases), paraffin blocks (59 cases) or slides and blocks (118 cases). Cases were reviewed and the original diagnoses and diagnoses from a specialist in breast pathology were compared. The main diagnoses, nuclear grade of ductal carcinoma in situ, and the histopathologic grade of invasive mammary carcinomas were evaluated. The kappa index and percentual concordance were used in the statistical analyses. RESULTS: a moderate agreement was observed between the original histopathologic diagnoses and the second opinion (kappa index=0.48; percentual concordance=59.9%). The diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed in 185/225 cases (82.2%) and diagnosis of benign lesions was confirmed in 89/104 cases (85.6%). The highest agreement was observed in the diagnosis of invasive mammary carcinomas (81%) and the highest disagreement was observed among diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (74%), lobular carcinoma in situ (70%), and atypical epithelial hyperplasias (61%). There was a moderate agreement in the nuclear grade of ductal carcinoma in situ (kappa index=0.52; percentual concordance=68.8%), and good concordance in the histologic grade of invasive carcinomas (kappa index=0.61; percentual concordance=74.3). CONCLUSIONS: the results show higher concordance rate in the diagnosis of invasive carcinomas and lower concordance in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion and premalignant breast lesions, especially lobular neoplasia in situ, and atypical epithelial hyperplasias.


Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia | 2013

Consultoria em patologia cirúrgica mamária: variabilidade interobservador no diagnóstico de lesões proliferativas intraductais atípicas

Amanda Arantes Perez; Débora Balabram; Marcio de Almeida Salles; Helenice Gobbi

PURPOSE To evaluate the agreement about the histopathological diagnosis of intraductal proliferative breast lesions between general pathologists and a specialist in breast pathology. METHODS This was an observational, cross-sectional study of 209 lesions received in consultation at the Breast Pathology Laboratory of the School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, from 2007 to 2011, comparing the original diagnosis and the review. We included only cases with a formal request for review and cases in which the original diagnosis or reviewers diagnosis showed proliferative lesions, pure ductal carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ associated with microinvasion or associated with invasive carcinoma. The kappa index and percent concordance were used in the statistical analyses. RESULTS A moderate agreement was observed between the original histopathological diagnosis and the second opinion (kappa=0.5; percentual concordance=83%). After the review, the diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed in 140/163 cases (86%) and the diagnosis of benign lesions was confirmed in 34/46 cases (74%). Regarding specific diagnosis, we observed moderate agreement between the original diagnosis and the reviewers diagnosis (136/209 cases; kappa=0.5; percent concordance=65%). The highest disagreement was observed in cases of ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (6/6 cases; 100%). Important discordance was observed in cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia (16/30 cases; 53%) and ductal carcinoma in situ (25/75 cases; 33%). Regarding the histological grade of ductal carcinoma in situ, we observed good agreement between the original diagnosis and the review (29/39 cases; kappa=0.6, percent agreement=74%). CONCLUSION Our data confirm that intraductal proliferative breast lesions, especially atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ and ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion show relevant discrepancies in the histopathological diagnoses, which may induce errors in therapeutic decisions.


Jornal Brasileiro De Patologia E Medicina Laboratorial | 2009

Contribuição da imuno-histoquímica na avaliação de fatores prognósticos e preditivos do câncer de mama e no diagnóstico de lesões mamárias

Marcio de Almeida Salles; Vinícius Silva Cúrcio; Amanda Arantes Perez; Douglas S Gomes; Helenice Gobbi

OBJETIVO: Fazer analise critica da contribuicao da imuno-histoquimica na avaliacao de fatores preditivos/prognosticos do câncer de mama, na pesquisa de micrometastases em linfonodos sentinela e no diagnostico diferencial de lesoes mamarias. METODOS: Foi realizado estudo observacional retrospectivo de todos os casos de lesoes mamarias e linfonodos sentinelas submetidas a estudo imuno-histoquimico no Laboratorio de Patologia Mamaria da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) entre 2001 e 2007. Os casos foram classificados de acordo com a indicacao do estudo imuno-histoquimico em tres categorias: avaliacao de fatores preditivos/prognosticos, pesquisa de celulas epiteliais metastaticas em linfonodos sentinela e definicao diagnostica. RESULTADOS: Foram realizados exames imuno-histoquimicos de 1.294 casos, totalizando 4.101 reacoes com 21 anticorpos diferentes. Na maioria dos casos, a imuno-histoquimica foi realizada para avaliacao de fatores preditivos/prognosticos (1.106 casos, 85,5%), seguido de pesquisa de celulas epiteliais metastaticas em linfonodos sentinelas (134 casos, 10,6%) e diagnostico diferencial de lesoes mamarias (51 casos, 3,9%). Obtiveram-se reacoes de boa qualidade com importante contribuicao do estudo imuno-histoquimico em 1.247 casos (96,4%). Em 47 casos (3,6%), o resultado foi inconclusivo devido a problemas de fixacao (autolise) da fase pre-analitica. CONCLUSAO: Nossos dados confirmam ser o estudo imuno-histoquimico importante ferramenta para avaliacao de fatores preditivos e prognosticos do câncer de mama, pesquisa de micrometastases em linfonodos sentinelas e diagnostico diferencial de lesoes mamarias. A maior utilizacao da imuno-histoquimica foi para avaliacao de fatores preditivos e prognosticos do câncer de mama.


Clinics | 2013

Immunohistochemical profile of high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Amanda Arantes Perez; Rafael Malagoli Rocha; Débora Balabram; Átila da Silva Souza; Helenice Gobbi

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of the immunohistochemical profiles of a series of high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one cases of high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ, pure or associated with invasive mammary carcinoma, were identified from 2003 to 2008 and examined with immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, cytokeratin 5, and epidermal growth factor receptor. The tumors were placed into five subgroups: luminal A, luminal B, HER2, basal-like, and “not classified”. RESULTS: The frequencies of the immunophenotypes of pure ductal carcinoma in situ were the following: luminal A (24/42 cases; 57.1%), luminal B (05/42 cases; 11.9%), HER2 (07/42 cases; 16.7%), basal-like phenotype (00/42 cases; 0%), and “not classified” (06/42 cases; 14.3%). The immunophenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ associated with invasive carcinoma were the following: luminal A (46/79 cases; 58.2%), luminal B (10/79 cases; 12.7%), HER2 (06/79 cases; 7.6%), basal-like (06/79 cases; 7.6%), and “not classified” (11/79 cases; 13.9%). There was no significant difference in the immunophenotype frequencies between pure ductal carcinoma in situ and ductal carcinoma in situ associated with invasive carcinoma (p>0.05). High agreement was observed in immunophenotypes between both components (kappa = 0.867). CONCLUSION: The most common immunophenotype of pure ductal carcinoma in situ was luminal A, followed by HER2. The basal-like phenotype was observed only in ductal carcinoma in situ associated with invasive carcinoma, which had a similar phenotype.


Diagnostic Pathology | 2014

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between histopathological features and age of patients

Amanda Arantes Perez; Débora Balabram; Marcio de Almeida Salles; Helenice Gobbi

BackgroundThe histopathological subtype, nuclear grade and presence or absence of comedonecrosis are established as critical elements in the reporting of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. The aims of this study were to determine the frequencies of morphological subtypes of DCIS, nuclear grade and comedonecrosis; to compare the age of patients with the histopathological characteristics of DCIS, and to assess the agreement of grade between in situ and invasive components in DCIS cases that were associated with invasive carcinoma.MethodsWe evaluated a series of 403 cases of DCIS, pure or associated with invasive mammary carcinoma, consecutively identified from the histopathology files of the Breast Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, from 2003 to 2008.ResultsDCIS displayed a single growth pattern in most cases (55.1%) and the solid subtype was the most common morphology (42.2% of the total). High-grade DCIS was identified in 293/403 cases (72.7%) and comedonecrosis was present in 222/403 cases (55%). Among DCIS with a single architectural pattern, high grade was more common in the solid subtype (151/168 cases, 89.9%; p < 0.001). Only 32% of tumours with a cribriform pattern had high nuclear grade. Comedonecrosis was more common in the solid morphology than in the cribriform, papillary and micropapillary subtypes (p < 0.001). Patients with high-grade DCIS were younger in relation to patients with low-grade DCIS (p = 0.027) and patients with tumours with comedonecrosis were also younger in comparison to patients with tumours without comedonecrosis (p = 0.003). Fair agreement was observed between in situ and invasive components with regard to grade (weighted kappa = 0.23).ConclusionsThe high nuclear grade and the presence of comedonecrosis were identified more frequently in younger patients and more often correlated with the solid pattern of DCIS.Virtual SlidesThe virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/13000_2014_227


Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia | 2006

Carcinoma ductal in situ da mama: critérios para diagnóstico e abordagem em hospitais públicos de Belo Horizonte

Marcio de Almeida Salles; Marco Antonio Rodrigues Freire Matias; Amanda Arantes Perez; Helenice Gobbi

PURPOSE: to evaluate the clinical, radiological therapeutic and anatomo-pathological aspects in a series of patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), attended in three public hospitals in Belo Horizonte (MG). METHODS: 179 cases of DCIS, that were selected from all the patients who had been diagnosed with breast cancer between 1985 and 2000, were studied retrospectively. After reviewing all the tissue sections, it was possible to collect all the clinical data, mammogram and treatment information of 85 cases. RESULTS: most patients were not symptomatic and the diagnosis had been done by mammogram (68.2%), being the microcalcification the most common radiological alteration. There has been a progressive increase in the diagnosis of DCIS along the years, following the introduction of periodical mammographic screening. The initial histopathological diagnosis and the review agreed in 72.9% of cases. In three cases, the original diagnosis of DCIS was not confirmed, being classified as atypical hyperplasia. Mammogram microcalcifications were confirmed in the pathological analysis in 95.6% of cases. Half of the patients was treated with mastectomy. All lymph nodes from axillary dissection were negative for metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is in agreement with the recent literature, which shows an increase in the diagnosis of DCIS since 1990. There has been a great interobserver variation since the initial pathological diagnosis, which tended to malignancy and the present review. There were a great number of radical treatments, such as mastectomy and axillary dissection, which would probably be replaced by conservative treatment and sentinel lymph node biopsy nowadays, according to recent knowledge.


The Lancet | 2002

Brain natriuretic peptide and left ventricular dysfunction in Chagas' disease

Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro; Adelina M. Reis; Márcio Vinícius Lins Barros; Marcos Roberto de Sousa; Ana Luiza Lunardi Rocha; Amanda Arantes Perez; Jacqueline Braga Pereira; Fernando Santana Machado; Manoel Otávio da Costa Rocha


International Journal of Cardiology | 2006

Brain natriuretic peptide based strategy to detect left ventricular dysfunction in Chagas disease: A comparison with the conventional approach ☆

Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro; Mauro M. Teixeira; Adelina M. Reis; André Talvani; Amanda Arantes Perez; Márcio Vinícius Lins Barros; Manoel Otávio da Costa Rocha

Collaboration


Dive into the Amanda Arantes Perez's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helenice Gobbi

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marcio de Almeida Salles

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marcos Roberto de Sousa

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Débora Balabram

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fernando Santana Machado

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Manoel Otávio da Costa Rocha

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Márcio Vinícius Lins Barros

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonio Luiz

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pinho Ribeiro

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge