Amanda Oakley
Waikato Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Amanda Oakley.
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare | 2000
Amanda Oakley; P Kerr; Mark Duffill; Marius Rademaker; P Fleischl; N Bradford
As part of a randomized controlled trial of the costs and benefits of realtime teledermatology in comparison with conventional face-to-face appointments, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire at the end of their consultation. One hundred and nine patients took part in an initial teledermatology consultation and 94 in a face-to-face consultation. The proportion of patients followed up by the dermatologist was almost the same after teledermatology 24 as after a hospital appointment 26 and for similar reasons. Two hundred and three questionnaires were completed after the first visit and a further 20 after subsequent visits. Patients seen by teledermatology at their own health centre travelled an average of 12 km, whereas those who attended a conventional clinic travelled an average of 271 km. The telemedicine group spent an average of 51 min attending the appointment compared with 4.3 h for those seen at the hospital. The results of the present study, as in a similar study conducted in Northern Ireland, show that the economic benefits of teledermatology favour the patient rather than the health-care system.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2009
Eugene Tan; Anthony Yung; M. Jameson; Amanda Oakley; Marius Rademaker
Background Teledermatology is a rapidly growing field with studies showing high diagnostic accuracy when compared with face‐to‐face diagnosis. Teledermoscopy involves the use of epiluminescence microscopy to increase diagnostic accuracy. The utility of teledermoscopy as a triage tool has not been established.
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare | 2001
M A Loane; Amanda Oakley; Marius Rademaker; N Bradford; P Fleischl; P Kerr; Richard Wootton
A randomized controlled trial was carried out to measure the societal costs of realtime teledermatology compared with those of conventional hospital care in New Zealand. Two rural health centres were linked to a specialist hospital via ISDN at 128 kbit/s. Over 10 months, 203 patients were referred for a specialist dermatological consultation and 26 were followed up, giving a total of 229 consultations. Fifty-four per cent were randomized to the teledermatology consultation and 46% to the conventional hospital consultation. A cost-minimization analysis was used to calculate the total costs of both types of dermatological consultation. The total cost of the 123 teledermatology consultations was NZ
Australasian Journal of Dermatology | 2000
Anthony Yung; Amanda Oakley
34,346 and the total cost of the 106 conventional hospital consultations was NZ
Australasian Journal of Dermatology | 2007
Susan Simpkin; Amanda Oakley
30,081. The average societal cost of the teledermatology consultation was therefore NZ
Australasian Journal of Dermatology | 2012
David Lim; Amanda Oakley; Marius Rademaker
279.23 compared with NZ
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare | 2006
Amanda Oakley; Felicity Reeves; Jane Bennett; Stephen H Holmes; Hadley Wickham
283.79 for the conventional hospital consultation. The marginal cost of seeing an additional patient was NZ
Australasian Journal of Dermatology | 1996
Amanda Oakley
135 via teledermatology and NZ
Australasian Journal of Dermatology | 1996
Amanda Oakley
284 via conventional hospital appointment. From a societal viewpoint, and assuming an equal outcome, teledermatology was a more cost-efficient use of resources than conventional hospital care.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2010
Eugene Tan; Amanda Oakley; H. P. Soyer; M. Haskett; Ashfaq A. Marghoob; M. Jameson; Marius Rademaker
A 19‐year‐old woman with a 6 month history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) developed a widespread urticated, erythematous eruption associated with tense, fluid‐filled blisters, erosions and crusting. Biopsy showed subepidermal blistering with a prominent neutrophilic infiltrate. Direct immunofluorescence showed markedly positive granular IgG deposition with weak IgM, IgA and C3 at the dermo‐ epidermal junction. No circulating antibodies were detected on indirect immunofluorescence. A diagnosis of bullous systemic erythematosus was made. Treatment with prednisone was ineffective. Subsequent treatment with dapsone led to rapid sustained remission of skin symptoms. Bullous SLE is a rare manifestation of SLE. We review the recent literature and discuss the distinctive features of this condition and contrast them with cutaneous SLE with blisters and the subepidermal blistering disorders.