Ambrosano Gm

Effect of preheating resin composite and light-curing units on the microleakage of Class II restorations submitted to thermocycling.

This in vitro study evaluated microleakage in Class II cavities restored with dental composite and varying light-curing units and the temperature of the composite when subjected to a thermocycling test. Ninety cavities were prepared on the proximal surfaces of bovine teeth and randomly divided according to the light-curing mode (QTH-420 mW/cm2, LED 2nd generation-1100 mW/cm2, or LED 3rd generation-700 mW/cm2) and temperature of the resin composite (23°C, 54°C and 60°C). Following the restorative procedures and thermocycling, the samples were immersed in methylene blue for 12 hours. The samples were ground and the powder prepared for analysis in an absorbance spectrophotometer. All the results were statistically analyzed using the nonparametric tests of Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn (p ≤ 0.05). The results showed that there was no statistical difference between the light-curing modes at a temperature of 23°C. For 54°C, QTH showed a microleakage mean that was significantly lower than those of the LED groups, and for 60°C, QTH had a microleakage mean significantly lower than that of the LED 2nd generation group. There was no statistical difference between the temperatures of the resin composite when LEDs were used. For QTH, 54°C showed statistically lower microleakage than 23°C. The group preheated to 60°C showed no difference when compared to the group heated to 23°C. Preheating the resin composite (54°C and 60°C) did not improve the microleakage means when high-irradiance LED was used; however, it decreased the microleakage means when a QTH with low irradiance was used.

Effect of surface sealants on microleakage of Class II restorations after thermocycling and long-term water storage.

PURPOSE To evaluate interface degradation leading to marginal microleakeage in Class II restorations that had received an application of surface sealant at the tooth/restoration interface or not. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty bovine incisors were used, and the teeth were split obliquely, 10 mm from the amelodentinal proximal junction, and finished with water abrasive papers to obtain a smooth, flat incisal surface. Cavities were made to simulate Class II preparations (8 mm high, 4 mm wide and 1.5 mm deep), and the restorations were performed with a composite resin. Teeth were then randomly allocated into 8 groups according to the surface sealant (none, Fortify, Single Bond 2, or Scothbond MP Plus) and aging process (none or thermocycling and storage for 6 months). Microleakage was then evaluated using a dye penetration method immediately after the restoration or after aging. The samples were triturated and assessed by spectrophotometer. RESULTS Microleakage was statistically similar in all groups when assessed immediately after the restorative procedure. After aging, teeth sealed with Fortify presented better results than the other groups. CONCLUSION Aging causes interface degradation and increased microleakage. Surface sealant can reduce these effects and decrease microleakage in Class II restorations.