Amir Ansaripour

The Drug Reimbursement Decision-Making System in Iran

BACKGROUND Previous studies of health policies in Iran have not focused exclusively on the drug reimbursement process. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe the entire drug reimbursement process and the stakeholders, and discuss issues faced by policymakers. METHODS Review of documents describing the administrative rules and directives of stakeholders, supplemented by published statistics and interviews with experts and policymakers. RESULTS Iran has a systematic process for the assessment, appraisal, and judgment of drug reimbursements. The two most important organizations in this process are the Food and Drug Organization, which considers clinical effectiveness, safety, and economic issues, and the Supreme Council of Health Insurance, which considers various criteria, including budget impact and cost-effectiveness. Ultimately, the Iranian Cabinet approves a drug and recommends its use to all health insurance organizations. Reimbursed drugs account for about 53.5% of all available drugs and 77.3% of drug expenditures. Despite its strengths, the system faces various issues, including conflicting stakeholder aims, lengthy decision-making duration, limited access to decision-making details, and rigidity in the assessment process. CONCLUSIONS The Iranian drug reimbursement system uses decision-making criteria and a structured approach similar to those in other countries. Important shortcomings in the system include out-of-pocket contributions due to lengthy decision making, lack of transparency, and conflicting interests among stakeholders. Iranian policymakers should consider a number of ways to remedy these problems, such as case studies of individual drugs and closer examination of experiences in other countries.

Use of data-mining to support real-world cost analyses: An example using HER2-positive breast cancer in Iran

Introduction Patient registries play an important role in obtaining real-world evidence of the cost-effectiveness of treatments. However, their implementation is costly and sometimes infeasible in many middle-income countries (MICs). We explored the combination of data-mining and a large claims database to estimate the direct healthcare costs of HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) treatment in Iran and the fraction of total costs from trastuzumab use. Method We performed a retrospective analysis of claims data from the Iran Social Security Organization, a health insurer which covers approximately 50%(~40 million) of the Iranian population, in the period of 21/03/2011-20/03/2014. A data-mining algorithm using R software and validated using patient dossiers in the Cancer Research Center identified 1295 patients and divided them into the three main HER2-positive breast cancer stages (early, loco-regional and advanced). A payer perspective was used to calculate the absolute and relative direct costs of healthcare services associated with the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer in the public and private healthcare systems. Results The number of women totaled 802 (early), 125 (loco-regional) and 218 (advanced). The mean age[SD] was 45[10], 46[10] and 48[10] years, respectively, while mean follow-up in all stages was approximately one year. Average costs of direct healthcare care in early, loco-regional and advanced stages were €11,796 (95%CI: €9,356-€12,498), €8,253 (95%CI: €6,843-€10,002), and €17,742 (95%CI: €15,720-€19,505), respectively. Trastuzumab accounted for the largest share of total costs in all three stages (range: 53–76%). Conclusion Wherever comprehensive patient registries are infeasible or costly, real-world costs can be estimated through claims databases and data-mining strategies. Using this method, real-world costs have been estimated in Iran. The stage-specific cost estimates derived from this study can be used to perform real-world cost-effectiveness analyses of therapies for HER2-positive BC and support healthcare financing decisions.

The cost–effectiveness of blue-light therapy in the treatment of mild-to-moderate psoriasis

AIM To investigate the cost-effectiveness of blue-light therapy versus a two-compound formulation (TCF) (Dovobet® gel [calcipotriol and betamethasone]) in mild-to-moderate psoriasis. METHODS A Markov model was applied to describe the course of disease among Dutch patients with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score ≤ 10 over a 52-week time horizon. Patients received either 12-week blue-light therapy or two 4-week treatments with TCF. Patients, experiencing no PASI reduction after either therapy, were assumed to receive 12-week ultraviolet B phototherapy. RESULTS There was no significant difference in PASI reduction between two interventions (71 vs 72%). However, blue-light therapy was associated with a cost savings of EU€248. CONCLUSION Treatment of mild-to-moderate chronic plaque psoriasis using blue-light therapy may be more cost-effective than TCF.