Amit P. Desai

Older age is associated with higher rate of discontinuation of anti‐TNF therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Background:In increasingly aging populations, awareness of outcomes of older patients treated with biologics is becoming more important. However, few studies to date have investigated the safety and durability of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in this subgroup. Methods:This was a retrospective single-center study with cases comprising all IBD patients who began anti-TNF treatment at age >60 years. Cases of Crohns disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were identified from medical record review. Our controls consisted of patients younger than age 60 years on anti-TNF treatment and patients >60 years on treatment with immunomodulators. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates were used to calculate the probability of remaining on anti-TNF therapy. Results:We identified a total of 54 IBD patients who initiated anti-TNF therapy over the age of 60 years (mean 73, range 61–97 years). Among these, a total of 38 patients (70%) discontinued anti-TNF therapy after a mean of 24.1 months. At 12 months after initiation, 75% of patients older than age 60 years were still on anti-TNF agents compared to 93% among younger users and 82% among older AZA users (P < 0.05). Compared to older AZA users, older anti-TNF users remained more likely to require early therapy cessation (hazard ratio 2.21, 95% confidence interval 1.29–3.78). Conclusions:The IBD population older than age 60 at the time of initiation of anti-TNF therapy is at higher risk for discontinuation of therapy. They may also be particularly vulnerable to infectious complications requiring hospitalization, suggesting the need for careful monitoring during therapy.

Management of pancreatic fluid collections: A comprehensive review of the literature

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are a frequent complication of pancreatitis. It is important to classify PFCs to guide management. The revised Atlanta criteria classifies PFCs as acute or chronic, with chronic fluid collections subdivided into pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Establishing adequate nutritional support is an essential step in the management of PFCs. Early attempts at oral feeding can be trialed in patients with mild pancreatitis. Enteral feeding should be implemented in patients with moderate to severe pancreatitis. Jejunal feeding remains the preferred route of enteral nutrition. Symptomatic PFCs require drainage; options include surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic approaches. With the advent of newer and more advanced endoscopic tools and expertise, and an associated reduction in health care costs, minimally invasive endoscopic drainage has become the preferable approach. An endoscopic ultrasonography-guided approach using a seldinger technique is the preferred endoscopic approach. Both plastic stents and metal stents are efficacious and safe; however, metal stents may offer an advantage, especially in infected pseudocysts and in WOPN. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy is often required in WOPN. Lumen apposing metal stents that allow for direct endoscopic necrosectomy and debridement through the stent lumen are preferred in these patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography with pancreatic duct (PD) exploration should be performed concurrent to PFC drainage. PD disruption is associated with an increased severity of pancreatitis, an increased risk of recurrent attacks of pancreatitis and long-term complications, and a decreased rate of PFC resolution after drainage. Any pancreatic ductal disruption should be bridged with endoscopic stenting.

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Significantly Reduces Body Mass Index and Metabolic Complications in Obese Patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an incisionless, minimally invasive bariatric procedure that reduces the length and width of the gastric cavity to facilitate weight loss. We performed a prospective study to evaluate the effects of ESG on total body weight loss and obesity‐related comorbidities. METHODS We collected data from 91 consecutive patients (mean age, 43.86 ± 11.26 years; 68% female) undergoing ESG from August 2013 through March 2016. All patients had a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2 and had failed noninvasive weight‐loss measures or had a BMI greater than 40 kg/m2 and were not considered as surgical candidates or refused surgery. All procedures were performed with a cap‐based flexible endoscopic suturing system to facilitate a triangular pattern of sutures to imbricate the greater curvature of the stomach. Patients were evaluated after 6 months (n = 73), 12 months (n = 53), and 24 months (n = 12) for anthropometric features (BMI, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure) and underwent serologic (hemoglobin A1c), lipid panel, serum triglycerides, and liver function tests. The primary outcomes were total body weight loss at 6, 12, and 24 months. Secondary outcomes were the effects of ESG on metabolic factors (blood pressure, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, steatohepatitis) and safety. RESULTS The patients’ mean BMI before the procedure was 40.7 ± 7.0 kg/m2. Patients had lost 14.4% of their total body weight at 6 months (80% follow‐up rate), 17.6% at 12 months (76% follow‐up rate), and 20.9% at 24 months (66% follow‐up rate) after ESG. At 12 months after ESG, patients had statistically significant reductions in levels of hemoglobin A1c (P = .01), systolic blood pressure (P = .02), waist circumference (P < .001), alanine aminotransferase (P < .001), and serum triglycerides (P = .02). However, there was no significant change in low‐density lipoprotein after vs before ESG (P = .79). There was one serious adverse event (1.1%) (perigastric leak) that occurred that was managed non‐operatively. CONCLUSIONS ESG is a minimally invasive and effective endoscopic weight loss intervention. In addition to sustained total body weight loss up to 24 months, ESG reduced markers of hypertension, diabetes, and hypertriglyceridemia.

Endoscopic suturing for the prevention of stent migration in benign upper gastrointestinal conditions: a comparative multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) have increasingly been used in benign upper gastrointestinal (UGI) conditions; however, stent migration remains a major limitation. Endoscopic suture fixation (ESF) may prevent stent migration. The aims of this study were to compare the frequency of stent migration in patients who received endoscopic suturing for stent fixation (ESF group) compared with those who did not (NSF group) and to assess the impact of ESF on clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent FCSEMS placement for benign UGI diseases. Patients were divided into either the NSF or ESF group. Outcome variables, including stent migration, clinical success (resolution of underlying pathology), and adverse events, were compared. RESULTS A total of 125 patients (44 in ESF group, 81 in NSF group; 56 benign strictures, 69 leaks/fistulas/perforations) underwent 224 stenting procedures. Stent migration was significantly more common in the NSF group (33 % vs. 16 %; P = 0.03). Time to stent migration was longer in the ESF group (P = 0.02). ESF appeared to protect against stent migration in patients with a history of stent migration (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.09; P = 0.002). ESF was also significantly associated with a higher rate of clinical success (60 % vs. 38 %; P = 0.03). Rates of adverse events were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic suturing for stent fixation is safe and associated with a decreased migration rate, particularly in patients with a prior history of stent migration. It may also improve clinical response, likely because of the reduction in stent migration.

Eus-guided Versus Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage: Isn’t It Time to Convert?

Background and Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound–guided drainage (EUS-GLB) is a minimally invasive option for patients with cholecystitis who are poor surgical candidates. Compared with percutaneous drainage (PC-GLB), earlier studies have demonstrated similar efficacy with improved quality of life. We present a multicenter, international experience comparing PC-GLB and EUS-GLB in nonsurgical patients with cholecystitis. Methods: All patients who underwent either PC-GLB drainage or EUS-GLB drainage from 7 centers between January 2010 and December 2015 were included. Technical success was defined as successful placement of a catheter or stent into the gallbladder. Clinical success was defined as resolution of clinical symptoms after intervention. Adverse events, length of stay, and the need for repeat interventions and/or hospitalizations were recorded for all patients. Results: A total of 155 patients were included (mean age 74±14.24 y; range, 31 to 96; 56% male). Forty-two patients underwent EUS-GLB and 113 patients underwent PC-GLB. Technical success was achieved in 40 patients (95%) in the EUS-GLB group and 112 patients (99%) in the PC-GLB group (P=0.179). Clinical success was achieved in 40 patients (95%) in the EUS-GLB group and 97 patients (86%) in the PC-GLB group (P=0.157). There was no difference in hospital readmission rates between the 2 groups (14% vs. 24%; P=0.194). However, there was significantly higher number of patients requiring repeat interventions in the PC-GLB group (n=28, 24%) compared with the EUS-GLB group (n=4, 10%) (P=0.037). There was no difference in adverse events between the 2 groups. Conclusions: EUS-GLB is safe and efficacious, with comparable technical and clinical success rates and no difference in adverse events. In addition, EUS-GLB offers a potential cost-saving benefit and morbidity benefit by demonstrating a decreased number of repeat interventions.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy as salvation technique post‐Heller: International experience

Treatment for achalasia has traditionally been Heller myotomy (HM). Despite its excellent efficacy rate, a number of patients remain symptomatic post‐procedure. Limited data exist as to the best management for recurrence of symptoms post‐HM. We present an international, multicenter experience evaluating the efficacy and safety of post‐HM peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

EUS-guided Gastrojejunostomy Versus Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy: An International Collaborative Study

Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound–guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) with placement of a lumen-apposing metal stent is a minimally invasive and efficacious procedure for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) patients not amenable to surgery. Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (Lap-GJ) has traditionally been the standard of care. No direct comparison between EUS-GJ and Lap-GJ has been described. Our aim was to compare the clinical outcomes, success rate, and adverse events (AE) of EUS-GJ with Lap-GJ. Methods: Patients with GOO from 4 academic centers in 3 countries were included. Technical success was defined as successful creation of a gastrojejunostomy. Clinical success was defined as the ability to tolerate a diet postprocedure. Results: Data were collected on 54 patients. A total of 25 patients underwent EUS-GJ (male n=11, mean age 63.9 y) and 29 patients underwent Lap-GJ (male n=22, mean age 75.8 y). Technical success was achieved in 29 (100%) Lap-GJ group patients and 23 (88%) in the EUS-GJ group (P=0.11). AEs occurred in 41% (n=12) of patients in the Lap-GJ group and 12% (n=3) in the EUS-GJ group (P=0.0386). According to the Clavien-Dindo Classification, the Lap-GJ group AEs were grade I (n=4), grade II (n=5), grade III (n=2), and grade V (n=1); the EUS-GJ AEs were grade II (n=2) and grade V (n=1). Conclusions: Although the EUS-GJ group contained more complex patients, efficacy was similar between the groups. AEs were significantly lower in the EUS-GJ group. EUS-GJ is a safe and efficacious, minimally invasive option for patients with GOO.

Fully-covered metal stents with endoscopic suturing vs. partially-covered metal stents for benign upper gastrointestinal diseases: a comparative study

Background and study aims  Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have been increasingly used in benign conditions (e. g. strictures, fistulas, leaks, and perforations). Fully covered SEMS (FSEMS) were introduced to avoid undesirable consequences of partially covered SEMS (PSEMS), but come with higher risk of stent migration. Endoscopic suturing (ES) for stent fixation has been shown to reduce migration of FSEMS. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of FSEMS with ES (FS/ES) versus PSEMS in patients with benign upper gastrointestinal conditions. Patients and methods  We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent stent placement for benign gastrointestinal conditions at seven US tertiary-care centers. Patients were divided into two groups: FSEMS with ES (FS/ES group) and PSEMS (PSEMS group). Clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results  A total of 74 (FS/ES 46, PSEMS 28) patients were included. On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in rate of stent migration between FS/ES (43 %) and PSEMS (15 %) (adjusted odds ratio 0.56; 95 % CI 0.15 – 2.00). Clinical success was similar [68 % vs. 64 %; P  = 0.81]. Rate of adverse events (AEs) was higher in PSEMS group [13 (46 %) vs. 10 (21 %); P  = 0.03). Difficult stent removal was higher in the PSEMS group (n = 5;17 %) vs. 0 % in the FS/ES group; P  = 0.005. Conclusions  The proportion of stent migration of FS/ES and PSEMS are similar. Rates of other stent-related AEs were higher in the PSEMS group. PSEMS was associated with tissue ingrowth or overgrowth leading to difficult stent removal, and secondary stricture formation. Thus, FSEMS with ES for stent fixation may be the preferred modality over PSEMS for the treatment of benign upper gastrointestinal conditions.

Becoming an Efficient and Effective Reader of Capsule Endoscopy in Screening and Surveillance of Small Bowel Polyposis Syndromes and Masses

Capsule endoscopy (CE) has become a powerful tool for endoscopic evaluation of the small bowel. This chapter will focus specifically on the use of CE in the identification of small bowel lesions in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and small bowel masses. This chapter will focus on the efficient and effective application of CE in the evaluation and management of patients with small bowel polyposis and masses.

Tu1229 Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia Predicts Postoperative Clinical Success: A Multicenter Case-Control Study

Background: Anorectal manometry is useful in evaluating and planning treatment in patients with fecal incontinence (FI) and other disorders of defecation. Traditional water perfusion techniques are limited to 4 to 8 radial measurements obtained via a pullback technique. Three-dimensional high resolution anorectal manometry (3D HRAM) employs solid state micro transducers and can obtain 257 data points during resting, squeeze, and bear down (simulated defecation) sequences. Data are then reconstructed into a 3D format showing functional anatomy. While differences are known to exist between patients with FI and obstruction, patients with mixed disorders (of FI and obstruction) are less well described Objective: To determine physiologic differences between groups of female patients with FI, obstructed defecation, and mixed disorders. In addition to known parameters of mean resting pressure and maximal squeeze pressure, relationships between rectoanal pressure differential and percent anal relaxation were sought among the groups. Methods Retrospective chart review of 50 female patients undergoing 3D HRAM between 1/1/ 13 and 6/1/14. Physiologic values including mean resting, and maximal squeeze pressures, percent anal relaxation, and rectoanal pressure differential were recorded. Analysis of variance test, and linear regression analysis was performed as appropriate. Results:Women with mixed defecatory disorders had sphincter pressure profiles that were significantly different from patients with pure FI or obstruction (table). While rectoanal pressure differential was not different among the groups, patients with mixed disorders had a significant linear relationship between rectoanal pressure differential and percent anal relaxation that was not seen among the pure FI or obstructed groups (figure). Conclusion: Mixed defecatory disorders are associated with a unique physiologic profile that can be characterized using 3D HRAM. The mixed defecatory group demonstrates relationships between physiologic parameters that are not seen the incontinent or obstructed groups. This data will be helpful in the planning treatment regimens.