Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Amity L. Manning is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Amity L. Manning.


Nature | 2012

A novel retinoblastoma therapy from genomic and epigenetic analyses

Jinghui Zhang; Claudia A. Benavente; Justina McEvoy; Jacqueline Flores-Otero; Li Ding; Xiang Chen; Anatoly Ulyanov; Gang Wu; Matthew W. Wilson; Jianmin Wang; Rachel Brennan; Michael Rusch; Amity L. Manning; Jing Ma; John Easton; Sheila A. Shurtleff; Charles G. Mullighan; Stanley Pounds; Suraj Mukatira; Pankaj Gupta; Geoff Neale; David Zhao; Charles Lu; Robert S. Fulton; Lucinda Fulton; Xin Hong; David J. Dooling; Kerri Ochoa; Clayton W. Naeve; Nicholas J. Dyson

Retinoblastoma is an aggressive childhood cancer of the developing retina that is initiated by the biallelic loss of RB1. Tumours progress very quickly following RB1 inactivation but the underlying mechanism is not known. Here we show that the retinoblastoma genome is stable, but that multiple cancer pathways can be epigenetically deregulated. To identify the mutations that cooperate with RB1 loss, we performed whole-genome sequencing of retinoblastomas. The overall mutational rate was very low; RB1 was the only known cancer gene mutated. We then evaluated the role of RB1 in genome stability and considered non-genetic mechanisms of cancer pathway deregulation. For example, the proto-oncogene SYK is upregulated in retinoblastoma and is required for tumour cell survival. Targeting SYK with a small-molecule inhibitor induced retinoblastoma tumour cell death in vitro and in vivo. Thus, retinoblastomas may develop quickly as a result of the epigenetic deregulation of key cancer pathways as a direct or indirect result of RB1 loss.


Nature Cell Biology | 2009

Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics

Samuel F. Bakhoum; Sarah L. Thompson; Amity L. Manning; Duane A. Compton

Most solid tumours are aneuploid and many frequently mis-segregate chromosomes. This chromosomal instability is commonly caused by persistent mal-oriented attachment of chromosomes to spindle microtubules. Chromosome segregation requires stable microtubule attachment at kinetochores, yet those attachments must be sufficiently dynamic to permit correction of mal-orientations. How this balance is achieved is unknown, and the permissible boundaries of attachment stability versus dynamics essential for genome stability remain poorly understood. Here we show that two microtubule-depolymerizing kinesins, Kif2b and MCAK, stimulate kinetochore–microtubule dynamics during distinct phases of mitosis to correct mal-orientations. Few-fold reductions in kinetochore–microtubule turnover, particularly in early mitosis, induce severe chromosome segregation defects. In addition, we show that stimulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores restores stability to chromosomally unstable tumour cell lines, establishing a causal relationship between deregulation of kinetochore–microtubule dynamics and chromosomal instability. Thus, temporal control of microtubule attachment to chromosomes during mitosis is central to genome stability in human cells.


Molecular Cell | 2010

CRL4Cdt2-Mediated Destruction of the Histone Methyltransferase Set8 Prevents Premature Chromatin Compaction in S Phase

Richard C. Centore; Courtney G. Havens; Amity L. Manning; Ju Mei Li; Rachel Litman Flynn; Alice Tse; Jianping Jin; Nicholas J. Dyson; Johannes C. Walter; Lee Zou

The proper coordination between DNA replication and mitosis during cell-cycle progression is crucial for genomic stability. During G2 and mitosis, Set8 catalyzes monomethylation of histone H4 on lysine 20 (H4K20me1), which promotes chromatin compaction. Set8 levels decline in S phase, but why and how this occurs is unclear. Here, we show that Set8 is targeted for proteolysis in S phase and in response to DNA damage by the E3 ubiquitin ligase, CRL4(Cdt2). Set8 ubiquitylation occurs on chromatin and is coupled to DNA replication via a specific degron in Set8 that binds PCNA. Inactivation of CRL4(Cdt2) leads to Set8 stabilization and aberrant H4K20me1 accumulation in replicating cells. Transient S phase expression of a Set8 mutant lacking the degron promotes premature H4K20me1 accumulation and chromatin compaction, and triggers a checkpoint-mediated G2 arrest. Thus, CRL4(Cdt2)-dependent destruction of Set8 in S phase preserves genome stability by preventing aberrant chromatin compaction during DNA synthesis.


Genes & Development | 2010

Loss of pRB causes centromere dysfunction and chromosomal instability

Amity L. Manning; Michelle S. Longworth; Nicholas J. Dyson

Chromosome instability (CIN) is a common feature of tumor cells. By monitoring chromosome segregation, we show that depletion of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) causes rates of missegregation comparable with those seen in CIN tumor cells. The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor is frequently inactivated in human cancers and is best known for its regulation of the G1/S-phase transition. Recent studies have shown that pRB inactivation also slows mitotic progression and promotes aneuploidy, but reasons for these phenotypes are not well understood. Here we describe the underlying mitotic defects of pRB-deficient cells that cause chromosome missegregation. Analysis of mitotic cells reveals that pRB depletion compromises centromeric localization of CAP-D3/condensin II and chromosome cohesion, leading to an increase in intercentromeric distance and deformation of centromeric structure. These defects promote merotelic attachment, resulting in failure of chromosome congression and an increased propensity for lagging chromosomes following mitotic delay. While complete loss of centromere function or chromosome cohesion would have catastrophic consequences, these more moderate defects allow pRB-deficient cells to proliferate but undermine the fidelity of mitosis, leading to whole-chromosome gains and losses. These observations explain an important consequence of RB1 inactivation, and suggest that subtle defects in centromere function are a frequent source of merotely and CIN in cancer.


Current Biology | 2003

Negative Regulation of Yeast WASp by Two SH3 Domain-Containing Proteins

Avital A. Rodal; Amity L. Manning; Bruce L. Goode; David G. Drubin

BACKGROUND WASp family proteins promote actin filament assembly by activating Arp2/3 complex and are regulated spatially and temporally to assemble specialized actin structures used in diverse cellular processes. Some WASp family members are autoinhibited until bound by activating ligands; however, regulation of the budding yeast WASp homolog (Las17/Bee1) has not yet been explored. RESULTS We isolated full-length Las17 and characterized its biochemical activities on yeast Arp2/3 complex. Purified Las17 was not autoinhibited; in this respect, it is more similar to SCAR/WAVE than to WASp proteins. Las17 was a much stronger activator of Arp2/3 complex than its carboxyl-terminal (WA) fragment. In addition, actin polymerization stimulated by Las17-Arp2/3 was much less sensitive to the inhibitory effects of profilin compared to polymerization stimulated by WA-Arp2/3. Two SH3 domain-containing binding partners of Las17, Sla1 and Bbc1, were purified and were shown to cooperate in inhibiting Las17 activity. The two SLA1 SH3 domains required for this inhibitory activity in vitro were also required in vivo, in combination with BBC1, for cell viability and normal actin organization. CONCLUSIONS Full-length Las17 is not autoinhibited and activates Arp2/3 complex more strongly than its WA domain alone, revealing an important role for the Las17 amino terminus in Arp2/3 complex activation. Two of the SH3 domain-containing ligands of Las17, Sla1 and Bbc1, cooperate to inhibit Las17 activity in vitro and are required for a shared function in actin organization in vivo. Our results show that, like SCAR/WAVE, WASp proteins can be controlled by negative regulation through the combined actions of multiple ligands.


Cell | 2013

KDM4A Lysine Demethylase Induces Site-Specific Copy Gain and Rereplication of Regions Amplified in Tumors

Joshua C. Black; Amity L. Manning; Capucine Van Rechem; Jaegil Kim; Brendon Ladd; Juok Cho; Cristiana M. Pineda; Nancy Murphy; Danette L. Daniels; Cristina Montagna; Peter W. Lewis; Kimberly Glass; C. David Allis; Nicholas J. Dyson; Gad Getz; Johnathan R. Whetstine

Acquired chromosomal instability and copy number alterations are hallmarks of cancer. Enzymes capable of promoting site-specific copy number changes have yet to be identified. Here, we demonstrate that H3K9/36me3 lysine demethylase KDM4A/JMJD2A overexpression leads to localized copy gain of 1q12, 1q21, and Xq13.1 without global chromosome instability. KDM4A-amplified tumors have increased copy gains for these same regions. 1q12h copy gain occurs within a single cell cycle, requires S phase, and is not stable but is regenerated each cell division. Sites with increased copy number are rereplicated and have increased KDM4A, MCM, and DNA polymerase occupancy. Suv39h1/KMT1A or HP1γ overexpression suppresses the copy gain, whereas H3K9/K36 methylation interference promotes gain. Our results demonstrate that overexpression of a chromatin modifier results in site-specific copy gains. This begins to establish how copy number changes could originate during tumorigenesis and demonstrates that transient overexpression of specific chromatin modulators could promote these events.


Nature Reviews Cancer | 2012

RB: mitotic implications of a tumour suppressor

Amity L. Manning; Nicholas J. Dyson

RB, a well known tumour suppressor that functions in the control of cell cycle progression and proliferation, has recently been shown to have additional functions in the maintenance of genomic stability, such that inactivation of RB family proteins promotes chromosome instability (CIN) and aneuploidy. Several studies have provided potential explanations for these phenomena that occur following RB loss, and they suggest that this new function of RB may contribute to its role in tumour suppression.


The EMBO Journal | 2010

CLASP1, astrin and Kif2b form a molecular switch that regulates kinetochore‐microtubule dynamics to promote mitotic progression and fidelity

Amity L. Manning; Samuel F. Bakhoum; Stefano Maffini; Clara Correia-Melo; Helder Maiato; Duane A. Compton

Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis requires precise coordination of various processes, such as chromosome alignment, maturation of proper kinetochore–microtubule (kMT) attachments, correction of erroneous attachments, and silencing of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). How these fundamental aspects of mitosis are coordinately and temporally regulated is poorly understood. In this study, we show that the temporal regulation of kMT attachments by CLASP1, astrin and Kif2b is central to mitotic progression and chromosome segregation fidelity. In early mitosis, a Kif2b–CLASP1 complex is recruited to kinetochores to promote chromosome movement, kMT turnover, correction of attachment errors, and maintenance of SAC signalling. However, during metaphase, this complex is replaced by an astrin–CLASP1 complex, which promotes kMT stability, chromosome alignment, and silencing of the SAC. We show that these two complexes are differentially recruited to kinetochores and are mutually exclusive. We also show that other kinetochore proteins, such as Kif18a, affect kMT attachments and chromosome movement through these proteins. Thus, CLASP1–astrin–Kif2b complex act as a central switch at kinetochores that defines mitotic progression and promotes fidelity by temporally regulating kMT attachments.


Current Biology | 2009

Motor-Independent Targeting of CLASPs to Kinetochores by CENP-E Promotes Microtubule Turnover and Poleward Flux

Stefano Maffini; Ana Maia; Amity L. Manning; Zoltan Maliga; Ana L. Pereira; Magno Junqueira; Andrej Shevchenko; Anthony A. Hyman; John R. Yates; Niels Galjart; Duane A. Compton; Helder Maiato

Efficient chromosome segregation during mitosis relies on the coordinated activity of molecular motors with proteins that regulate kinetochore attachments to dynamic spindle microtubules [1]. CLASPs are conserved kinetochore- and microtubule-associated proteins encoded by two paralog genes, clasp1 and clasp2, and have been previously implicated in the regulation of kinetochore microtubule dynamics [2-4]. However, it remains unknown how CLASPs work in concert with other proteins to form a functional kinetochore microtubule interface. Here we have identified mitotic interactors of human CLASP1 via a proteomic approach. Among these, the microtubule plus-end-directed motor CENP-E [5] was found to form a complex with CLASP1 that colocalizes to multiple structures of the mitotic apparatus in human cells. We found that CENP-E recruits both CLASP1 and CLASP2 to kinetochores independently of its motor activity or the presence of microtubules. Depletion of CLASPs or CENP-E by RNA interference in human cells causes a significant and comparable reduction of kinetochore microtubule poleward flux and turnover rates and rescues spindle bipolarity in Kif2a-depleted cells. We conclude that CENP-E integrates two critical functions that are important for accurate chromosome movement and spindle architecture: one relying directly on its motor activity, and the other involving the targeting of key microtubule regulators to kinetochores.


Trends in Cell Biology | 2011

pRB, a Tumor Suppressor with a Stabilizing Presence

Amity L. Manning; Nicholas J. Dyson

The product of the retinoblastoma tumor-susceptibility gene (RB1) is a key regulator of cell proliferation and this function is thought to be central to its tumor suppressive activity. Several studies have demonstrated that inactivation of pRB not only allows inappropriate proliferation but also undermines mitotic fidelity, leading to genome instability and ploidy changes. Such properties promote tumor evolution and correlate with increased resistance to therapeutics and tumor relapse. These observations suggest that inactivation of pRB could contribute to both tumor initiation and progression. Further characterization of the role of pRB in chromosome segregation will provide insight into processes that are misregulated in human tumors and could reveal new therapeutic targets to kill or stall these chromosomally unstable lesions. We review the evidence that pRB promotes genome stability and discuss the mechanisms that probably contribute to this effect.

Collaboration


Dive into the Amity L. Manning's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Samuel F. Bakhoum

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacqueline A. Lees

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge