Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Amy Gillis is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Amy Gillis.


Postgraduate Medical Journal | 2015

Communication skills assessment in the final postgraduate years to established practice: a systematic review

Amy Gillis; M. Morris; Paul F. Ridgway

Introduction Communication breakdown is a factor in the majority of all instances of medical error. Despite the importance, a relative paucity of time is invested in communication skills in postgraduate curricula. Our objective is to systematically review the literature to identify the current tools used to assess communication skills in postgraduate trainees in the latter 2 years of training and in established practice. Methods Two reviewers independently reviewed the literature identifying communication skill assessment tools, for postgraduate trainees in the latter 2 years of training and in established practice following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework, and inclusion/exclusion criteria from January 1990 to 15 August 2014. Databases: PubMed/CINAHL/ERIC/EMBASE/PsycInfo/Psyc Articles/Cochrane. Results 222 articles were identified; after review, 34 articles fulfilled criteria for complete evaluation; the majority (26) had a high level of evidence scoring 3 or greater on the Best Evidence Medical Education guide. 22 articles used objective structured clinical examination/standardised patient (SP)-based formats in an assessment or training capacity. Evaluation tools included author-developed questionnaires and validated tools. Nineteen articles demonstrated an educational initiative. Conclusions The reviewed literature is heterogeneous for objectives and measurement techniques for communication. Observed interactions, with patients or SPs, is the current favoured method of evaluation using author-developed questionnaires. The role of self-evaluation of skill level is questioned. The need for a validated assessment tool for communication skills is highlighted.


Journal of innovation in health informatics | 2018

Robot Assisted Surgical Ward Rounds: Virtually Always There

Stefanie M. Croghan; Paul Carroll; Sarah Reade; Amy Gillis; Paul F. Ridgway

Background While an explosion in technological sophistication has revolutionised surgery within the operating theatre, delivery of surgical ward-based care has seen little innovation. Use of telepresence allowing offsite clinicians communicate with patients has been largely restricted to outpatient settings or use of complex, expensive and static devices. We designed a prospective study ascertaining feasibility and face validity of a remotely controlled mobile audiovisual drone (LUCY) to access inpatients. This device is, uniquely, lightweight, freely mobile and emulates ‘human’ interaction by swiveling and adjusting height to patients’ eye-level. Methods Robot-assisted ward rounds (RASWRs) were conducted over 3 months. A remotely located consultant surgeon communicated with patients/bedside teams via encrypted audiovisual telepresence robot (DoubleRobotics, Burlingame, CA). Likert-scale satisfaction questionnaires, incorporating free-text sections for mixed-methods data collection, were disseminated to patient and staff volunteers following RASWRs. The same cohort completed a linked questionnaire following conventional (gold-standard) rounds, acting as a control group. Data were paired and non-parametric analysis was performed. Results RASWRs are feasible (>90% completed without technical difficulty). The RASWR (n = 52 observations) demonstrated face validity with strong correlations (r > 0.7; Spearman, p-value < 0.05) between robotic and conventional ward rounds among patients and staff on core themes, including dignity/confidentiality/communication/satisfaction with management plan. Patients (96.08%, n = 25) agreed RASWR were a satisfactory alternative when consultant physical presence was not possible. There was acceptance of nursing/non-consultant hospital doctor cohort [100% (n = 11) willing to regularly partake in RASWR]. Conclusion RASWRs receive high levels of patient and staff acceptance, and offer a valid alternative to conventional ward rounds when a consultant cannot be physically present.


Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development | 2016

Prepared for Practice? Interns’ Experiences of Undergraduate Clinical Skills Training in Ireland

M. Morris; A. O’Neill; Amy Gillis; S. Charania; J. Fitzpatrick; A. Redmond; S. Rosli; Paul F. Ridgway

Background Many previous studies on internship have reported a lack of preparedness for the role. More recently in Ireland, medical schools have introduced formal clinical skills training programmes. This study sought to evaluate the impact, if any, of formal skills training in the medical training on interns preparedness for practice. Methods The study utilized a survey approach followed by focus group discussions. The aim was to identify the skills that were taught and assessed in medical training and the skills that were actually required in their intern year. Results Most interns had received skills training in designated skills laboratories. No intern had received training in all skills advised in the European guidelines. Skills taught to all interns were intravenous cannulation, basic life support, and basic suture. Skills required from all interns were intravenous cannulation, phlebotomy, and arterial blood sampling. Removal of peripherally inserted central line (PICC) lines, central lines, and chest drains were commonly requested but not taught. Senior staff underestimated skill abilities and expected failure. Conclusion These findings identify discordance between the skills taught and the skills required in the job. There is a need for standardization in the clinical skills training to ensure that all interns enter practice with equal competencies. Consideration should be given to experiential learning opportunities such as subintern programmes to consolidate learning and improve preparedness. Improvement in communications with senior clinicians is indicated to ensure that expectations are realistic and reflective of actual training.


International Journal of Medical Education | 2016

An international survey of medical licensing requirements for immigrating physicians, focusing on communication evaluation

Amy Gillis; Rebecca Weedle; M. Morris; Paul F. Ridgway

Objectives To identify current entry requirements set by international medical licensing bodies for immigrating physicians, focusing on postgraduate level communication skills, clinical and technical skill assessments. Methods A standardised, author developed survey was administered to a selection of national, state and provincial licensing institutions across 6 continents. Representative institutions were selected from the most populated regions of each continent. Surveys were administered by email and telephone. The information was also searched by website review. Website information alone was used if no response was received by the targeted institution after 2 phone/2 email attempts. Statistical analysis of the non-parametric data was conducted using SPSS (v.21). Results Thirty-seven licensing bodies were contacted from 30 countries; verifiable information was available for 29; twenty-six responded to the communication inquiry. Sixty five 65.4% (n=17) surveyed communication skills, 100% involved language proficiency testing; 11.5% tested other forms of communication skills. For clinical and technical skills, 86.2% (n=25) assessed candidates by credential review, 72.4% (n=21) required both credential review and exam and 62.1% (n=18) used country-specific examination. A mentorship period were required by 37.9% (n=11), ranging from 3 months to 1 year. Only 2 countries identified examinations for recertification. No technical/clinical skills nor communication skill evaluation (beyond language proficiency) are routinely assessed at the postgraduate level. Conclusions International assessments of migrating physicians are heterogeneous. Communication skills, beyond language proficiency, are not routinely assessed in foreign trained physicians seeking entry. The majority of clinical and technical skills are assessed by credential review only. This study highlights the lack of standardisation of assessment internationally and the need for steps toward a global agreement on training schemes and summative assessment.


Communication in medicine | 2016

Pilot evaluation of a novel observational tool for collaboration and communication within multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs)

Amy Gillis; M. Morris; Nikita Bhatt; Paul F. Ridgway

BACKGROUND Despite widespread use of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs) to facilitate patient care, little evidence exists that MDTs improve patient survival or impact care. Research into MDT function and outcome is limited. This pilot study looks to validate a novel tool developed to assess MDT functioning. METHODS A tool was developed with predefined Likert behaviour stems in the areas of structure, communication and collaboration. The tool was evaluated in nine MDTs by three independent observers and included participant evaluation. Inter-rater reliability was calculated with intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICC); Students t-test was used to calculate significance in participant evaluation and matched observations. RESULTS The tool was used to evaluate 9 MDTs, discussing 133 cases. The overall ICC for the three coders was 0.935; for each MDT: 0.776-0.917. The inter-rater reliability for each MDT observation ranged from 0.245-0.923; the majority with an ICC >0.8. No significant difference was noted between participant evaluation and observer response. DISCUSSION MDTs provide a means of coordinating complex care for patients. This tool provides a means of evaluating group interaction within MDTs and is designed for use by different medical personnel. The pilot study has shown promising ICC; further evaluation is needed using a broader group of MDTs and including case complexity and outcome.


Cancer Medicine | 2016

Epidemiological study of soft-tissue sarcomas in Ireland.

Nikita Bhatt; Sandra Deady; Amy Gillis; Alexia Bertuzzi; Aurelie Fabre; Eric Heffernan; Charles Gillham; Gary O'Toole; Paul F. Ridgway

Soft‐tissue sarcomas (STS) account for 1% of adult and 7% of pediatric malignancies. Histopathology and classification of these rare tumors requires further refinements. The aim of this paper is to describe the current incidence and survival of STS from 1994 to 2012 in Ireland and compare these with comparably coded international published reports. This is a retrospective, population study based on the data from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (NCRI). Incidence and relative survival rates for STS in Ireland were generated. Incidence of STS based on gender, age and anatomical location was examined. Annual mean incidence rate (European Age Standardized) in Ireland between 1994 and 2012 was 4.48 ± 0.15 per 100,000 person‐years. The overall relative 5‐year survival rate of STS for the period 1994–2011 in Ireland was 56%, which was similar to that reported in the U.K. but lower than in most of Europe and U.S.A. Survival rate fluctuated over the period examined, declining slightly in females but showing an increase in males. STS incidence trends in Ireland were comparable to international reports. Survival trends of STS were significantly different between Ireland and other European countries, requiring further study to understand causation.


British Journal of Surgery | 2016

When should surgeons retire

Nikita Bhatt; M. Morris; A. O'Neil; Amy Gillis; Paul F. Ridgway


Surgeon-journal of The Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland | 2016

Evidence based management of polyps of the gall bladder: A systematic review of the risk factors of malignancy

Nikita Bhatt; Amy Gillis; Craig O. Smoothey; Faisal N. Awan; Paul F. Ridgway


Surgeon-journal of The Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland | 2017

Postoperative exercise training is associated with reduced respiratory infection rates and early discharge: A case-control study

Nikita Bhatt; G. Sheridan; M. Connolly; S. Kelly; Amy Gillis; Kevin C. Conlon; S. Lane; E. Shanahan; Paul F. Ridgway


Journal of Oncology Practice | 2018

Pembrolizumab-Related Sarcoid-Like Reaction Presenting as Reactivation of Quiescent Scars

Mary Clare McKenna; Kevin Molloy; Stephen Crowther; John Feeney; Amy Gillis; Maureen Connolly; Fergal Kelleher

Collaboration


Dive into the Amy Gillis's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul F. Ridgway

University College Dublin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nikita Bhatt

University College Dublin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. Sheridan

University College Dublin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Connolly

University College Dublin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aurelie Fabre

University College Dublin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brendan O'Shea

Irish College of General Practitioners

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Shanahan

University College Dublin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Heffernan

University College Dublin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge