Amy Jo Scarino
Langley Research Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Amy Jo Scarino.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Lei Zhu; Daniel J. Jacob; Patrick S. Kim; Jenny A. Fisher; Karen Yu; Katherine R. Travis; Loretta J. Mickley; Robert M. Yantosca; Melissa P. Sulprizio; Isabelle De Smedt; Gonzalo González Abad; Kelly Chance; Can Li; Richard A. Ferrare; Alan Fried; Johnathan W. Hair; T. F. Hanisco; Dirk Richter; Amy Jo Scarino; James G. Walega; Petter Weibring; G. M. Wolfe
Formaldehyde (HCHO) column data from satellites are widely used as a proxy for emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) but validation of the data has been extremely limited. Here we use highly accurate HCHO aircraft observations from the NASA SEAC4RS campaign over the Southeast US in August-September 2013 to validate and intercompare six retrievals of HCHO columns from four different satellite instruments (OMI, GOME2A, GOME2B and OMPS) and three different research groups. The GEOS-Chem chemical transport model is used as a common intercomparison platform. All retrievals feature a HCHO maximum over Arkansas and Louisiana, consistent with the aircraft observations and reflecting high emissions of biogenic isoprene. The retrievals are also interconsistent in their spatial variability over the Southeast US (r=0.4-0.8 on a 0.5°×0.5° grid) and in their day-to-day variability (r=0.5-0.8). However, all retrievals are biased low in the mean by 20-51%, which would lead to corresponding bias in estimates of isoprene emissions from the satellite data. The smallest bias is for OMI-BIRA, which has high corrected slant columns relative to the other retrievals and low scattering weights in its air mass factor (AMF) calculation. OMI-BIRA has systematic error in its assumed vertical HCHO shape profiles for the AMF calculation and correcting this would eliminate its bias relative to the SEAC4RS data. Our results support the use of satellite HCHO data as a quantitative proxy for isoprene emission after correction of the low mean bias. There is no evident pattern in the bias, suggesting that a uniform correction factor may be applied to the data until better understanding is achieved.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
S.-W. Kim; Brian C. McDonald; Sunil Baidar; Steven S. Brown; B. Dube; Richard A. Ferrare; G. J. Frost; Robert A. Harley; John S. Holloway; H.‐J. Lee; S. A. McKeen; J. A. Neuman; J. B. Nowak; H. Oetjen; Ivan Ortega; I. B. Pollack; James M. Roberts; T. B. Ryerson; Amy Jo Scarino; Christoph J. Senff; Ryan Thalman; M. Trainer; R. Volkamer; Nicholas L. Wagner; Rebecca A. Washenfelder; Eleanor M. Waxman; Cora J. Young
We developed a new nitrogen oxide (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) emission inventory for the Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) expanding the Fuel-based Inventory for motor-Vehicle Emissions and applied it in regional chemical transport modeling focused on the California Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) 2010 field campaign. The weekday NOx emission over the SoCAB in 2010 is 620 t d−1, while the weekend emission is 410 t d−1. The NOx emission decrease on weekends is caused by reduced diesel truck activities. Weekday and weekend CO emissions over this region are similar: 2340 and 2180 t d−1, respectively. Previous studies reported large discrepancies between the airborne observations of NOx and CO mixing ratios and the model simulations for CalNex based on the available bottom-up emission inventories. Utilizing the newly developed emission inventory in this study, the simulated NOx and CO mixing ratios agree with the observations from the airborne and the ground-based in situ and remote sensing instruments during the field study. The simulations also reproduce the weekly cycles of these chemical species. Both the observations and the model simulations indicate that decreased NOx on weekends leads to enhanced photochemistry and increase of O3 and Ox (=O3 + NO2) in the basin. The emission inventory developed in this study can be extended to different years and other urban regions in the U.S. to study the long-term trends in O3 and its precursors with regional chemical transport models.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015
Kang Sun; Karen E. Cady-Pereira; David J. Miller; Lei Tao; Mark A. Zondlo; J. B. Nowak; J. A. Neuman; Tomas Mikoviny; Markus Müller; Armin Wisthaler; Amy Jo Scarino; Chris A. Hostetler
Ammonia measurements from a vehicle-based, mobile open-path sensor and those from aircraft were compared with Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) NH3 columns at the pixel scale during the NASA Deriving Information on Surface conditions from Column and Vertically Resolved Observations Relevant to Air Quality field experiment. Spatial and temporal mismatches were reduced by having the mobile laboratory sample in the same areas as the TES footprints. To examine how large heterogeneities in the NH3 surface mixing ratios may affect validation, a detailed spatial survey was performed within a single TES footprint around the overpass time. The TES total NH3 column above a single footprint showed excellent agreement with the in situ total column constructed from surface measurements with a difference of 2% (within the combined measurement uncertainties). The comparison was then extended to a TES transect of nine footprints where aircraft data (5–80 ppbv) were available in a narrow spatiotemporal window (<10 km, <1 h). The TES total NH3 columns above the nine footprints agreed to within 6% of the in situ total columns derived from the aircraft-based measurements. Finally, to examine how TES captures surface spatial gradients at the interpixel scale, ground-based, mobile measurements were performed directly underneath a TES transect, covering nine footprints within ±1.5 h of the overpass. The TES total columns were strongly correlated (R2 = 0.82) with the median NH3 mixing ratios measured at the surface. These results provide the first in situ validation of the TES total NH3 column product, and the methodology is applicable to other satellite observations of short-lived species at the pixel scale.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2013
Luke D. Ziemba; K. Lee Thornhill; Rich Ferrare; J. Barrick; A. J. Beyersdorf; G. Chen; S. Crumeyrolle; John Hair; Chris A. Hostetler; C. H. Hudgins; Michael D. Obland; R. R. Rogers; Amy Jo Scarino; Edward L. Winstead; Bruce E. Anderson
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2013
Amy Jo Scarino; Michael D. Obland; Jerome D. Fast; Sharon Burton; Richard A. Ferrare; Chris A. Hostetler; Larry K. Berg; Barry Lefer; Christine Haman; John Hair; Ray Rogers; Carolyn F. Butler; A. L. Cook; D. B. Harper
Atmospheric Environment | 2013
Kirk R. Baker; Chris Misenis; Michael D. Obland; Richard A. Ferrare; Amy Jo Scarino; James T. Kelly
Atmospheric Environment | 2015
D. Allen Chu; Richard A. Ferrare; James J. Szykman; Jasper R. Lewis; Amy Jo Scarino; Jennifer Carrie Hains; Sharon Burton; G. Chen; Tzuchin Tsai; Chris A. Hostetler; Johnathan W. Hair; Brent N. Holben; J. H. Crawford
Nature Geoscience | 2017
Michael J. Behrenfeld; Yongxiang Hu; Robert T. O’Malley; Emmanuel Boss; Chris A. Hostetler; David A. Siegel; Jorge L. Sarmiento; Jennifer A. Schulien; Johnathan W. Hair; Xiaomei Lu; Sharon Rodier; Amy Jo Scarino
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015
David J. Miller; Kang Sun; Lei Tao; Da Pan; Mark A. Zondlo; J. B. Nowak; Zhen Liu; Glenn S. Diskin; Glen Sachse; A. J. Beyersdorf; Richard A. Ferrare; Amy Jo Scarino
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2017
Chantelle R. Lonsdale; Jennifer D. Hegarty; Karen E. Cady-Pereira; Matthew J. Alvarado; Daven K. Henze; Matthew D. Turner; Shannon L. Capps; J. B. Nowak; J. Andy Neuman; Ann M. Middlebrook; R. Bahreini; Jennifer G. Murphy; Milos Z. Markovic; Trevor C. VandenBoer; Lynn M. Russell; Amy Jo Scarino
Collaboration
Dive into the Amy Jo Scarino's collaboration.
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
View shared research outputs