Amy Sedlacek Cooper

Endovaginal sonography for the diagnosis of upper genital tract infection

Objective To determine the clinical utility of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of upper genital tract infection. Methods Fifty-five women who either met the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions minimal criteria for acute pelvic inflammatory disease or were being seen for non-classic signs of upper genital tract infection were evaluated. During abdominal and endovaginal ultrasound testing, fluid in the cul-de-sac, discrete tubes with or without tubal fluid, multicystic ovaries, and adnexal masses were noted. Upper genital tract infection was confirmed by laparoscopic visualization or histologic or microbiologic evidence of salpingitis or endometritis. Results The specificity of identifying fallopian tubes with or without intraluminal fluid on ultrasound was 97% (35 of 36); the sensitivity, however, was only 32% (six of 19). Calculated using Bayes theorem and based on a prevalence rate of 50%, the positive predictive value of visualizing fallopian tubes was 91%. The sensitivities associated with the visualization of a multicystic ovary or tubo-ovarian abscess were 42% (eight of 19) and 32% (six of 19), with specificities of 86% (31 of 36) and 97% (35 of 36), and positive predictive values of 75% and 91%, respectively. Cul-de-sac fluid was associated with low sensitivity (37%; seven of 19), low specificity (58%; 21 of 36), and the lowest positive predictive value (47%). Conclusion Endovaginal sonography has limited clinical utility in the diagnosis of upper genital tract infection due to its low sensitivity.

Positive cone biopsy specimen margins in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the positive margin rate associated with cervical conization among women who are seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus with that among women who are seronegative. STUDY DESIGN This was a cross-sectional study of 245 women who underwent cervical conization for the following indications: biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3, abnormal endocervical curettage specimen, cytologic-histologic examination discrepancy, persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1, or abnormal cytologic characteristics with inadequate colposcopic examination. RESULTS Twenty-two (47.8%) of 46 women who were seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus and 65 (32.7%) of 199 women who were seronegative had positive cone biopsy specimen margins. In a multivariable logistic regression the human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive women had a 2-fold increased risk of having a positive cone biopsy margin (odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.76). CONCLUSION If the presence of positive cone biopsy specimen margins represents the potential for disease progression, then our findings of a positive margin rate of nearly 50% in a human immunodeficiency virus-positive population may argue against the kind of conservative management of colposcopic follow-up that has been proposed for immunocompetent women.

Prevalence and patient characteristics associated with CIN 3 in adolescents

OBJECTIVE We sought to identify patient characteristics associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 in adolescents. STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional cohort study was done using a colposcopic database. Data collected included demographic and clinical information as well as cytologic and histologic results. Variables associated with CIN 3 in the univariable analysis (P ≤ .10) were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS Of 614 adolescents evaluated, 48 (8%; 95% confidence interval, 6-10%) had CIN 3. No cancers were detected. In the univariable analysis, parity, ≥ 4 lifetime male sexual partners, and a history of sexually transmitted infections were associated with an increased risk of CIN 3. In the final model, only ≥ 4 sexual partners (compared to <4; adjusted odds ratio, 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-10.61) was significantly associated with the finding of CIN 3. CONCLUSION CIN 3 was infrequently encountered in adolescents, and those with multiple sexual partners were at increased risk for CIN 3.