Ana B. Ibáñez
University of California, Berkeley
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ana B. Ibáñez.
The Plant Cell | 2012
Clara Sánchez-Rodríguez; Stefan Bauer; Kian Hématy; Friederike Saxe; Ana B. Ibáñez; Vera Vodermaier; Cornelia Konlechner; Arun Sampathkumar; Markus Rüggeberg; Ernst Aichinger; Lutz Neumetzler; Ingo Burgert; Chris Somerville; Marie-Theres Hauser; Staffan Persson
Cell wall and cellulose structure is imperative for proper cell elongation and, consequently, the architecture of plants, but components regulating cellulose structure are still elusive. This article shows that the secreted CTL1/POM1 and its close homolog CTL2 interact with glucan-based polymers and influence cellulose crystallinity and cell expansion. Plant cells are encased by a cellulose-containing wall that is essential for plant morphogenesis. Cellulose consists of β-1,4-linked glucan chains assembled into paracrystalline microfibrils that are synthesized by plasma membrane–located cellulose synthase (CESA) complexes. Associations with hemicelluloses are important for microfibril spacing and for maintaining cell wall tensile strength. Several components associated with cellulose synthesis have been identified; however, the biological functions for many of them remain elusive. We show that the chitinase-like (CTL) proteins, CTL1/POM1 and CTL2, are functionally equivalent, affect cellulose biosynthesis, and are likely to play a key role in establishing interactions between cellulose microfibrils and hemicelluloses. CTL1/POM1 coincided with CESAs in the endomembrane system and was secreted to the apoplast. The movement of CESAs was compromised in ctl1/pom1 mutant seedlings, and the cellulose content and xyloglucan structures were altered. X-ray analysis revealed reduced crystalline cellulose content in ctl1 ctl2 double mutants, suggesting that the CTLs cooperatively affect assembly of the glucan chains, which may affect interactions between hemicelluloses and cellulose. Consistent with this hypothesis, both CTLs bound glucan-based polymers in vitro. We propose that the apoplastic CTLs regulate cellulose assembly and interaction with hemicelluloses via binding to emerging cellulose microfibrils.
Molecular Systems Biology | 2014
Jeffrey M. Skerker; Dacia Leon; Morgan N. Price; Jordan S Mar; Daniel R. Tarjan; Adam M. Deutschbauer; Jason K. Baumohl; Stefan Bauer; Ana B. Ibáñez; Valerie D. Mitchell; Cindy H. Wu; Ping Hu; Terry C. Hazen; Adam P. Arkin
The efficient production of biofuels from cellulosic feedstocks will require the efficient fermentation of the sugars in hydrolyzed plant material. Unfortunately, plant hydrolysates also contain many compounds that inhibit microbial growth and fermentation. We used DNA‐barcoded mutant libraries to identify genes that are important for hydrolysate tolerance in both Zymomonas mobilis (44 genes) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (99 genes). Overexpression of a Z. mobilis tolerance gene of unknown function (ZMO1875) improved its specific ethanol productivity 2.4‐fold in the presence of miscanthus hydrolysate. However, a mixture of 37 hydrolysate‐derived inhibitors was not sufficient to explain the fitness profile of plant hydrolysate. To deconstruct the fitness profile of hydrolysate, we profiled the 37 inhibitors against a library of Z. mobilis mutants and we modeled fitness in hydrolysate as a mixture of fitness in its components. By examining outliers in this model, we identified methylglyoxal as a previously unknown component of hydrolysate. Our work provides a general strategy to dissect how microbes respond to a complex chemical stress and should enable further engineering of hydrolysate tolerance.
Biotechnology and Bioengineering | 2014
Stefan Bauer; Ana B. Ibáñez
The cellulose analysis results of four feedstocks and Avicel obtained by a one-step/two-step hydrolysis method were compared to the conventional cellulose assay according to Updegraff. Slightly lower cellulose levels were observed for Avicel (97%), corn stover (97%), poplar (96%), and Miscanthus (94%) but for pine the amounts were almost identical (101%). Despite these differences, the one-step/two-step method can be seen as a true alternative to the more labor-intensive Updegraff method.
Green Chemistry | 2014
Douglas R. Greer; Thalita P. Basso; Ana B. Ibáñez; Stefan Bauer; Jeffrey M. Skerker; A. Evren Özçam; Dacia Leon; Chaeyoung Shin; Adam P. Arkin; Nitash P. Balsara
The large-scale use of lignocellulosic hydrolysate as a fermentation broth has been impeded due to its high concentration of organic inhibitors to fermentation. In this study, pervaporation with polystyrene-block-polydimethylsiloxane-block-polystyrene (SDS) block copolymer membranes was shown to be an effective method for separating volatile inhibitors from dilute acid pretreated hydrolysate, thus detoxifying hydrolysate for subsequent fermentation. We report the separation of inhibitors from hydrolysate thermodynamically and quantitatively by detailing their concentrations in the hydrolysate before and after detoxification by pervaporation. Specifically, we report >99% removal of furfural and 27% removal of acetic acid with this method. Additionally, we quantitatively report that the membrane is selective for organic inhibitor compounds over water, despite waters smaller molecular size. Because its inhibitors were removed but its sugars left intact, pervaporation-detoxified hydrolysate was suitable for fermentation. In our fermentation experiments, Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain SA-1 consumed the glucose in pervaporation-detoxified hydrolysate, producing ethanol. In contrast, under the same conditions, a control hydrolysate was unsuitable for fermentation; no ethanol was produced and no glucose was consumed. This work demonstrates progress toward economical lignocellulosic hydrolysate fermentation.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry | 2012
Stefan Bauer; Hagit Sorek; Valerie D. Mitchell; Ana B. Ibáñez; David E. Wemmer
Biotechnology for Biofuels | 2015
Prachand Shrestha; Ana B. Ibáñez; Stefan Bauer; Sydney I. Glassman; Timothy M. Szaro; Thomas D. Bruns; John W. Taylor
Biomass & Bioenergy | 2014
Ana B. Ibáñez; Stefan Bauer
Biotechnology for Biofuels | 2016
Margreet J. Oosterkamp; Celia Méndez-García; Chang H. Kim; Stefan Bauer; Ana B. Ibáñez; Sabrina Zimmerman; Pei-Ying Hong; Isaac K. O. Cann; Roderick I. Mackie
BIO-PROTOCOL | 2016
Trevor H. Yeats; Tamara Vellosillo; Nadav Sorek; Ana B. Ibáñez; Stefan Bauer
BMC Biotechnology | 2015
Stefan Bauer; Ana B. Ibáñez