Ana Filipa Macedo

A meta-analysis of serious adverse events reported with exenatide and liraglutide: acute pancreatitis and cancer.

AIMS The association between GLP-1 agonists, acute pancreatitis (AP), any cancer and thyroid cancer is discussed. This meta-analysis was aimed at evaluating the risk of those serious adverse events associated with GLP-1 agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov were searched in order to identify longitudinal studies evaluating exenatide or liraglutide use and reporting data on AP or cancer. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a random-effects model. I(2) statistics assessed heterogeneity. RESULTS Twenty-five studies were included. Neither exenatide (OR 0.84 [95% CI 0.58-1.22], I(2) = 30%) nor liraglutide (OR 0.97 [95% CI 0.21-4.39], I(2) = 0%) were associated with an increased risk of AP, independent of baseline comparator. The pooled OR for cancer associated with exenatide was 0.86 (95% CI 0.29, 2.60, I(2) = 0%) and for liraglutide was 1.35 (95% CI 0.70, 2.59, I(2) = 0%). Liraglutide was not associated with an increased risk for thyroid cancer (OR 1.54 [95% CI 0.40-6.02], I(2) = 0%). For exenatide, no thyroid malignancies were reported. CONCLUSIONS Current available published evidence is insufficient to support an increased risk of AP or cancer associated with GLP-1 agonists. These rare and long-term adverse events deserve properly monitoring in future studies evaluating GLP-1 agonists.

Predictors of uncontrolled hypertension and antihypertensive medication nonadherence

Background: Although hypertension is, in most cases, a controllable major risk factor in the development of cardiovascular disease, studies have demonstrated that hypertension remains poorly controlled in Portugal. Our aim was to evaluate the covariates associated with poor blood pressure (BP) control in a Portuguese hypertensive population. Patients and Results: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a hospital hypertension outpatient clinic, located in the Eastern Central Region of Portugal. Patients attending the clinic from July to September 2009 were asked to participate in a structured interview including medication adherence and knowledge about hypertension. Eligible participants were all adults aged 18 or over with an established diagnosis of arterial hypertension and had been on antihypertensive drug treatment for at least 6 months. Exclusion criteria were dementia, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. Detailed clinical information was prospectively obtained from medical records. A total of 197 patients meeting the inclusion criteria and consenting to participate completed the interview. Of these, only 33.0% had their BP controlled according to the JNC 7 guidelines. Logistic regression analysis revealed three independent predictors of poor BP control: living alone (OR = 5.3, P = 0.004), medication nonadherence (OR = 4.8, P < 0.001), and diabetes (OR = 4.4, P = 0.011). Predictors of medication nonadherence were: unawareness of target BP values (OR = 3.7, P < 0.001), a report of drug side effects (OR = 3.7, P = 0.002), lack of BP monitoring (OR = 2.5, P = 0.015) and unawareness of medication indications (OR = 2.4, P = 0.021), and of hypertension risks (OR = 2.1, P = 0.026). Conclusions: Poor medication adherence, lack of information about hypertension, and side effects should be considered as possible underlying causes of uncontrolled BP and must be addressed in any intervention aimed to improve BP control.

Data sources on drug safety evaluation: a review of recent published meta‐analyses

Meta‐analysis is a quantitative approach to summarize the findings from several studies and has been applied with increasing frequency to clinical trials. Because of their sample size and duration limitations, experimental studies (ESs) could not be able to detect late or rare adverse events (AEs), which may be identified in well‐designed observational studies (OSs). This study aims to identify and analyze meta‐analyses from both ES and OS where safety was found to be an outcome measure.

Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Safety After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty A Meta-Analysis

Direct experimental safety comparisons of Xa coagulation factor direct inhibitors, apixaban and rivaroxaban, on their approved therapeutic indications have not been identified. Due to recently raised safety concerns, a meta-analysis was carried out pooling data from studies identified on a Medline and Cochrane Library search in order to better evaluate the safety profile of both drugs. Abstracts from scientific meetings were also searched from 2003 to 2011. Primary and secondary outcome measures were major bleeding and total bleeding, respectively. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated using random effects models and statistical heterogeneity was estimated with I2 statistics. Of the 160 screened publications, 12 clinical trials were included in which enoxaparin was the active control. For knee arthroplasty, apixaban was associated with significantly fewer major bleeding events (6496 patients, RR 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.96) and fewer total bleeding events (6496 patients, RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97). There were no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding events (5699 patients, RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.56-3.52) or in the incidence of total bleeding events for rivaroxaban (5699 patients, RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91-1.30). No differences were found when thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement was the case. Apixaban seems to be associated with a lower risk of the incidence of hemorrhagic events after total knee arthroplasty. For hip arthroplasty, no differences were found between the studied drugs.

Multiple drug exposure as a risk factor for the seriousness of adverse drug reactions

AIM The aim of the present study was to validate the hypothesis that multiple drug exposure is an independent risk factor for serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs). BACKGROUND Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an important cause of iatrogenic disease, the majority being preventable. Multiple drug exposure, ageing and female gender have been identified as important risk factors for an increased incidence of ADRs. METHOD ADR reports received by the central Portugal Regional Pharmacovigilance Unit, between January 2001 and December 2009, were studied. RESULTS Nearly half (47.4%) of ADRs reports were considered serious, from which 66.7% reported multiple drug exposure (mean 3.07 ± 2.2; maximum 13). After adjusting for gender, simultaneous exposure to three or more drugs was significantly associated with an increased risk of serious ADRs [odds ratio (OR) 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.51]. CONCLUSIONS The present results support that multiple drug exposure is an independent risk factor for serious ADRs. Such findings are of importance in both medicines benefit/risk ratio evaluations and patient safety monitoring. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT A new level of nursing involvement is needed in both the detection of ADRs and prevention of serious outcomes, particularly in high-risk patients.

Sources of information used by regulatory agencies on the generation of drug safety alerts.

PurposeThe study of the grounds on which data regulatory authorities base their decisions on drug safety evaluations is an important clinical and public health issue. The aim of this study was to review the type and publication status of data sources supporting benefit/risk ratio re-evaluations conducted by the major regulatory authorities on safety issues.MethodsA website search was carried out to identify all safety alerts published by the U.S Food and Drugs Administration, Health Canada, European Medicines Agency and the Australian Therapeutics Goods Administration. Safety alerts were included if the causal relation between a suspected drug exposure and the occurrence of an adverse event was evaluated for the first time between 2010 and 2012. Type of data sources evaluated by these regulatory authorities, publication status of the data sources and status of the drug label section with respect to updating were evaluated.ResultsA total of 59 safety alerts were included in this study. Of these, 33 (56%) were supported by post-marketing spontaneous reports, 24 (41%) evaluated randomized clinical trials, 16 evaluated cohort studies (27%), 13 were case–control studies (22%) and 11 evaluated case report/case series (17%). Twenty-three safety alerts (39%) were issued based. on unpublished evidence, corresponding mainly to post-marketing spontaneous reports. The “Warnings and precautions section” was the drug label section most frequently updated (n = 40; 68%).ConclusionDespite the different lengths of time taken by the different regulatory authorities to come to similar decisions on the same issues—an issue which would seem to deserve further harmonization—post-marketing spontaneous reports have supported most of the benefit/risk ratio re-evaluations, thereby confirming the value of such re-evaluations in detecting unknown adverse events.

Association of statin therapy with blood pressure control in hypertensive hypercholesterolemic outpatients in clinical practice

Background: Some clinical evidence revealed that statins, apart from lowering cholesterol levels, also have an antihypertensive effect. Our aim was to evaluate the existence of a possible association of statin therapy with blood pressure (BP) control in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Patients attending a hypertension/dyslipidemia clinic were prospectively evaluated. Those patients with a diagnosis of stage 1 hypertension and hypercholesterolemia who consented to participate were included in the study, either in the statin group (when taking a statin) or in the control group (when not taking a statin). Exclusion criteria included dementia, pregnancy, or breastfeeding, and history or evidence of stage 2 hypertension. Detailed clinical information was prospectively obtained from medical records. A total of 110 hypertensive patients were assigned to the study (82 in the statin group and 28 in the control group). Results: Although there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in both groups concerning gender, body mass index, antihypertensive pharmacotherapy, and serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, a higher BP control was observed in the statin group (P = 0.002). Significantly lower systolic BP (–6.7 mmHg, P = 0.020) and diastolic BP (–6.4 mmHg, P = 0.002) levels were reported in the statin group. Serum levels of low-density lipoprotein were also significantly lower in the statin group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: This observational study detected an association of statin therapy with BP control in hypertensive hypercholesterolemic patients in clinical practice. These findings raise the possibility that statin therapy may be useful for BP control in the studied population.

Hb Plasencia [α125(H8)Leu→Arg (α2)] is a Frequent Cause of α+-Thalassemia in the Portuguese Population

Hb Plasencia is a thalassemic hemoglobin (Hb) mutation caused by a leucine to arginine replacement at residue 125 of the α2-globin chain (HBA2:c.377T>G). This variant was first described in the heterozygous state in association with a very mild α-thalassemic phenotype in three members of a Spanish family from Plasencia, Western Spain. Reviewing the molecular characterization of 308 Portuguese individual suspected of having α-thalassemia (α-thal) we found Hb Plasencia to be the second most frequent mutation after the –α3.7 deletion.