Anand Roopsind
University of Florida
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anand Roopsind.
Nature | 2015
Roel J. W. Brienen; Oliver L. Phillips; Ted R. Feldpausch; Emanuel Gloor; Timothy R. Baker; Jon Lloyd; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo-Mendoza; Yadvinder Malhi; Simon L. Lewis; R. Vásquez Martínez; Miguel Alexiades; E. Álvarez Dávila; Patricia Alvarez-Loayza; Ana Andrade; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; E.J.M.M. Arets; Luzmila Arroyo; Olaf S. Bánki; Christopher Baraloto; Jorcely Barroso; Damien Bonal; Rene G. A. Boot; José Luís C. Camargo; Carolina V. Castilho; V. Chama; Kuo-Jung Chao; Jérôme Chave; James A. Comiskey
Atmospheric carbon dioxide records indicate that the land surface has acted as a strong global carbon sink over recent decades, with a substantial fraction of this sink probably located in the tropics, particularly in the Amazon. Nevertheless, it is unclear how the terrestrial carbon sink will evolve as climate and atmospheric composition continue to change. Here we analyse the historical evolution of the biomass dynamics of the Amazon rainforest over three decades using a distributed network of 321 plots. While this analysis confirms that Amazon forests have acted as a long-term net biomass sink, we find a long-term decreasing trend of carbon accumulation. Rates of net increase in above-ground biomass declined by one-third during the past decade compared to the 1990s. This is a consequence of growth rate increases levelling off recently, while biomass mortality persistently increased throughout, leading to a shortening of carbon residence times. Potential drivers for the mortality increase include greater climate variability, and feedbacks of faster growth on mortality, resulting in shortened tree longevity. The observed decline of the Amazon sink diverges markedly from the recent increase in terrestrial carbon uptake at the global scale, and is contrary to expectations based on models.
Global Ecology and Biogeography | 2014
Edward T. A. Mitchard; Ted R. Feldpausch; Roel J. W. Brienen; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo; Timothy R. Baker; Simon L. Lewis; Jon Lloyd; Carlos A. Quesada; Manuel Gloor; Hans ter Steege; Patrick Meir; Esteban Álvarez; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Luzmila Arroyo; Gerardo Aymard; Olaf Banki; Damien Bonal; Sandra A. Brown; Foster Brown; Carlos Cerón; Victor Chama Moscoso; Jérôme Chave; James A. Comiskey; Fernando Cornejo; Massiel Corrales Medina; Lola Da Costa; Flávia R. C. Costa; Anthony Di Fiore
Aim The accurate mapping of forest carbon stocks is essential for understanding the global carbon cycle, for assessing emissions from deforestation, and for rational land-use planning. Remote sensing (RS) is currently the key tool for this purpose, but RS does not estimate vegetation biomass directly, and thus may miss significant spatial variations in forest structure. We test the stated accuracy of pantropical carbon maps using a large independent field dataset. Location Tropical forests of the Amazon basin. The permanent archive of the field plot data can be accessed at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5521/FORESTPLOTS.NET/2014_1 Methods Two recent pantropical RS maps of vegetation carbon are compared to a unique ground-plot dataset, involving tree measurements in 413 large inventory plots located in nine countries. The RS maps were compared directly to field plots, and kriging of the field data was used to allow area-based comparisons. Results The two RS carbon maps fail to capture the main gradient in Amazon forest carbon detected using 413 ground plots, from the densely wooded tall forests of the north-east, to the light-wooded, shorter forests of the south-west. The differences between plots and RS maps far exceed the uncertainties given in these studies, with whole regions over- or under-estimated by > 25%, whereas regional uncertainties for the maps were reported to be < 5%. Main conclusions Pantropical biomass maps are widely used by governments and by projects aiming to reduce deforestation using carbon offsets, but may have significant regional biases. Carbon-mapping techniques must be revised to account for the known ecological variation in tree wood density and allometry to create maps suitable for carbon accounting. The use of single relationships between tree canopy height and above-ground biomass inevitably yields large, spatially correlated errors. This presents a significant challenge to both the forest conservation and remote sensing communities, because neither wood density nor species assemblages can be reliably mapped from space.
Current Biology | 2015
Ervan Rutishauser; Bruno Hérault; Christopher Baraloto; Lilian Blanc; Laurent Descroix; Eleneide Doff Sotta; Joice Ferreira; Milton Kanashiro; Lucas Mazzei; Marcus Vinicio Neves d’Oliveira; Luís Cláudio de Oliveira; Marielos Peña-Claros; Francis E. Putz; Ademir Roberto Ruschel; Ken Rodney; Anand Roopsind; Alexander Shenkin; Kátia Emídio da Silva; Cintia Rodrigues de Souza; Marisol Toledo; Edson Vidal; Thales A.P. West; Verginia Wortel; Plinio Sist
While around 20% of the Amazonian forest has been cleared for pastures and agriculture, one fourth of the remaining forest is dedicated to wood production. Most of these production forests have been or will be selectively harvested for commercial timber, but recent studies show that even soon after logging, harvested stands retain much of their tree-biomass carbon and biodiversity. Comparing species richness of various animal taxa among logged and unlogged forests across the tropics, Burivalova et al. found that despite some variability among taxa, biodiversity loss was generally explained by logging intensity (the number of trees extracted). Here, we use a network of 79 permanent sample plots (376 ha total) located at 10 sites across the Amazon Basin to assess the main drivers of time-to-recovery of post-logging tree carbon (Table S1). Recovery time is of direct relevance to policies governing management practices (i.e., allowable volumes cut and cutting cycle lengths), and indirectly to forest-based climate change mitigation interventions.While around 20% of the Amazonian forest has been cleared for pastures and agriculture, one fourth of the remaining forest is dedicated to wood production [1] . Most of these production forests have been or will be selectively harvested for commercial timber, but recent studies show that even soon after logging, harvested stands retain much of their tree-biomass carbon and biodiversity [2,3] . Comparing species richness of various animal taxa among logged and unlogged forests across the tropics, Burivalova et al. [4] found that despite some variability among taxa, biodiversity loss was generally explained by logging intensity (the number of trees extracted). Here, we use a network of 79 permanent sample plots (376 ha total) located at 10 sites across the Amazon Basin [5] to assess the main drivers of time-to-recovery of post-logging tree carbon ( Table S1 ). Recovery time is of direct relevance to policies governing management practices (i.e., allowable volumes cut and cutting cycle lengths), and indirectly to forest-based climate change mitigation interventions.
Global Change Biology | 2016
Michelle O. Johnson; David Galbraith; Manuel Gloor; Hannes De Deurwaerder; Matthieu Guimberteau; Anja Rammig; Kirsten Thonicke; Hans Verbeeck; Celso von Randow; Abel Monteagudo; Oliver L. Phillips; Roel J. W. Brienen; Ted R. Feldpausch; Gabriela Lopez Gonzalez; Sophie Fauset; Carlos A. Quesada; Bradley Christoffersen; Philippe Ciais; Gilvan Sampaio; Bart Kruijt; Patrick Meir; Paul R. Moorcroft; Ke Zhang; Esteban Álvarez-Dávila; Atila Alves de Oliveira; Iêda Leão do Amaral; Ana Andrade; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; E.J.M.M. Arets
Abstract Understanding the processes that determine above‐ground biomass (AGB) in Amazonian forests is important for predicting the sensitivity of these ecosystems to environmental change and for designing and evaluating dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs). AGB is determined by inputs from woody productivity [woody net primary productivity (NPP)] and the rate at which carbon is lost through tree mortality. Here, we test whether two direct metrics of tree mortality (the absolute rate of woody biomass loss and the rate of stem mortality) and/or woody NPP, control variation in AGB among 167 plots in intact forest across Amazonia. We then compare these relationships and the observed variation in AGB and woody NPP with the predictions of four DGVMs. The observations show that stem mortality rates, rather than absolute rates of woody biomass loss, are the most important predictor of AGB, which is consistent with the importance of stand size structure for determining spatial variation in AGB. The relationship between stem mortality rates and AGB varies among different regions of Amazonia, indicating that variation in wood density and height/diameter relationships also influences AGB. In contrast to previous findings, we find that woody NPP is not correlated with stem mortality rates and is weakly positively correlated with AGB. Across the four models, basin‐wide average AGB is similar to the mean of the observations. However, the models consistently overestimate woody NPP and poorly represent the spatial patterns of both AGB and woody NPP estimated using plot data. In marked contrast to the observations, DGVMs typically show strong positive relationships between woody NPP and AGB. Resolving these differences will require incorporating forest size structure, mechanistic models of stem mortality and variation in functional composition in DGVMs.
Ecological Monographs | 2016
Masha T. van der Sande; E.J.M.M. Arets; Marielos Peña-Claros; Angela Luciana de Avila; Anand Roopsind; Lucas Mazzei; Nataly Ascarrunz; B. Finegan; Alfredo Alarcón; Yasmani Cáceres‐Siani; Juan Carlos Licona; Ademir Roberto Ruschel; Marisol Toledo; Lourens Poorter
Tropical forests have long been thought to be in stable state, but recent insights indicate that global change is leading to shifts in forest dynamics and species composition. These shifts may be driven by environmental changes such as increased resource availability, increased drought stress, and/or recovery from past disturbances. The relative importance of these drivers can be inferred from analyzing changes in trait values of tree communities. Here, we evaluate a decade of change in species and trait composition across five old-growth Neotropical forests in Bolivia, Brazil, Guyana, and Costa Rica that cover large gradients in rainfall and soil fertility. To identify the drivers of compositional change, we used data from 29 permanent sample plots and measurements of 15 leaf, stem, and whole-plant traits that are important for plant performance and should respond to global change drivers. We found that forests differ strongly in their community-mean trait values, resulting from differences in soil fertility and annual rainfall seasonality. The abundance of deciduous species with high specific leaf area increases from wet to dry forests. The community-mean wood density is high in the driest forests to protect xylem vessels against drought cavitation, and is high in nutrient-poor forests to increase wood longevity and enhance nutrient residence time in the plant. Interestingly, the species composition changed over time in three of the forests, and the community-mean wood density increased and the specific leaf area decreased in all forests, indicating that these forests are changing toward later successional stages dominated by slow-growing, shade-tolerant species. We did not see changes in other traits that could reflect responses to increased drought stress, such as increased drought deciduousness or decreased maximum adult size, or that could reflect increased resource availability (CO2, rainfall, or nitrogen). Changes in species and trait composition in these forests are therefore most likely caused by recovery from past disturbances. These compositional changes may also lead to shifts in ecosystem processes, such as a lower carbon sequestration and “slower” forest dynamics.
International Forestry Review | 2014
Ruslandi; Anand Roopsind; Plinio Sist; Marielos Peña-Claros; Raquel Thomas; Francis E. Putz
SUMMARY Tropical forest management and policy decisions are hampered by lack of reliable information about forest responses to timber harvesting and other silvicultural interventions. Although the necessary raw data from permanent sample plots (PSPs) mostly exist, the relevant results are generally unavailable due to lack of analytical capacities within data-holding institutions or lack of incentives to make the results available. Where analytical deficiency is the bottleneck, collaborative data-sharing agreements that go beyond the outsourcing of data-analysis to third parties can provide equitable and effective short- and long-term options. Simply outsourcing PSP data analysis to established scientists from extra-tropical countries might solve short-term problems, but does not prepare the community of scientists in tropical countries to address future research challenges. The design of such collaborative agreements that satisfy the needs and desires of the various parties involved is complicated by cultural and institutional differences, but progress on this front is evident.
Archive | 2014
Roel J. W. Brienen; Oliver L. Phillips; Ted R. Feldpausch; Emanuel Gloor; Timothy R. Baker; Jonathan Lloyd; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo Mendoza; Yadvinder Malhi; Simon L. Lewis; Rodolfo Vásquez Martinez; Miguel Alexiades; Esteban Álvarez Dávila; Patricia Alvarez-Loayza; Ana Andrade; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Alejandro Araujo Murakami; E.J.M.M. Arets; Luzmila Arroyo; A C Gerardo Aymard; Olaf Banki; Christopher Baraloto; Jorcely Barroso; Damien Bonal; Rene G. A. Boot; José Luís C. Camargo; Carolina V. Castilho; Victor Chama; Kuo-Jung Chao; Jérôme Chave
Atmospheric CO2 records indicate that the land surface has acted as a strong global carbon sink over recent decades, with a substantial fraction of this sink likely located in the tropics, particularly in the Amazon. Nevertheless, it is unclear how the terrestrial carbon sink will evolve as climate and atmospheric composition continue to change. Here we analyse the historic evolution of the biomass dynamics of the Amazon rainforest over three decades using a distributed network of 321 plots. While this analysis confirms that the Amazon has acted as a long-term net biomass sink, we find a long-term decreasing trend of carbon accumulation. Rates of net increase in above ground biomass declined by a third during the last decade compared to the 1990s. This is a consequence of growth rate increases levelling off recently, while reduction in biomass due to tree mortality persistently increased throughout, leading to a shortening of carbon residence times. Potential drivers for the mortality increase include a greater climate variability, and feedbacks of faster growth on mortality, resulting in shortened tree longevity. The observed decline of the Amazon sink diverges markedly from the recent increase in terrestrial carbon uptake at the global scale, and is contrary to expectations based on models.
Applied Vegetation Science | 2015
Plinio Sist; Ervan Rutishauser; Marielos Peña-Claros; Alexander Shenkin; Bruno Hérault; Lilian Blanc; Christopher Baraloto; Fidèle Baya; Fabrice Bénédet; Kátia Emídio da Silva; Laurent Descroix; Joice Ferreira; Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury; Marcelino Carneiro Guedes; Ismail Bin Harun; Riina Jalonen; Milton Kanashiro; Haruni Krisnawati; Mrigesh Kshatriya; Philippa Lincoln; Lucas Mazzei; Vincent P. Medjibe; Robert Nasi; Marcus V.N. d'Oliveira; Luís Cláudio de Oliveira; Nicolas Picard; Stephan Alexander Pietsch; Michelle A. Pinard; H. Priyadi; Francis E. Putz
Forest Ecology and Management | 2016
Boris Arevalo; Jair Valladarez; Shahira Muschamp; Elma Kay; Alex Finkral; Anand Roopsind; Francis E. Putz
Biotropica | 2017
Anand Roopsind; T. Trevor Caughlin; Hemchandranauth Sambhu; José M. V. Fragoso; Francis E. Putz