Anders Walan

Long-term omeprazole treatment in resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease: Efficacy, safety, and influence on gastric mucosa

BACKGROUND & AIMS The efficacy and safety of long-term acid suppression remains a subject for debate. We report data from patients with refractory reflux esophagitis who were undergoing maintenance therapy with >/=20 mg omeprazole daily for a mean period of 6.5 years (range, 1.4-11.2 years). METHODS Patients with severe reflux esophagitis resistant to long-term therapy with H(2)-receptor antagonists and who were not eligible for surgery were evaluated at least annually for endoscopic relapse and histological changes in the gastric corpus. RESULTS In 230 patients (mean age, 63 years at entry; 36% were >/=70 years), there were 158 relapses of esophagitis during 1490 treatment years (1 per 9.4 years), with no significant difference in relapse rates between Helicobacter pylori-positive and -negative patients. All patients rehealed during continued therapy with omeprazole at the same or higher dose. The annual incidence of gastric corpus mucosal atrophy was 4.7% and 0.7% in H. pylori-positive and -negative patients, respectively, which was mainly observed in elderly patients who had moderate/severe gastritis at entry. In patients with baseline moderate/severe gastritis, the incidences were similar: 7.9% and 8.4%, respectively. Corpus intestinal metaplasia was rare, and no dysplasia or neoplasms were observed. The adverse event profile was as might be expected from this elderly group of patients. CONCLUSIONS Long-term omeprazole therapy (up to 11 years) is highly effective and safe for control of reflux esophagitis.

Seven-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing proton-pump inhibition with surgical therapy for reflux oesophagitis.

This randomized clinical trial compared long‐term outcome after antireflux surgery with acid inhibition therapy in the treatment of chronic gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).

Changing Patterns of Helicobacter pylori Gastritis in Long-Standing Acid Suppression

Background. Helicobacter pylori colonization and associated inflammation are influenced by local acid output. Infected subjects with acid‐related diseases, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are likely to have an antral‐predominant gastritis. We hypothesized that long‐term acid suppression would result in relatively greater bacterial colonization in the corpus leading to diffuse or corpus‐predominant gastritis and that this would be prevented by prior H. pylori eradication.

Comparison of Outcomes Twelve Years After Antireflux Surgery or Omeprazole Maintenance Therapy for Reflux Esophagitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS It is important to evaluate the long-term effects of therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In a 12-year study, we compared the effects of therapy with omeprazole with those of antireflux surgery. METHODS This open, parallel group study included 310 patients with esophagitis enrolled from outpatient clinics in Nordic countries. Of the 155 patients randomly assigned to each arm of the study, 154 received omeprazole (1 withdrew before therapy began), and 144 received surgery (11 withdrew before surgery). In patients who remained in remission after treatment, post-fundoplication complaints, other symptoms, and safety variables were assessed. RESULTS Of the patients enrolled in the study, 71 who were given omeprazole (46%) and 53 treated with surgery (37%) were followed for a 12-year follow-up period. At this time point, 53% of patients who underwent surgery remained in continuous remission, compared with 45% of patients given omeprazole with a dose adjustment (P = .022) and 40% without dose adjustment (P = .002). In addition, 38% of surgical patients required a change in therapeutic strategy (eg, to medical therapy or another operation), compared with 15% of those on omeprazole. Heartburn and regurgitation were significantly more common in patients given omeprazole, whereas dysphagia, rectal flatulence, and the inability to belch or vomit were significantly more common in surgical patients. The therapies were otherwise well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS As long-term therapeutic strategies for chronic GERD, surgery and omeprazole are effective and well-tolerated. Antireflux surgery is superior to omeprazole in controlling overall disease manifestations, but post-fundoplication complaints continue after surgery.

Changes of gastric mucosal architecture during long‐term omeprazole therapy: results of a randomized clinical trial

Background  The impact of long‐term acid suppression on the gastric mucosa remains controversial.

Management of gastroduodenal ulcers and gastrointestinal symptoms associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy: A summary of four comparative trials with omeprazole, ranitidine, misoprostol, and placebo

Abstract Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in the treatment of systemic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis but are associated with a range of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, including dyspepsia, peptic ulcer, and ulcer complications. Several studies have compared the relative efficacy and tolerability of omeprazole, ranitidine, and misoprostol in the management of NSAID-associated GI adverse events. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to summarize and evaluate the results of 4 clinical studies that compared the efficacy and tolerability of omeprazole, misoprostol, and ranitidine in the acute and maintenance treatment of NSAID-associated gastroduodenal ulcers and GI symptoms. Methods: The 4 trials, which included 1822 patients being treated continuously with NSAIDs, studied omeprazole (20 and 40 mg once daily) as acute treatment for healing gastroduodenal ulcers and erosions and as prophylaxis (20 mg once daily) over 3 to 6 months. Comparators were misoprostol 200 μg 4 times daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in the acute phases and misoprostol 200 μg twice daily, ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, or placebo in the prophylactic phases. Results: Gastric and duodenal ulcer healing rates were higher with omeprazole than with either misoprostol ( P = 0.004 for gastric ulcers; P P P = 0.032 for duodenal ulcers). A significantly larger percentage of patients taking misoprostol had the number of gastric or duodenal erosions reduced from >10 to P P = 0.008). More patients taking omeprazole remained in remission than patients taking misprostol ( P = 0.001), ranitidine ( P = 0.004), or placebo ( P Conclusions: Omeprazole was more effective in healing and prophylaxis of NSAID-associated gastroduodenal ulceration and symptoms than misoprostol and ranitidine in chronic NSAID users, and was better tolerated than misoprostol.