Andrea C. Varella

Host plant quantitative trait loci affect specific behavioral sequences in oviposition by a stem-mining insect

Key messageGenetic diversity in quantitative loci associated with plant traits used by insects as cues for host selection can influence oviposition behavior and maternal choice.AbstractHost plant selection for oviposition is an important determinant of progeny performance and survival for phytophagous insects. Specific cues from the plant influence insect oviposition behavior; but, to date, no set of host plant quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have been shown to have an effect on behavioral sequences leading to oviposition. Three QTLs in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) have been identified as influencing resistance to the wheat stem sawfly (WSS) (Cephus cinctus Norton). Wheat near-isogenic lines (NILs) for each of the three QTLs were used to test whether foraging WSS were able to discriminate variation in plant cues resulting from allelic changes. A QTL on chromosome 3B (Qss-msub-3BL) previously associated with stem solidness and larval antibiosis was shown to affect WSS oviposition behavior, host preference, and field infestation. Decreased preference for oviposition was also related to a QTL allele on chromosome 2D (Qwss.msub-2D). A QTL on chromosome 4A (Qwss.msub-4A.1) affected host plant attractiveness to foraging females, but did not change oviposition preference after females landed on the stem. These findings show that oviposition decisions regarding potential plant hosts require WSS females to discriminate signals from the plant associated with allelic variation at host plant quantitative loci. Allele types in a host plant QTL associated with differential survival of immature progeny can affect maternal choices for oviposition. The multidisciplinary approach used here may lead to the identification of plant genes with important community consequences, and may complement the use of antibiosis due to solid stems to control the wheat stem sawfly in agroecosystems.

Tolerance: the forgotten child of plant resistance

Plant resistance against insect herbivory has greatly focused on antibiosis, whereby the plant has a deleterious effect on the herbivore, and antixenosis, whereby the plant is able to direct the herbivore away from it. Although these two types of resistance may reduce injury and yield loss, they can produce selection pressures on insect herbivores that lead to pest resistance. Tolerance, on the other hand, is a more sustainable pest management strategy because it involves only a plant response and therefore does not cause evolution of resistance in target pest populations. Despite its attractive attributes, tolerance has been poorly studied and understood. In this critical, interpretive review, we discuss tolerance to insect herbivory and the biological and socioeconomic factors that have limited its use in plant resistance and integrated pest management. First, tolerance is difficult to identify, and the mechanisms conferring it are poorly understood. Second, the genetics of tolerance are mostly unknown. Third, several obstacles hinder the establishment of high-throughput phenotyping methods for large-scale screening of tolerance. Fourth, tolerance has received little attention from entomologists because, for most, their primary interest, research training, and funding opportunities are in mechanisms which affect pest biology, not plant biology. Fifth, the efforts of plant resistance are directed at controlling pest populations rather than managing plant stress. We conclude this paper by discussing future research and development activities.

Characterization of Resistance to Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in Barley Germplasm

Abstract Most barley cultivars have some degree of resistance to the wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Damage caused by WSS is currently observed in fields of barley grown in the Northern Great Plains, but the impact of WSS damage among cultivars due to genetic differences within the barley germplasm is not known. Specifically, little is known about the mechanisms underlying WSS resistance in barley. We characterized WSS resistance in a subset of the spring barley CAP (Coordinated Agricultural Project) germplasm panel containing 193 current and historically important breeding lines from six North American breeding programs. Panel lines were grown in WSS infested fields for two consecutive years. Lines were characterized for stem solidness, stem cutting, WSS infestation (antixenosis), larval mortality (antibiosis), and parasitism (indirect plant defense). Variation in resistance to WSS in barley was compared to observations made for solid-stemmed resistant and hollow-stemmed susceptible wheat lines. Results indicate that both antibiosis and antixenosis are involved in the resistance of barley to the WSS, but antibiosis seems to be more prevalent. Almost all of the barley lines had greater larval mortality than the hollow-stemmed wheat lines, and only a few barley lines had mortality as low as that observed in the solid-stemmed wheat line. Since barley lines lack solid stems, it is apparent that barley has a different form of antibiosis. Our results provide information for use of barley in rotation to control the WSS and may provide a basis for identification of new approaches for improving WSS resistance in wheat.

A large-scale multiomics analysis of wheat stem solidness and the wheat stem sawfly feeding response, and syntenic associations in barley, Brachypodium, and rice

The wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), is an important pest of wheat and other cereals, threatening the quality and quantity of grain production. WSS larvae feed and develop inside the stem where they are protected from the external environment; therefore, pest management strategies primarily rely on host plant resistance. A major locus on the long arm of wheat chromosome 3B underlies most of the variation in stem solidness; however, the impact of stem solidness on WSS feeding has not been completely characterized. Here, we used a multiomics approach to examine the response to WSS in both solid- and semi-solid-stemmed wheat varieties. The combined transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data revealed that two important molecular pathways, phenylpropanoid and phosphate pentose, are involved in plant defense against WSS. We also detected a general downregulation of several key defense transcripts, including those encoding secondary metabolites such as DIMBOA, tricetin, and lignin, which suggested that the WSS larva might interfere with plant defense. We comparatively analyzed the stem solidness genomic region known to be associated with WSS tolerance in wild emmer, durum, and bread wheats, and described syntenic regions in the close relatives barley, Brachypodium, and rice. Additionally, microRNAs identified from the same genomic region revealed potential regulatory pathways associated with the WSS response. We propose a model outlining the molecular responses of the WSS–wheat interactions. These findings provide insight into the link between stem solidness and WSS feeding at the molecular level.

Identification of Candidate Genes Responsible for Stem Pith Production Using Expression Analysis in Solid-Stemmed Wheat

Wheat stem solidness is associated with gene expression changes A wheat stem solidness candidate gene is involved in lignin biosynthesis Candidate genes can be identified via linked markers relatively easily.