Andreas Gleißner
University of Passau
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andreas Gleißner.
graph drawing | 2012
Franz J. Brandenburg; David Eppstein; Andreas Gleißner; Michael T. Goodrich; Kathrin Hanauer; Josef Reislhuber
A graph is 1-planar if it can be drawn in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once. It is maximal 1-planar if the addition of any edge violates 1-planarity. Maximal 1-planar graphs have at most 4n−8 edges. We show that there are sparse maximal 1-planar graphs with only
Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications | 2013
Franz-Josef Brandenburg; Andreas Gleißner; Andreas Hofmeier
\frac{45}{17} n + \mathcal{O}(1)
Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications | 2015
Christopher Auer; Franz J. Brandenburg; Andreas Gleißner; Josef Reislhuber
edges. With a fixed rotation system there are maximal 1-planar graphs with only
graph drawing | 2011
Christopher Auer; Christian Bachmaier; Franz-Josef Brandenburg; Andreas Gleißner
\frac{7}{3} n + \mathcal{O}(1)
graph drawing | 2012
Christopher Auer; Franz-Josef Brandenburg; Andreas Gleißner; Kathrin Hanauer
edges. This is sparser than maximal planar graphs. There cannot be maximal 1-planar graphs with less than
graph drawing | 2010
Christopher Auer; Christian Bachmaier; Franz-Josef Brandenburg; Wolfgang Brunner; Andreas Gleißner
\frac{21}{10} n - \mathcal{O}(1)
workshop on graph theoretic concepts in computer science | 2012
Christopher Auer; Christian Bachmaier; Franz-Josef Brandenburg; Andreas Gleißner; Kathrin Hanauer
edges and less than
international symposium on algorithms and computation | 2012
Franz-Josef Brandenburg; Andreas Gleißner; Andreas Hofmeier
\frac{28}{13} n - \mathcal{O}(1)
Theoretical Computer Science | 2015
Christopher Auer; Christian Bachmaier; Franz J. Brandenburg; Andreas Gleißner; Kathrin Hanauer
edges with a fixed rotation system. Furthermore, we prove that a maximal 1-planar rotation system of a graph uniquely determines its 1-planar embedding.
ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithms | 2012
Christian Bachmaier; Wolfgang Brunner; Andreas Gleißner
Comparing and ranking information is an important topic in social and information sciences, and in particular on the web. Its objective is to measure the difference of the preferences of voters on a set of candidates and to compute a consensus ranking. Commonly, each voter provides a total order or a bucket order of all candidates, where bucket orders allow ties. In this work we consider the generalization of total and bucket orders to partial orders and compare them by the nearest neighbor and the Hausdorff Kendall tau distances. For total and bucket orders these distances can be computed in time. We show that the computation of the nearest neighbor Kendall tau distance is NP-hard, 2-approximable and fixed-parameter tractable for a total and a partial order. The computation of the Hausdorff Kendall tau distance for a total and a partial order is shown to be coNP-hard. The rank aggregation problem is known to be NP-complete for total and bucket orders, even for four voters and solvable in time for two voters. We show that it is NP-complete for two partial orders and the nearest neighbor Kendall tau distance. For the Hausdorff Kendall tau distance it is in , but not in NP or coNP unless NP = coNP, even for four voters.