Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew J. Berkley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew J. Berkley.


Physical Review B | 2010

Experimental investigation of an eight-qubit unit cell in a superconducting optimization processor

R. Harris; M. W. Johnson; T. Lanting; Andrew J. Berkley; J. Johansson; Paul I. Bunyk; E. Tolkacheva; E. Ladizinsky; N. Ladizinsky; T. Oh; F. Cioata; I. Perminov; P. Spear; C. Enderud; C. Rich; S. Uchaikin; M. C. Thom; E. M. Chapple; J. Wang; B. Wilson; M. H. S. Amin; N. Dickson; K. Karimi; B. Macready; C. J. S. Truncik; G. Rose

A superconducting chip containing a regular array of flux qubits, tunable interqubit inductive couplers, an XY-addressable readout system, on-chip programmable magnetic memory, and a sparse network of analog control lines has been studied. The architecture of the chip and the infrastructure used to control it were designed to facilitate the implementation of an adiabatic quantum optimization algorithm. The performance of an eight-qubit unit cell on this chip has been characterized by measuring its success in solving a large set of random Ising spin-glass problem instances as a function of temperature. The experimental data are consistent with the predictions of a quantum mechanical model of an eight-qubit system coupled to a thermal environment. These results highlight many of the key practical challenges that we have overcome and those that lie ahead in the quest to realize a functional large-scale adiabatic quantum information processor.


Physical Review X | 2014

Entanglement in a quantum annealing processor

T. Lanting; Anthony Przybysz; A. Yu. Smirnov; F. M. Spedalieri; M. H. S. Amin; Andrew J. Berkley; R. Harris; Fabio Altomare; Sergio Boixo; Paul I. Bunyk; Neil G. Dickson; C. Enderud; Jeremy P. Hilton; E. Hoskinson; M. W. Johnson; E. Ladizinsky; N. Ladizinsky; R. Neufeld; T. Oh; Ilya Perminov; C. Rich; Murray C. Thom; E. Tolkacheva; Sergey Victorovich Uchaikin; A. B. Wilson; Geordie Rose

Abstract : Entanglement lies at the core of quantum algorithms designed to solve problems that are intractable by classical approaches. One such algorithm, quantum annealing (QA), provides a promising path to a practical quantum processor. We have built a series of architecturally scalable QA processors consisting of networks of manufactured interacting spins (qubits). Here, we use qubit tunneling spectroscopy to measure the energy eigen spectrum of two- and eight-qubit systems within one such processor, demonstrating quantum coherence in these systems. We present experimental evidence that, during a critical portion of QA, the qubits become entangled and entanglement persists even as these systems reach equilibrium with a thermal environment. Our results provide an encouraging sign that QA is a viable technology for large scale quantum computing.


IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity | 2014

Architectural Considerations in the Design of a Superconducting Quantum Annealing Processor

Paul I. Bunyk; E. Hoskinson; M. W. Johnson; E. Tolkacheva; Fabio Altomare; Andrew J. Berkley; R. Harris; Jeremy P. Hilton; T. Lanting; Anthony Przybysz; Jed D. Whittaker

We have developed a quantum annealing processor, based on an array of tunable coupled rf-SQUID flux qubits, fabricated in a superconducting integrated circuit process. Implementing this type of processor at a scale of 512 qubits and 1472 programmable interqubit couplers and operating at ~ 20 mK has required attention to a number of considerations that one may ignore at the smaller scale of a few dozen or so devices. Here, we discuss some of these considerations, and the delicate balance necessary for the construction of a practical processor that respects the demanding physical requirements imposed by a quantum algorithm. In particular, we will review some of the design tradeoffs at play in the floor planning of the physical layout, driven by the desire to have an algorithmically useful set of interqubit couplers, and the simultaneous need to embed programmable control circuitry into the processor fabric. In this context, we have developed a new ultralow-power embedded superconducting digital-to-analog flux converter (DAC) used to program the processor with zero static power dissipation, optimized to achieve maximum flux storage density per unit area. The 512 single-stage, 3520 two-stage, and 512 three-stage flux DACs are controlled with an XYZ addressing scheme requiring 56 wires. Our estimate of on-chip dissipated energy for worst-case reprogramming of the whole processor is ~ 65 fJ. Several chips based on this architecture have been fabricated and operated successfully at our facility, as well as two outside facilities (see, for example, the recent reporting by Jones).


Nature Communications | 2013

Thermally assisted quantum annealing of a 16-qubit problem

N G Dickson; M. W. Johnson; M. H. S. Amin; R. Harris; Fabio Altomare; Andrew J. Berkley; Paul I. Bunyk; J Cai; E M Chapple; P Chavez; F Cioata; T Cirip; P deBuen; M Drew-Brook; C. Enderud; S. Gildert; F Hamze; Jeremy P. Hilton; E. Hoskinson; K Karimi; E. Ladizinsky; N. Ladizinsky; T. Lanting; T Mahon; R. Neufeld; T. Oh; I Perminov; C Petroff; Anthony Przybysz; C. Rich

Efforts to develop useful quantum computers have been blocked primarily by environmental noise. Quantum annealing is a scheme of quantum computation that is predicted to be more robust against noise, because despite the thermal environment mixing the systems state in the energy basis, the system partially retains coherence in the computational basis, and hence is able to establish well-defined eigenstates. Here we examine the environments effect on quantum annealing using 16 qubits of a superconducting quantum processor. For a problem instance with an isolated small-gap anticrossing between the lowest two energy levels, we experimentally demonstrate that, even with annealing times eight orders of magnitude longer than the predicted single-qubit decoherence time, the probabilities of performing a successful computation are similar to those expected for a fully coherent system. Moreover, for the problem studied, we show that quantum annealing can take advantage of a thermal environment to achieve a speedup factor of up to 1,000 over a closed system.


Physical Review B | 2010

Experimental Demonstration of a Robust and Scalable Flux Qubit

R. Harris; J. Johansson; Andrew J. Berkley; M. W. Johnson; T. Lanting; Siyuan Han; Paul I. Bunyk; E. Ladizinsky; T. Oh; I. Perminov; E. Tolkacheva; S. Uchaikin; E. M. Chapple; C. Enderud; C. Rich; M.C. Thom; J. C. Wang; B. Wilson; G. Rose

Received 23 September 2009; revised manuscript received 11 February 2010; published 7 April 2010 A rf–superconducting quantum interference device SQUID flux qubit that is robust against fabrication variations in Josephson-junction critical currents and device inductance has been implemented. Measurements of the persistent current and of the tunneling energy between the two lowest-lying states, both in the coherent and incoherent regimes, are presented. These experimental results are shown to be in agreement with predictions of a quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian whose parameters were independently calibrated, thus justifying the identification of this device as a flux qubit. In addition, measurements of the flux and critical current noise spectral densities are presented that indicate that these devices with Nb wiring are comparable to the best Al wiring rf SQUIDs reported in the literature thus far, with a 1 /f flux noise spectral density at 1 Hz of 1.3 �0.5 0 /Hz. An explicit formula for converting the observed flux noise spectral density into a freeinduction-decay time for a flux qubit biased to its optimal point and operated in the energy eigenbasis is presented.


Superconductor Science and Technology | 2010

A scalable control system for a superconducting adiabatic quantum optimization processor

M. W. Johnson; Paul I. Bunyk; F. Maibaum; E. Tolkacheva; Andrew J. Berkley; E. M. Chapple; R. Harris; J. Johansson; T. Lanting; I. Perminov; E. Ladizinsky; T. Oh; Geordie Rose

We have designed, fabricated and operated a scalable system for applying independently programmable time-independent, and limited time-dependent flux biases to control superconducting devices in an integrated circuit. Here we report on the operation of a system designed to supply 64 flux biases to devices in a circuit designed to be a unit cell for a superconducting adiabatic quantum optimization system. The system requires six digital address lines, two power lines, and a handful of global analog lines.


Physical Review Letters | 2007

Sign and magnitude tunable coupler for superconducting flux qubits

R. Harris; Andrew J. Berkley; M. W. Johnson; Paul I. Bunyk; S. Govorkov; M. C. Thom; S. Uchaikin; A. B. Wilson; J. Chung; E. Holtham; Jacob Biamonte; A. Yu. Smirnov; M. H. S. Amin; Alec Maassen van den Brink

We experimentally confirm the functionality of a coupling element for flux-based superconducting qubits, with a coupling strength


Superconductor Science and Technology | 2010

A scalable readout system for a superconducting adiabatic quantum optimization system

Andrew J. Berkley; M. W. Johnson; Paul I. Bunyk; R. Harris; J. Johansson; T. Lanting; E. Ladizinsky; E. Tolkacheva; M. H. S. Amin; Geordie Rose

J


Physical Review B | 2009

Geometrical dependence of the low-frequency noise in superconducting flux qubits

T. Lanting; Andrew J. Berkley; B. Bumble; Paul I. Bunyk; A. Fung; J. Johansson; Anupama B. Kaul; A. Kleinsasser; E. Ladizinsky; F. Maibaum; R. Harris; M. W. Johnson; E. Tolkacheva; M. H. S. Amin

whose sign and magnitude can be tuned {\it in situ}. To measure the effective


Physical Review Letters | 2008

Probing noise in flux qubits via macroscopic resonant tunneling.

R. Harris; M. W. Johnson; Siyuan Han; Andrew J. Berkley; J. Johansson; Paul I. Bunyk; E. Ladizinsky; S. Govorkov; M. C. Thom; S. Uchaikin; Bruce Bumble; A. Fung; Anupama B. Kaul; Alan Kleinsasser; M. H. S. Amin; Dmitri V. Averin

J

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew J. Berkley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge