Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mohammad H. S. Amin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mohammad H. S. Amin.


Nature | 2011

Quantum annealing with manufactured spins

M. W. Johnson; Mohammad H. S. Amin; S. Gildert; T. Lanting; F. Hamze; N. Dickson; R. Harris; A. J. Berkley; J. Johansson; Paul I. Bunyk; E. M. Chapple; C. Enderud; Jeremy P. Hilton; K. Karimi; E. Ladizinsky; N. Ladizinsky; T. Oh; I. Perminov; C. Rich; M. C. Thom; E. Tolkacheva; C. J. S. Truncik; S. Uchaikin; J. Wang; B. Wilson; Geordie Rose

Many interesting but practically intractable problems can be reduced to that of finding the ground state of a system of interacting spins; however, finding such a ground state remains computationally difficult. It is believed that the ground state of some naturally occurring spin systems can be effectively attained through a process called quantum annealing. If it could be harnessed, quantum annealing might improve on known methods for solving certain types of problem. However, physical investigation of quantum annealing has been largely confined to microscopic spins in condensed-matter systems. Here we use quantum annealing to find the ground state of an artificial Ising spin system comprising an array of eight superconducting flux quantum bits with programmable spin–spin couplings. We observe a clear signature of quantum annealing, distinguishable from classical thermal annealing through the temperature dependence of the time at which the system dynamics freezes. Our implementation can be configured in situ to realize a wide variety of different spin networks, each of which can be monitored as it moves towards a low-energy configuration. This programmable artificial spin network bridges the gap between the theoretical study of ideal isolated spin networks and the experimental investigation of bulk magnetic samples. Moreover, with an increased number of spins, such a system may provide a practical physical means to implement a quantum algorithm, possibly allowing more-effective approaches to solving certain classes of hard combinatorial optimization problems.


Physical Review A | 2009

First-order quantum phase transition in adiabatic quantum computation

Mohammad H. S. Amin; Vicky Choi

We investigate the connection between local minima in the problem Hamiltonian and first-order quantum phase transitions during adiabatic quantum computation. We demonstrate how some properties of the local minima can lead to an extremely small gap that is exponentially sensitive to the Hamiltonian parameters. Using perturbation expansion, we derive an analytical formula that cannot only predict the behavior of the gap, but also provide insight on how to controllably vary the gap size by changing the parameters. We show agreement with numerical calculations for a weighted maximum independent set problem instance.


Physical Review Letters | 2011

Does adiabatic quantum optimization fail for NP-complete problems?

Neil G. Dickson; Mohammad H. S. Amin

It has been recently argued that adiabatic quantum optimization would fail in solving NP-complete problems because of the occurrence of exponentially small gaps due to crossing of local minima of the final Hamiltonian with its global minimum near the end of the adiabatic evolution. Using perturbation expansion, we analytically show that for the NP-hard problem known as maximum independent set, there always exist adiabatic paths along which no such crossings occur. Therefore, in order to prove that adiabatic quantum optimization fails for any NP-complete problem, one must prove that it is impossible to find any such path in polynomial time.


Physical Review A | 2009

Role of single-qubit decoherence time in adiabatic quantum computation

Mohammad H. S. Amin; C. J. S. Truncik; Dmitri V. Averin

We have studied numerically the evolution of an adiabatic quantum computer in the presence of a Markovian Ohmic environment by considering Ising spin-glass systems with up to 20 qubits independently coupled to this environment via two conjugate degrees of freedom. The required computation time is demonstrated to be of the same order as that for an isolated system and is not limited by the single-qubit decoherence time


Physical Review A | 2015

Searching for quantum speedup in quasistatic quantum annealers

Mohammad H. S. Amin

{T}_{2}^{\ensuremath{\ast}}


Physical Review A | 2012

Algorithmic approach to adiabatic quantum optimization

Neil G. Dickson; Mohammad H. S. Amin

, even when the minimum gap is much smaller than the temperature and decoherence-induced level broadening. For small minimum gap, the system can be described by an effective two-state model coupled only longitudinally to environment.


Quantum Information Processing | 2012

Investigating the performance of an adiabatic quantum optimization processor

Kamran Karimi; Neil G. Dickson; Firas Hamze; Mohammad H. S. Amin; Marshall Drew-Brook; Fabian Chudak; Paul I. Bunyk; William G. Macready; Geordie Rose

We argue that a quantum annealer at very long annealing times is likely to experience a quasistatic evolution, returning a final population that is close to a Boltzmann distribution of the Hamiltonian at a single (freeze-out) point during the annealing. Such a system is expected to correlate with classical algorithms that return the same equilibrium distribution. These correlations do not mean that the evolution of the system is classical or can be simulated by these algorithms. The computation time extracted from such a distribution reflects the equilibrium behavior with no information about the underlying quantum dynamics. This makes the search for quantum speedup problematic.


Quantum Information Processing | 2013

Adiabatic quantum optimization with qudits

Mohammad H. S. Amin; Neil G. Dickson; Peter Smith

It is believed that the presence of anticrossings with exponentially small gaps between the lowest two energy levels of the system Hamiltonian, can render adiabatic quantum optimization inefficient. Here, we present a simple adiabatic quantum algorithm designed to eliminate exponentially small gaps caused by anticrossings between eigenstates that correspond with the local and global minima of the problem Hamiltonian. In each iteration of the algorithm, information is gathered about the local minima that are reached after passing the anticrossing non-adiabatically. This information is then used to penalize pathways to the corresponding local minima, by adjusting the initial Hamiltonian. This is repeated for multiple clusters of local minima as needed. We generate 64-qubit random instances of the maximum independent set problem, skewed to be extremely hard, with between 10^5 and 10^6 highly-degenerate local minima. Using quantum Monte Carlo simulations, it is found that the algorithm can trivially solve all the instances in ~10 iterations.


Physical Review B | 2014

Evidence for temperature-dependent spin diffusion as a mechanism of intrinsic flux noise in SQUIDs

T. Lanting; Mohammad H. S. Amin; A. J. Berkley; C. Rich; S. F. Chen; S. LaForest; Rogerio de Sousa

Adiabatic quantum optimization offers a new method for solving hard optimization problems. In this paper we calculate median adiabatic times (in seconds) determined by the minimum gap during the adiabatic quantum optimization for an NP-hard Ising spin glass instance class with up to 128 binary variables. Using parameters obtained from a realistic superconducting adiabatic quantum processor, we extract the minimum gap and matrix elements using high performance Quantum Monte Carlo simulations on a large-scale Internet-based computing platform. We compare the median adiabatic times with the median running times of two classical solvers and find that, for the considered problem sizes, the adiabatic times for the simulated processor architecture are about 4 and 6 orders of magnitude shorter than the two classical solvers’ times. This shows that if the adiabatic time scale were to determine the computation time, adiabatic quantum optimization would be significantly superior to those classical solvers for median spin glass problems of at least up to 128 qubits. We also discuss important additional constraints that affect the performance of a realistic system.


IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity | 2002

High temperature /spl pi//2-SQUID

Mohammad H. S. Amin; Michael Coury; Geordie Rose

Most realistic solid state devices considered as qubits are not true two-state systems. If the energy separation of the upper energy levels from the lowest two levels is not large, then these upper states may affect the evolution of the ground state over time and therefore cannot be neglected. In this work, we study the effect of energy levels beyond the lowest two energy levels on adiabatic quantum optimization in a device with a double-well potential as the basic logical element. We show that the extra levels can be modeled by adding additional ancilla qubits coupled to the original logical qubits, and that the presence of upper levels has no effect on the final ground state. We also study the influence of upper energy levels on the minimum gap for a set of 8-qubit spin glass instances.

Collaboration


Dive into the Mohammad H. S. Amin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge