Andrew Joelson

Enteric Infection in Relapse of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Utility of Stool Microbial PCR Testing

Background: The similar presentations in relapse of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and enteric infection pose substantial barriers to diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence, etiology, predictors, and treatment of enteric infection in patients with IBD. Methods: We reviewed the records of 214 patients with IBD who underwent 295 gastrointestinal pathogen panel and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) stool tests during an exacerbation of symptoms. We collected baseline characteristics, PCR outcomes, and medication exposures. We tested for associations via the Chi-square test and the t-test. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of enteric infection. Results: Of 295 PCR tests ordered during an exacerbation of symptoms, 38 (12.9%) were positive for CDI and 41 (13.8%) were positive for 14 other pathogens, with E. coli species as the most common. A previous history of CDI or colonic involvement of IBD predicted CDI, whereas a previous colectomy predicted negative testing for CDI. The majority with CDI (24, 63.2%) received oral vancomycin and 15 (37.5%) with other enteric pathogens were treated for their infection. Patients with CDI had a longer median length of hospital stay (8.5 versus 4 days, P = 0.041). Patients who tested negative for enteric infections were more likely to have IBD medications added or up-titrated (P = 0.027). Conclusions: Enteric infection was detected in 79 (26.8%) symptomatic patients with IBD , with CDI the most frequent followed by E. coli. Negative stool PCR testing was associated with changes in IBD management. Broad enteric PCR testing should be considered during relapse of IBD.

Enteric Infections Are Common in Patients with Flares of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have examined the role of non‐Clostridium difficile enteric infections in flares of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our objective was to investigate enteric infection detected by multiplex PCR stool testing in patients with IBD. METHODS: We performed a cross‐sectional analysis of 9403 patients who underwent 13,231 stool tests with a gastrointestinal pathogen PCR panel during a diarrheal illness from March 2015 to May 2017. Our primary outcome was the presence of an infection. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic and histologic predictors of infection, and IBD outcomes following testing. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients with Crohns disease (CD), 300 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 8826 patients without IBD underwent 454, 503, and 12,275 tests, respectively. Compared to patients without IBD, patients with IBD were less likely to test positive (CD 18.1%, UC 16.1%, no IBD 26.6%, p < 0.001). Compared to patients without IBD, CD had a higher prevalence of norovirus (p = 0.05) and Campylobacter (p = 0.043), whereas UC had a lower prevalence of norovirus (p = 0.001) and a higher prevalence of Campylobacter (p = 0.013), Plesiomonas (p = 0.049), and Escherichia coli species (p < 0.001). Of 77 patients who underwent endoscopy, there were no major endoscopic or histologic predictors of a positive test. Patients who tested negative were more likely to have IBD therapy escalated (p = 0.004). Enteric infection did not impact IBD outcomes following testing (log‐rank 0.224). CONCLUSIONS: Non‐Clostridium difficile enteric infections were identified in 17% of symptomatic patients with IBD. Endoscopic and histologic findings may not differentiate flare from infection. Norovirus and E.coli may play an important role in flare of IBD.

The Effect of Depressive Symptoms on the Association between Gluten-Free Diet Adherence and Symptoms in Celiac Disease: Analysis of a Patient Powered Research Network

Background: The prevalence of depression in celiac disease (CD) is high, and patients are often burdened socially and financially by a gluten-free diet. However, the relationship between depression, somatic symptoms and dietary adherence in CD is complex and poorly understood. We used a patient powered research network (iCureCeliac®) to explore the effect that depression has on patients’ symptomatic response to a gluten-free diet (GFD). Methods: We identified patients with biopsy-diagnosed celiac disease who answered questions pertaining to symptoms (Celiac Symptom Index (CSI)), GFD adherence (Celiac Dietary Adherence Test (CDAT)), and a 5-point, scaled question regarding depressive symptoms relating to patients’ celiac disease. We then measured the correlation between symptoms and adherence (CSI vs. CDAT) in patients with depression versus those without depression. We also tested for interaction of depression with regard to the association with symptoms using a multiple linear regression model. Results: Among 519 patients, 86% were female and the mean age was 40.9 years. 46% of patients indicated that they felt “somewhat,” “quite a bit,” or “very much” depressed because of their disorder. There was a moderate correlation between worsened celiac symptoms and poorer GFD adherence (r = 0.6, p < 0.0001). In those with a positive depression screen, there was a moderate correlation between worsening symptoms and worsening dietary adherence (r = 0.5, p < 0.0001) whereas in those without depression, the correlation was stronger (r = 0.64, p < 0.0001). We performed a linear regression analysis, which suggests that the relationship between CSI and CDAT is modified by depression. Conclusions: In patients with depressive symptoms related to their disorder, correlation between adherence and symptoms was weaker than those without depressive symptoms. This finding was confirmed with a linear regression analysis, showing that depressive symptoms may modify the effect of a GFD on celiac symptoms. Depressive symptoms may therefore mask the relationship between inadvertent gluten exposure and symptoms. Additional longitudinal and prospective studies are needed to further explore this potentially important finding.

Numbers and Features of Patients With a Diagnosis of Celiac Disease Without Duodenal Biopsy, Based on a National Survey

BACKGROUND & AIMS According to guidelines, individuals with symptoms of celiac disease should undergo duodenal biopsy analysis to establish a diagnosis, but little is known about physician adherence to these guidelines. We used a patient‐powered research network (PPRN) to compare demographics, diagnoses, symptoms, and treatment between groups of patients with celiac disease diagnosed by biopsy analysis and patients with a diagnosis based on results of serology tests. METHODS We analyzed data from iCureCeliac—a voluntary, PPRN hosted and distributed by the Celiac Disease Foundation, from January 30, 2016, through August 25, 2016. We compared data from adults with a diagnosis of celiac disease (mean age, 43.4 years; 85.6% female) based on biopsy analysis (n = 780) vs patients with a diagnosis based on only serologic analysis (n = 202) using univariate and multivariable analyses. We collected demographic information, as well as data on type of health care practitioner, where patients obtain their primary information about celiac disease, and the Celiac Disease Quality of Life score, nutritionist referral rates, adherence to the gluten‐free diet, ongoing symptoms and use of supplements. RESULTS Among patients with a diagnosis based on serology results, 33.3% were diagnosed by non‐gastroenterologists vs 20.7% in the biopsy diagnosed group (P < .001). Fewer patients with a diagnosis based on serology results sought nutritional counseling at the time of diagnosis (40.1%) than patients with a diagnosis based on biopsy (58.9%) (P < .001). A higher proportion of patients diagnosed by serology without biopsy took dietary supplements to aid in digestion of gluten (19.8%) than patients with a diagnosis based on biopsy (8.9%) (P < .001). After we adjusted for age and sex, patients with a diagnosis based on serology were less likely to seek nutritional counseling after diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.33–0.63), less likely to receive a diagnosis from a gastroenterologist (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07–0.37), and more likely to use digestive supplements (OR, 2.61; 95%, CI 1.62–4.19). CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of data from a PPRN, we found that 21% of adult participants with celiac disease did not have a diagnosis based on a duodenal biopsy. Patients with a diagnosis based on serology results were more likely to be diagnosed by non‐gastroenterologists, less likely to seek nutritional counseling, and more likely to use dietary supplements. Patients require more education about management of celiac disease and referral to gastroenterologists for duodenal biopsy confirmation of their disease.