Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew M. Childs is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew M. Childs.


symposium on the theory of computing | 2003

Exponential algorithmic speedup by a quantum walk

Andrew M. Childs; Richard Cleve; Enrico Deotto; Edward Farhi; Sam Gutmann; Daniel A. Spielman

We construct a black box graph traversal problem that can be solved exponentially faster on a quantum computer than on a classical computer. The quantum algorithm is based on a continuous time quantum walk, and thus employs a different technique from previous quantum algorithms based on quantum Fourier transforms. We show how to implement the quantum walk efficiently in our black box setting. We then show how this quantum walk solves our problem by rapidly traversing a graph. Finally, we prove that no classical algorithm can solve the problem in subexponential time.


Physical Review Letters | 2009

Universal Computation by Quantum Walk

Andrew M. Childs

In some of the earliest work on quantum computing, Feynman showed how to implement universal quantum computation with a time-independent Hamiltonian. I show that this remains possible even if the Hamiltonian is restricted to be the adjacency matrix of a low-degree graph. Thus quantum walk can be regarded as a universal computational primitive, with any quantum computation encoded in some graph. The main idea is to implement quantum gates by scattering processes.


Quantum Information Processing | 2002

An Example of the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Random Walks

Andrew M. Childs; Edward Farhi; Sam Gutmann

AbstractIn this note, we discuss a general definition of quantum random walks on graphs and illustrate with a simple graph the possibility of very different behavior between a classical random walk and its quantum analog. In this graph, propagation between a particular pair of nodes is exponentially faster in the quantum case. PACS: 03.67.Hk


Physical Review A | 2004

Spatial search by quantum walk

Andrew M. Childs; Jeffrey Goldstone

Grovers quantum search algorithm provides a way to speed up combinatorial search, but is not directly applicable to searching a physical database. Nevertheless, Aaronson and Ambainis showed that a database of N items laid out in d spatial dimensions can be searched in time of order {radical}(N) for d>2, and in time of order {radical}(N) poly(log N) for d=2. We consider an alternative search algorithm based on a continuous-time quantum walk on a graph. The case of the complete graph gives the continuous-time search algorithm of Farhi and Gutmann, and other previously known results can be used to show that {radical}(N) speedup can also be achieved on the hypercube. We show that full {radical}(N) speedup can be achieved on a d-dimensional periodic lattice for d>4. In d=4, the quantum walk search algorithm takes time of order {radical}(N) poly(log N), and in d<4, the algorithm does not provide substantial speedup.


Physical Review A | 2001

Robustness of adiabatic quantum computation

Andrew M. Childs; Edward Farhi; John Preskill

We study the fault tolerance of quantum computation by adiabatic evolution, a quantum algorithm for solving various combinatorial search problems. We describe an inherent robustness of adiabatic computation against two kinds of errors, unitary control errors and decoherence, and we study this robustness using numerical simulations of the algorithm.


Reviews of Modern Physics | 2010

Quantum algorithms for algebraic problems

Andrew M. Childs; Wim van Dam

Quantum computers can execute algorithms that dramatically outperform classical computation. As the best-known example, Shor discovered an efficient quantum algorithm for factoring integers, whereas factoring appears to be difficult for classical computers. Understanding what other computational problems can be solved significantly faster using quantum algorithms is one of the major challenges in the theory of quantum computation, and such algorithms motivate the formidable task of building a large-scale quantum computer. This article reviews the current state of quantum algorithms, focusing on algorithms with superpolynomial speedup over classical computation and, in particular, on problems with an algebraic flavor.


Communications in Mathematical Physics | 2010

On the Relationship Between Continuous- and Discrete-Time Quantum Walk

Andrew M. Childs

Quantum walk is one of the main tools for quantum algorithms. Defined by analogy to classical random walk, a quantum walk is a time-homogeneous quantum process on a graph. Both random and quantum walks can be defined either in continuous or discrete time. But whereas a continuous-time random walk can be obtained as the limit of a sequence of discrete-time random walks, the two types of quantum walk appear fundamentally different, owing to the need for extra degrees of freedom in the discrete-time case.In this article, I describe a precise correspondence between continuous- and discrete- time quantum walks on arbitrary graphs. Using this correspondence, I show that continuous-time quantum walk can be obtained as an appropriate limit of discrete-time quantum walks. The correspondence also leads to a new technique for simulating Hamiltonian dynamics, giving efficient simulations even in cases where the Hamiltonian is not sparse. The complexity of the simulation is linear in the total evolution time, an improvement over simulations based on high-order approximations of the Lie product formula. As applications, I describe a continuous-time quantum walk algorithm for element distinctness and show how to optimally simulate continuous-time query algorithms of a certain form in the conventional quantum query model. Finally, I discuss limitations of the method for simulating Hamiltonians with negative matrix elements, and present two problems that motivate attempting to circumvent these limitations.


SIAM Journal on Computing | 2010

Any AND-OR Formula of Size

Andris Ambainis; Andrew M. Childs; Ben W. Reichardt; Robert Spalek; Shengyu Zhang

Consider the problem of evaluating an AND-OR formula on an


foundations of computer science | 2005

N

Dave Bacon; Andrew M. Childs; W. van Dam

N


SIAM Journal on Computing | 2010

Can Be Evaluated in Time

Andris Ambainis; Andrew M. Childs; Ben W. Reichardt; Robert Spalek; Shengyu Zhang

-bit black-box input. We present a bounded-error quantum algorithm that solves this problem in time

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew M. Childs's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward Farhi

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Zak Webb

University of Waterloo

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey Goldstone

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rolando D. Somma

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge