Andrew M. Southerland

Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intracranial artery dissection

Spontaneous intracranial artery dissection is an uncommon and probably underdiagnosed cause of stroke that is defined by the occurrence of a haematoma in the wall of an intracranial artery. Patients can present with headache, ischaemic stroke, subarachnoid haemorrhage, or symptoms associated with mass effect, mostly on the brainstem. Although intracranial artery dissection is less common than cervical artery dissection in adults of European ethnic origin, intracranial artery dissection is reportedly more common in children and in Asian populations. Risk factors and mechanisms are poorly understood, and diagnosis is challenging because characteristic imaging features can be difficult to detect in view of the small size of intracranial arteries. Therefore, multimodal follow-up imaging is often needed to confirm the diagnosis. Treatment of intracranial artery dissections is empirical in the absence of data from randomised controlled trials. Most patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage undergo surgical or endovascular treatment to prevent rebleeding, whereas patients with intracranial artery dissection and cerebral ischaemia are treated with antithrombotics. Prognosis seems worse in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage than in those without.

Common variation in PHACTR1 is associated with susceptibility to cervical artery dissection

Cervical artery dissection (CeAD), a mural hematoma in a carotid or vertebral artery, is a major cause of ischemic stroke in young adults although relatively uncommon in the general population (incidence of 2.6/100,000 per year). Minor cervical traumas, infection, migraine and hypertension are putative risk factors, and inverse associations with obesity and hypercholesterolemia are described. No confirmed genetic susceptibility factors have been identified using candidate gene approaches. We performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in 1,393 CeAD cases and 14,416 controls. The rs9349379[G] allele (PHACTR1) was associated with lower CeAD risk (odds ratio (OR) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.69–0.82; P = 4.46 × 10−10), with confirmation in independent follow-up samples (659 CeAD cases and 2,648 controls; P = 3.91 × 10−3; combined P = 1.00 × 10−11). The rs9349379[G] allele was previously shown to be associated with lower risk of migraine and increased risk of myocardial infarction. Deciphering the mechanisms underlying this pleiotropy might provide important information on the biological underpinnings of these disabling conditions.

Endovascular vs medical management of acute ischemic stroke

Objective: To compare the outcomes between endovascular and medical management of acute ischemic stroke in recent randomized controlled trials (RCT). Methods: A systematic literature review was performed, and multicenter, prospective RCTs published from January 1, 2013, to May 1, 2015, directly comparing endovascular therapy to medical management for patients with acute ischemic stroke were included. Meta-analyses of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and mortality at 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) for endovascular therapy and medical management were performed. Results: Eight multicenter, prospective RCTs (Interventional Management of Stroke [IMS] III, Local Versus Systemic Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke [SYNTHESIS] Expansion, Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy [MR RESCUE], Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands [MR CLEAN], Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness [ESCAPE], Extending the Time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits–Intra-Arterial [EXTEND-IA], Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment [SWIFT PRIME], and Endovascular Revascularization With Solitaire Device Versus Best Medical Therapy in Anterior Circulation Stroke Within 8 Hours [REVASCAT]) comprising 2,423 patients were included. Meta-analysis of pooled data demonstrated functional independence (mRS 0–2) at 90 days in favor of endovascular therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71; p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis of the 6 trials with large vessel occlusion (LVO) criteria also demonstrated functional independence at 90 days in favor of endovascular therapy (OR = 2.23; p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis of the 5 trials that primarily utilized stent retriever devices (≥70%) in the intervention arm demonstrated functional independence at 90 days in favor of endovascular therapy (OR = 2.39; p < 0.00001). No difference was found for mortality at 90 days and sICH between endovascular therapy and medical management in all analyses and subgroup analyses. Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides strong evidence that endovascular intervention combined with medical management, including IV tissue plasminogen activator for eligible patients, improves the outcomes of appropriately selected patients with acute ischemic stroke in the setting of LVO.

Current perspectives on the use of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for treatment of acute ischemic stroke

In 1995, the NINDS (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke) tPA (tissue plasminogen activator) Stroke Study Group published the results of a large multicenter clinical trial demonstrating efficacy of intravenous tPA by revealing a 30% relative risk reduction (absolute risk reduction 11%–15%) compared with placebo at 90 days in the likelihood of having minimal or no disability. Since approval in 1996, tPA remains the only drug treatment for acute ischemic stroke approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Over the years, an abundance of research and clinical data has supported the safe and efficacious use of intravenous tPA in all eligible patients. Despite such supporting data, it remains substantially underutilized. Challenges to the utilization of tPA include narrow eligibility and treatment windows, risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, perceived lack of efficacy in certain high-risk subgroups, and a limited pool of neurological and stroke expertise in the community. With recent US census data suggesting annual stroke incidence will more than double by 2050, better education and consensus among both the medical and lay public are necessary to optimize the use of tPA for all eligible stroke patients. Ongoing and future research should continue to improve upon the efficacy of tPA through more rapid stroke diagnosis and treatment, refinement of advanced neuroimaging and stroke biomarkers, and successful demonstration of alternative means of reperfusion.

Considering hyperglycemia and thrombolysis in the stroke hyperglycemia insulin network effort (shine) trial

Hyperglycemia is associated with enhanced cortical toxicity and larger infarct volumes following focal cerebral ischemia. Initial blood glucose in acute ischemic stroke patients may also contribute to a differential response to thrombolysis (i.e., administration of tissue plasminogen activator (t‐PA)) and affect risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) study is a phase III single‐blinded, randomized control trial comparing an intensive level of glucose control with standard of care glucose control in hyperglycemic stroke patients. In stratifying randomization by treatment with intravenous t‐PA, the SHINE trial offers a unique opportunity to evaluate an association between euglycemic control and outcomes from stroke thrombolysis in a prospective, comparative study. We hypothesize that normalization of blood glucose in the acute stroke setting may reduce risk of thrombolysis‐induced sICH. With enrollment recently underway, the stratified results from the SHINE trial could substantially influence future treatment decisions for hyperglycemic stroke patients.

Shared associations of nonatherosclerotic, large-vessel, cerebrovascular arteriopathies: considering intracranial aneurysms, cervical artery dissection, moyamoya disease and fibromuscular dysplasia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW With ongoing advancements in noninvasive vascular imaging and high-throughput genomics, we have the opportunity to reclassify the cerebrocervical disorders by these shared associations, rather than their downstream events, and to better understand etiology, mechanism and preventive treatments going forward. RECENT FINDINGS The common nonatherosclerotic, large-vessel arteriopathies affecting the cerebrovasculature include intracranial aneurysms, cervical artery dissection, fibromuscular dysplasia and moyamoya disease. Together, these entities contribute to a high incidence of devastating cerebrovascular outcomes, including ischemic stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage, leading to long-term physical and cognitive disability frequently in young otherwise healthy adults. In addition to well reported clinical overlap, these polygenic phenotypes share epidemiological characteristics, environmental risk and a common pathological weakening of the arterial wall. SUMMARY We reviewed both past and present studies relating these shared associations, including reported candidate gene analyses and genome-wide association data. We also catalogue recent descriptions of novel arteriopathic syndromes that add to the growing list of monogenic connective tissue disease affecting the arterial wall, and further inform our understanding of more common polygenic phenotypes. We also place these cerebrocervical arteriopathies in the context of other systemic nonatherosclerotic, large-vessel vascular disease (e.g. aortic aneurysm and dissection).

A low-cost, tablet-based option for prehospital neurologic assessment: The iTREAT Study

Objectives: In this 2-center study, we assessed the technical feasibility and reliability of a low cost, tablet-based mobile telestroke option for ambulance transport and hypothesized that the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) could be performed with similar reliability between remote and bedside examinations. Methods: We piloted our mobile telemedicine system in 2 geographic regions, central Virginia and the San Francisco Bay Area, utilizing commercial cellular networks for videoconferencing transmission. Standardized patients portrayed scripted stroke scenarios during ambulance transport and were evaluated by independent raters comparing bedside to remote mobile telestroke assessments. We used a mixed-effects regression model to determine intraclass correlation of the NIHSS between bedside and remote examinations (95% confidence interval). Results: We conducted 27 ambulance runs at both sites and successfully completed the NIHSS for all prehospital assessments without prohibitive technical interruption. The mean difference between bedside (face-to-face) and remote (video) NIHSS scores was 0.25 (1.00 to −0.50). Overall, correlation of the NIHSS between bedside and mobile telestroke assessments was 0.96 (0.92–0.98). In the mixed-effects regression model, there were no statistically significant differences accounting for method of evaluation or differences between sites. Conclusions: Utilizing a low-cost, tablet-based platform and commercial cellular networks, we can reliably perform prehospital neurologic assessments in both rural and urban settings. Further research is needed to establish the reliability and validity of prehospital mobile telestroke assessment in live patients presenting with acute neurologic symptoms.

Shared genetic susceptibility of vascular-related biomarkers with ischemic and recurrent stroke

Objective: To investigate the genetic contributors to cerebrovascular disease and variation in biomarkers of ischemic stroke. Methods: The Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention Trial (VISP) was a randomized, controlled clinical trial of B vitamin supplementation to prevent recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. VISP collected baseline measures of C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, creatinine, prothrombin fragments F1+2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and thrombomodulin prior to treatment initiation. Genome-wide association scans were conducted for these traits and follow-up replication analyses were performed. Results: We detected an association between CRP single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and circulating CRP levels (most associated SNP, rs2592902, p = 1.14 × 10−9) in 2,100 VISP participants. We discovered a novel association for CRP level in the AKR1D1 locus (rs2589998, p = 7.3 × 10−8, approaching genome-wide significance) that also is an expression quantitative trait locus for CRP gene expression. We replicated previously identified associations of fibrinogen with SNPs in the FGB and LEPR loci. CRP-associated SNPs and CRP levels were significantly associated with risk of ischemic stroke and recurrent stroke in VISP as well as specific stroke subtypes in METASTROKE. Fibrinogen levels but not fibrinogen-associated SNPs were also found to be associated with recurrent stroke in VISP. Conclusions: Our data identify a genetic contribution to inflammatory and hemostatic biomarkers in a stroke population. Additionally, our results suggest shared genetic contributions to circulating CRP levels measured poststroke and risk for incident and recurrent ischemic stroke. These data broaden our understanding of genetic contributors to biomarker variation and ischemic stroke risk, which should be useful in clinical risk evaluation.

Symptomatic ICH and outcomes in patients after IV tPA A business of risk or risky business

Since the earliest trials of IV thrombolysis (IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator [rtPA]) in acute stroke, the salient benefits of treatment have remained shadowed by an underlying concern for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Our current treatment guidelines stem from the sentinel prospective clinical trials in which sICH event frequency ranges from 2% to 8% depending on the definition.1,–,3 These rates of sICH are often quoted as static numbers, particularly in the setting of discussion with patients and families considering treatment, but most would admit that variations in actual risk for individuals likely occur. Moreover, certain nonmodifiable factors such as age, baseline NIH Stroke Scale score, and early ischemic changes on CT, as well as modifiable factors such as onset-to-treatment time (OTT), likely influence both the risk of sICH and outcomes after thrombolysis.4,5 Since we herald the benefit of IV rtPA in the acute stroke setting based on more favorable 3-month outcomes, we should consider the risk under the same auspices and not simply by the immediate outcome of sICH. In this issue …

Safety of Computed Tomographic Angiography in the Evaluation of Patients With Acute Stroke: A Single-Center Experience

Background and Purpose— Noncontrasted head computed tomography (NCHCT) has long been the standard of care for acute stroke imaging. New guidelines recommending advanced vascular imaging to identify eligible patients for endovascular therapy have renewed safety concerns on the use of contrast in the emergent setting without laboratory confirmation of renal function. Methods— We compared computed tomographic angiography (CTA) versus NCHCT alone during acute stroke evaluation with focus on renal safety and timeliness of therapy delivery. We reviewed data on all emergency department patients for whom the Acute Stroke Intervention Team was activated between December 2013 and September 2014. Primary outcomes included acute kidney injury and change in serum creatinine from presentation to 24 to 48 hours (&Dgr; serum creatinine [Cr]). We assessed therapy delay using door-to-CT and door-to-needle times. Results— Of 289 patients requiring Acute Stroke Intervention Team activation, 157 received CTA and 132 NCHCT only. There was no difference between groups in mean Cr at 24 to 48 hours (1.06 CTA; 1.40 NCHCT; P=0.059), &Dgr;Cr (−0.07 CTA, −0.11 NCHCT, P=0.489), or rates of acute kidney injury (5 CTA, 7 NCHCT, P=0.422). There was no significant difference in mean intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment times (68.11 minutes CTA, 81.36 minutes NCHCT; P=0.577). In the 157 patients who underwent CTA, 16 (10.2%) vascular anomalies and 55 (35.0%) high-grade stenoses or occlusions were identified. Conclusions— CTA acquisition during acute stroke evaluation was safe with regards to renal function and did not delay appropriate therapy delivery. Acute CTA acquisition offers additional clinical value in rapid identification of vascular abnormalities.