Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andrew Ransick is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andrew Ransick.


Mechanisms of Development | 1993

Whole mount in situ hybridization shows Endo 16 to be a marker for the vegetal plate territory in sea urchin embryos

Andrew Ransick; Susan G. Ernst; Roy J. Britten; Eric H. Davidson

We have used whole mount in situ hybridization to analyze the pattern of expression of the gene Endo 16 in S. purpuratus embryos. The mRNA is first detectable at 18 h post-fertilization in the cytoplasm of blastomeres derived from the Veg2 6th cleavage tier. The number of Endo 16 positive cells increases gradually through the beginning of gastrulation, and these cell numbers are in agreement with estimates of the number of cells that should be in the vegetal plate at these stages. We conclude that Endo 16 expression is indeed an early vegetal plate marker and that this gene is expressed by all Veg2 tier derivatives while they are part of the vegetal plate. The progressive regionalization of Endo 16 expression that occurs in normal embryos is also seen in lithium chloride induced exogastrulae, leading to the conclusion that genetic regulation of endoderm differentiation is programmed into the vegetal plate cells once they have been specified. Finally, we report a reproducible phenomenon seen in cultures of LiCl exogastrulae, in which the tips of the everted archenterons fuse, followed by the induction of supernumerary pigment cells.


Developmental Biology | 2003

Spdeadringer, a sea urchin embryo gene required separately in skeletogenic and oral ectoderm gene regulatory networks

Gabriele Amore; Robert G Yavrouian; Kevin J. Peterson; Andrew Ransick; David R. McClay; Eric H. Davidson

The Spdeadringer (Spdri) gene encodes an ARID-class transcription factor not previously known in sea urchin embryos. We show that Spdri is a key player in two separate developmental gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Spdri is expressed in a biphasic manner, first, after 12 h and until ingression in the skeletogenic descendants of the large micromeres; second, after about 20 h in the oral ectoderm, where its transcripts remain present at 30-50 mRNA molecules/cell far into development. In both territories, the periods of Spdri expression follow prior territorial specification events. The functional significance of each phase of expression was assessed by determining the effect of an alphaSpdri morpholino antisense oligonucleotide (MASO) on expression of 17 different mesodermal genes, 8 different oral ectoderm genes, and 18 other genes expressed specifically during endomesoderm specification. These effects were measured by quantitative PCR, supplemented by whole-mount in situ hybridization and morphological observations. Spdri is shown to act in the micromere descendants in the pathways that result in the expression of batteries of terminal skeletogenic genes. But, in the oral ectoderm, the same gene participates in the central GRN controlling oral ectoderm identity. Spdri is linked in the oral ectoderm GRN with several other genes encoding transcriptional regulators that are expressed specifically in various regions of the oral ectoderm. If its expression is blocked by treatment with alphaSpdri MASO, oral-specific features disappear and expression of the aboral ectoderm marker spec1 encompasses the whole of the ectoderm. In addition to disappearance of the oral ectoderm, morphological consequences of alphaSpdri MASO treatment include failure of spiculogenesis and of correct primary mesenchyme cell (pmc) patterning in the postgastrular embryo, and also failure of gastrulation. To further analyze these phenotypes, chimeric embryos were constructed consisting of two labeled micromeres combined with micromereless 4th cleavage host embryos; either the micromeres or the hosts contained alphaSpdri MASO. These experiments showed that, while Spdri expression is required autonomously for expression of skeletogenic genes prior to ingression, complete skeletogenesis also requires the expression of oral ectoderm patterning information. Presentation of this information on the oral side of the blastocoel in turn depends on Spdri expression in the oral ectoderm. Failure of gastrulation is not due to indirect interference with endomesodermal specification per se, since all endomesodermal genes tested function normally in alphaSpdri MASO embryos. Part of its cause is interference by alphaSpdri MASO with a late signaling function on the part of the micromere descendants that is needed to complete clearance of the Soxb1 repressor of gastrulation from the prospective endoderm, but in addition there is a nonautonomous oral ectoderm effect.


Mechanisms of Development | 1994

Complexity and organization of DNA-protein interactions in the 5'-regulatory region of an endoderm-specific marker gene in the sea urchin embryo.

Chiou-Hwa Yuh; Andrew Ransick; Pedro Martinez; Roy J. Britten; Eric H. Davidson

This study concerns the organization of sites of specific DNA/protein interaction within the regulatory domain of the Endo16 gene of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Earlier work had displayed a complex pattern of expression of this gene during embryogenesis. Endo16 transcripts are confined to the definitive vegetal plate in blastula stage embryos; at gastrula stage this gene is expressed throughout the archenteron, but later only in the midgut. In this work we exploited the exceptional experimental accessibility of the sea urchin embryo, with respect to both functional assays of gene regulatory systems and to characterization of transcription factors, in order to approach a complete description of potential Endo16 regulatory interactions. Accurate expression of an Endo16 fusion gene was obtained with a 2200-nucleotide (nt) upstream fragment of the gene. We present a map locating high specificity target sites for DNA-binding proteins within the 2200-nt Endo16 regulatory domain, and an assessment of the complexity of the set of putative Endo16 transcription factors that we have been able to recover from 24-h (blastula stage) nuclear extract. Protein binding sites were initially mapped by gel shift reactions carried out on nested sets of end-labeled restriction fragments, and then to finer resolution by oligonucleotide gel shift competitions. Thirty-eight sites of high specificity DNA-protein interaction were thus identified. Appropriate oligonucleotides were then used for partial purification of the DNA-binding proteins by affinity chromatography. DNA-binding proteins specific for each target site were identified by molecular weight, using southwestern blotting procedures and two-dimensional gel shift separations, and by directly renaturing and reacting with oligonucleotide probes specific proteins that had been resolved by SDS-PAGE from selected affinity column fractions. A complete series of gel shift cross-competitions amongst the target sites was carried out. We conclude that nine different protein factors are bound at unique sites within the Endo16 regulatory domain. Multiple target sites for five other proteins account for the remaining binding site locations. The target sites appear to be organized in a sequence of clusters, focused on the unique factors. The high complexity of the Endo16 gene regulatory system may be characteristic for genes that are spatially regulated in early embryonic development.


Methods in Cell Biology | 2004

Detection of mRNA by in situ hybridization and RT-PCR.

Andrew Ransick

Publisher Summary This chapter provides an overview of several approaches currently being used that rely on messenger RNA (mRNA) from a relatively small amount of starting material as a means to obtain detailed information on the expression of a single gene or an entire network of genes in the embryo. Whole mount in situ hybridization (WMISH) is a relatively easy procedure, resulting in specimens with long-term stability and great utility for deciphering gene expression patterns. The WMISH protocol presented is optimized for preserving specimen morphology and handling small numbers of specimens. In situ hybridization methods use sectioned tissue and radioactively labeled RNA probes. It provides a more quantitative assessment of relative mRNA target levels and also offers a good way to compare the distributions of different mRNAs in the same embryo by probing adjacent thin (1 μm) sections. In situ signals for a large number of different mRNAs as a function of developmental stage are always consistent with other hybridization assays, such as RNA blotting or RNase protection. Whole-mount in situ hybridization largely replaces radioactive methods with sectioned tissue because of its relative speed, the long-term stability of the probes, and the ease of three-dimensional interpretation. The detection of mRNA by real time quantitative PCR (RTQ–PCR) helps to obtain accurate relative quantity of mRNA expression for as many genes as possible in direct comparisons between differentially manipulated experimental samples using relatively small quantities of starting material.


Developmental Biology | 2013

Diversification of oral and aboral mesodermal regulatory states in pregastrular sea urchin embryos.

Stefan C. Materna; Andrew Ransick; Enhu Li; Eric H. Davidson

Specification of the non-skeletogenic mesoderm (NSM) in sea urchin embryos depends on Delta signaling. Signal reception leads to expression of regulatory genes that later contribute to the aboral NSM regulatory state. In oral NSM, this is replaced by a distinct oral regulatory state in consequence of Nodal signaling. Through regulome wide analysis we identify the homeobox gene not as an immediate Nodal target. not expression in NSM causes extinction of the aboral regulatory state in the oral NSM, and expression of a new suite of regulatory genes. All NSM specific regulatory genes are henceforth expressed exclusively, in oral or aboral domains, presaging the mesodermal cell types that will emerge. We have analyzed the regulatory linkages within the aboral NSM gene regulatory network. A linchpin of this network is gataE which as we show is a direct Gcm target and part of a feedback loop locking down the aboral regulatory state.


BMC Biology | 2006

CBFβ is a facultative Runx partner in the sea urchin embryo

Anthony J. Robertson; Carrie Dickey-Sims; Andrew Ransick; Dawn Rupp; John J. McCarthy; James A. Coffman

BackgroundRunx proteins are developmentally important metazoan transcription factors that form a heterodimeric complex with the non-homologous protein Core Binding Factor β (CBFβ). CBFβ allosterically enhances Runx DNA binding but does not bind DNA itself. We report the initial characterization of SpCBFβ, the heterodimeric partner of SpRunt-1 from the sea urchin Stronylocentrotus purpuratus.ResultsSpCBFβ is remarkably similar to its mammalian homologues, and like them it enhances the DNA binding of the Runt domain. SpCBFβ is entirely of zygotic provenance and its expression is similar that of SpRunt-1, accumulating globally at late blastula stage then later localizing to endoderm and oral ectoderm. Unlike SpRunt-1, however, SpCBFβ is enriched in the endodermal mid- and hindgut of the pluteus larva, and is not highly expressed in the foregut and ciliated band. We showed previously that morpholino antisense-mediated knockdown of SpRunt-1 leads to differentiation defects, as well as to extensive post-blastula stage apoptosis caused by under-expression of the Runx target gene SpPKC1. In contrast, we show here that knockdown of SpCBFβ does not negatively impact cell survival or SpPKC1 expression, although it does lead to differentiation defects similar to those associated with SpRunt-1 deficiency. Moreover, SpRunt-1 containing a single amino acid substitution that abolishes its ability to interact with SpCBFβ retains the ability to rescue cell survival in SpRunt-1 morphant embryos. Chromatin immunoprecipitation shows that while the CyIIIa promoter engages both proteins, the SpPKC1 promoter only engages SpRunt-1.ConclusionSpCBFβ is a facultative Runx partner that appears to be required specifically for cell differentiation.


Methods in Cell Biology | 2004

Blastomere isolation and transplantation

Hyla Sweet; Shonan Amemiya; Andrew Ransick; Takuya Minokawa; David R. McClay; Athula H. Wikramanayake; Ritsu Kuraishi; Masato Kiyomoto; Hiroki Nishida; Jonathan J. Henry

Publisher Summary This chapter describes methods for setting up and preparing the instruments and tools needed for embryo operations. The methods for isolation and recombination of blastomeres in sea urchin embryos are discussed. Removal of the fertilization envelope is usually necessary for blastomere isolation and transplantation. The surgical isolation and recombination of blastomeres by hand includes techniques that were originally used by Horstadius on sea urchin embryos. These techniques are very powerful and some embryologists continue to use them with only minor modifications. A disadvantage to these techniques is that they require much patience and practice. New techniques include similar surgical experiments but use micromanipulators to control the dissection needles and bulk methods. When doing blastomere transplantations, doubling the amount of calcium in the seawater results in greater adhesion of donor and host cells. The methods for surgical operation on starfish, amphioxus, ascidians, and hemichordates are also described.


Science | 2002

A Genomic Regulatory Network for Development

Eric H. Davidson; Jonathan P. Rast; Paola Oliveri; Andrew Ransick; Cristina Calestani; Chiou-Hwa Yuh; Takuya Minokawa; Gabriele Amore; Veronica F. Hinman; César Arenas-Mena; Ochan Otim; C. Titus Brown; Carolina B. Livi; Pei Yun Lee; Roger Revilla; Alistair G. Rust; Zheng Jun Pan; Maria J. Schilstra; Peter J C Clarke; Maria I. Arnone; Lee Rowen; R. Andrew Cameron; David R. McClay; Leroy Hood; Hamid Bolouri


Developmental Biology | 2002

A Provisional Regulatory Gene Network for Specification of Endomesoderm in the Sea Urchin Embryo

Eric H. Davidson; Jonathan P. Rast; Paola Oliveri; Andrew Ransick; Cristina Calestani; Chiou-Hwa Yuh; Takuya Minokawa; Gabriele Amore; Veronica F. Hinman; César Arenas-Mena; Ochan Otim; C. Titus Brown; Carolina B. Livi; Pei Yun Lee; Roger Revilla; Maria J. Schilstra; Peter J C Clarke; Alistair G. Rust; Zhengjun Pan; Maria Ina Arnone; Lee Rowen; R. Andrew Cameron; David R. McClay; Leroy Hood; Hamid Bolouri


Development | 1998

Specification of cell fate in the sea urchin embryo: summary and some proposed mechanisms.

Eric H. Davidson; R.A. Cameron; Andrew Ransick

Collaboration


Dive into the Andrew Ransick's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric H. Davidson

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cristina Calestani

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Takuya Minokawa

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriele Amore

Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan P. Rast

Sunnybrook Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carolina B. Livi

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Andrew Cameron

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chiou-Hwa Yuh

National Health Research Institutes

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Titus Brown

University of California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge