Andy Dedecker
Ghent University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andy Dedecker.
Aquatic Ecology | 2007
Peter Goethals; Andy Dedecker; Wim Gabriels; Sovan Lek; Niels De Pauw
To facilitate decision support in freshwater ecosystem protection and restoration management, habitat suitability models can be very valuable. Data driven methods such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) are particularly useful in this context, seen their time-efficient development and relatively high reliability. However, specialized and technical literature on neural network modelling offers a variety of model development criteria to select model architecture, training procedure, etc. This may lead to confusion among ecosystem modellers and managers regarding the optimal training and validation methodology. This paper focuses on the analysis of ANN development and application for predicting macroinvertebrate communities, a species group commonly used in freshwater assessment worldwide. This review reflects on the different aspects regarding model development and application based on a selection of 26 papers reporting the use of ANN models for the prediction of macroinvertebrates. This analysis revealed that the applied model training and validation methodologies can often be improved and moreover crucial steps in the modelling process are often poorly documented. Therefore, suggestions to improve model development, assessment and application in ecological river management are presented. In particular, data pre-processing determines to a high extent the reliability of the induced models and their predictive relevance. This also counts for the validation criteria, that need to be better tuned to the practical simulation requirements. Moreover, the use of sensitivity methods can help to extract knowledge on the habitat preference of species and allow peer-review by ecological experts. The selection of relevant input variables remains a critical challenge as well. Model coupling is a missing crucial step to link human activities, hydrology, physical habitat conditions, water quality and ecosystem status. This last aspect is probably the most valuable aspect to enable decision support in water management based on ANN models.
Aquatic Ecology | 2007
Wim Gabriels; Peter Goethals; Andy Dedecker; Sovan Lek; Niels De Pauw
The effect of environmental conditions on river macrobenthic communities was studied using a dataset consisting of 343 sediment samples from unnavigable watercourses in Flanders, Belgium. Artificial neural network models were used to analyse the relation among river characteristics and macrobenthic communities. The dataset included presence or absence of macroinvertebrate taxa and 12 physicochemical and hydromorphological variables for each sampling site. The abiotic variables served as input for the artificial neural networks to predict the macrobenthic community. The effects of the input variables on model performance were assessed in order to identify the most diagnostic river characteristics for macrobenthic community composition. This was done by consecutively eliminating the least important variables and, when beneficial for model performance, adding previously removed ones again. This stepwise input variable selection procedure was tested not only on a model predicting the entire macrobenthic community, but also on three models, each predicting an individual taxon. Additionally, during each step of the stepwise leave-one-out procedure, a sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the response of the predicted macroinvertebrate taxa to the input variables applied. This research illustrated that a combination of input variable selection with sensitivity analyses can contribute to the development of reliable and ecologically relevant ANN models. The river characteristics predicting presence or absence of the benthic macroinvertebrates best were the Julian day, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen content. These conditions reflect the importance of discharges of untreated wastewater that occurred during the period of investigation in nearly all Flemish rivers.
The Scientific World Journal | 2002
Andy Dedecker; Peter Goethals; Niels De Pauw
Modelling has become an interesting tool to support decision making in water management. River ecosystem modelling methods have improved substantially during recent years. New concepts, such as artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, evolutionary algorithms, chaos and fractals, cellular automata, etc., are being more commonly used to analyse ecosystem databases and to make predictions for river management purposes. In this context, artificial neural networks were applied to predict macroinvertebrate communities in the Zwalm River basin (Flanders, Belgium). Structural characteristics (meandering, substrate type, flow velocity) and physical and chemical variables (dissolved oxygen, pH) were used as predictive variables to predict the presence or absence of macroinvertebrate taxa in the headwaters and brooks of the Zwalm River basin. Special interest was paid to the frequency of occurrence of the taxa as well as the selection of the predictors and variables to be predicted on the prediction reliability of the developed models. Sensitivity analyses allowed us to study the impact of the predictive variables on the prediction of presence or absence of macroinvertebrate taxa and to define which variables are the most influential in determining the neural network outputs.
Ecological informatics : understanding ecology by biologically-inspired computation | 2006
Peter Goethals; Andy Dedecker; Wim Gabriëls; N. De Pauw
Prediction of freshwater organisms based on machine learning techniques is becoming more and more reliable due to the availability of appropriate datasets and modelling techniques. Artificial neural networks (Lek and Guegan 1999), fuzzy logic (Barros et al. 2000), evolutionary algorithms (Caldarelli et al. 1998), cellular automata (Gronewold and Sonnenschein 1998), etc. proved to be powerful tools to perform ecological modelling, especially when large datasets are involved. Models have several interesting applications in river management. They allow for a better interpretation of the results, easing the cause-allocation of the actual river status and increasing the insight needed to improve assessment systems (Fig. 6.1.). Models also allow for simulating the effect of potential management options and thus supporting decision-making. The development of effective and efficient monitoring networks based on models is probably another important advantage.
Ecological Modelling | 2004
Andy Dedecker; Peter Goethals; Wim Gabriels; Niels De Pauw
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2005
Andy Dedecker; Peter Goethals; Tom D'Heygere; Muriel Gevrey; Sovan Lek; Niels De Pauw
Ecological Modelling | 2007
Andy Dedecker; Koen Van Melckebeke; Peter Goethals; Niels De Pauw
Aquatic Ecology | 2006
Andy Dedecker; Peter Goethals; Tom D’heygere; Niels De Pauw
Modelling community structure in freshwater ecosystems | 2005
Andy Dedecker; Peter Goethals; N de Pauw
Annales De Limnologie-international Journal of Limnology | 2006
E. Dakou; Peter Goethals; Tom D'Heygere; Andy Dedecker; Wim Gabriels; N. De Pauw; M. Lazaridou-Dimitriadou