Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Andy J. Fischer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Andy J. Fischer.


The Journal of Comparative Neurology | 1998

Immunocytochemical characterization of quisqualic acid- and N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced excitotoxicity in the retina of chicks.

Andy J. Fischer; Ruth L. Pickett Seltner; Johnny Poon; William K. Stell

A single, large dose of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) or quisqualic acid (QA) injected into the chick eye has been shown previously to destroy many retinal amacrine cells and to induce excessive ocular growth accompanied by myopia. The purpose of this study was to identify distinct populations of retinal cells, particularly those believed to be involved in regulating ocular growth, that are sensitive to NMDA or QA. Two μmol of NMDA or 0.2 μmol of QA were injected unilaterally into eyes of 7‐day‐old chicks, and retinas were prepared for observation 1, 3, or 7 days later. Retinal neurons were identified by using immunocytochemistry, and cells containing fragmented DNA were identified by 3′‐nick‐end labelling in frozen sections. NMDA and QA destroyed many amacrine cells, including those immunoreactive for vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, Met‐enkephalin, and choline acetyltransferase, but they had little effect upon tyrosine hydroxylase‐immunoreactive cells. Other cells affected by both QA and NMDA included those immunoreactive for glutamic acid decarboxylase, γ‐aminobutyric acid, parvalbumin, serotonin, and aminohydroxy methylisoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptor subunits GluR1 and GluR2/3. Cells largely unaffected by QA or NMDA included bipolar cells immunoreactive for protein kinase C (α and β isoforms) and amacrine cells immunoreactive for glucagon. DNA fragmentation was detected maximally in many amacrine cells and in some bipolar cells 1 day after exposure to QA or NMDA. We propose that excitotoxicity caused by QA and NMDA induces apoptosis in specific populations of amacrine cells and that these actions are responsible for the ocular growth‐specific effects of QA and NMDA reported elsewhere. J. Comp. Neurol. 393:1–15, 1998.


The Journal of Comparative Neurology | 1999

Nitric oxide synthase-containing cells in the retina, pigmented epithelium, choroid, and sclera of the chick eye.

Andy J. Fischer; William K. Stell

Nitric oxide is a nonconventional neurotransmitter that is produced as needed by the enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS). NOS has been detected in numerous neural structures, including distinct populations of retinal neurons in a variety of vertebrate species. The purpose of this study was to identify NOS‐containing cells in the retina and extraretinal ocular tissues of hatched chicks. NOS was detected in frozen sections by using nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)‐diaphorase histochemistry and antisera to neuronal NOS. In the retina, NADPH‐diaphorase and NOS immunolabelling were present in four subtypes of amacrine cells, some ganglion cells, efferent fibers, efferent target cells, and neuronal processes in both plexiform layers, whereas diaphorase alone was detected in photoreceptor ellipsoids and Müller cells. In addition, NADPH‐diaphorase and immunoreactive NOS were detected in axon bundles and innervation to vascular smooth muscle in the choroid, whereas stromal and endothelial cells in the choroid, scleral chondrocytes, and the retinal pigmented epithelium contained only NADPH‐diaphorase. The excitotoxin quisqualate destroyed all but one subtype of NOS‐immunoreactive amacrine cell and caused increased NADPH‐diaphorase activity in Müller cells. We conclude that nitric oxide is produced by many different cells in the chick eye, including retinal amacrine and ganglion cells, Müller cells, retinal pigmented epithelium, and cells in the choroid, and likely has a broad range of visual and regulatory functions. J. Comp. Neurol. 405:1–14, 1999.


The Journal of Comparative Neurology | 1998

IDENTIFICATION AND LOCALIZATION OF MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORS IN THE OCULAR TISSUES OF THE CHICK

Andy J. Fischer; Lise A. McKinnon; Neil M. Nathanson; William K. Stell

The purpose of this study was to characterize the distribution of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) in the ocular tissues of hatched chicks. In the chick, different isoforms of these receptors have been detected in the brain, heart, and retina, and mAChRs in ocular tissues have been implicated in the pathogenesis of form‐deprivation myopia. However, the precise anatomical distribution of mAChRs within the retina, retinal pigment epithelium, choroid, ciliary body, and ciliary ganglion remains unknown. We used affinity‐purified, type‐specific antibodies directed to three different chick mAChR subtypes (cm2, cm3, and cm4) to detect receptor immunoreactivity in sections and extracts of these ocular tissues. We found cm2, cm3, and cm4 in the retina, retinal pigment epithelium, choroid, and ciliary body. Within the retina, cm2 was expressed in numerous amacrine and ganglion cells; cm3 was expressed in many bipolar cells and small subsets of amacrine cells; and cm4 was found in most, if not all, amacrine and ganglion cells. Each mAChR was localized to distinct strata within the inner plexiform layer that cumulatively form three broad bands that closely match previously described localizations of subtype‐nonspecific muscarinic ligand binding. Only cm3 was detected in the outer plexiform layer, and only cm4 was detected in the ciliary ganglion. We propose that each mAChR subtype has unique functions in each ocular tissue. J. Comp. Neurol. 392:273–284, 1998.


Vision Research | 1999

Colchicine causes excessive ocular growth and myopia in chicks

Andy J. Fischer; Ian G. Morgan; William K. Stell

Colchicine has been reported to destroy ganglion cells (GCs) in the retina of hatchling chicks. We tested whether colchicine influences normal ocular growth and form-deprivation myopia, and whether it affects cells other than GCs. Colchicine greatly increased axial length, equatorial diameter, eye weight, and myopic refractive error, while reducing corneal curvature. Colchicine caused DNA fragmentation in many GCs and some amacrine cells and photoreceptors, ultimately leading to the destruction of most GCs and particular sub-sets of amacrine cells. Colchicine-induced ocular growth may result from the destruction of amacrine cells that normally suppress ocular growth, and corneal flattening may result from the destruction of GCs whose central pathway normally plays a role in shaping the cornea.


Brain Research | 1998

Cholinergic amacrine cells are not required for the progression and atropine-mediated suppression of form-deprivation myopia

Andy J. Fischer; Pat Miethke; Ian G. Morgan; William K. Stell

Muscarinic cholinergic pathways have been implicated in the visual control of ocular growth. However, the source(s) of acetylcholine and the tissue(s) which regulate ocular growth via muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) remain unknown. We sought to determine whether retinal sources of acetylcholine and mAChRs contribute to visually guided ocular growth in the chick. Cholinergic amacrine cells were ablated by intraocular injections of either ethylcholine mustard aziridinium ion (ECMA; a selective cholinotoxin) or quisqualic acid (QA; an excitotoxin that destroys many amacrine cells, including those that release acetylcholine). Disruption of cholinergic pathways was assessed immunocytochemically with antibodies to the acetylcholine-synthesizing enzyme choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and three different isoforms of mAChR, and by biochemical assay for ChAT activity. ECMA (25 nmol) destroyed two of the four subtypes of cholinergic amacrine cells and attenuated retinal ChAT activity, but left retinal mAChR-immunoreactivity intact. QA (200 nmol) destroyed the majority of all four subtypes of cholinergic amacrine cells, and ablated most mAChR-immunoreactivity and ChAT activity in the retina. ECMA and QA had no apparent effect on mAChRs or cholinergic fibres in the choroid, only marginally reduced choroidal ChAT activity, and had little effect on ChAT activity in the anterior segment. Toxin-treated eyes remained emmetropic and responded to form-deprivation by growing excessively and becoming myopic. Furthermore, daily intravitreal injection of 40 microg atropine for 6 days into form-deprived toxin-treated eyes completely prevented ocular elongation and myopia. We conclude that neither cholinergic amacrine cells nor mAChRs in the retina are required for visual regulation of ocular growth, and that atropine may exert its growth-suppressing influence by acting upon extraretinal mAChRs, possibly in the choroid, retinal pigmented epithelium, or sclera.


Journal of Neurocytology | 1999

Localization of retinoid binding proteins, retinoid receptors, and retinaldehyde dehydrogenase in the chick eye.

Andy J. Fischer; Josh Wallman; James R. Mertz; William K. Stell

Retinoids have many functions in the eye, including, perhaps, the visual guidance of ocular growth. Therefore, we identified where retinoid receptors, binding proteins, and biosynthetic enzymes are located in the ocular tissues of the chick as a step toward discovering where retinoids are generated and where they act. Using antibodies to interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP), cellular retinol binding protein (CRBP), cellular retinoic acid binding protein (CRABP), cellular retinaldehyde binding protein (CRALBP), retinaldehyde dehydrogenase (RALDH), and retinoic acid receptors (RAR and RXR), we localized these proteins to cells in the retina, retinal pigmented epithelium, choroid and sclera of the chick eye. IRBP was detected in the photoreceptor layer and pigmented epithelium; CRBP was in the pigmented epithelium; CRABP was in amacrine and bipolar cells in the retina; CRALBP was in Müller cells, pigmented epithelium, choroid, and fibrous sclera; RALDH was in retinal amacrine cells, pigmented epithelium, and choroid; RAR was in amacrine cells, choroid, and chondrocytes and fibroblasts in the sclera; and RXR was in amacrine and ganglion cells, bipolar cell nuclei, choroid, and chondrocytes. We also found that the growth-modulating toxins colchicine and quisqualate destroyed selectively different subsets of CRABP-containing amacrine cells. We conclude that the distribution of proteins involved in retinoid metabolism is consistent with a role of retinoids not only in phototransduction, but also in maintenance of cellular phenotype and visual guidance of ocular growth.


Visual Neuroscience | 1998

Opiate and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in form-deprivation myopia

Andy J. Fischer; Ruth L. Pickett Seltner; William K. Stell

Pharmacological studies have implicated retinal opiate pathways in the visual regulation of ocular growth. However, the effects of opiate receptor subtype-specific compounds on form-deprivation myopia (FDM) are inconsistent (Seltner et al., 1997), and may be mediated by non-opiate receptors. The purpose of this study was to test whether opiate receptor-inactive (D-) enantiomers elicit the same FDM-suppressing effect as their opiate receptor-active (L-) counterparts. Since some opiates are thought to act at NMDA receptors, we also tested whether NMDA receptor agonists and antagonists influence ocular growth or FDM. We found that both L- and D- enantiomers of morphine-like compounds (dextrorphanol and levorphanol, and D- and L-naloxone) were equally effective in blocking FDM. The NMDA receptor antagonists dextromethorphan, MK801, and AP5 also suppressed FDM. A single toxic dose of NMDA, that destroys many subtypes of amacrine cells (including those that synthesize the opioid peptide enkephalin), induced myopia and ocular enlargement in ungoggled eyes, and eliminated the ability of form-deprivation to enhance ocular growth. The NR-1 subunit of the NMDA receptor was localized to a narrowly stratified, intense stratum at approximately 50% depth in the inner plexiform layer, diffusely throughout the proximal inner plexiform layer, and to many somata in the amacrine and ganglion cell layers. These observations suggest that most effects of opiate receptor ligands on FDM in the chick are mediated by non-opiate receptors, which are likely to include NMDA receptors. NMDA as an excitotoxin transiently enhances ocular growth, but thereafter disables retinal mechanisms that promote emmetropization and FDM. These observations are consistent with a prominent role for pathways utilizing NMDA receptors in FDM and ocular growth-control.


Visual Neuroscience | 2001

Nitric oxide donor stimulated increase of cyclic GMP in the goldfish retina.

William H. Baldridge; Andy J. Fischer

Nitric oxide (NO) activates soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) and the resulting increase in cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) is an important intracellular signalling pathway in the vertebrate retina. Immunocytochemical detection of cGMP following exposure to NO donors has proven an effective method of identifying cells that express sGC. While such an approach has proven useful for the study of several vertebrate retinas, it has not been applied to the well-characterized teleost retina. Therefore, in the present study, we have applied this approach to the retina of the goldfish (Carassius auratus). In the presence of the phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), incubation of goldfish eyecups in Ringers solution containing (+/-)-S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) increased cGMP-like immunoreactivity (cG-ir) in bipolar, horizontal, amacrine, and ganglion cells and in ganglion cell axons and optic nerve. Weak labeling was observed in horizontal cells but no change in cG-ir was noted within photoreceptors. The NO donor-stimulated increases of cG-ir in horizontal, bipolar, amacrine, and ganglion cells are consistent with known physiological effects of NO on these neurons. The physiological significance of NO action at the level of optic nerve is not known. The lack of an effect of SNAP on cG-ir in photoreceptors was unexpected, as there are known physiological actions of NO, mediated by cGMP, on these neurons. Although this may be due to insufficient sensitivity of immunolabeling, this result may indicate a difference between isoforms of sGC or cGMP PDE in these neurons, compared to neurons where exogenous NO increased cG-ir.


Optometry and Vision Science | 2011

Myopia: Why Study the Mechanisms of Myopia? Novel Approaches to Risk Factors Signalling Eye Growth- How Could Basic Biology Be Translated into Clinical Insights? Where Are Genetic and Proteomic Approaches Leading? How Does Visual Function Contribute to and Interact with Ametropia? Does Eye Shape Matter? Why Ametropia at All?

Elena Tarutta; Wei-Han Chua; Terri L. Young; Ernst Goldschmidt; Seang-Mei Saw; Kathryn A. Rose; Earl L. Smith; Donald O. Mutti; Regan S. Ashby; Richard A. Stone; Christine F. Wildsoet; Howard C. Howland; Andy J. Fischer; William K. Stell; Andreas Reichenbach; Michael R. Frost; Alex Gentle; Xiaoying Zhu; Jody Summers-Rada; Veluchamy A. Barathi; Liqin Jiang; Sally A. McFadden; Jeremy Andrew Guggenheim; Christopher J. Hammond; Ruth Schippert; Chi-ho To; Jane Gwiazda; Susana Marcos; Michael J. Collins; W. Neil Charman


Archive | 1999

Nitric oxide synthase-containing cells in the retina

Andy J. Fischer; William K. Stell

Collaboration


Dive into the Andy J. Fischer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian G. Morgan

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James R. Mertz

New England College of Optometry

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge