Anežka Sharma
Masaryk University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anežka Sharma.
Science of The Total Environment | 2017
Anežka Sharma; Katarína Bányiová; Pavel Babica; Naouale El Yamani; Andrew R. Collins; Pavel Čupr
2-ethylhexyl 4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC), used in many categories of personal care products (PCPs), is one of the most discussed ultraviolet filters because of its endocrine-disrupting effects. EHMC is unstable in sunlight and can be transformed from trans-EHMC to emergent cis-EHMC. Toxicological studies are focusing only on trans-EHMC; thus the toxicological data for cis-EHMC are missing. In this study, the in vitro genotoxic effects of trans- and cis-EHMC on adult human liver stem cells HL1-hT1 and human-derived lymphoblastoid cells TK-6 using a high-throughput comet assay were studied. TK-6 cells treated with cis-EHMC showed a high level of DNA damage when compared to untreated cells in concentrations 1.56 to 25μgmL-1. trans-EHMC showed genotoxicity after exposure to the two highest concentrations 12.5 and 25μgmL-1. The increase in DNA damage on HL1-hT1 cells induced by cis-EHMC and trans-EHMC was detected at the concentration 25μgmL-1. The No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL, mg kg-1bwday-1) was determined using a Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE) approach: NOAELtrans-EHMC=3.07, NOAELcis-EHMC=0.30 for TK-6 and NOAELtrans-EHMC=26.46, NOAELcis-EHMC=20.36 for HL1-hT1. The hazard index (HI) was evaluated by comparing the reference dose (RfD, mgkg-1bwday-1) obtained from our experimental data with the chronic daily intake (CDI) of the female population. Using comet assay experimental data with the more sensitive TK-6 cells, HIcis-EHMC was 7 times higher than HItrans-EHMC. In terms of CDI, relative contributions were; dermal exposure route>oral>inhalation. According to our results we recommend the RfDtrans-EHMC=0.20 and RfDcis-EHMC=0.02 for trans-EHMC and cis-EHMC, respectively, to use for human health risk assessment. The significant difference in trans-EHMC and cis-EHMC response points to the need for toxicological reevaluation and application reassessment of both isomers in PCPs.
Science of The Total Environment | 2019
Brij Mohan Sharma; Jitka Bečanová; Martin Scheringer; Anežka Sharma; Girija K. Bharat; Paul Whitehead; Jana Klánová; Luca Nizzetto
Pharmaceuticals, personal care products (PPCPs), and artificial sweeteners (ASWs) are contaminants of emerging concern commonly found in the aquatic environments. In India, studies reporting environmental occurrence of these contaminants are scarce. In this study, we investigated the occurrence and distribution of 15 PPCPs and five ASWs in the river and groundwater (used untreated as drinking water) at several sites along the Ganges River. Based on the measured groundwater concentrations, we estimated the life-long human health risk from exposure to PPCPs through drinking. In addition, we estimated the risk of exposure to PPCPs and ASWs in the river water for aquatic organisms. The sum of detected PPCPs in the river water ranged between 54.7-826 ng/L, with higher concentrations in the severely anthropogenically influenced middle and lower reaches of the Ganges. The highest concentration among the PPCPs in the river water was of caffeine (743 ng/L). The sum of detected ASWs in river water ranged between 0.2-102 ng/L. Similar to PPCPs, the sum of ASWs in the river water was higher in the middle and lower reaches of the Ganges. In groundwater, the sum of detected PPCPs ranged between 34-293 ng/L, whereas of ASWs ranged between 0.5-25 ng/L. Negligible risk for humans was estimated from PPCPs in the drinking groundwater sources along the Ganges River, whereas moderate risks to PPCPs and ASWs (namely: caffeine, sulfamethoxazole, triclocarban, triclosan, and sucralose) were estimated for aquatic organisms in the Ganges River.
Environmental Pollution | 2018
Daniela Baráková; Anežka Sharma; Mária Chropeňová; Pavel Čupr
Genotoxic compounds, as common contaminants of the air environment, are of interest in air pollution monitoring. There are several methods to determine the level of these contaminants in different localities, many of which may be difficult to access with the use of conventional active and passive samplers. In the present study, the needles Pinus mugo Turra and Picea abies were used to monitor sampling localities in Austria, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic. Needles were extracted and chemical analysis and the genotoxicity bioassay SOS chromotest were used to obtain complex information about the chemical mixture of pollutants present and their genotoxic effects. The SOS chromotest method was optimized by using a CPRG chromogenic substrate to reduce the false positive genotoxic effect of needle extracts. Pinus mugo Turra and Picea abies were identified as suitable passive sampling matrices for long-term air monitoring using the same plants sampled at the same time. The presented study brings an innovative method for the fast screening and identification of localities loaded by genotoxic active air contaminants.
Environment International | 2017
Katarína Bányiová; Milena Černá; Ondřej Mikeš; Klára Komprdová; Anežka Sharma; Tenzing Gyalpo; Pavel Čupr; Martin Scheringer
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2017
Anežka Sharma; Katarína Bányiová; Branislav Vrana; Ivan Justan; Pavel Čupr
Toxicology Letters | 2016
Anežka Sharma; Katarína Bányiová; Jaromír Literák; Pavel Čupr
Toxicology Letters | 2016
Katarína Bányiová; Anežka Sharma; Pavel Čupr
Archive | 2016
Pavel Čupr; Branislav Vrana; Ondřej Sáňka; Roman Prokeš; Jana Borůvková; Jitka Bečanová; Foppe Smedes; Klára Hilscherová; Jiří Novák; Michal Bittner; Šimon Vojta; Ondřej Mikeš; Anežka Sharma; Katarína Bányiová; Kateřina Šebková; Jakub Urík; Mária Chropeňová; Pavlína Karásková; Lisa Melymuk; Ondřej Audy; Petra Přibylová; Jiří Kohoutek; Barbora Prokešová; Jana Klánová
Archive | 2016
Branislav Vrana; Pavel Čupr; Roman Prokeš; Jana Borůvková; Jitka Bečanová; Foppe Smedes; Klára Hilscherová; Jiří Novák; Michal Bittner; Ondřej Sáňka; Šimon Vojta; Ondřej Mikeš; Anežka Sharma; Katarína Bányiová; Kateřina Šebková; Jakub Urík; Barbora Prokešová; Jana Klánová
Archive | 2016
Pavel Čupr; Klára Hilscherová; Branislav Vrana; Lisa Melymuk; Katarína Řiháčková; Anežka Sharma; Mária Chropeňová; Roman Prokeš; Foppe Smedes; Jana Borůvková; Jitka Bečanová; Jiří Novák; Michal Bittner; Ondřej Sáňka; Šimon Vojta; Ondřej Mikeš; Kateřina Šebková; Jakub Urík; Pavlína Karásková; Ondřej Audy; Petra Přibylová; Jiří Kohoutek; Barbora Prokešová; Jana Klánová