Ang Qu

Percutaneous computed tomography/ultrasonography-guided permanent iodine-125 implantation as salvage therapy for recurrent squamous cell cancers of head and neck

Objective: To assess the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity of permanent percutaneous 125I seed implantation under computed tomography (CT)/ultrasonography guidance for recurrent squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck. Methods: Twenty-five patients underwent 125I seed implantation under CT or ultrasonography guidance. Postoperative dosimetry was routinely performed for all the patients. The actuarial D90 of the implanted 125I seeds ranged from 90 Gy to 160 Gy (median: 130 Gy). The activity of 125I seed ranged from 0.35 mCi to 0.8 mCi (median: 0.6 mCi). The total number of seeds implanted ranged from 3 to 61 (median: 22). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 40 months (median: 8 months). Results: The median local disease-free progression was 12 months (95% CI, 4.8–19.2), and the 1- and 2-year local tumor control rates were 48.7% and 39.9%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 42.5% and 28.3%, respectively (median: 11 months) (95% CI, 8.2–13.8). Of the 25 patients, 6 (24%) died of local recurrence and 5 (20%) died of metastases; 2 patients showed recurrences at 3 and 8 months after seed implantation and subsequently died of pneumonia. One patient died of heart disease. One developed ulceration with tumor progression. Blood vessel damage and neuropathy were not observed. Conclusion: The high local tumor control rates, minimal invasion, and low morbidity suggest that percutaneous 125I seed implantation is a feasible and safe salvage for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

An investigation of 125I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy

BackgroundA preliminary assessment was conducted of the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity of 125I seed implantation for recurrent head and neck carcinoma after surgery and external beam radiotherapy.MethodsNineteen patients with recurrent head and neck carcinomas underwent 125I seed implantation under ultrasound or computed tomography guidance. The actuarial D90 of 125I seed implantation ranged from 90 to 160 Gy (median, 131 Gy). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 44 months (median, 11 months).ResultsThe median local control was 24 months (95% confidence interval, 10.2 to 37.8). The one- year, two-year and three-year local controls were 73.3%, 27.5% and 27.5%, respectively, whereas the one-year, two-year and three-year survival rates were 53.0%, 18.2% and 18.2%, respectively, and the median survival was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 6.6 to 19.4). A total of 26.3% of patients (5/19) died of local recurrence and 21.1% of patients (4/19) died of metastases. One suffered from a grade 1 skin reaction.Conclusions125I seed implantation is feasible and safe as a salvage treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancers. The high local control results and low morbidity merits further investigation.

Biological effects of (125)i seeds radiation on A549 lung cancer cells: G2/M arrest and enhanced cell death.

External beam radiation (EBRT) and 125I seeds continuous low dose rate radiation (CLDR) were used to treat patients with lung cancer. We herein investigated the biological effects of EBRT and CLDR on lung cancer cells. A549 human lung cancer cell line was thus exposed to different doses of EBRT and CLDR. CLDR was more efficient to inhibit cell growth than EBRT. CLDR induced increased DNA damage as evidenced by long-lasting p-H2AX activity. The enhanced inhibitory effects of CLDR on lung cancer cell growth may be, at least in part, due to the increased Bax/Bcl2 ratio and cyclin B1-mediated G2/M arrest.

Permanent Implantation of Iodine-125 Seeds as a Salvage Therapy for Recurrent Head and Neck Carcinoma After Radiotherapy

Seventeen patients with head and neck recurrent carcinoma underwent 125I seed implantation under CT or ultrasound guidance. The actuarial D90 of the 125I seeds implanted was 90–160 Gy (median, 126 Gy). Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 3–48 months). The median local control time was 16 months; the 1- and 2-year local control rates were 66.5% and 49.9%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 51.3% and 38.5%, respectively (median, 16 months). None of the patients experienced grade 4 toxicity. 125I seed implantation was a feasible and effective salvage treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancers.

Image-Guided Percutaneous 125I Seed Implantation as a Salvage Treatment for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcomas After Surgery and Radiotherapy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous iodine-125 ((125)I) seed implantation using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound guidance in the treatment of recurrent soft tissue malignancies after surgery and radiotherapy. From February 2002 to September 2009, 18 patients with recurrent soft tissue sarcomas were treated under ultrasound or CT guidance. The actuarial median number of (125)I seeds implanted was 35 (range, 6-129), and the actuarial D90 of the implanted (125)I seeds ranged from 107.9 to 204.4 Gy (median, 147.1 Gy). The activity of the seeds ranged from 0.4 to 0.8 mCi (median, 0.7 mCi). Follow-up times ranged from 4 to 78 months (median, 20 months). The median local control was 41 months (95% CI, 15.9-66.1 months). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year local controls were 78.8%, 78.8%, 78.8%, 26.3%, and 0%, respectively. The median survival was 32 months (95% CI, 16-48 months). The actuarial 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survivals were 76.6%, 61.3%, 39.4%, 39.4%, and 39.4%, respectively. Seven (7) patients (38.9%) experienced recurrence after seed implantation. Six (6) patients (33.3%) died of distant metastases and 1 died of stroke. Two (2) patients developed ulceration, 1 case caused by recurrence and another by a reaction of the skin to radiation. Percutaneous (125)I seed implantation for recurrent soft tissue malignancies under CT or ultrasound guidance is safe and is associated with high efficacy and low morbidity.

Percutaneous Ultrasonography-Guided Permanent Iodine-125 Implantation as Salvage Therapy for Recurrent Head and Neck Carcimonas

Twenty-nine (29) patients with recurrent head and neck carcinomas underwent (125)I seed permanent implantation under ultrasonography guidance and the feasibility and efficacy of (125)I seed implantation were assessed. The postplan evaluation showed that the actuarial D90 of (125)I seeds ranged from 90 to 160 Gy (median, 130 Gy). The activity of each (125)I seed ranged from 0.35 to 0.8 mCi (median, 0.6 mCi). The total number of sources implanted ranged from 3 to 61 (median, 22). The follow-up ranged from 3 to 40 months (median, 8 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control rates were 53.1%, 34.8%, and 17.4%, respectively, with a median local control of 16 months (95% confidence interval, 5.8-26.1). The 1-, 2-, and 3- year survival rates were 54.1%, 27.5%, and 27.5%, respectively (median, 13 months; 95% confidence interval, 6.0-19.9). Of the 25 patients, 5 (17.2%) died of local recurrence and 7 (24.1%) died of metastases; 2 patients showed recurrences at 3 and 8 months after seed implantation and subsequently died of pneumonia. One (1) patient died of heart disease. One (1) developed ulceration with tumor progression. Blood vessel damage and neuropathy were not observed. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided (125)I seed implantation is a feasible, safe salvage for patients with recurrent carcinomas of the head and neck.

Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy, high-dose rate brachytherapy, and low-dose rate permanent seeds implant for localized prostate cancer

To investigate the dosimetric and radiobiological differences among volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, and low-dose rate (LDR) permanent seeds implant for localized prostate cancer. A total of 10 patients with localized prostate cancer were selected for this study. VMAT, HDR brachytherapy, and LDR permanent seeds implant plans were created for each patient. For VMAT, planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the clinical target volume plus a margin of 5mm. Rectum, bladder, urethra, and femoral heads were considered as organs at risk. A 78Gy in 39 fractions were prescribed for PTV. For HDR and LDR plans, the dose prescription was D90 of 34Gy in 8.5Gy per fraction, and 145Gy to clinical target volume, respectively. The dose and dose volume parameters were evaluated for target, organs at risk, and normal tissue. Physical dose was converted to dose based on 2-Gy fractions (equivalent dose in 2Gy per fraction, EQD2) for comparison of 3 techniques. HDR and LDR significantly reduced the dose to rectum and bladder compared with VMAT. The Dmean (EQD2) of rectum decreased 22.36Gy in HDR and 17.01Gy in LDR from 30.24Gy in VMAT, respectively. The Dmean (EQD2) of bladder decreased 6.91Gy in HDR and 2.53Gy in LDR from 13.46Gy in VMAT. For the femoral heads and normal tissue, the mean doses were also significantly reduced in both HDR and LDR compared with VMAT. For the urethra, the mean dose (EQD2) was 80.26, 70.23, and 104.91Gy in VMAT, HDR, and LDR brachytherapy, respectively. For localized prostate cancer, both HDR and LDR brachytherapy were clearly superior in the sparing of rectum, bladder, femoral heads, and normal tissue compared with VMAT. HDR provided the advantage in sparing of urethra compared with VMAT and LDR.