Jinna Li

SDF-1/CXCR4 Axis Regulates Cell Cycle Progression and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition via Up-regulation of Survivin in Glioblastoma.

Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 ligand-receptor axis is widely recommended as an attractive target for cancer therapy. Meanwhile, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process is linked to disease pathophysiology. As one of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins, survivin is implicated in the onset and development of cancer. In the present study, we tried to determine the cause-effect associations between SDF-1/CXCR4 axis and survivin expression in glioblastoma U-251 cell line. Survivin activation and inhibition were induced with exogenous SDF-1 and survivin small interfering RNA (survivin siRNA), respectively. Western blot was used to detect relevant proteins in SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Western blot analysis revealed that survivin expression in U-251 increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner in response to SDF-1 treatment. However, the interference with MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathway prohibited SDF-1-induced survivin up-regulation. Importantly, survivin knockdown abrogated cell cycle progression and the expression of snail and N-cadherin, compared with non-transfectants. In conclusion, the present study shows that SDF-1 up-regulates survivin via MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathway, leading to cell cycle progression and EMT occurrence dependent on survivin. The blockade of survivin will allow for the treatment of glioblastoma.

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Bone morphogenetic protein 2 mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition via AKT and ERK signaling pathways in gastric cancer

Although deregulation of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) signaling has been linked to various types of cancers, the relationships between abnormal activation of these signaling pathways and tumorigenesis are not clear in gastric cancer. We hypothesized that BMP2 might be involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process of gastric cancer. Here, BMPR-II activation and inhibition in gastric cancer cell line AGS were induced with exogenous BMP2 and with BMPR-II small interfering RNA (siRNA), respectively. BMPR-II downstream signal molecules AKT, ERK phosphorylation, and EMT biomarkers (vimentin, snail, N-cadherin, and E-cadherin) were tested using the Western blot. In the present study, our results showed that BMP2 can induce AKT and ERK phosphorylation in a dose-dependent method, and endogenous BMPR-II can be inhibited completely by BMPR-II siRNA in AGS. Notably BMP2 alone treatment can induce the up-regulation of vimentin, snail, and N-cadherin in AGS cells, besides, the down-regulation of E-cadherin also occurred. On the contrary, BMPR-II siRNA significantly prohibited BMP2-induced AKT and ERK phosphorylation, at the same time, EMT biomarkers changes were not observed. On the other hand, BMPR-II knockdown could significantly affect AGS wound closure and the migration ability (p < 0.001) compared to control siRNA and BMP2 alone. In conclusion, this study suggested that EMT process can be triggered by the BMP2/BMPR axis in gastric cancer and then involved in the tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis via the activation of PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK pathways. Our study lays a new foundation for the treatment of gastric cancer through antagonizing BMP2 system.

Biological effects of (125)i seeds radiation on A549 lung cancer cells: G2/M arrest and enhanced cell death.

External beam radiation (EBRT) and 125I seeds continuous low dose rate radiation (CLDR) were used to treat patients with lung cancer. We herein investigated the biological effects of EBRT and CLDR on lung cancer cells. A549 human lung cancer cell line was thus exposed to different doses of EBRT and CLDR. CLDR was more efficient to inhibit cell growth than EBRT. CLDR induced increased DNA damage as evidenced by long-lasting p-H2AX activity. The enhanced inhibitory effects of CLDR on lung cancer cell growth may be, at least in part, due to the increased Bax/Bcl2 ratio and cyclin B1-mediated G2/M arrest.

Retraction Note to “SDF-1/CXCR4 Axis Regulates Cell Cycle Progression and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition via Up-regulation of Survivin in Glioblastoma”

Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 ligand-receptor axis is widely recommended as an attractive target for cancer therapy. Meanwhile, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process is linked to disease pathophysiology. As one of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins, survivin is implicated in the onset and development of cancer. In the present study, we tried to determine the cause-effect associations between SDF-1/CXCR4 axis and survivin expression in glioblastoma U-251 cell line. Survivin activation and inhibition were induced with exogenous SDF-1 and survivin small interfering RNA (survivin siRNA), respectively. Western blot was used to detect relevant proteins in SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Western blot analysis revealed that survivin expression in U-251 increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner in response to SDF-1 treatment. However, the interference with MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathway prohibited SDF-1-induced survivin up-regulation. Importantly, survivin knockdown abrogated cell cycle progression and the expression of snail and N-cadherin, compared with non-transfectants. In conclusion, the present study shows that SDF-1 up-regulates survivin via MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathway, leading to cell cycle progression and EMT occurrence dependent on survivin. The blockade of survivin will allow for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Image-Guided Percutaneous 125I Seed Implantation as a Salvage Treatment for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcomas After Surgery and Radiotherapy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous iodine-125 ((125)I) seed implantation using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound guidance in the treatment of recurrent soft tissue malignancies after surgery and radiotherapy. From February 2002 to September 2009, 18 patients with recurrent soft tissue sarcomas were treated under ultrasound or CT guidance. The actuarial median number of (125)I seeds implanted was 35 (range, 6-129), and the actuarial D90 of the implanted (125)I seeds ranged from 107.9 to 204.4 Gy (median, 147.1 Gy). The activity of the seeds ranged from 0.4 to 0.8 mCi (median, 0.7 mCi). Follow-up times ranged from 4 to 78 months (median, 20 months). The median local control was 41 months (95% CI, 15.9-66.1 months). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year local controls were 78.8%, 78.8%, 78.8%, 26.3%, and 0%, respectively. The median survival was 32 months (95% CI, 16-48 months). The actuarial 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survivals were 76.6%, 61.3%, 39.4%, 39.4%, and 39.4%, respectively. Seven (7) patients (38.9%) experienced recurrence after seed implantation. Six (6) patients (33.3%) died of distant metastases and 1 died of stroke. Two (2) patients developed ulceration, 1 case caused by recurrence and another by a reaction of the skin to radiation. Percutaneous (125)I seed implantation for recurrent soft tissue malignancies under CT or ultrasound guidance is safe and is associated with high efficacy and low morbidity.

An IMRT/VMAT Technique for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

The study is to investigate a Hybrid IMRT/VMAT technique which combines intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two partial arcs VMAT, 5-field IMRT, and hybrid plans were created for 15 patients with NSCLC. The hybrid plans were combination of 2 partial arcs VMAT and 5-field IMRT. The dose distribution of planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) for hybrid technique was compared with IMRT and VMAT. The monitor units (MUs) and treatment delivery time were also evaluated. Hybrid technique significantly improved the target conformity and homogeneity compared with IMRT and VMAT. The mean delivery time of IMRT, VMAT, and hybrid plans was 280 s, 114 s, and 327 s, respectively. The mean MUs needed for IMRT, VMAT, and hybrid plans were 933, 512, and 737, respectively. Hybrid technique reduced V 5, V 10, V 30, and MLD of normal lung compared with VMAT and spared the OARs better with fewer MUs with the cost of a little higher V 5, V 10, and mean lung dose (MLD) of normal lung compared with IMRT. Hybrid IMRT/VMAT can be a viable radiotherapy technique with better plan quality.