Angel Lanas

Risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding associated with selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, traditional non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin and combinations

Background: The risks and benefits of coxibs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and aspirin treatment are under intense debate. Objective: To determine the risk of peptic ulcer upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) associated with the use of coxibs, traditional NSAIDs, aspirin or combinations of these drugs in clinical practice. Methods: A hospital-based, case–control study in the general community of patients from the National Health System in Spain. The study included 2777 consecutive patients with endoscopy-proved major UGIB because of the peptic lesions and 5532 controls matched by age, hospital and month of admission. Adjusted relative risk (adj RR) of UGIB determined by conditional logistic regression analysis is provided. Results: Use of non-aspirin-NSAIDs increased the risk of UGIB (adj RR 5.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.5 to 6.2). Among non-aspirin-NSAIDs, aceclofenac (adj RR 3.1; 95% CI 2.3 to 4.2) had the lowest RR, whereas ketorolac (adj RR 14.4; 95% CI 5.2 to 39.9) had the highest. Rofecoxib treatment increased the risk of UGIB (adj RR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1 to 4.0), whereas celecoxib, paracetamol or concomitant use of a proton pump inhibitor with an NSAID presented no increased risk. Non-aspirin antiplatelet treatment (clopidogrel/ticlopidine) had a similar risk of UGIB (adj RR 2.8; 95% CI 1.9 to 4.2) to cardioprotective aspirin at a dose of 100 mg/day (adj RR 2.7; 95% CI 2.0 to 3.6) or anticoagulants (adj RR 2.8; 95% CI 2.1 to 3.7). An apparent interaction was found between low-dose aspirin and use of non-aspirin-NSAIDs, coxibs or thienopyridines, which increased further the risk of UGIB in a similar way. Conclusions: Coxib use presents a lower RR of UGIB than non-selective NSAIDs. However, when combined with low-dose aspirin, the differences between non-selective NSAIDs and coxibs tend to disappear. Treatment with either non-aspirin antiplatelet or cardioprotective aspirin has a similar risk of UGIB.

Effect of Antisecretory Drugs and Nitrates on the Risk of Ulcer Bleeding Associated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, Antiplatelet Agents, and Anticoagulants

OBJECTIVES:After the withdrawal of some cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors, traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use has increased, but without additional prevention strategies against upper gastrointestinal (GI) complications in many cases. Here, we report the effect of antisecretory drugs and nitrates on the risk of upper GI peptic ulcer bleeding (UGIB) associated with nonselective NSAIDs, aspirin, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulants.METHODS:This case–control study matched 2,777 consecutive patients with UGIB (confirmed by endoscopy) with 5,532 controls (2:1). Adjusted relative risks (RR) of UGIB are reported.RESULTS:Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (RR 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.39), H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RAs) (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50–0.85), and nitrates (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38–0.70) reduced UGIB risk. PPI use was associated with greater reductions among both traditional NSAID (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.09–0.19 vs RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17–0.53 with H2-RAs; RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.19–1.24 with nitrates) and low-dose aspirin users (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22–0.51 vs RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19–0.73 with H2-RA; RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.36–1.04 with nitrates), and among patients taking clopidogrel (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07–0.49). For patients taking anticoagulants, use of nitrates, H2-RA, or PPIs was not associated with a significant effect on UGIB risk.CONCLUSION:Antisecretory agent or nitrate treatment is associated with reduced UGIB RR in patients taking NSAID or aspirin. Only PPI therapy was associated with a marked, consistent risk reduction among patients receiving all types of agents (including nonaspirin antiplatelet agents). Protection was not apparent in patients taking anticoagulants.

Relevance of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms to gastric cancer susceptibility and phenotype

Human glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are phase II metabolizing enzymes that play a key role in protecting against cancer by detoxifying numerous potentially cytotoxic/genotoxic compounds. The genes encoding the human GST isoenzymes GSTM(mu)1, GSTT(theta)1 and GSTP(pi)1 harbour polymorphisms, which have been considered important modifiers of the individual risk for environmentally induced cancers such as gastric cancer (GC). However, results are inconsistent among studies from different geographic areas and ethnic groups. Our goal was to perform a nationwide, case-control study in Spain to evaluate the relevance of several functional GST gene polymorphisms and environmental factors to GC risk and phenotype. DNA from 557 GC patients and 557 sex- and age-matched healthy controls (HC) was typed for two deletions in the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes and two SNPs in the GSTP1 gene (rs1695 and rs1138272) using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism methods. Logistic regression analysis identified Helicobacter pylori infection with CagA strains [odds ratio (OR): 2.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.78-3.15], smoking habit (OR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.48-2.97) and family history of GC (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 2.02-5.16) as independent risk factors for GC. No differences in the frequencies of GSTM1 or GSTT1 null genotypes were observed between cases and controls (GSTM1: 50.8% vs. 48%; GSTT1: 21.5% vs. 21%). Moreover, simultaneous carriage of both, the GSTM1 and the GSTT1 null genotypes, was almost identical in both groups (10.7% in GC vs. 10.6% in HC). In addition, no significant differences in GSTP1 Ile105Val (rs1695) and GSTP1 Val114Ala (rs1138272) genotype distribution were observed between GC patients and controls. Subgroup analysis for age, gender, Helicobacter pylori status, smoking habits, family history of GC, anatomic location and histological subtype revealed no significant association between GST variants and GC risk. Our results show that the GST polymorphisms evaluated in this study are not relevant when determining the individual susceptibility to GC or phenotype in a South-European population.

Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Risk. The Role of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in NSAID/Low-Dose Aspirin Users

OBJECTIVES:Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and NSAID/low-dose aspirin (ASA) use are associated with peptic ulcer disease. The risk of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) associated with the interaction of these factors remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of PUB associated with the interaction between H. pylori infection and current nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low-dose ASA use.METHODS:This was a case-control study of consecutive patients hospitalized because of PUB. Controls were matched by age, sex, and month of admission. H. pylori infection status was determined in all cases and controls by serology. Drug use was determined by structured questionnaire. Adjusted relative risk (RR) associated with different factors, and the interaction between NSAID/ASA and H. pylori infection was estimated by logistic regression analysis.RESULTS:The study included 666 cases of PUB and 666 controls; 74.3% cases and 54.8% controls (RR: 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0–3.3) tested positive for H. pylori infection; 34.5% of cases had current NSAID use compared with 13.4% of controls (RR: 4.0; 95% CI: 3.0–5.4). Respective proportions for low-dose ASA use were 15.8 and 12%, respectively (RR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3–2.7). The RR of PUB for concomitant NSAID use and H. pylori infection suggested an additive effect (RR: 8.0; 95% CI: 5.0–12.8), whereas no interaction was observed with ASA use (RR: 3.5; 95% CI: 2.0–6.1).CONCLUSIONS:NSAID, low-dose ASA use, and H. pylori infection are three independent risk factors for the development of PUB, but there were differences in the interaction effect between low-dose ASA (no interaction) or NSAID (addition) use and H. pylori infection, which may have implications for clinical practice in prevention strategies.

Epidemiology of Low Dose Aspirin Damage in the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract.

Low dose aspirin (ASA), commonly defined as the cardiovascular (CV) dose of 75 to 325 mg daily, is one of the most widely prescribed drugs in the world and the cornerstone of therapy and prophylaxis for CV disease. However, the use of low dose ASA is well known to be associated with an increased risk of different upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) complications, such as peptic ulceration and bleeding. In the recent past, clinical research was mainly focused on ASA-related injury of the upper GI tract. However, the introduction of new endoscopic techniques, such as capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted endoscopy for the evaluation of small bowel lesions have resulted in an increasing interest among gastroenterologists about the side effects of ASA on the large and small bowel. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that chronic use of low dose ASA results in a variety of lesions in the lower GI tract, including multiple petechiae, erosions, ulcers, diverticular bleeding and even circumferential ulcers with stricture. The ideal treatment for small bowel injury in low dose ASA users would be withdrawal of ASA, however, this withdrawal could increase the risk of CV/cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality in high percentage of patients. Therefore, several drugs have been evaluated to identify the best choice to prevent or treat ASA-induced small bowel injury with different results. Nevertheless, further specifically designed studies with more sample size are needed to determine the best treatment for low dose ASA related GI injury.

Evidence for PTGER4,PSCA, and MBOAT7 as risk genes for gastric cancer on the genome and transcriptome level

Genetic associations between variants on chromosome 5p13 and 8q24 and gastric cancer (GC) have been previously reported in the Asian population. We aimed to replicate these findings and to characterize the associations at the genome and transcriptome level. We performed a fine‐mapping association study in 1926 GC patients and 2012 controls of European descent using high dense SNP marker sets on both chromosomal regions. Next, we performed expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analyses using gastric transcriptome data from 143 individuals focusing on the GC associated variants. On chromosome 5p13 the strongest association was observed at rs6872282 (P = 2.53 × 10−04) and on chromosome 8q24 at rs2585176 (P = 1.09 × 10−09). On chromosome 5p13 we found cis‐eQTL effects with an upregulation of PTGER4 expression in GC risk allele carrier (P = 9.27 × 10−11). On chromosome 8q24 we observed cis‐eQTL effects with an upregulation of PSCA expression in GC risk allele carrier (P = 2.17 × 10−47). In addition, we found trans‐eQTL effects for the same variants on 8q24 with a downregulation of MBOAT7 expression in GC risk allele carrier (P = 3.11 × 10−09). In summary, we confirmed and refined the previously reported GC associations at both chromosomal regions. Our data point to shared etiological factors between Asians and Europeans. Furthermore, our data imply an upregulated expression of PTGER4 and PSCA as well as a downregulated expression of MBOAT7 in gastric tissue as risk‐conferring GC pathomechanisms.

Low-Dose Aspirin in the Cardiovascular System

This chapter highlights practical aspects related to aspirin therapy in cardiovascular diseases, specifically, the benefits and hazards in different clinical settings. The absolute benefit of aspirin is linearly related to the risk of the patient. The benefit of aspirin can vary substantially in different settings. For example, in primary prevention in low-risk population, it is not unusual that the number of vascular events avoided equals the number of major bleeds induced by aspirin. In the secondary prevention, the benefits usually outweigh the excess of major bleeding complications. In this setting, the assessment of both bleeding risk and cardiovascular benefits of low-dose aspirin for any individual patient may be difficult in clinical practice. On the other hand, the relatively rare occurrence of major bleeding (gastrointestinal or cerebrovascular) complications should not be underestimated, mainly due to its high morbi-mortality. For all these reasons, in this chapter new developments in the field directed toward individualized risk assessment strategies are discussed.

Aspirin in the Treatment and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Need for Individual Clinical Judgments

In secondary prevention—among survivors of a myocardial infarction (MI), occlusive stroke, transient ischemic attack, or CABG surgery or those with stable angina—aspirin significantly reduces the risk of subsequent MI, stroke, and vascular death. Furthermore, in patients suffering an acute MI, occlusive stroke, or unstable angina, aspirin significantly reduces the risks of MI, stroke, and vascular death. In primary prevention, however, the totality of evidence is insufficient upon which to make general guidelines for aspirin. In large-scale trials of primary prevention in men and women without established CVD, and subsequent meta-analyses, aspirin produced a significant reduction in the risk of a first MI, but not that of stroke or cardiovascular death. In addition, in primary prevention the absolute benefit is far lower, because the average 10-year absolute risk of CHD in apparently healthy individuals included in the trials of primary prevention was 10 %. Finally, patients with prior gastrointestinal bleeding, as well as those taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or with gastrointestinal symptoms due to ulcer disease are all at increased risk of developing major bleeding when taking aspirin.