María Teresa Arroyo

Risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding associated with selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, traditional non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin and combinations

Background: The risks and benefits of coxibs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and aspirin treatment are under intense debate. Objective: To determine the risk of peptic ulcer upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) associated with the use of coxibs, traditional NSAIDs, aspirin or combinations of these drugs in clinical practice. Methods: A hospital-based, case–control study in the general community of patients from the National Health System in Spain. The study included 2777 consecutive patients with endoscopy-proved major UGIB because of the peptic lesions and 5532 controls matched by age, hospital and month of admission. Adjusted relative risk (adj RR) of UGIB determined by conditional logistic regression analysis is provided. Results: Use of non-aspirin-NSAIDs increased the risk of UGIB (adj RR 5.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.5 to 6.2). Among non-aspirin-NSAIDs, aceclofenac (adj RR 3.1; 95% CI 2.3 to 4.2) had the lowest RR, whereas ketorolac (adj RR 14.4; 95% CI 5.2 to 39.9) had the highest. Rofecoxib treatment increased the risk of UGIB (adj RR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1 to 4.0), whereas celecoxib, paracetamol or concomitant use of a proton pump inhibitor with an NSAID presented no increased risk. Non-aspirin antiplatelet treatment (clopidogrel/ticlopidine) had a similar risk of UGIB (adj RR 2.8; 95% CI 1.9 to 4.2) to cardioprotective aspirin at a dose of 100 mg/day (adj RR 2.7; 95% CI 2.0 to 3.6) or anticoagulants (adj RR 2.8; 95% CI 2.1 to 3.7). An apparent interaction was found between low-dose aspirin and use of non-aspirin-NSAIDs, coxibs or thienopyridines, which increased further the risk of UGIB in a similar way. Conclusions: Coxib use presents a lower RR of UGIB than non-selective NSAIDs. However, when combined with low-dose aspirin, the differences between non-selective NSAIDs and coxibs tend to disappear. Treatment with either non-aspirin antiplatelet or cardioprotective aspirin has a similar risk of UGIB.

Effect of Antisecretory Drugs and Nitrates on the Risk of Ulcer Bleeding Associated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, Antiplatelet Agents, and Anticoagulants

OBJECTIVES:After the withdrawal of some cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors, traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use has increased, but without additional prevention strategies against upper gastrointestinal (GI) complications in many cases. Here, we report the effect of antisecretory drugs and nitrates on the risk of upper GI peptic ulcer bleeding (UGIB) associated with nonselective NSAIDs, aspirin, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulants.METHODS:This case–control study matched 2,777 consecutive patients with UGIB (confirmed by endoscopy) with 5,532 controls (2:1). Adjusted relative risks (RR) of UGIB are reported.RESULTS:Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (RR 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.39), H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RAs) (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50–0.85), and nitrates (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38–0.70) reduced UGIB risk. PPI use was associated with greater reductions among both traditional NSAID (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.09–0.19 vs RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17–0.53 with H2-RAs; RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.19–1.24 with nitrates) and low-dose aspirin users (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22–0.51 vs RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19–0.73 with H2-RA; RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.36–1.04 with nitrates), and among patients taking clopidogrel (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07–0.49). For patients taking anticoagulants, use of nitrates, H2-RA, or PPIs was not associated with a significant effect on UGIB risk.CONCLUSION:Antisecretory agent or nitrate treatment is associated with reduced UGIB RR in patients taking NSAID or aspirin. Only PPI therapy was associated with a marked, consistent risk reduction among patients receiving all types of agents (including nonaspirin antiplatelet agents). Protection was not apparent in patients taking anticoagulants.

Adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, aspirin and coxibs) on upper gastrointestinal tract.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most widely prescribed medication in the world. Their main benefit derives from their anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect, but the use of these agents is not innocuous since they mainly increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular complications compared with non-NSAID users. NSAIDs injures the upper and lower gut by depleting COX-1 derived prostaglandins and causing topical injury to the mucosa. The risk of upper GI complications varies, depending on the presence of one or more risk factors. Among them, the three main risk factors are prior history of peptic ulcer, the single most important risk factor, age, the most common, and concomitant aspirin use, due to their GI and cardiovascular implications. Those individuals at-risk should be considered for alternatives to NSAID therapy and modifications of risk factors. If NSAID therapy is required, patients at risk will need prevention strategies including co-therapy of NSAID with gastroprotectants (PPI or misoprostol) or the prescription of COX-2 selective inhibitors. The probable introduction of NO-NSAIDs in the market in the near future may open a new therapeutic option for patients with hypertension who need NSAIDs.

Effect of parenteral omeprazole and ranitidine on gastric pH and the outcome of bleeding peptic ulcer.

The pharmacotherapy of bleeding peptic ulcer is directed at attempting to keep the gastric pH above the proteolytic range for pepsin. In this randomized, prospective, open clinical trial we have compared the effects and outcome of omeprazole versus ranitidine in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. Of 219 consecutive patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, 51 (23.2%) had an ulcer with endoscopic predictors of rebleeding at the time of diagnosis. These 51 patients were selected at random to receive either omeprazole (80 mg bolus and 40 mg/12 h i.v.) or ranitidine (50 mg/4 h i.v.). No endoscopic therapy was performed at the time of diagnosis. Twenty of these patients with duodenal ulcer (n = 10 omeprazole, n = 10 ranitidine) underwent 24-h gastric pH monitoring. Both groups were homogeneous in all clinical and endoscopic parameters. No differences in blood transfusion units, time of hospitalization, the lowest hematocrit measured, and mortality rates were observed between the groups. However, omeprazole reduced the number of rebleeding episodes (p = 0.1) and the need for surgery (3.8% vs. 22.7%; p = 0.05). Omeprazole also reduced the amount of time the gastric pH was < 6 (15.3 +/- 5.9% vs. 61.8 +/- 5.6%, p < 0.0001). We conclude that parenteral omeprazole is much more effective than ranitidine in keeping the gastric pH above the proteolytic range for pepsin in bleeders and that this might explain a better outcome in a subset of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers treated with parenteral omeprazole.

Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Risk. The Role of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in NSAID/Low-Dose Aspirin Users

OBJECTIVES:Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and NSAID/low-dose aspirin (ASA) use are associated with peptic ulcer disease. The risk of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) associated with the interaction of these factors remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of PUB associated with the interaction between H. pylori infection and current nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low-dose ASA use.METHODS:This was a case-control study of consecutive patients hospitalized because of PUB. Controls were matched by age, sex, and month of admission. H. pylori infection status was determined in all cases and controls by serology. Drug use was determined by structured questionnaire. Adjusted relative risk (RR) associated with different factors, and the interaction between NSAID/ASA and H. pylori infection was estimated by logistic regression analysis.RESULTS:The study included 666 cases of PUB and 666 controls; 74.3% cases and 54.8% controls (RR: 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0–3.3) tested positive for H. pylori infection; 34.5% of cases had current NSAID use compared with 13.4% of controls (RR: 4.0; 95% CI: 3.0–5.4). Respective proportions for low-dose ASA use were 15.8 and 12%, respectively (RR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3–2.7). The RR of PUB for concomitant NSAID use and H. pylori infection suggested an additive effect (RR: 8.0; 95% CI: 5.0–12.8), whereas no interaction was observed with ASA use (RR: 3.5; 95% CI: 2.0–6.1).CONCLUSIONS:NSAID, low-dose ASA use, and H. pylori infection are three independent risk factors for the development of PUB, but there were differences in the interaction effect between low-dose ASA (no interaction) or NSAID (addition) use and H. pylori infection, which may have implications for clinical practice in prevention strategies.

Tratamiento con infliximab en la colitis ulcerosa: experiencia inicial en dos centros de referencia

OBJECTIVE: To perform a descriptive analysis of our experience with infliximab in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study of all patients with UC treated with infliximab and with criteria of corticosteroid resistance or dependence in two referral hospitals. The medical records of all patients treated with infliximab to December 2006 were reviewed, following the GETECCU Guidelines. Lennard-Jones and Montreal criteria were used for diagnosis and classification, respectively. Activity was defined according to Truelove-Witts criteria. Response was evaluated at 8 weeks, although most of the patients were followed-up for more than 30 weeks. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (15 steroid-dependent and four severe, steroid-resistant) were included. Of the 15 steroid-dependent patients, response to infliximab was observed in 13 (86%; 95% IC, 56-98) and complete remission was achieved in nine (60%; 32-83.7); colectomy was performed in one patient. Remission was achieved in two out of four severe, steroid-resistant patients and the remaining two patients were colectomized. Only one serious adverse event (Pseudomonas aeruginosa cavitary pneumonia) was observed in one patient, who was also receiving azathioprine and prednisone. DISCUSSION: This short-term experience suggests that infliximab can be useful in some UC patients. However, the therapeutic role of this drug should be defined more precisely in further studies.