Angelo Zullo

Sequential Therapy versus Standard Triple-Drug Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Randomized Trial

Context Eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection are decreasing worldwide because of increasing antimicro-bial resistance. Contribution This double-blind trial randomly assigned 300 adults with dyspepsia or peptic ulcers to a 10-day sequential regimen (pantoprazole, amoxicillin, and placebo taken for 5 days followed by pantoprazole, clarithromycin, and tinidazole taken for 5 days) or standard 10-day therapy (pantoprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin). The eradication rate of H. pylori infection was greater with the sequential regimen (89%) than with the standard treatment (77%). Approximately 5% of patients in each group had epigastric pain and 3% to 5% had mild diarrhea. Implication Sequential therapy eradicates H. pylori infection more often than does standard therapy. The Editors Helicobacter pylori infection causes peptic ulcers, gastric mucosaassociated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric cancer (1). Standard treatments for H. pylori infection that have been endorsed by U.S. and European authorities rely on clarithromycin or metronidazole in conjunction with other antibiotics and acid inhibitors (2, 3). The prevalence of clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance has increased substantially in recent years, and there has been a corresponding decrease in the eradication rate for H. pylori infection (4). Eradication rates in most western countries have declined to unacceptable levels. Eradication therapy fails in approximately 1 in 5 patients (5). A simple, short treatment regimen that would return eradication levels to those seen at the advent of H. pylori treatment is urgently needed (5). Such a regimen should have high efficacy against clarithromycin-resistant and metronidazole-resistant strains of H. pylori because these strains are increasingly encountered in routine clinical practice. Novel 10-day sequential therapy consisting of 5-day dual therapy (proton-pump inhibitor plus amoxicillin) followed by 5-day triple therapy (proton-pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, and tinidazole) has had good eradication success in unblinded trials in elderly and pediatric patients (68). However, no double-blind, controlled trials using conventional therapy have been reported, and the effect of clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance on the outcome of sequential therapy has not been studied prospectively. The aim of this study was to compare a 10-day sequential treatment regimen for H. pylori infection with standard 10-day triple therapy in a randomized, controlled trial. Secondary objectives were to determine the efficacy of the treatment regimen in patients with resistant strains of H. pylori, to assess treatment adherence, and to evaluate side effects. Methods Design Overview This was a prospective, double-blind, controlled study with a parallel-group design. At baseline, patients were evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria and provided written informed consent. Patients were then randomly assigned to a treatment group and had follow-up evaluations to assess the eradication rate of H. pylori infection, treatment adherence, and side effects. The study was performed according to good clinical practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committees at the 2 participating centers approved the study. The consent form indicated that patients would be randomly assigned to treatment that was the current standard or a new therapy that might have higher eradication rates. Patients were told that eradication failure was possible with any therapy regimen. All patients with eradication failure were offered a rescue therapy on the basis of the results of sensitivity testing. Setting and Participants Between September 2003 and April 2006, consecutive patients with dyspepsia who were at least 18 years of age, who had never received treatment for H. pylori infection, and who had been referred to our hospitals (Bologna, Italy, and Rome, Italy) for a gastroenterology consultation were asked to participate in the study. No special recruitment techniques (such as advertisements or letters sent to primary care physicians) were used. Exclusion criteria were previous treatment for H. pylori infection; use of proton-pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists, bismuth preparations, or antibiotics in the previous 2 weeks; concomitant use of anticoagulants or ketoconazole (because of potential interaction with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and glucocorticoids (because of association with ulcer disease); the ZollingerEllison syndrome; previous surgery of the esophagus or upper gastrointestinal tract (except appendectomy, polypectomy, or cholecystectomy); severe or unstable cardiovascular, pulmonary, or endocrine disease; clinically significant renal or hepatic disease or dysfunction; hematologic disorders; any other clinically significant medical condition that could increase risk; malignant disease of any kind except for successfully treated skin cancer (basal- or squamous-cell carcinoma) during the previous 5 years; Barrett esophagus or high-grade dysplasia; drug, alcohol, or medication abuse within the past year; severe psychiatric or neurologic disorders; and pregnancy or lactation, as well as sexually active women of child-bearing years who were not willing to practice medically acceptable contraception (oral or injectable contraceptives, implantable or mechanical intrauterine or vaginal devices, or vasectomy for the partner) for the study duration. Randomization and Interventions Patient allocation was determined with a random-number chart that was concealed from investigators and patients by using numbered blister packs of the study medication that corresponded to the random-number chart. A computer-generated randomization chart was used to determine allocation, which was stratified according to center by using a block design and a block size of 4. Allocation was concealed with an opaque envelope, which contained a number that corresponded to the numbered blister packs. The envelope was opened when the patient met the inclusion criteria and provided informed consent. Patients and investigators were blinded to treatment group. Patients were randomly allocated to receive a 10-day sequential regimen (40 mg of pantoprazole, 1 g of amoxicillin, and placebo, each administered twice daily for the first 5 days, followed by 40 mg of pantoprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 500 mg of tinidazole, each administered twice daily for the remaining 5 days); or standard therapy (40 mg of pantoprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 1 g of amoxicillin, each administered twice daily for 10 days). Medications were contained in individual blisters in the package. A placebo that was identical in color and shape to the clarithromycin capsule was administered during the first 5 days of sequential therapy to maintain blinding. This ensured that all patients took 3 medications twice a day for 10 days. Measurements and Outcomes The primary outcome of the study was eradication of H. pylori infection. Secondary outcomes were to determine the efficacy of sequential treatment against clarithromycin-resistant strains of H. pylori, to assess adherence to therapy, and to determine the frequency of self-reported side effects. 13C-Urea Breath Test Urea breath tests were done after an overnight fast. A baseline breath sample was obtained, and 75 mg of 13C-urea with citric acid (1.5 g) was administered as an aqueous solution. Another breath sample was collected 30 minutes after the test solution was administered. The results of the test were considered positive if the difference between the baseline sample and the 30-minute sample exceeded 4.5 parts per 1000 of 13CO2. All breath samples were analyzed in Bologna by using a single gas isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Finnigan, Bremen, Germany). The accuracy of the urea breath test was previously validated in our laboratory. We reported sensitivity and specificity values of 94.7% and 95.7%, respectively (9). Endoscopy All patients with positive results on the urea breath test had upper endoscopy, and 5 biopsy specimens were obtained during the procedure. Two specimens were taken from the antrum and 2 were taken from the corpus for histologic evaluation. The specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Giemsa stains, and gastritis was scored by using the updated Sydney System (10). The pathologist who performed the histologic examination was blinded to the results of all other tests. One biopsy specimen was obtained from the antrum for the rapid urease test (Campylobacter pylori test, Yamanouchi Pharma S.p.A, Corrugate, Milan, Italy). Two additional biopsy samples from the antrum were collected for bacterial culture and susceptibility testing. We performed cultures without knowing the other test results. For this purpose, biopsy specimens were sent to a single microbiological laboratory in Bologna within 24 hours and were stored at 70C. Isolated strains were tested for primary clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance by using an agar dilution method, which was defined as a minimal inhibitory concentration greater than 1 mg/L and greater than 8 mg/L for clarithromycin and metronidazole, respectively (11). Strains were classified as having isolated resistance to clarithromycin or metronidazole if the organisms were only resistant to 1 antibiotic. Dual resistance was defined as resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole. At baseline, patients were classified as having H. pylori infection if the results on the urea breath test were positive and if the results on at least 2 of the following 3 tests were positive: rapid urease test, histologic examination, and culture. An expert panel recommended these criteria for use in clinical trials of H. pylori infection (12). Follow-up Procedures Treatment Adherence and Side Effects Patients were asked to return at the completion of therapy for a physical evaluation and to assess adherence to therapy and side effects. We first aske

The sequential therapy regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a pooled-data analysis

Background:: Standard triple therapies are the most used treatment in clinical practice. However, a critical fall in the H pylori eradication rate following these therapies has been observed in the last few years. The sequential regimen is a novel, promising therapeutic approach. Objectives:: To evaluate the available data on the sequential therapy regimen. Methods:: A pooled-data analysis of all studies on the sequential regimen was performed. The eradication rate was calculated according to gastroduodenal pathology, proton pump inhibitor used, antibiotic resistance, as well as setting (paediatric or geriatric patients). Compliance, side effects, and cost implications were also evaluated. Results:: Overall, more than 1800 patients have been treated with the sequential regimen. Such a therapy was superior to 7–10 days triple therapies in paediatric, adult and elderly patients, achieving an eradication rate constantly higher than 90% at ITT analysis. Although primary clarithromycin resistance reduced the efficacy of such a therapy, a success rate significantly higher than that observed with the standard 7–10 days triple therapies was found. Conclusion:: The 10-day sequential treatment regimen achieves higher eradication rates than standard triple therapies.

High eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori with a new sequential treatment

Background : Eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori with standard triple therapy are disappointing, and studies from several countries confirm this poor performance.

Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

BACKGROUND AND AIM This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the choice amongst regimens available for cleansing the colon in preparation for colonoscopy. METHODS This Guideline is based on a targeted literature search to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendation and the quality of evidence. RESULTS The main recommendations are as follows. (1) The ESGE recommends a low-fiber diet on the day preceding colonoscopy (weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence). (2) The ESGE recommends a split regimen of 4 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution (or a same-day regimen in the case of afternoon colonoscopy) for routine bowel preparation. A split regimen (or same-day regimen in the case of afternoon colonoscopy) of 2 L PEG plus ascorbate or of sodium picosulphate plus magnesium citrate may be valid alternatives, in particular for elective outpatient colonoscopy (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). In patients with renal failure, PEG is the only recommended bowel preparation. The delay between the last dose of bowel preparation and colonoscopy should be minimized and no longer than 4 hours (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). (3) The ESGE advises against the routine use of sodium phosphate for bowel preparation because of safety concerns (strong recommendation, low quality evidence).

Systematic review: endoscopic dilatation in Crohn’s disease

Background  Endoscopic dilatation for Crohn’s disease has been evaluated only in some small and heterogeneous studies.

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.

Prior cost‐effectiveness models analyzing computed tomography colonography (CTC) screening have assumed that patients with diminutive lesions (≤5 mm) will be referred to optical colonoscopy (OC) for polypectomy. However, consensus guidelines for CTC recommend reporting only polyps measuring ≥6 mm. The purpose of the current study was to assess the potential harms, benefits, and cost‐effectiveness of CTC screening without the reporting of diminutive lesions compared with other screening strategies.

Clarithromycin-Resistant Genotypes and Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Context Point mutations in the peptidyltransferase region of the 23S ribosomal RNA gene may be responsible for Helicobacter pylori clarithromycin resistance. Contribution This study related mutations to eradication rates in 156 adults treated with clarithromycin regimens for H. pylori infection. Eradication was successful in 14 of 15 patients with either A2142G or A2142C point mutations but in only 11 of 23 patients with the A2143G point mutation. Cautions This was a post hoc subgroup study of selected participants in a multicenter randomized trial. Implications The A2143G point mutation may be associated with a low eradication rate of H. pylori infection. The Editors Helicobacter pylori infection plays a major role in peptic ulcer disease, low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric cancer (1), and its eradication dramatically affects the natural history of both peptic ulcer and gastric lymphoma (2). European and U.S. guidelines advised the use of triple therapies (proton-pump inhibitor, clarithromycin plus amoxicillin, or metronidazole) for 7 to 14 days to cure this infection (3, 4). However, H. pylori resistance against clarithromycin is increasing worldwide, reducing the success rate of standard triple therapies to mean values as low as 18% to 44% (5-7). Novel culture-free polymerase chain reaction (PCR)based assays have allowed the detection of the genetic mutations that are involved in the mechanisms of clarithromycin resistance (8, 9). In detail, A2143G and A2142G transitions are the most prevalent point mutations in Europe and the United States (10, 11), while the A2144G mutation is more frequent in Asia (12, 13). Although such genetic mutations have been associated with different degrees of bacterial resistance in vitro, data are still conflicting (7, 14). Moreover, no study has assessed the role of these different mutations on H. pylori treatment outcome. In a recent multicenter study, a novel sequential regimen, consisting of a simple dual therapy given for the first 5 days followed by a triple therapy for the remaining 5 days, achieved a very high cure rate as compared with standard triple therapy (92% vs. 74%) (15). Whether such a high cure rate may depend on increased efficacy of the sequential regimen against the clarithromycin-resistant strains is unknown. We wanted to evaluate the role of different point mutations in the success of eradication therapy and to compare the efficacy of standard triple therapy and the sequential regimen for these mutations. Methods Study Design To assess the role of primary clarithromycin resistance in therapeutic outcome, we designed a post hoc subgroup analysis of a previous study involving 8 Italian centers (15). In detail, we selected patients from those who were previously enrolled by our 2 centers to participate in a multicenter study between January and December 2001 (Figure). Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients enrolled in our substudy were similar to those of patients enrolled in the original multicenter study. Briefly, in the original study, Zullo and colleagues (15) allocated patients who were never treated for H. pylori infection, according to a computer-generated randomization list drawn in each center, to receive standard 7-day treatment (20 mg of rabeprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 1 g of amoxicillin twice daily) or 10-day sequential therapy (20 mg of rabeprazole plus 1 g of amoxicillin twice daily for the first 5 days followed by 20 mg of rabeprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 500 mg of tinidazole twice daily for the remaining 5 days). To assess H. pylori status, the investigators performed upper endoscopy with several gastric biopsies for histology (Giemsa staining), a rapid urease test, and a standard 13C-urea breath test at entry and at 4 to 6 weeks after therapy. Investigators considered infections to be eradicated when all 3 test results were negative and considered treatment to have failed when at least 1 test result was positive. The local ethics committee approved the protocol, and all participants gave written informed consent. Figure. Flow chart showing data of patients recruited in this substudy from the previous multicenter study. For our current study, we selected 75 of 192 patients who were treated with standard triple therapy and 81 of 185 patients who were treated with the sequential regimen in the 2 participating centers. We recruited patients consecutively from the randomization lists of the previous study, independent of the eradication status. The final study sample included 58 of 140 patients whose infections were eradicated and 17 of 52 patients whose infections were not eradicated after standard triple therapy and 76 of 177 patients whose infections were eradicated and 5 of 8 whose infections were not eradicated after the sequential regimen. Clarithromycin Resistance Assessment We assessed the 3 point mutations (A2142C, A2142G, and A2143G) of clarithromycin resistance by using a validated real-time PCR, as reported elsewhere (16). Briefly, we extracted the DNA by using NucleoSpin Tissue (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co., Dren, Germany), according to the manufacturers instructions, applied on paraffin-embedded sections. We applied the same procedure to homogeneous bacterial cultures of H. pylori (positive and negative controls), for which clarithromycin resistance had been previously assessed with Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden). We estimated final DNA concentrations by ultraviolet absorbance at 260 nm. Preparation of the Probes and Primers We designed TaqMan minor groove binder (MGB) probes and primers to hybridize with wild-type and mutant DNA by using the Primer Express program and Custom TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assay service (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California) that synthesized the primers and probes for each mutation. Genotyping Assay The assay reagents for the genotyping single nucleotide mutation from the Assays-by-Design service (Applied Biosystems) consisted of a 40X mix of unlabeled PCR primers and TaqMan MGB probes (FAM and VIC fluorochrome dyelabeled). These assays were designed for the genotyping of specific mutations. Each assay enables scoring of both genotypes in a single well. Since a recent study showed that the conjugation of MGB to oligonucleotides stabilizes nucleic acid duplexes, causing a dramatic increase in oligonucleotide melting temperature (17, 18), we used an attachment of the MGB, which enables the use of shorter fluorogenic probes, thus resulting in improved mismatch discrimination. Our probes were distinguished by being labeled with different fluorescent reporter dyes (FAM dye and VIC dye). A substantial increase in FAM or VIC dye fluorescence indicated homozygosity for the FAM- or VIC-specific allele, while an increase in both signals indicated heterozygosity (19). Real-Time PCR Assay and Allelic Discrimination We performed the real-time PCR procedure according to the method of Wada and colleagues (20). We enclosed positive and negative controls in each assay. We analyzed fluorescence of hybridized probes by multicomponent graphics, where we examined dye-labeled (FAM and VIC), background, and passive control (ROX fluorochrome dye-labeled) fluorescence and expressed them as normalized reporter signal (Rn). We clustered all samples by using the maximum likelihood algorithm based on the ratio of normalized reporter dye signal. The result of the analysis yields 3 major clusters corresponding to the 3 genotypic constituents: wild-type homozygous, mutated-type homozygous, and heterozygous. Characterization of Positive and Negative Controls by Amplification and Sequencing of the Hp23S Fragment We obtained the Hp23S fragment by PCR amplification of H. pylori extracted DNA from homogeneous bacterial cultures (strains with and without clarithromycin resistance, previously assessed by Etest) by using primer Hp23-F (5-CCACAGCGAT GTG GTCTCAG-3) and Hp23-R (5-CTCCATAAGAGCCAAAGCCC-3) according to conventional PCR assay (21). Before sequencing, we purified the PCR products by using the Wizard PCR preps (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin). We performed the sequencing reaction with the same primers for PCR, as described by Sanger and colleagues (22), by using the Dye Terminator 3.1 Ready Reaction Kit (Applied Biosystems) as indicated by the manufacturer. We performed sequencing on the 2 strands of each PCR product with the automated ABI Prism 377 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems) and aligned the resulting nucleotide sequence by using the Sequence Navigator software package (Applied Biosystems). Statistical Analysis We determined sample size before the start of the study on the basis of the available data in the literature. In detail, an eradication rate ranging from 18% to 44% was reported after standard triple therapy in patients with primary clarithromycin-resistant strains (5-7), whereas the sequential regimen eradicated the infection in 79% of such patients (15). Assuming a high eradication rate for the triple therapy (45%) and a relatively poor success rate for the sequential regimen (70%) in patients with primary clarithromycin-resistant strains, we calculated that at least 68 patients per group were needed to detect a statistically significant difference with 0.8 power and an level of 0.05 (2-sided). After the study was completed, we realized that our sample size estimate provided the necessary number of clarithromycin-resistant patients and should have been inflated, on the basis of a presumed overall rate of clarithromycin resistance, to provide an estimate of total sample size. We compared eradication rates by H. pylori clarithromycin-resistant strain mutation (A2142C, A2142G, and A2143G) by using the Fisher exact test or chi-square test, as appropriate. We determined point mutation groupings after reviewing eradication rates by individual mutation. We compared clinical characteristics among the different groups by using the Student t-test for unpaired da

Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication on early stage gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS Different remission rates of gastric low-grade, B-cell, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma have been reported after Helicobacter pylori eradication. We assessed the long-term remission and relapse rates of early stage MALT lymphoma in patients treated only by H pylori eradication and identified factors that might predict outcome. METHODS This systematic review analyzed data from 32 studies, including 1408 patients. RESULTS The MALT lymphoma remission rate was 77.5% (95% confidence interval, 75.3-79.7), and was significantly higher in patients with stage I than stage II(1) lymphoma (78.4% vs 55.6%; P = .0003) and in Asian than in Western groups (84.1% vs 73.8%; P = .0001). Neoplasia confined to the submucosa regressed more frequently than that with deeper invasion (82.2% vs 54.5%; P = .0001); patients with lymphoma localized to the distal stomach experienced regression more frequently than those with lymphoma of the proximal stomach (91.8% vs 75.7%; P = .0037). The remission rate was higher among patients without the API2-MALT1 translocation than in those with this translocation (78% vs 22.2%; P = .0001). In an analysis of data from 994 patients, 7.2% experienced lymphoma relapse during 3253 patient-years of follow-up evaluation, with a yearly recurrence rate of 2.2%. Infection and lymphoma were cured by additional eradication therapy in all patients with H pylori recurrence (16.7%). Five (0.05%) of the patients initially cured of lymphoma developed high-grade lymphoma within 6 to 25 months of therapy. CONCLUSIONS H pylori eradication is effective in treating approximately 75% of patients with early stage gastric lymphoma. Long-term follow-up evaluation of these patients is needed to detect early lymphoma relapse or progression.

A new highly effective short-term therapy schedule for Helicobacter pylori eradication

Although triple therapy regimens suggested in the Current European guidelines give fairly good results, several studies have reported an unsatisfactory Helicobacter pylori eradication rate (< 80%).

Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH). Main Recommendations MR1. ESGE recommends immediate assessment of hemodynamic status in patients who present with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH), with prompt intravascular volume replacement initially using crystalloid fluids if hemodynamic instability exists (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR2. ESGE recommends a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy that aims for a target hemoglobin between 7 g/dL and 9 g/dL. A higher target hemoglobin should be considered in patients with significant co-morbidity (e. g., ischemic cardiovascular disease) (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR3. ESGE recommends the use of the Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) for pre-endoscopy risk stratification. Outpatients determined to be at very low risk, based upon a GBS score of 0 - 1, do not require early endoscopy nor hospital admission. Discharged patients should be informed of the risk of recurrent bleeding and be advised to maintain contact with the discharging hospital (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR4. ESGE recommends initiating high dose intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPI), intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion (80 mg then 8 mg/hour), in patients presenting with acute UGIH awaiting upper endoscopy. However, PPI infusion should not delay the performance of early endoscopy (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR5. ESGE does not recommend the routine use of nasogastric or orogastric aspiration/lavage in patients presenting with acute UGIH (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR6. ESGE recommends intravenous erythromycin (single dose, 250 mg given 30 - 120 minutes prior to upper gastrointestinal [GI] endoscopy) in patients with clinically severe or ongoing active UGIH. In selected patients, pre-endoscopic infusion of erythromycin significantly improves endoscopic visualization, reduces the need for second-look endoscopy, decreases the number of units of blood transfused, and reduces duration of hospital stay (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR7. Following hemodynamic resuscitation, ESGE recommends early (≤ 24 hours) upper GI endoscopy. Very early (< 12 hours) upper GI endoscopy may be considered in patients with high risk clinical features, namely: hemodynamic instability (tachycardia, hypotension) that persists despite ongoing attempts at volume resuscitation; in-hospital bloody emesis/nasogastric aspirate; or contraindication to the interruption of anticoagulation (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR8. ESGE recommends that peptic ulcers with spurting or oozing bleeding (Forrest classification Ia and Ib, respectively) or with a nonbleeding visible vessel (Forrest classification IIa) receive endoscopic hemostasis because these lesions are at high risk for persistent bleeding or rebleeding (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR9. ESGE recommends that peptic ulcers with an adherent clot (Forrest classification IIb) be considered for endoscopic clot removal. Once the clot is removed, any identified underlying active bleeding (Forrest classification Ia or Ib) or nonbleeding visible vessel (Forrest classification IIa) should receive endoscopic hemostasis (weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR10. In patients with peptic ulcers having a flat pigmented spot (Forrest classification IIc) or clean base (Forrest classification III), ESGE does not recommend endoscopic hemostasis as these stigmata present a low risk of recurrent bleeding. In selected clinical settings, these patients may be discharged to home on standard PPI therapy, e. g., oral PPI once-daily (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR11. ESGE recommends that epinephrine injection therapy not be used as endoscopic monotherapy. If used, it should be combined with a second endoscopic hemostasis modality (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR12. ESGE recommends PPI therapy for patients who receive endoscopic hemostasis and for patients with adherent clot not receiving endoscopic hemostasis. PPI therapy should be high dose and administered as an intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion (80 mg then 8 mg/hour) for 72 hours post endoscopy (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR13. ESGE does not recommend routine second-look endoscopy as part of the management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH). However, in patients with clinical evidence of rebleeding following successful initial endoscopic hemostasis, ESGE recommends repeat upper endoscopy with hemostasis if indicated. In the case of failure of this second attempt at hemostasis, transcatheter angiographic embolization (TAE) or surgery should be considered (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR14. In patients with NVUGIH secondary to peptic ulcer, ESGE recommends investigating for the presence of Helicobacter pylori in the acute setting with initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy when H. pylori is detected. Re-testing for H. pylori should be performed in those patients with a negative test in the acute setting. Documentation of successful H. pylori eradication is recommended (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR15. In patients receiving low dose aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis who develop peptic ulcer bleeding, ESGE recommends aspirin be resumed immediately following index endoscopy if the risk of rebleeding is low (e. g., FIIc, FIII). In patients with high risk peptic ulcer (FIa, FIb, FIIa, FIIb), early reintroduction of aspirin by day 3 after index endoscopy is recommended, provided that adequate hemostasis has been established (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence).