C. Hassan

Thiopurine methyltransferase activity and the use of azathioprine in inflammatory bowel disease

Background : Azathioprine therapy is discontinued in one‐third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease because of toxicity or a lack of clinical response. Patients with thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) deficiency are intolerant to azathioprine, whilst carriers are at increased risk of side‐effects.

A new highly effective short-term therapy schedule for Helicobacter pylori eradication

Although triple therapy regimens suggested in the Current European guidelines give fairly good results, several studies have reported an unsatisfactory Helicobacter pylori eradication rate (< 80%).

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps. Design Relevant publications were identified in MEDLINE/EMBASE/Cochrane Central Register for the period 1966–2014. Studies in which ≥20 mm colorectal neoplastic lesions were treated with endoscopic resection were included. Rates of postendoscopic resection surgery due to non-curative resection or adverse events, as well as the rates of complete endoscopic removal, invasive cancer, adverse events, recurrence and mortality, were extracted. Study quality was ascertained according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Forest plot was produced based on random effect models. I2 statistic was used to describe the variation across studies due to heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis was also performed. Results 50 studies including 6442 patients and 6779 large polyps were included in the analyses. Overall, 503 out of 6442 patients (pooled rate: 8%, 95% CI 7% to 10%, I2=78.6%) underwent surgery due to non-curative endoscopic resection, and 31/6442 (pooled rate: 1%, 95% CI 0.7% to 1.4%, I2=0%) to adverse events. Invasive cancer at histology, non-curative endoscopic resection, synchronous lesions and recurrence accounted for 58%, 28%, 2.2% and 5.9% of all the surgeries, respectively. Endoscopic perforation occurred in 96/6595 (1.5%, 95% CI 1.2% to 1.7%) polyps, while bleeding in 423/6474 (6.5%, 95% CI 5.9% to 7.1%). Overall, 5334 patients entered in surveillance, 502/5836 (8.6%, 95% CI 7.9% to 9.3%) being lost at follow-up. Endoscopic recurrence was detected in 735/5334 patients (13.8%, 95% CI 12.9% to 14.7%), being an invasive cancer in 14/5334 (0.3%, 95% CI 0.1% to 0.4%). Endoscopic treatment was successful in 664/735 cases (90.3%, 95% CI 88.2% to 92.5%). Mortality related with management of large polyps was reported in 5/6278 cases (0.08%, 95% CI 0.01% to 0.15%). Conclusions Endoscopic resection of large polyps appeared to be an extremely effective and safe intervention. However, an adequate endoscopic surveillance is necessary for its long-term efficacy.

Ascorbic acid and intestinal metaplasia in the stomach: a prospective, randomized study

Intestinal type metaplasia plays a role in intestinal type gastric carcinoma development. Ascorbic acid demonstrates a protective effect against gastric carcinogenesis, due to its ability to inactivate oxygen free‐radicals as well as its nitrite‐scavenging effects.

Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: A randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme

Objective Although a split regimen of bowel preparation has been associated with higher levels of bowel cleansing, it is still uncertain whether it has a favourable effect on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The present study was aimed at evaluating whether a split regimen was superior to the traditional ‘full-dose, day-before’ regimen in terms of ADR. Design In a multicentre, randomised, endoscopist-blinded study, 50–69-year-old subjects undergoing first colonoscopy after positive-faecal immunochemical test within an organised colorectal cancer organised screening programmes were 1:1 randomised to receive low-volume 2-L polyethylene glycol (PEG)-ascorbate solution in a ‘split-dose’ (Split-Dose Group, SDG) or ‘day-before’ regimen (Day-Before Group, DBG). The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma. Secondary endpoints were the detection rates of advanced adenomas and serrated lesions at per-patient analysis and the total number of lesions. Results 690 subjects were included in the study. At per-patient analysis, the proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma was significantly higher in the SDG than in the DBG (183/345, 53.0% vs 141/345, 40.9%, relative risk (RR) 1.22, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.46); corresponding figures for advanced adenomas were 26.4% (91/345) versus 20.0% (69/345, RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.73). At per-polyp analysis, the total numbers of both adenomas and advanced adenomas per subject were significantly higher in the SDG (1.15 vs 0.8, p <0.001; 0.36 vs 0.22, p<0.001). Conclusions In an organised screening setting, the adoption of a split regimen resulted into a higher detection rate of clinically relevant neoplastic lesions, thus improving the effectiveness of colonoscopy. Based on such evidence, the adoption of a split regimen for colonoscopy should be strongly recommended. Clinical trial registration number NCT02178033.

Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy vs. colonoscopy in pediatric ulcerative colitis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy (CCE-2) may overcome the invasiveness of colonoscopy in the evaluation of mucosal inflammation, especially in pediatric ulcerative colitis. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CCE-2 in evaluating disease activity, using colonoscopy as a gold standard. Disease extent, tolerability, interobserver agreement, and safety were also evaluated. METHODS A total of 30 consecutive pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis were prospectively enrolled (mean age 14.1 ± 3.2 years). Patients underwent CCE-2 followed by colonoscopy in the late afternoon or the following day. The blinded procedures were performed, and the diagnostic accuracy of CCE-2 to assess disease activity was determined using a modified Matts score, which classified patients as either normal (Matts score ≤ 6) or with active inflammation (Matts score > 6). Interobserver agreement was assessed using the kappa statistic. RESULTS One patient was excluded from the analysis because they were unable to swallow the capsule, leaving 29 patients available for analysis. The sensitivity of CCE-2 for disease activity was 96 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 79 - 99) and specificity was 100 % (95 %CI 61 - 100). The positive and negative predictive values of CCE-2 were 100 % (95 %CI 85 - 100) and 85 % (95 %CI 49 - 97), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. CCE-2 had a higher overall tolerability than colonoscopy (P < 0.05). Interobserver agreement was excellent in all cases (κ > 0.86). CONCLUSIONS Using a modified Matts score, CCE-2 was accurate in evaluating significant mucosal inflammation in children with ulcerative colitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov--NCT01740349.

Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in Europe. A single flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening at around the age of 60 years prevents about one-third of CRC cases. However, FS screens only the distal colon, and thus mortality from proximal CRC is unaffected. Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a highly accurate examination that allows assessment of the entire colon. However, the benefit of CTC testing as a CRC screening test is uncertain. We designed a randomized trial to compare participation rate, detection rates, and costs between CTC (with computer-aided detection) and FS as primary tests for population-based screening.Methods/DesignAn invitation letter to participate in a randomized screening trial comparing CTC versus FS will be mailed to a sample of 20,000 people aged 58 or 60 years, living in the Piedmont region and the Verona district of Italy. Individuals with a history of CRC, adenomas, inflammatory bowel disease, or recent colonoscopy, or with two first-degree relatives with CRC will be excluded from the study by their general practitioners. Individuals responding positively to the invitation letter will be then randomized to the intervention group (CTC) or control group (FS), and scheduled for the screening procedure. The primary outcome parameter of this part of the trial is the difference in advanced neoplasia detection between the two screening tests. Secondary outcomes are cost-effectiveness analysis, referral rates for colonoscopy induced by CTC versus FS, and the expected and perceived burden of the procedures. To compare participation rates for CTC versus FS, 2,000 additional eligible subjects will be randomly assigned to receive an invitation for screening with CTC or FS. In the CTC arm, non-responders will be offered fecal occult blood test (FOBT) as alternative screening test, while in the FS arm, non-responders will receive an invitation letter to undergo screening with either FOBT or CTC. Data on reasons for participation and non-participation will also be collected.DiscussionThis study will provide reliable information concerning benefits and risks of the adoption of CTC as a mass screening intervention in comparison with FS. The trial will also evaluate the role of computer-aided detection in a screening setting.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01739608

Helicobacter pylori infection, plasma ammonia levels, and psychometric testing in cirrhotic patients

OBJECTIVE:The role of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection as a cause of hepatic encephalopathy is still debated. This study focused on the relationship between H. pylori, plasma ammonia levels, and intellectual function in cirrhotic patients.METHODS:Forty-seven cirrhotics with latent or mild hepatic encephalopathy were enrolled in the study, upon H. pylori assessment at endoscopy. Plasma ammonia level determinations and psychometric testing were performed at entry in all patients. Patients with H. pylori infection received a 2-wk standard dual therapy and bacterial eradication was assessed at endoscopy 6-8 wk later. On this occasion, plasma ammonia levels and psychometric assessments were repeated. Patients without H. pylori infection at entry were also studied after 6-8 wk for ammonia level assessment and psychometric testing, as a control group. Patients receiving lactulose therapy and those without therapy were grouped separately for statistical analysis.RESULTS:Among 21 patients without lactulose therapy (group A), basal plasma ammonia levels and psychometric testing scores did not significantly differ between 13 infected and eight uninfected patients. Similarly, among 26 patients undergoing lactulose therapy (group B), basal plasma ammonia concentration and psychometric testing scores did not significantly differ between 13 infected and 13 uninfected patients. Moreover, in group B, both the prevalence of previous overt hepatic encephalopathy episodes and the mean daily dose of lactulose therapy were similar between infected and uninfected patients. In addition, no significant reduction in the plasma ammonia concentrations and in psychometric testing scores emerged in both groups A and B after bacterial eradication.CONCLUSIONS:This study failed to find a relationship between H. pylori, plasma ammonia levels, and psychometric testing scores in cirrhotic patients with latent or mild hepatic encephalopathy.

Colon capsule endoscopy compared with other modalities in the evaluation of pediatric Crohn's disease of the small bowel and colon

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data on colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) in evaluating the small bowel and colon concurrently are rare. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CCE in assessing disease activity of the small bowel and colon in pediatric Crohns disease (CD) by comparison with magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), small-intestine contrast US (SICUS), and ileocolonoscopy. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 40 consecutive patients (22 male, 18 female, mean age 13.1 ± 3.1 years) with CD of the small bowel and colon. All underwent SICUS, MRE, CCE, and ileocolonoscopy sequentially over 5 days. All investigators were blinded to patient history and test results. Patients were classified as active or inactive for the small bowel and the colon according to specific criteria for each tool (simple endoscopic score for CD, Lewis score, US and magnetic resonance parameters of activity). For colon mucosa evaluation, ileocolonoscopy was the comparator. For the small bowel, a consensus panel was convened. RESULTS Sensitivity of CCE to detect colon inflammation was 89%, and specificity was 100%. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CCE for colon inflammation were 100% and 91%, respectively. In the small bowel, CCE showed 90% sensitivity, 94% specificity, with PPV and NPV of 95% and 90%, respectively. Accuracy parameters for SICUS (sensitivity 90%, specificity 83%) and MRE (sensitivity 85%, specificity 89%) were lower than those for CCE. No serious adverse events related to the CCE procedure or preparation were reported. CONCLUSIONS CCE is of great usefulness in evaluating both small bowel and colon mucosa in pediatric CD. This single, noninvasive tool makes it possible to evaluate the small-bowel and the colon concurrently with high diagnostic accuracy. Future multicenter studies need to define the role of CCE in the routine management of pediatric patients with CD. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02199626.).

Bowel Preparations for Colonoscopy: An RCT

BACKGROUND: The ideal preparation regimen for pediatric colonoscopy remains elusive, and available preparations continue to represent a challenge for children. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and acceptance of 4 methods of bowel cleansing before colonoscopy in children. METHODS: This randomized, investigator-blinded, noninferiority trial enrolled all children aged 2 to 18 years undergoing elective colonoscopy in a referral center for pediatric gastroenterology. Patients were randomly assigned to receive polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000 with simethicon (PEG-ELS group) or PEG-4000 with citrates and simethicone plus bisacodyl (PEG-CS+Bisacodyl group), or PEG 3350 with ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc group), or sodium picosulfate plus magnesium oxide and citric acid (NaPico+MgCit group). Bowel cleansing was evaluated according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. The primary end point was overall colon cleansing. Tolerability, acceptability, and compliance were also evaluated. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were randomly allocated to the 4 groups. In the per-protocol analysis, PEG-CS+Bisacodyl, PEG-Asc, and NaPico+MgCit were noninferior to PEG-ELS in bowel-cleansing efficacy of both the whole colon (P = .910) and colonic segments. No serious adverse events occurred in any group. Rates of tolerability, acceptability, and compliance were significantly higher in the NaPico+MgCit group. CONCLUSIONS: Low-volume PEG preparations (PEG-CS+Bisacodyl, PEG-Asc) and NaPico+MgCit are noninferior to PEG-ELS in children, representing an attractive alternative to high-volume regimens in clinical practice. Because of the higher tolerability and acceptability profile, NaPico+MgCit would appear as the most suitable regimen for bowel preparation in children.