Anita Wan Sze Lau

MDM2 and MDMX bind and stabilize the p53-related protein p73

The p53 gene encodes one of the most important tumor suppressors in human cells and undergoes frequent mutational inactivation in cancers. MDM2, a transcriptional target of p53, binds p53 and can both inhibit p53-mediated transcription [1] [2] and target p53 for proteasome-mediated proteolysis [3] [4]. A close relative of p53, p73, has recently been identified [5] [6]. Here, we report that, like p53, p73alpha and the alternative transcription product p73beta also bind MDM2. Interaction between MDM2 and p53 represents a key step in the regulation of p53, as MDM2 promotes the degradation of p53. In striking contrast to p53, the half-life of p73 was found to be increased by binding to MDM2. Like MDM2, the MDM2-related protein MDMX also bound p73 and stabilized the level of p73. Moreover, the growth suppression functions of p73 and the induction of endogenous p21, a major mediator of the p53-dependent growth arrest pathway, were enhanced in the presence of MDM2. These differences between the regulation of p53 and p73 by MDM2/MDMX may highlight a physiological difference in their action.

How many mutant p53 molecules are needed to inactivate a tetramer

ABSTRACT The tumor suppressor p53 is transcription factor composed of four identical subunits. The majority of the mutations in p53 are missense mutations that impair DNA binding. On the other hand, the p53-related p63 and p73 genes are rarely mutated, but many cell types express natural variants lacking the N-terminal transactivation domain (NΔ). Compelling evidence indicates that both the DNA binding-defective and NΔ mutants can impair the function of wild-type p53 in a dominant-negative manner. Interestingly, it is uncertain how many mutant subunit(s) a p53 tetramer can tolerate. In this study, we first made theoretical predictions based on the number of mutant p53 monomers needed to inactivate a tetramer and then tested how well the experimental data fit the predicted values. Surprisingly, these experiments reveal that DNA binding-defective p53 mutants (R249S and R273H) are very ineffective in impairing the transcriptional activity of p53: at least three mutants are required to inactivate a tetramer. In marked contrast, p53NΔ is a very potent inhibitor of p53: one NΔ subunit per tetramer is sufficient to abolish the transcriptional activity. DNA binding is not necessary for the NΔ proteins to inactivate p53. Similarly, NΔ variants of p63 and p73 are also powerful inhibitors of members of the p53 family. These results have important implications for our thinking about the mechanism of tumorigenesis involving missense p53 mutants or the N-terminally truncated isoforms.

MDM2 and MDMX can interact differently with ARF and members of the p53 family

Members of the p53 family of transcription factors have essential roles in tumor suppression and in development. MDM2 is an essential regulator of p53 that can inhibit the transcriptional activity of p53, shuttle p53 out of the nucleus, and target p53 for ubiquitination‐mediated degradation. Little is known about the interaction and selectivity of different members of the p53 family (p53, p63, and p73) and the MDM2 family (MDM2 and MDMX). Here we show that the transcriptional activities of p53 and p73, but not that of p63, were inhibited by both MDM2 and MDMX. Consistent with these, we found that MDMX can physically interact with p53 and p73, but not with p63. Moreover, ectopically expressed MDM2 and MDMX could induce alterations in the subcellular localization of p73, but did not affect the subcellular localization of p53 and p63. Finally, we demonstrate that while ARF can interact with MDM2 and inhibit the regulation of p53 by MDM2, no interaction was found between ARF and MDMX. These data reveal that significant differences and selectivity exist between the regulation of different members of the p53 family by MDM2 and MDMX.

Regulation of Cyclin A-Cdk2 by SCF Component Skp1 and F-Box Protein Skp2

ABSTRACT Cyclin A-Cdk2 complexes bind to Skp1 and Skp2 during S phase, but the function of Skp1 and Skp2 is unclear. Skp1, together with F-box proteins like Skp2, are part of ubiquitin-ligase E3 complexes that target many cell cycle regulators for ubiquitination-mediated proteolysis. In this study, we investigated the potential regulation of cyclin A-Cdk2 activity by Skp1 and Skp2. We found that Skp2 can inhibit the kinase activity of cyclin A-Cdk2 in vitro, both by direct inhibition of cyclin A-Cdk2 and by inhibition of the activation of Cdk2 by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-activating kinase phosphorylation. Only the kinase activity of Cdk2, not of that of Cdc2 or Cdk5, is reduced by Skp2. Skp2 is phosphorylated by cyclin A-Cdk2 on residue Ser76, but nonphosphorylatable mutants of Skp2 can still inhibit the kinase activity of cyclin A-Cdk2 toward histone H1. The F box of Skp2 is required for binding to Skp1, and both the N-terminal and C-terminal regions of Skp2 are involved in binding to cyclin A-Cdk2. Furthermore, Skp2 and the CDK inhibitor p21 Cip1/WAF1 bind to cyclin A-Cdk2 in a mutually exclusive manner. Overexpression of Skp2, but not Skp1, in mammalian cells causes a G1/S cell cycle arrest.

Cyclin F Is Degraded during G2-M by Mechanisms Fundamentally Different from Other Cyclins

Cyclin F, a cyclin that can form SCF complexes and bind to cyclin B, oscillates in the cell cycle with a pattern similar to cyclin A and cyclin B. Ectopic expression of cyclin F arrests the cell cycle in G2/M. How the level of cyclin F is regulated during the cell cycle is completely obscure. Here we show that, similar to cyclin A, cyclin F is degraded when the spindle assembly checkpoint is activated and accumulates when the DNA damage checkpoint is activated. Cyclin F is a very unstable protein throughout much of the cell cycle. Unlike other cyclins, degradation of cyclin F is independent of ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated pathways. Interestingly, proteolysis of cyclin F is likely to involve metalloproteases. Rapid destruction of cyclin F does not require the N-terminal F-box motif but requires the COOH-terminal PEST sequences. The PEST region alone is sufficient to interfere with the degradation of cyclin F and confer instability when fused to cyclin A. These data show that although cyclin F is degraded at similar time as the mitotic cyclins, the underlying mechanisms are entirely distinct.

Ubiquitination of p53 at multiple sites in the DNA-binding domain.

The tumor suppressor p53 is negatively regulated by the ubiquitin ligase MDM2. The MDM2 recognition site is at the NH2-terminal region of p53, but the positions of the actual ubiquitination acceptor sites are less well defined. Lysine residues at the COOH-terminal region of p53 are implicated as sites for ubiquitination and other post-translational modifications. Unexpectedly, we found that substitution of the COOH-terminal lysine residues did not diminish MDM2-mediated ubiquitination. Ubiquitination was not abolished even after the entire COOH-terminal regulatory region was removed. Using a method involving in vitro proteolytic cleavage at specific sites after ubiquitination, we found that p53 was ubiquitinated at the NH2-terminal portion of the protein. The lysine residue within the transactivation domain is probably not essential for ubiquitination, as substitution with an arginine did not affect MDM2 binding or ubiquitination. In contrast, several conserved lysine residues in the DNA-binding domain are critical for p53 ubiquitination. Removal of the DNA-binding domain reduced ubiquitination and increased the stability of p53. These data provide evidence that in addition to the COOH-terminal residues, p53 may also be ubiquitinated at sites in the DNA-binding domain. (Mol Cancer Res 2006;4(1)15–25)

Differential Mode of Regulation of the Checkpoint Kinases CHK1 and CHK2 by Their Regulatory Domains

CHK1 and CHK2 are key mediators that link the machineries that monitor DNA integrity to components of the cell cycle engine. Despite the similarity and potential redundancy in their functions, CHK1 and CHK2 are unrelated protein kinases, each having a distinctive regulatory domain. Here we compare how the regulatory domains of human CHK1 and CHK2 modulate the respective kinase activities. Recombinant CHK1 has only low basal activity when expressed in cultured cells. Surprisingly, disruption of the C-terminal regulatory domain activates CHK1 even in the absence of stress. Unlike the full-length protein, C-terminally truncated CHK1 displays autophosphorylation, phosphorylates CDC25C on Ser216, and delays cell cycle progression. Intriguingly, enzymatic activity decreases when the entire regulatory domain is removed, suggesting that the regulatory domain contains both inhibitory and stimulatory elements. Conversely, the kinase domain suppresses Ser345 phosphorylation, a major ATM/ATR phosphorylation site in the regulatory domain. In marked contrast, CHK2 expressed in either mammalian cells or in bacteria is already active as a kinase against itself and CDC25C and can delay cell cycle progression. Unlike CHK1, disruption of the regulatory domain of CHK2 abolishes its kinase activity. Moreover, the regulatory domain of CHK2, but not that of CHK1, can oligomerize. Finally, CHK1 but not CHK2 is phosphorylated during the spindle assembly checkpoint, which correlates with the inhibition of the kinase. The mitotic phosphorylation of CHK1 requires the regulatory domain, does not involve Ser345, and is independent on ATM. Collectively, these data reveal the very different mode of regulation between CHK1 and CHK2.

ING1b decreases cell proliferation through p53‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms

ING1b can stimulate cell cycle arrest, repair, senescence, and apoptosis. The actions of ING1b are attributed to its activation of the tumor suppressor p53. Here we investigate the more subtle effects of ING1b on the cell cycle and DNA damage responses in the absence of p53. To this end, we have generated isogenic cell lines that expressed ING1b and p53 either individually or in combination under the control of inducible promoters. A five‐ to 10‐fold induction of ING1b over the endogenous protein in a p53‐null H1299 background slightly impairs proliferation by increasing the doubling time by ∼10%. Significantly, ectopic expression of ING1b enhanced the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint induced by adriamycin. We demonstrated that the DNA damage‐induced cell death mediated by the cooperation between ING1b and p53 was more prominent than by the individual proteins alone. In adriamycin‐treated cells, p53 was stabilized and induced the expression of p21 CIP1/WAF1 , but the expression of ING1b was not affected. The exact targets of ING1b in the p53‐null background are not known, but we demonstrated that the transcriptional activities of other members of the p53 family, p63α and p73α, could be activated by ING1b. These data indicate that ING1 has a subtle antiproliferative effect even in the absence of p53, and ING1b enhances the DNA damage responses through p53‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms.

Stalled replication induces p53 accumulation through distinct mechanisms from DNA damage checkpoint pathways.

Stalled replication forks induce p53, which is required to maintain the replication checkpoint. In contrast to the well-established mechanisms of DNA damage-activated p53, the downstream effectors and upstream regulators of p53 during replication blockade remain to be deciphered. Hydroxyurea triggered accumulation of p53 through an increase in protein stability. The requirement of p53 accumulation for the replication checkpoint was not due to p21(CIP1/WAF1) as its down-regulation with short-hairpin RNA did not affect the checkpoint. Similar to DNA damage, stalled replication triggered the activation of the MRN-ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)/ATM and Rad3-related-CHK1/CHK2 axis. Down-regulation of CHK1 or CHK2, however, reduced p53 basal expression but not the hydroxyurea-dependent induction. Moreover, p53 was still stabilized in ataxia telangiectasia cells or in cells treated with caffeine, suggesting that ATM was not a critical determinant. These data also suggest that the functions of ATM, CHK1, and CHK2 in the replication checkpoint were not through the p53-p21(CIP1/WAF1) pathway. In contrast, induction of p53 by hydroxyurea was defective in cells lacking NBS1 and BLM. In this connection, the impaired replication checkpoint in several other genetic disorders has little correlation with the ability to stabilize p53. These data highlighted the different mechanisms involved in the stabilization of p53 after DNA damage and stalled replication forks.

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CULLIN AND F-BOX PROTEIN PARTNER SKP1

Skp1 interacts with cullins, F‐box containing proteins, and forms a complex with cyclin A‐Cdk2 in mammalian cells. Skp1 is also involved in diverse biological processes like degradation of key cell cycle regulators, glucose sensing, and kinetochore function. However, little is known about the structure and exact function of Skp1. Here we characterized the interaction between Skp1 and the F‐box protein Skp2. We show that Skp1 can bind to Skp2 in vitro using recombinant proteins, and in vivo using the yeast two‐hybrid system. Deletion analysis of Skp1 indicated that most of the Skp1 protein is required for binding to Skp2. In mammalian cell extracts, a large portion of Skp1 appears to associate with proteins other than Skp2. Biochemical analysis indicated that Skp1 is likely to be a flexible, non‐spherical protein, and is capable of forming dimers.