Cain H. Yam

Regulation of Cyclin A-Cdk2 by SCF Component Skp1 and F-Box Protein Skp2

ABSTRACT Cyclin A-Cdk2 complexes bind to Skp1 and Skp2 during S phase, but the function of Skp1 and Skp2 is unclear. Skp1, together with F-box proteins like Skp2, are part of ubiquitin-ligase E3 complexes that target many cell cycle regulators for ubiquitination-mediated proteolysis. In this study, we investigated the potential regulation of cyclin A-Cdk2 activity by Skp1 and Skp2. We found that Skp2 can inhibit the kinase activity of cyclin A-Cdk2 in vitro, both by direct inhibition of cyclin A-Cdk2 and by inhibition of the activation of Cdk2 by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-activating kinase phosphorylation. Only the kinase activity of Cdk2, not of that of Cdc2 or Cdk5, is reduced by Skp2. Skp2 is phosphorylated by cyclin A-Cdk2 on residue Ser76, but nonphosphorylatable mutants of Skp2 can still inhibit the kinase activity of cyclin A-Cdk2 toward histone H1. The F box of Skp2 is required for binding to Skp1, and both the N-terminal and C-terminal regions of Skp2 are involved in binding to cyclin A-Cdk2. Furthermore, Skp2 and the CDK inhibitor p21 Cip1/WAF1 bind to cyclin A-Cdk2 in a mutually exclusive manner. Overexpression of Skp2, but not Skp1, in mammalian cells causes a G1/S cell cycle arrest.

Cyclin F Is Degraded during G2-M by Mechanisms Fundamentally Different from Other Cyclins

Cyclin F, a cyclin that can form SCF complexes and bind to cyclin B, oscillates in the cell cycle with a pattern similar to cyclin A and cyclin B. Ectopic expression of cyclin F arrests the cell cycle in G2/M. How the level of cyclin F is regulated during the cell cycle is completely obscure. Here we show that, similar to cyclin A, cyclin F is degraded when the spindle assembly checkpoint is activated and accumulates when the DNA damage checkpoint is activated. Cyclin F is a very unstable protein throughout much of the cell cycle. Unlike other cyclins, degradation of cyclin F is independent of ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated pathways. Interestingly, proteolysis of cyclin F is likely to involve metalloproteases. Rapid destruction of cyclin F does not require the N-terminal F-box motif but requires the COOH-terminal PEST sequences. The PEST region alone is sufficient to interfere with the degradation of cyclin F and confer instability when fused to cyclin A. These data show that although cyclin F is degraded at similar time as the mitotic cyclins, the underlying mechanisms are entirely distinct.

G1 versus G2 cell cycle arrest after adriamycin-induced damage in mouse Swiss3T3 cells.

Cell cycle arrest after different types of DNA damage can occur in either G1 phase or G2 phase of the cell cycle, involving the distinct mechanisms of p53/p21Cip1/Waf1 induction, and phosphorylation of Cdc2, respectively. Treatment of asynchronously growing Swiss3T3 cells with the chemotherapeutic drug adriamycin induced a predominantly G2 cell cycle arrest. Here we investigate why Swiss3T3 cells were arrested in G2 phase and not in G1 phase after adriamycin‐induced damage. We show that adriamycin was capable of inducing a G1 cell cycle arrest, both during the G0‐G1 transition and during the G1 phase of the normal cell cycle. In G0 cells, adriamycin induced a prolonged cell cycle arrest. However, adriamycin caused only a transient cell cycle delay when added to cells at later time points during G0‐G1 transition or at the G1 phase of normal cell cycle. The G1 arrest correlated with the induction of p53 and p21Cip1/Waf1, and the exit from the arrest correlated with the decline of their expression. In contrast to the G1 arrest, adriamycin‐induced G2 arrest was relatively tight and correlated with the Thr‐14/Tyr‐15 phosphorylation of cyclin B‐Cdc2 complexes. The relative stringency of the G1 versus G2 cell cycle arrest may explain the predominance of G2 arrest after adriamycin treatment in mammalian cells.

The N-terminal regulatory domain of cyclin A contains redundant ubiquitination targeting sequences and acceptor sites

Cyclin A is destroyed during mitosis by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Like cyclin B, a destruction box (D-box) motif is required for the destruction of cyclin A. However, Cyclin A degradation is more complicated than cyclin B because cyclin A’s D-box motif is more extensive and proteolysis involves complex signaling in some organisms. In this study, we found that in addition to the D-box, the region between residues 123-157 also contributed to the ubiquitination and degradation of human cyclin A. Indeed, removal of the bulk of the N-terminal regulatory domain was needed to completely stabilize cyclin A and eliminate ubiquitination. A putative second RxxL motif around residue 138 played only a minor role in cyclin A degradation. To distinguish between sequences recognized by the ubiquitination machinery and the ubiquitin acceptor sites per se, we utilized a novel approach involving in vitro cleavage of cyclin A after ubiquitination. We found that several lysine residues proximal to the D-box (Lys37, Lys54, and Lys68) were ubiquitin acceptor sites. Cyclin A lacking the three lysine residues was degraded slower than the wild-type protein. Although these lysines were normally used, ubiquitination could shift to other cryptic sites when the preferred sites were unavailable, suggesting the exact positions of the ubiquitin chains also contributed to degradation. Together, these data revealed that ubiquitination does not occur randomly on cyclin A and open up questions on the precise function of the D-box.

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CULLIN AND F-BOX PROTEIN PARTNER SKP1

Skp1 interacts with cullins, F‐box containing proteins, and forms a complex with cyclin A‐Cdk2 in mammalian cells. Skp1 is also involved in diverse biological processes like degradation of key cell cycle regulators, glucose sensing, and kinetochore function. However, little is known about the structure and exact function of Skp1. Here we characterized the interaction between Skp1 and the F‐box protein Skp2. We show that Skp1 can bind to Skp2 in vitro using recombinant proteins, and in vivo using the yeast two‐hybrid system. Deletion analysis of Skp1 indicated that most of the Skp1 protein is required for binding to Skp2. In mammalian cell extracts, a large portion of Skp1 appears to associate with proteins other than Skp2. Biochemical analysis indicated that Skp1 is likely to be a flexible, non‐spherical protein, and is capable of forming dimers.