Anja C. Nagel

Hairless-Mediated Repression of Notch Target Genes Requires the Combined Activity of Groucho and CtBP Corepressors

ABSTRACT Notch signal transduction centers on a conserved DNA-binding protein called Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)] in Drosophila species. In the absence of Notch activation, target genes are repressed by Su(H) acting in conjunction with a partner, Hairless, which contains binding motifs for two global corepressors, CtBP and Groucho (Gro). Usually these corepressors are thought to act via different mechanisms; complexed with other transcriptional regulators, they function independently and/or redundantly. Here we have investigated the requirement for Gro and CtBP in Hairless-mediated repression. Unexpectedly, we find that mutations inactivating one or the other binding motif can have detrimental effects on Hairless similar to those of mutations that inactivate both motifs. These results argue that recruitment of one or the other corepressor is not sufficient to confer repression in the context of the Hairless-Su(H) complex; Gro and CtBP need to function in combination. In addition, we demonstrate that Hairless has a second mode of repression that antagonizes Notch intracellular domain and is independent of Gro or CtBP binding.

Two isoforms of the Notch antagonist Hairless are produced by differential translation initiation

The Notch-signaling pathway controls cellular differentiation, including proliferation and cell death in all higher metazoans (including flies and men). Signal transduction through activated Notch involves the CSL group of transcriptional regulators. Notch signals need to be tightly regulated, and in Drosophila they are antagonized by the Hairless (H) protein. H silences the activity of Notch target genes by transforming the Drosophila CSL protein, Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], from a transcriptional activator into a repressor while recruiting one of the corepressors dCtBP or Groucho. The H protein has a calculated molecular mass of ≈110 kDa and contains several functional domains apart from the two small corepressor-binding domains. However, although there is no indication for alternative splicing, two Hairless protein isoforms, Hp120 and Hp150, are observed throughout development. Here, we show that the smaller isoform derives from an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) within the ORF. The IRES is active in a heterologous assay and contains an essential, conserved structural element. The two Hairless isoforms have residual activity in vivo which is, however, reduced compared to a combination of both, which implies that both protein isoforms are necessary for WT function. In larval tissues, translation of the two isoforms is cell-cycle regulated: whereas the Hp150 isoform is translated during interphase, Hp120 is enriched during mitosis. Thus, the presence of either H isoform throughout the cell cycle allows efficient inhibition of Notch-regulated cell proliferation.

Subcellular localization of Hairless protein shows a major focus of activity within the nucleus

Hairless, a major antagonist of the Notch signaling-pathway in Drosophila (Bang and Posakony, 1992; Maier et al., 1992), associates with Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], thereby inhibiting trans-activation of Notch target genes (Brou et al., 1994). These molecular interactions could occur either at the step of signal transduction in the cytoplasm or during implementation of the signal within the nucleus. We examined the subcellular distribution of Hairless, showing that it is a low abundant, ubiquitous protein that is cytosolic as well as nuclear. High levels of Hairless cause nuclear retention of Su(H), loss of Hairless reduces the amount of Su(H) in the nucleus.

Genetic Modifier Screens on Hairless Gain-of-Function Phenotypes Reveal Genes Involved in Cell Differentiation, Cell Growth and Apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster

Overexpression of Hairless (H) causes a remarkable degree of tissue loss and apoptosis during imaginal development. H functions as antagonist in the Notch-signaling pathway in Drosophila, and the link to growth and apoptosis is poorly understood. To further our insight into H-mediated apoptosis, we performed two large-scale screens for modifiers of a small rough eye phenotype caused by H overexpression. Both loss- and gain-of-function screens revealed known and new genetic interactors representing diverse cellular functions. Many of them did not cause eye phenotypes on their own, emphasizing a specific genetic interaction with H. As expected, we also identified components of different signaling pathways supposed to be involved in the regulation of cell growth and cell death. Accordingly, some of them also acted as modifiers of proapoptotic genes, suggesting a more general involvement in the regulation of apoptosis. Overall, these screens highlight the importance of H and the Notch pathway in mediating cell death in response to developmental and environmental cues and emphasize their role in maintaining developmental cellular homeostasis.

Green fluorescent protein as a convenient and versatile marker for studies on functional genomics in Drosophila.

Abstract. Gene function can be deduced from lack or gain of activity. For the manipulation of gene doses or activity in Drosophila, a set of P-based vectors was constructed containing green fluorescent protein as marker. pBLUEi, pGREENi and pYELLi were designed for large insert transformation. Mosaicism was generated in vivo with pFlipG which is also ideal for targeted gene disruption. Tissue-specific gene silencing in vivo was performed with the vector set pHIBS and pUdsGFP. pHIBS allows easy cloning and shuttling of double-headed constructs. With pUdsGFP, double stranded RNA can be produced in defined patterns and the area of interference simultaneously visualized by green fluorescence. We demonstrate nearly complete silencing of a ubiquitously expressed gene in a tissue-specific manner.

Su(H)-independent activity of Hairless during mechano-sensory organ formation in Drosophila

Formation of mechano-sensory organs in Drosophila involves the selection of neural precursor cells (SOPs) mediated by the classical Notch pathway in the process of lateral inhibition. Here we show that the subsequent cell type specifications rely on distinct subsets of Notch signaling components. Whereas E(spl) bHLH genes implement SOP selection, they are not required for later decisions. Most remarkably, the Notch signal transducer Su(H) is essential to determine outer but not inner cell fates. In contrast, the Notch antagonist Hairless, thought to act upon Su(H), influences strongly the entire cell lineage demonstrating that it functions through targets other than Su(H) within the inner lineage. Thereby, Hairless and numb may have partly redundant activities. This suggests that Notch-dependent binary cell fate specifications involve different sets of mediators depending on the cell type considered.

The Putzig-NURF Nucleosome Remodeling Complex is Required for Ecdysone Receptor Signaling and Innate Immunity in Drosophila melanogaster

Putzig (Pzg) was originally identified as being an integral component of the TRF2/DREF complex in Drosophila melanogaster, thereby regulating the transcriptional activation of replication-related genes. In a DREF-independent manner, Pzg was shown to mediate Notch target gene activation. This function of Pzg entails an association with the nucleosome remodeling factor complex NURF, which directly binds the ecdysone receptor EcR and coregulates targets of the EcR via the NURF-specific subunit Nurf-301. In contrast, Nurf-301 acts as a negative regulator of JAK/STAT signaling. Here, we provide evidence to show that Pzg is fundamental for these functions of NURF, apart from the regulation of Notch signaling activity. A jump-out mutagenesis provided us with a pzg null mutant displaying early larval lethality, defects in growth, and molting accompanied by aberrant feeding behavior. We show that Pzg is associated with EcR in vivo and required for the transcriptional induction of EcR target genes, whereas reduced ecdysteroid levels imply a NURF-independent function of Pzg. Moreover, pzg interferes with JAK/STAT-signaling activity by acting as a corepressor of Ken. Lamellocyte differentiation was consistently affected in a JAK/STAT mutant background and the expression level of defense response genes was elevated in pzg mutants, leading to the formation of melanotic tumors. Our results suggest that Pzg acts as an important partner of NURF in the regulation of EcR and JAK/STAT signaling.

Mutations in rugose promote cell type-specific apoptosis in the Drosophila eye

rugose (rg) encodes an A kinase anchor protein and was isolated as a genetic interactor of the Notch and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways during eye development in Drosophila. rg mutants display a small, rough eye phenotype primarily caused by the loss of cone cells. Here we show that the basis of this phenotype is cell type-specific apoptosis rather than transformation and hence can be rescued by reduction of proapoptotic signals. Moreover, a nearly complete rescue is observed by an increased Notch signal suggesting an antiapoptotic function of Notch in this developmental context. Cone cell loss in rg mutants is accompanied by enhanced Jun N-terminal kinase activity and, concomitantly, by a reduction of EGFR signalling activity. Together, these findings support the idea that rg plays an important role in the integration of different signals required for the exact regulation of cone cell development and survival.

A Novel Pzg-NURF Complex Regulates Notch Target Gene Activity

The Putzig (Pzg) protein is associated with the NURF nucleosome remodeling complex, thereby promoting Notch target gene expression. Our findings suggest a novel Pzg-NURF complex that is responsible for the epigenetic regulation of Notch target genes.

Dynamic expression of Drosophila TRAF1 during embryogenesis and larval development

TNF-receptor associated factors (TRAFs) comprise a family of adaptor proteins that act as downstream signal transducers of the TNF receptor superfamily and the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor family. The mammalian TRAFs 2, 5 and 6 are known to activate JNK- and NF-kappaB signaling pathways, whereas the function of the other three mammalian family members, TRAF 1, 3 and 4 is less well characterized. Vertebrate TRAFs have a very similar structure with the exception of TRAF1: aside the characteristic C-terminal TRAF domain, they share a N-terminal RING finger followed by five or, in the case of TRAF4, seven regularly spaced zinc fingers. Two TRAF homologues are present in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster, DTRAF1 and DTRAF2 (also known as DTRAF6) and both have been implicated in the Toll-receptor pathways leading to the activation of NF-kappa B and JNK. DTRAF1 is most closely related to mammalian TRAF4 which is predominantly expressed during nervous system development and in ephitelial progenitor cells. In order to gain insight into possible roles of DTRAF1 during development, we have performed a detailed transcriptional analysis of the gene at various embryonic and larval stages.