Anja Oldenburg

Potential Value of Contrast-Enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasonography During Partial Hepatectomy for Metastases: An Essential Investigation Before Resection?

Objective:The aim of the study was to assess the clinical value of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) as a novel tool in the hepatic staging of patients undergoing liver resection. Methods:Sixty patients scheduled to undergo liver resection for metastatic disease were studied. Preoperative staging with contrast-enhanced CT and/or MR scans was performed within 2 to 6 weeks of operation. Following exploration, intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) was performed using an HDI-5000 scanner (Philips) and a finger-probe with pulse inversion harmonic (PIH) capability. CE-IOUS in the PIH mode was performed in a standardized protocol (low MI: 0.02–0.04) after intravenous injection of 3–4 mL of SonoVue (Bracco spa, Milan); all detected lesions on precontrast and postcontrast scans were counted and mapped. Any alteration in surgical management was documented following CE-IOUS compared with IOUS. Results:Three patients were excluded due to disseminated disease on exploration. CE-IOUS was significantly more sensitive than CT/MR and IOUS in detecting liver metastases (96.1% versus 76.7% and 81.5%, respectively) (P < 0.05); it altered surgical management in 29.8% (17 of 57) of cases, due to 1) additional metastases in 19.3% (11 of 57), 2) less metastases in 3.5% (2 of 57), 3) benign lesions wrongly diagnosed as metastasis on IOUS/CT in 5.3% (3 of 57), and 4) vascular proximity in 1.8% (1 of 57). Management was unchanged in 70.2% (40 of 57) despite additional lesions detected in 3.5% (2 of 57) and benign lesion wrongly diagnosed on IOUS and CT as metastasis in 1.8% (1 of 57). CE-IOUS altered combined IOUS/CT/MR staging in 35.1%. Conclusion:These preliminary results suggest CE-IOUS is an essential tool prior to liver resection for metastases.

Detection and Characterisation of Liver Metastases

Modern liver imaging of cancer patients requires an imaging modality that is not only highly sensitive in detecting lesions but also provides reliable characterisation of lesions and thus allows differentiation of metastases from frequently found benign lesions. Conventional ultrasound (US) has a relatively poor sensitivity and specificity for imaging liver metastases and US used to be inferior to CT and MRI mainly due to a lack of contrast agents. This has changed with the advent of microbubble contrast agents for US. The use of recent contrast agents such as SonoVue (Bracco, Italy) combined with low mechanical index contrast-specific imaging techniques such as Contrast Pulse Sequencing provides dynamic real time imaging of focal liver lesions in the arterial, portal venous and delayed phase. This improves lesion detection and characterisation. To investigate the benefit of SonoVue for detecting liver metastases we studied 40 cancer patients with liver lesions on reference imaging (CT or MRI), 37 of them had metastases. The mean number of reference confirmed metastases per patient increased from 1.85+/-1.79 on conventional ultrasound to 2.73+/-2.50 post SonoVue (p < 0.05). CEUS showed more individual metastases than baseline in 12 (34%) patients. Using CT or MRI as the reference, the mean sensitivity to individual metastases increased from 69% on baseline US to 90% post contrast (p < 0.0005). The role of SonoVue in characterisation of focal liver lesions was evaluated in 63 patients. One lesion was studied per patient. Based on standardised dynamic enhancement criteria for each lesion type, the number of correctly diagnosed lesions improved from 41 (65%) on baseline US to 58 (92%) post contrast (p < 0.001). On CEUS all 27 metastases were correctly diagnosed, while baseline US misinterpreted 2 of these. The number of correctly diagnosed benign lesions (n = 28) increased from 12 (43%) on baseline to 25 (89%) post SonoVue. In conclusion, detection and characterisation of focal liver lesions by US are markedly improved by the use of SonoVue. Contrast agents add a new dimension to sonography allowing it to rival CT and MRI, especially for lesion characterisation.

Imaging of paediatric splenic injury with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

We report two children who sustained traumatic parenchymal splenic injury and were monitored with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). In both cases, unenhanced US failed to diagnose splenic haematoma, but the injury was well demonstrated after injection of contrast agent. In one case agreement with CT was excellent; in the other, CT was not performed due to the comprehensive information provided by CEUS.