Anja Reichert
Hoffmann-La Roche
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anja Reichert.
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology | 2008
Lars-Christian Horn; Anja Reichert; Anne Oster; Sanne Frost Arndal; Marcus J. Trunk; Ruediger Ridder; Ole Feldballe Rassmussen; Kaj Bjelkenkrantz; P. Christiansen; Matthias Eck; Thomas Lorey; Vibeke Ravn Skovlund; Thomas Ruediger; Volker Schneider; Dietmar Schmidt
The quality of cervical histopathology is critical to cervical cancer prevention, cancer treatment, and research programs. On the basis of the histology results further patient management is determined. However, the diagnostic interpretation of histologic hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained slides is affected by substantial rates of discordance among pathologists. Overexpression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a, a cell cycle regulating protein, has been shown to be strongly correlated with dysplastic lesions of the cervix uteri. In this study, we assessed whether p16INK4a immunohistochemistry may increase the performance of pathologists in diagnosing squamous lesions in cervical punch and cone biopsies. When using a consecutive p16INK4a-stained slide in conjunction to the H&E-stained slide, interobserver agreement between 6 pathologists improved significantly for both cervical punch and cone biopsies (P<0.001). For punch biopsies (n=247), κ value increased from 0.49 (moderate agreement) to 0.64 indicating substantial agreement, and interobserver agreement for cone biopsies (n=249) improved from 0.63 (conventional H&E slide reading) to 0.70 when H&E-stained slides were read conjunctively with p16INK4a-stained slides. In comparison to a common consensus diagnosis established by 3 independent experts, 4 pathologists reached an improvement with the conjunctive p16INK4a test, 2 of them showing significantly better agreement (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). p16INK4a immunohistochemistry as an adjunct to conventional H&E-stained specimens thus contributes to a more reproducible diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and may be a valuable aid for the interpretation of cervical histology.
International Journal of Cancer | 2007
Constance Mao; Akhila Balasubramanian; Mujun Yu; Nancy B. Kiviat; Ruediger Ridder; Anja Reichert; Matthias Herkert; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Laura A. Koutsky
p16INK4a, a cell cycle regulation protein, accumulates in abnormal epithelial cells infected with high‐risk human papilloma virus (HPV). In immunostaining studies, p16INK4a has shown potential as a marker of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and invasive cervical cancer. To evaluate its potential use in cervical cancer screening, we conducted a feasibility study to compare the performance of a new enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) for p16INK4a (mtm laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany) to that of the Hybrid capture 2™ (hc2) test for high‐risk HPV DNA for the detection of CIN3. Three hundred and nineteen women were referred from Western Washington Planned Parenthood clinics for colposcopy examination and cervical biopsy because of abnormal Pap test results. Cervical samples were obtained from study participants for p16INK4a ELISA, liquid‐based cytology and hc2. The order (first and second) for obtaining samples for cervical cytology and p16INK4a ELISA changed with every other subject. Concentrations of p16INK4a protein were higher when the sample was taken before the cytology. The sensitivity of p16INK4a ELISA (concentration ≥ 8 units/ml) taken as first sample was 90.0% for CIN3, and the sensitivity of HC2 taken as a second sample was 85%. In the same group, the specificity of p16INK4a ELISA (46.9%) was slightly better than hc2 (35.4%) Results from this proof‐of‐concept study suggest that p16INK4a ELISA has a similar sensitivity and slightly better specificity for CIN3 compared to hc2. These findings support proceeding with a larger study with samples from a population of women presenting for routine cytology screening.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2004
Sophia S. Wang; Marcus J. Trunk; Mark Schiffman; Rolando Herrero; Mark E. Sherman; Robert D. Burk; Allan Hildesheim; M. Concepcion Bratti; Thomas C. Wright; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Sabrina Chen; Anja Reichert; Christina von Knebel Doeberitz; Ruediger Ridder; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
Cancer | 2006
Nicolas Wentzensen; Monika Hampl; Matthias Herkert; Anja Reichert; Marcus J. Trunk; Christopher Poremba; Ruediger Ridder; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
Archive | 2003
Rüdiger Ridder; Wolfgang Rudy; Matthias Herkert; Marcus Trunk-Gehmacher; Anja Reichert; Magnus Von Knebel Doeberitz
Archive | 2004
Ruediger Ridder; Anja Reichert; Magnus Von Knebel Doeberitz; Matthias Herkert; Alexander Duwe; Rainer Hipfel; Peter Martin
Archive | 2013
Ruediger Ridder; Anja Reichert; Marcus Trunk-Gehmacher; Richard Batrla
Archive | 2003
Magnus Von Knebel Doeberitz; Rüdiger Ridder; Matthias Herkert; Anja Reichert
Archive | 2009
Rudiger Ridder; Wolfgang Rudy; Matthias Herkert; Marcus Trunk-Gehmacher; Anja Reichert; Magnus Von Knebel Doeberitz
Archive | 2003
Ruediger Ridder; Peter Martin; Matthias Herkert; Anja Reichert; Marcus Trunk-Gehmacher