Ruediger Ridder

Overexpression of p16INK4a as a specific marker for dysplastic and neoplastic epithelial cells of the cervix uteri

Cytological screening for cervical cancer or its precursors using Papanicolaous smear test (Pap test) has been highly efficient to reduce the morbidity and mortality of cervical cancer. However, evaluation of the Pap test relies on subjective diagnostic parameters and is affected by a high rate of false‐positive and false‐negative results. More objective diagnostic parameters to identify truly dysplastic or neoplastic cells in cervical smears as well as in cervical biopsy samples would therefore avoid insecurity for many patients and the high screening costs associated with repeated testing. Cervical dysplasia is induced by persistent infections through high‐risk types of human papillomaviruses (HPVs). Outgrowth of dysplastic lesions is triggered by increasing expression of two viral oncogenes, E6 and E7, which both interact with various cell cycle‐regulating proteins. Among these is the retinoblastoma gene product pRB, which is inactivated by E7. pRB inhibits transcription of the cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitor gene p16INK4a. Increasing expression of the viral oncogenes in dysplastic cervical cells might thus be reflected by increased expression of p16INK4a. In line with this hypothesis, we observed marked overexpression of p16INK4a in all cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN) I lesions (n = 47) except those associated with low‐risk HPV types (n = 7), all CIN II lesions (n = 32), all CIN III lesions (n = 60) and 58 of 60 invasive cervical cancers. In contrast, no detectable expression of p16INK4a was observed in normal cervical epithelium (n = 42), inflammatory lesions (n = 48) and low‐grade cervical lesions (CIN I) associated with low‐risk HPV types (n = 7). Dysplastic cells could also be identified in cervical smears using a specific p16INK4a monoclonal antibody. These data demonstrate that p16INK4a is a specific biomarker to identify dysplastic cervical epithelia in sections of cervical biopsy samples or cervical smears.

p16/ki-67 dual-stain cytology in the triage of ASCUS and LSIL Papanicolaou cytology†‡§

The objective of this study was to analyze the diagnostic performance of a newly established immunocytochemical dual‐stain protocol, which simultaneously detects p16INK4a and Ki‐67 expression in cervical cytology samples, for identifying high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) in women with Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology results categorized as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL).

Triaging Pap cytology negative, HPV positive cervical cancer screening results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology.

OBJECTIVE Testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) has been shown to increase the sensitivity and negative predictive value for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+), either when used in conjunction with Pap cytology testing or alone. However, there is no satisfying clinical management algorithm for women testing Pap negative/HPV positive. We therefore evaluated the clinical utility of a novel dual biomarker-based approach (p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology) for the identification of CIN2+ in women with Pap negative/HPV positive screening results, without the need to refer all women to immediate colposcopy. METHODS All women aged ≥30 enrolled during 2007/2008 into a regional prospective Pap/HPV co-testing screening pilot project and tested Pap negative, but positive for HPV (n=425) were included in the analysis. p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology was performed from residual cellular material available from the liquid-based cytology vial collected during the initial Pap/HPV co-testing screening visit. Results were correlated to the presence of CIN2+ confirmed during preliminary follow-up. RESULTS p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology tested positive at baseline in 108 out of 425 (25.4%) Pap negative/HPV positive cases. Sensitivity of Dual-stain testing for the detection of biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ during preliminary follow-up within the group of Pap negative/HPV positive women was 91.9% for CIN2+ (34/37 cases), and 96.4% for CIN3+ (27/28 cases). Specificity was 82.1% for CIN2+ on biopsy, and 76.9% for CIN3+, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Triaging Pap negative/HPV positive screening test results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology may identify women with a high probability of underlying CIN2+ and may efficiently complement HPV-based screening programs to prevent cervical cancer.

Characterization of viral-cellular fusion transcripts in a large series of HPV16 and 18 positive anogenital lesions.

Persistent high risk type human papillomavirus (HR–HPVs) infections induce dysplasia or cancer of the anogenital tract, most notably of the uterine cervix. The viral genome usually persists and replicates as an episomal molecule in early dysplasia, whereas in advanced dysplasia or cervical cancer HPV genomes are frequently integrated into the chromosomal DNA of the host cell. Previous studies suggested that modification of critical cellular sequences by integration of HPV genomes might significantly contribute to the neoplastic transformation of anogenital epithelia (insertional mutagenesis). This prompted us to characterize the integration loci of high risk HPV genomes in a large set of genital lesions. We amplified E6/E7 oncogene transcripts derived from integrated HPV16 and HPV18 genomes and characterized in detail the co-transcribed cellular sequences of 64 primary genital lesions and five cervical cancer cell lines. Database analyses of the cellular parts of these fusion transcripts revealed 51 different integration loci, including 26 transcribed genes (14 known genes, 12 EST sequences with unknown gene function). Seventeen sequences showed similarity to repetitive elements, and 26 sequences did not show any database match other than genomic sequence. Chromosomal integration loci were distributed over almost all human chromosomes. Although we found HPV sequences integrated into cancer related genes and close to fragile sites, no preferential site or integration motif could be identified. These data demonstrate that target directed insertional mutagenesis might occur in few HPV-induced anogenital lesions, however, it is rather the exception than the rule.

Screening for Cervical Cancer Precursors With p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology: Results of the PALMS Study

Background Pap cytology is known to be more specific but less sensitive than testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). We assessed whether p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology, a biomarker combination indicative of transforming HPV infections, can provide high sensitivity for CIN2+ in screening while maintaining high specificity. Results were compared with Pap cytology and HPV testing. Methods A total of 27349 women 18 years or older attending routine cervical cancer screening were prospectively enrolled in five European countries. Pap cytology, p16/Ki-67 immunostaining, and HPV testing were performed on all women. Positive test results triggered colposcopy referral, except for women younger than 30 years with only positive HPV test results. Presence of CIN2+ on adjudicated histology was used as the reference standard. Two-sided bias-corrected McNemar P values were determined. Results The p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology positivity rates were comparable with the prevalence of abnormal Pap cytology results and less than 50% of the positivity rates observed for HPV testing. In women of all ages, dual-stained cytology was more sensitive than Pap cytology (86.7% vs 68.5%; P < .001) for detecting CIN2+, with comparable specificity (95.2% vs 95.4%; P = .15). The relative performance of the tests was similar in both groups of women: younger than age 30 and 30 years or older. HPV testing in women 30 years or older was more sensitive than dual-stained cytology (93.3% vs 84.7%; P = .03) but less specific (93.0% vs 96.2%; P < .001). Conclusions The p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology combines superior sensitivity and noninferior specificity over Pap cytology for detecting CIN2+. It suggests a potential role of dual-stained cytology in screening, especially in younger women where HPV testing has its limitations.

Immunostaining for p16INK4a used as a conjunctive tool improves interobserver agreement of the histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

The quality of cervical histopathology is critical to cervical cancer prevention, cancer treatment, and research programs. On the basis of the histology results further patient management is determined. However, the diagnostic interpretation of histologic hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained slides is affected by substantial rates of discordance among pathologists. Overexpression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a, a cell cycle regulating protein, has been shown to be strongly correlated with dysplastic lesions of the cervix uteri. In this study, we assessed whether p16INK4a immunohistochemistry may increase the performance of pathologists in diagnosing squamous lesions in cervical punch and cone biopsies. When using a consecutive p16INK4a-stained slide in conjunction to the H&E-stained slide, interobserver agreement between 6 pathologists improved significantly for both cervical punch and cone biopsies (P<0.001). For punch biopsies (n=247), κ value increased from 0.49 (moderate agreement) to 0.64 indicating substantial agreement, and interobserver agreement for cone biopsies (n=249) improved from 0.63 (conventional H&E slide reading) to 0.70 when H&E-stained slides were read conjunctively with p16INK4a-stained slides. In comparison to a common consensus diagnosis established by 3 independent experts, 4 pathologists reached an improvement with the conjunctive p16INK4a test, 2 of them showing significantly better agreement (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). p16INK4a immunohistochemistry as an adjunct to conventional H&E-stained specimens thus contributes to a more reproducible diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and may be a valuable aid for the interpretation of cervical histology.

Morphologic characteristics of p16INK4a-positive cells in cervical cytology samples

OBJECTIVE Overexpression of p16INK4a has been proposed as a biomarker helpful for the identification of dysplastic cervical epithelial cells on histologic slides as well as in cervical smears. Since a few nontransformed cells in the genital tract in some instances may also express p16INK4a, we evaluated whether applying established morphologic criteria for cervical dysplasia allows a distinction of dysplastic from nondysplastic p16INK4a-stained cells in cytologic samples. STUDY DESIGN Liquid-based cytology samples were obtained from a screening population (n=50), and from patients attending a dysplasia clinic (n=40). Slides prepared from these samples were stained with the conventional Papanicolaou stain procedure. From each specimen, a second slide was prepared in parallel and immunostained for p16INK4a. Cytologic diagnoses for most patients attending the dysplasia clinic could be compared to the reported histologic diagnoses on punch biopsy samples taken from the patients at the time of colposcopy. This allowed a comparison of the cytology and p16INK4a immunostaining results with subsequent hematoxylin and eosin-based histologic diagnoses. RESULTS Overall, in 10% of slides obtained from patients with nonsuspicious smears, few p16INK4a-positive cells were found. Using established morphologic criteria and applying these criteria on cells showing any p16INK4a immunoreactivity, p16INK4a-positive normal or metaplastic cells could be discriminated from p16INK4a-expressing dysplastic cells. In 21 of 22 cases (95%) of high grade lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or higher in follow-up histology), easily recognizable p16INK4a-positive dysplastic cells could be detected, with the remaining case lacking dysplastic cells in the thin-layer slide used for p16INK4a immunostaining. CONCLUSION Established morphologic criteria for cervical dysplasia can be readily applied to p16INK4a-immunostained cytologic specimens. Thus, p16INK4a immunostaining may help to avoid ambiguities in the interpretation of cervical cytology samples and facilitate more rapid diagnosis and possibly even automated screening of cytologic slides.

No evidence of p53 allele-specific predisposition in human papillomavirus-associated cervical cancer

The potential association of distinct polymorphisms of the tumor suppressor gene p53 with an increased susceptibility to malignant transformation has been reported for various cancer entities. Most recently, p53 protein containing an arginine residue in codon 72 was shown to be more effectively degraded by the E6 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus (HPV) than the corresponding proline isoform in cervical carcinoma cells. Additionally, a seven times higher risk of cervical cancer for Arg homozygotes was suggested. We set out to confirm this allele-specific predisposition on a larger population, comprising 87 cervical cancer and 151 normal control samples. However, there was no significant difference in the observed frequencies of homozygous Arg genotypes in cervical cancer patients (52.8%) and normal controls (55.7%). Furthermore, the prevalence of the Arg/Arg allelotype did not vary between HPV+ (n=75) and HPV– (n=12) carcinoma samples. Thus, our investigation of a larger set of clinical samples does not support the proposed association of any polymorphic status of p53 at codon 72 with an elevated risk for cervical cancer.

Evaluation of cervical cone biopsies for coexpression of p16INK4a and Ki‐67 in epithelial cells

Diffuse overexpression of p16INK4a in basal and parabasal cells of cervical epithelium is a hallmark of human papillomavirus‐mediated transformation. Focal p16INK4a expression is occasionally observed in nondysplastic epithelium. In normal cells, expression of p16INK4a triggers cell cycle arrest. However, cells undergoing transformation in intraepithelial lesions actively proliferate. To prove that the different expression patterns of p16INK4a, i.e., focal versus diffuse, reflect biologically different entities, we hypothesized that p16INK4a‐positive cells in epithelia displaying focal p16INK4a expression pattern do not coexpress proliferation‐associated Ki‐67 protein, while p16INK4a‐positive cells in lesions with diffuse p16INK4a expression may do. A total of 138 cervical cone biopsies were stained for the expression of p16INK4a and Ki‐67 using a primary antibody cocktail. All metaplastic lesions (n = 21) displayed focal staining for p16INK4a, and in all of these lesions p16INK4a‐positive cells were found to be negative for Ki‐67 expression. Diffuse expression of p16INK4a was observed in 12/21 (57.1%) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 lesions, all of them simultaneously showed Ki‐67 immunoreactivity in a large proportion of p16INK4a‐positive cells. Seventeen of 23 (73.9%) CIN2 lesions and all 27 (100%) CIN3/carcinoma in situ (CIS) as well as all 46 (100%) carcinoma cases displayed diffuse and combined expression of p16INK4a and Ki‐67. Coexpression of Ki‐67 and p16INK4a in the same cell is entirely restricted to cervical lesions displaying diffuse p16INK4a expression, whereas in lesions with focal p16INK4a expression, p16INK4a‐expressing cells are negative for Ki‐67. Thus, diffuse expression of p16INK4a reflects lesions with proliferation‐competent cells, while p16INK4a‐expressing cells associated with focal expression patterns are cell cycle arrested.

Evaluation of a new p16INK4A ELISA test and a high‐risk HPV DNA test for cervical cancer screening: Results from proof‐of‐concept study

p16INK4a, a cell cycle regulation protein, accumulates in abnormal epithelial cells infected with high‐risk human papilloma virus (HPV). In immunostaining studies, p16INK4a has shown potential as a marker of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and invasive cervical cancer. To evaluate its potential use in cervical cancer screening, we conducted a feasibility study to compare the performance of a new enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) for p16INK4a (mtm laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany) to that of the Hybrid capture 2™ (hc2) test for high‐risk HPV DNA for the detection of CIN3. Three hundred and nineteen women were referred from Western Washington Planned Parenthood clinics for colposcopy examination and cervical biopsy because of abnormal Pap test results. Cervical samples were obtained from study participants for p16INK4a ELISA, liquid‐based cytology and hc2. The order (first and second) for obtaining samples for cervical cytology and p16INK4a ELISA changed with every other subject. Concentrations of p16INK4a protein were higher when the sample was taken before the cytology. The sensitivity of p16INK4a ELISA (concentration ≥ 8 units/ml) taken as first sample was 90.0% for CIN3, and the sensitivity of HC2 taken as a second sample was 85%. In the same group, the specificity of p16INK4a ELISA (46.9%) was slightly better than hc2 (35.4%) Results from this proof‐of‐concept study suggest that p16INK4a ELISA has a similar sensitivity and slightly better specificity for CIN3 compared to hc2. These findings support proceeding with a larger study with samples from a population of women presenting for routine cytology screening.