Anna Capasso

Increased TGF-α as a Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to the Anti-EGFR Inhibitor Cetuximab through EGFR–MET Interaction and Activation of MET Signaling in Colon Cancer Cells

Purpose: Although cetuximab, an anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, is an effective treatment for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), its clinical use is limited by onset of resistance. Experimental Design: We characterized two colorectal cancer models to study the mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab. Results: Following chronic treatment of nude mice bearing cetuximab-sensitive human GEO colon xenografts, cetuximab-resistant GEO (GEO-CR) cells were obtained. In GEO-CR cells, proliferation and survival signals were constitutively active despite EGFR inhibition by cetuximab treatment. Whole gene expression profiling identified a series of genes involved in the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-MET–dependent pathways, which were upregulated in GEO-CR cells. Furthermore, activated, phosphorylated MET was detected in GEO-CR cells. A second colorectal cancer cell line with acquired resistance to cetuximab was obtained (SW48-CR). Inhibition of MET expression by siRNA restored cetuximab sensitivity in GEO-CR and SW48-CR cells, whereas exogenous activation of MET by HGF stimulation in cetuximab-sensitive GEO and SW48 cells induced resistance to cetuximab. Treatment of GEO-CR and SW48-CR cells with PHA665752, a selective MET inhibitor, inhibited cell growth, proliferation, and survival signals and impaired cancer cell migration. Overexpression of TGF-α, a specific EGFR ligand, was involved in the acquisition of cetuximab resistance in GEO-CR and SW48-CR cells. In fact, TGF-α overexpression induced the EGFR–MET interaction, with subsequent MET phosphorylation and activation of MET downstream effectors in GEO-CR and SW48-CR cells. Conclusions: These results suggest that overexpression of TGF-α through induction of EGFR–MET interaction contributes to cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer cells. The combined inhibition of EGFR and MET receptor could represent a strategy for preventing and/or overcoming cetuximab resistance in patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 19(24); 6751–65. ©2013 AACR.

Synergistic Antitumor Activity of Sorafenib in Combination with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Colorectal and Lung Cancer Cells

Purpose: Cancer cell survival, invasion, and metastasis depend on cancer cell proliferation and on tumor-induced angiogenesis. We evaluated the efficacy of the combination of sorafenib and erlotinib or cetuximab. Experimental Design: Sorafenib, erlotinib, and cetuximab, alone or in combination, were tested in vitro in a panel of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer cell lines and in vivo in H1299 tumor xenografts. Results: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) ligand mRNAs were expressed in all NSCLC and colorectal cancer cell lines with variable levels ranging from 0.4- to 8.1-fold as compared with GEO colorectal cancer cells. Lung cancer cells had the highest levels of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) A, B, and C, and of VEGF receptors as compared with colorectal cancer cells. Combined treatments of sorafenib with erlotinib or cetuximab produced combination index values between 0.02 and 0.5, suggesting a significant synergistic activity to inhibit soft agar colony formation in all cancer cell lines, which was accompanied by a marked blockade in mitogen-activated protein kinase and AKT signals. The in vitro migration of H1299 cells, which expressed high levels of both VEGF ligands and receptors, was inhibited by treatment with sorafenib, and this effect was significantly increased by the combination with anti-EGFR drugs. In nude mice bearing established human H1299 xenografts, treatment with the combination of sorafenib and erlotinib or cetuximab caused a significant tumor growth delay resulting in 70 to 90 days increase in mice median overall survival as compared with single-agent sorafenib treatment. Conclusions: Combination treatment with sorafenib and erlotinib or cetuximab has synergistic antitumor effects in human colorectal and lung cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res; 16(20); 4990–5001. ©2010 AACR.

The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology

Advances in our knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of cancer have led to increased interest in molecularly targeted agents (MTAs), which target specific oncogenic drivers and are now a major focus of cancer drug development. MTAs differ from traditional cytotoxic agents in various aspects, including their toxicity profiles and the potential availability of predictive biomarkers of response. The landscape of phase I oncology trials is evolving to adapt to these novel therapies and to improve the efficiency of drug development. In this Review, we discuss new strategies used in phase I trial design, such as novel dose-escalation schemes to circumvent limitations of the classic 3 + 3 design and enable faster dose escalation and/or more-precise dose determinations using statistical modelling; improved selection of patients based on genetic or molecular biomarkers; pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses; and the early evaluation of efficacy — in addition to safety. Indeed, new expedited approval pathways that can accelerate drug development require demonstration of efficacy in early phase trials. The application of molecular tumour profiling for matched therapy and the testing of drug combinations based on a strong biological rationale are also increasingly seen in phase I studies. Finally, the shift towards multi-institutional trials and centralized study management results in consequent implications for institutions and investigators. These issues are also highlighted herein.

The novel tankyrase inhibitor (AZ1366) enhances irinotecan activity in tumors that exhibit elevated tankyrase and irinotecan resistance

Background Dysregulation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway has been implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC) development as well as incipient stages of malignant transformation. In this study, we investigated the antitumor effects of AZ1366 (a novel tankyrase inhibitor) as a single agent and in combination with irinotecan in our patient derived CRC explant xenograft models. Results Six out of 18 CRC explants displayed a significant growth reduction to AZ1366. There was one CRC explant (CRC040) that reached the threshold of sensitivity (TGII ≤ 20%) in this study. In addition, the combination of AZ1366 + irinotecan demonstrated efficacy in 4 out of 18 CRC explants. Treatment effects on the WNT pathway revealed that tankyrase inhibition was ineffective at reducing WNT dependent signaling. However, the anti-tumor effects observed in this study were likely a result of alternative tankyrase effects whereby tankyrase inhibition reduced NuMA levels. Materials and Methods Eighteen CRC explants were treated with AZ1366 single agent or in combination for 28 days and treatment responses were assessed. Pharmacokinetic (AZ1366 drug concentrations) and pharmacodynamic effects (Axin2 levels) were investigated over 48 hours. Immunohistochemistry of nuclear β-catenin levels as well as western blot was employed to examine the treatment effects on the WNT pathway as well as NuMA. Conclusions Combination AZ1366 and irinotecan achieved greater anti-tumor effects compared to monotherapy. Activity was limited to CRC explants that displayed irinotecan resistance and increased protein levels of tankyrase and NuMA.

Antitumor activity of the aurora a selective kinase inhibitor, alisertib, against preclinical models of colorectal cancer

Background The Aurora kinases are a family of serine/threonine kinases comprised of Aurora A, B, and C which execute critical steps in mitotic and meiotic progression. Alisertib (MLN8237) is an investigational Aurora A selective inhibitor that has demonstrated activity against a wide variety of tumor types in vitro and in vivo, including CRC. Results CRC cell lines demonstrated varying sensitivity to alisertib with IC50 values ranging from 0.06 to > 5 umol/L. Following exposure to alisertib we observed a decrease in pAurora A, B and C in four CRC cell lines. We also observed an increase in p53 and p21 in a sensitive p53 wildtype cell line in contrast to the p53 mutant cell line or the resistant cell lines. The addition of alisertib to standard CRC treatments demonstrated improvement over single agent arms; however, the benefit was largely less than additive, but not antagonistic. Methods Forty-seven CRC cell lines were exposed to alisertib and IC50s were calculated. Twenty-one PDX models were treated with alisertib and the Tumor Growth Inhibition Index was assessed. Additionally, 5 KRAS wildtype and mutant PDX models were treated with alisertib as single agent or in combination with cetuximab or irinotecan, respectively. Conclusion Alisertib demonstrated anti-proliferative effects against CRC cell lines and PDX models. Our data suggest that the addition of alisertib to standard therapies in colorectal cancer if pursued clinically, will require further investigation of patient selection strategies and these combinations may facilitate future clinical studies.

Clinical outcome and molecular characterisation of chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients with long-term efficacy of regorafenib treatment

Please click here to see linked paper Background To investigate the potential predictors of response to regorafenib, in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with long-term efficacy from regorafenib treatment. Methods Retrospective, single institution analysis of patients with chemorefractory mCRC treated with regorafenib, in clinical practice setting. 123 patients were treated and stratified into two groups according to number of cycles received (<7 and ≥7). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were evaluated. 20 tumour samples (10 poor and 10 long responders) were analysed with the OncoMine Comprehensive Assay for 143 genes. Results A good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, a lung limited metastatic disease and a long history of metastatic disease were significantly associated with better OS and PFS from treatment with regorafenib. Mutations were mostly found in TP53, KRAS and PIK3CA as well as in NRAS, ERBB2, SMAD4 and PTEN genes. BCL2L1, ERBB2, KRAS, MYC, GAS6 gene amplifications were detected as well as ALK rearrangement. No significant correlation between molecular alterations and response to regorafenib was observed. However, HER2 gene alterations were found in three poor responder patients, suggesting a potential role in regorafenib resistance. Conversely, GAS6 amplification and SMAD4 mutation, detected in two long responder patients, might suggest a role of epithelial–mesenchymal transition phenotype in regorafenib response. Conclusion A subgroup of long responder patients to regorafenib treatment was identified and a comprehensive molecular characterisation was performed; however, further research efforts are essential to confirm our data.

Development and Maintenance of a Preclinical Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft Model for the Investigation of Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies

Patient derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) models provide a necessary platform in facilitating anti-cancer drug development prior to human trials. Human tumor pieces are injected subcutaneously into athymic nude mice (immunocompromised, T cell deficient) to create a bank of tumors and subsequently are passaged into different generations of mice in order to maintain these tumors from patients. Importantly, cellular heterogeneity of the original tumor is closely emulated in this model, which provides a more clinically relevant model for evaluation of drug efficacy studies (single agent and combination), biomarker analysis, resistant pathways and cancer stem cell biology. Some limitations of the PDTX model include the replacement of the human stroma with mouse stroma after the first generation in mice, inability to investigate treatment effects on metastasis due to the subcutaneous injections of the tumors, and the lack of evaluation of immunotherapies due to the use of immunocompromised mice. However, even with these limitations, the PDTX model provides a powerful preclinical platform in the drug discovery process.

Efficacy and Molecular Mechanisms of Differentiated Response to the Aurora and Angiogenic Kinase Inhibitor ENMD-2076 in Preclinical Models of p53-Mutated Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype associated with poor prognosis and for which there are limited therapeutic options. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ENMD-2076 in p53-mutated TNBC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and describe patterns of terminal cell fate in models demonstrating sensitivity, intrinsic resistance, and acquired resistance to ENMD-2076. Experimental design p53-mutated, TNBC PDX models were treated with ENMD-2076 and evaluated for mechanisms of sensitivity or resistance to treatment. Correlative tissue testing was performed on tumor tissue to assess for markers of proliferation, apoptosis, senescence, and pathways of resistance after treatment and at the time of acquired resistance. Results Sensitivity to ENMD-2076 200 mg/kg daily was associated with induction of apoptosis while models exhibiting intrinsic or acquired resistance to treatment presented with a senescent phenotype. Response to ENMD-2076 was accompanied by an increase in p53 and p73 levels, even within the background of mutant p53. Treatment with ENMD-2076 resulted in a decrease in pAurA and an increase in pHH3. We observed a TNBC subtype switch from the luminal androgen receptor to the basal-like subtype at acquired resistance. Conclusion ENMD-2076 has antitumor activity in preclinical models of p53-mutated TNBC. Increased levels of p53 and p73 correlated with sensitivity whereas senescence was associated with resistance to ENMD-2076. The novel finding of a TNBC subtype switch at time of acquired resistance may provide mechanistic insights into the biologic effects of selective pressure of anticancer treatments on TNBC. ENMD-2076 is currently being evaluated in a Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with metastatic, previously treated TNBC where these biologic correlates can be further explored.

BRAF fusions identified in melanomas have variable treatment responses and phenotypes

Oncogenic BRAF fusions have emerged as an alternate mechanism for BRAF activation in melanomas and other cancers. A number of BRAF fusions with different 5′ gene partners and BRAF exon breakpoints have been described, but the effects of different partners and breakpoints on cancer phenotypes and treatment responses has not been well characterized. Targeted RNA sequencing was used to screen 60 melanoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models for BRAF fusions. We identified three unique BRAF fusions, including a novel SEPT3-BRAF fusion, occurring in four tumors (4/60, 6.7%), all of which were “pan-negative” (lacking other common mutations) (4/18, 22.2%). The BRAF fusion PDX models showed variable growth rates and responses to MAPK inhibitors in vivo. Overexpression of BRAF fusions identified in our study, as well as other BRAF fusions previously identified in melanomas, resulted in a high degree of variability in 2D proliferation and 3D invasion between the different fusions. While exogenously expressed BRAF fusions all responded to MAPK inhibition in vitro, we observed potential differences in signaling and feedback mechanisms. In summary, BRAF fusions are actionable therapeutic targets, however there are significant differences in phenotypes, treatment responses, and signaling which may be clinically relevant.

Abstract A083: A phase Ib study of the combination of MLN0128 (dual TORC1/2 inhibitor) and MLN8237 (Aurora A inhibitor, alisertib) in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: MLN0128 is an oral inhibitor of mTOR kinase and mTORC1/2 signaling. Alisertib is an oral inhibitor of Aurora A kinase. Senescence and upregulation of genes in the PI3K/AKT/mTor pathway have been observed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenograft models treated with alisertib, with greater tumor growth inhibition demonstrated in combination with MLN0128 as compared to each agent alone. An investigator-initiated trial was developed to evaluate the combination of MLN0128 and alisertib in patients with advanced solid tumors, followed by an expansion cohort in metastatic TNBC and other selected cancers. The goals of this ongoing study are to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of the combination. Results of dose escalation are presented here. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy were treated orally at escalating doses with the combination of MLN0128 daily on a continuous schedule and alisertib twice daily (BID) on days 1-7 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation was conducted according to a standard 3+3 design. Key eligibility criteria included HgbA1c max was 24.7 (± 13.6) ng/mL for MLN0128 and 1049 (±363) ng/mL for alisertib at combination MTD doses. MLN0128 AUC was 128.2 (±72.7) ng/mLxhr and alisertib AUC 0-8 was 6119 (±2331) ng/mlxhr at these doses. Conclusions: MLN0128 2mg daily on a continuous schedule and alisertib 30mg BID days 1-7 of a 21-day cycle is the MTD of the drug combination. An expansion cohort in patients with TNBC and other selected cancers is currently enrolling at this dose. Functional imaging and serial tumor biopsies are being integrated into this cohort to assess the pharmacodynamic interactions of the combination. Citation Format: S. Lindsey Davis, Elaine T. Lam, Bradley R. Corr, Cindy L. O9Bryant, Ashley Glode, Nichole Adler, Todd M. Pitts, John J. Tentler, Anna Capasso, Kyrie Dailey, Natalie J. Serkova, Colin D. Weekes, Daniel L. Gustafson, Christopher H. Lieu, Wells A. Messersmith, Stephen Leong, S. Gail Eckhardt, Jennifer R. Diamond. A phase Ib study of the combination of MLN0128 (dual TORC1/2 inhibitor) and MLN8237 (Aurora A inhibitor, alisertib) in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A083.