Anna Di Norcia
Sapienza University of Rome
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anna Di Norcia.
Cognition & Emotion | 2014
Fiorenzo Laghi; Roberto Baiocco; Anna Di Norcia; Eleonora Cannoni; Emma Baumgartner; Anna Silvia Bombi
This study examined the relationship between emotional understanding, friendship representation and reciprocity in school-aged children. Two hundred and fifty-one Caucasian 6-year-old children (111 males and 140 females) took part in the study. The Test of Emotion Comprehension (TEC) and the Pictorial Assessment of Interpersonal Relationships (PAIR) were used. Children having a reciprocal friendship and children having a unilateral friendship with a child named as their “best friend” were compared on the emotional understanding task and on their pictorial representations of friendship. Multilevel analyses indicated that friendship status effects were not influenced by classroom-level differences. Results showed that children with reciprocal friendships drew themselves as more similar to and more cohesive with their best friends, and they showed better understanding of emotions, than children having a unilateral friendship. Finally, the implications of these findings for theoretical and empirical research development on friendship are discussed.
Parenting: Science and Practice | 2015
Anna Silvia Bombi; Anna Di Norcia; Laura Di Giunta; Concetta Pastorelli; Jennifer E. Lansford
SYNOPSIS Objective. The present study uses a mixed qualitative and quantitative method to examine three main research questions: What are the practices that mothers report they use when trying to correct their children’s misbehaviors? Are there common patterns of these practices? Are the patterns that emerge related to children’s well-being? Design. Italian mother–child dyads (N = 103) participated in the study (when children were 8 years of age). At Time 1, mothers answered open-ended questions about discipline; in addition, measures of maternal physical discipline and rejection and child aggression were assessed in mothers and children at Time 1, 1 year later (Time 2), and 2 years later (Time 3). Results. Mothers’ answers to open-ended questions about what they would do in three disciplinary situations were classified in six categories: physical or psychological punishment, control, mix of force and reasoning, reasoning, listening, and permissiveness. Cluster analysis yielded three clusters: Group 1, induction (predominant use of reasoning and listening; 74%); Group 2, punishment (punitive practices and no reasoning; 16%); Group 3, mixed practices (combination of reasoning and punishment, as well as high control and no listening; 10%). Multiple-group latent growth curves of maternal physical discipline, maternal rejection, and child aggression were implemented to evaluate possible differences in the developmental trends from Time 1 to Time 3, as a function of cluster. Conclusions. Qualitative data deepen understanding of parenting because they shed light on what parents think about themselves; their self-descriptions, in turn, help to identify ways of parenting that may have long-lasting consequences for children’s adjustment.
Assessment | 2015
Eleonora Cannoni; Anna Di Norcia; Anna Silvia Bombi; Laura Di Giunta
To verify the dimensionality of Bicycle Drawing Test (BDT), we applied the coding system of Greenberg, Rodriguez, and Sesta to bicycle drawings made by 295 boys and 320 girls (6-10 years old) with typical development, and submitted the data to item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. These analyses confirmed only two of the original four dimensions of the BDT: spatial reasoning and visual-motor control. The scores in these two factors were correlated with the Colored Progressive Matrices, the Rey Complex Figure (Copy and Memory) and with the teachers’ ratings in mathematics, language, and drawing. The correlations, albeit moderate in magnitude, were consistent with the hypothesized convergent and discriminant validity. After checking for measurement invariance across gender and age, we conducted two analyses of variance, the first of which showed a significant difference between younger children (6-8 years old) and older children (9-10 years old); the analysis of variance by gender did not yield significant differences. These data enhance the usefulness of the BDT as a measure of separate cognitive components, but do not support its use as a measure of mechanical reasoning.
Journal of Child and Family Studies | 2015
Anna Di Norcia; Giulia Pecora; Anna Silvia Bombi; Emma Baumgartner; Fiorenzo Laghi
Children and Youth Services Review | 2013
Fiorenzo Laghi; Roberto Baiocco; Eleonora Cannoni; Anna Di Norcia; Emma Baumgartner; Anna Silvia Bombi
Psicología Educativa | 2018
Eleonora Cannoni; Anna Silvia Bombi; Gemma Marano; Anna Di Norcia
Journal of Child and Family Studies | 2018
Anna Di Norcia; Anna Silvia Bombi; Eleonora Cannoni; Gemma Marano
PSICOLOGIA DELL'EDUCAZIONE | 2016
Anna Di Norcia; Gemma Marano
RASSEGNA DI PSICOLOGIA | 2014
Eleonora Cannoni; Anna Di Norcia; Francesca Federico
Rassegna di Psicologia | 2012
Eleonora Cannoni; Anna Di Norcia